Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T09:23:45.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) Control with Fumigant and Pebulate Combinations in Tomato

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James P. Gilreath  and
Bielinski M. Santos
James P. Gilreath
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 14625 County Road 672, Wimauma, FL 33598
Bielinski M. Santos*
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 14625 County Road 672, Wimauma, FL 33598
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: bmsantos@ifas.ufl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted to determine the effect of fumigant-pebulate combinations on purple nutsedge density in fresh market tomato. Treatments consisted of methyl bromide plus chloropicrin (MBr plus Pic) [67:33] at rates of 270 and 130 kg/ha, respectively; Pic plus pebulate at 400 and 4.5 kg/ha, respectively; metham (MNa) plus pebulate at 485 and 4.5 kg/ha, respectively; dazomet plus pebulate at 950 and 4.5 kg/ha, respectively; and 1,3-dicholopropene plus Pic (C-17) [87:13] plus pebulate at 392 and 4.5 kg/ha, respectively. At 12 wk after treatment, MBr plus Pic controlled purple nutsedge more effectively (10 plants/m2) than the fumigant-pebulate combinations (50 to 70 plants/m2). Compared to MBr plus Pic, Pic plus pebulate had a 14% lower marketable yield. No differences in marketable yield were noted with dazomet plus pebulate or C-17 plus pebulate compared to MBr plus Pic. However, MNa plus pebulate produced a 15% higher yield than MBr plus Pic. Additionally, MNa plus pebulate had 15% higher marketable fruit weight than MBr plus Pic.

Keywords

Purple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L. # CYPROtomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘Sunny’Methyl bromidechloropicrinmethamdazomet1,3-dichloropropeneMBr, methyl bromideMNa, metham1,3-D, 1,3-dichloropropenePic, chloropicrinC-17, 1,3-D plus Pic (87:13)MITC, methylisothiocyanateWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 575 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Published as Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series R-10192.

References

Literature Cited

Bryson, C. T., Reddy, K. N., and Molin, W. T. 2003. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) populations in narrow row transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and soybean (Glycine max) rotation. Weed Technol. 17:805–810.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P. and Santos, B. M. 2004a. Efficacy of methyl bromide alternatives on purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control in tomato and pepper. Weed Technol. 18:341–345.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P. and Santos, B. M. 2004b. Herbicide dose and incorporation depth in combination with 1,3-dichloropropene plus chloropicrin for Cyperus rotundus control in tomato and pepper. Crop Prot. 23:205–210.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P. and Santos, B. M. 2004c. Manejo de Cyperus rotundus con alternativas al bromuro de metilo en tomate de mesa. Manejo Integrado de Plagas y Agroecología 71:54–58.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P., Jones, J. P., Motis, T. N., Santos, B. M., Noling, J. W., and Rosskopf, E. N. 2003. Evaluation of various chemical treatments for potential as methyl bromide replacements for disinfestation of soilborne pests in polyethylene-mulched tomato. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 116:151–158.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P., Jones, J. P., and Noling, J. W. 1996. Effect of incorporation method on pebulate efficacy under polyethylene mulch in tomato. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 109:190–192.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P., Santos, B. M., Motis, T. N., Noling, J. W., and Mirusso, J. M. 2005. Methyl bromide alternatives for nematode and Cyperus control in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). Crop Prot. 24: (in press).Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Besler, B. A., and Brewer, K. D. 2003. Purple nutsedge control and potato (Solanum tuberosum) tolerance to sulfentrazone and halosulfuron. Weed Technol. 17:485–490.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Jones, J. P., Gilreath, J. P., and Overman, A. J. 1995. Control of soil-borne disease of mulched tomato by fumigation. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 108:201–203.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. E. 1987. Interference and interaction of purple and yellow nutsedges (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus) with crops. Weed Technol. 1:74–81.Google Scholar
Locascio, S. J., Dickson, D. W., and Rosskopf, E. 2002. Alternative fumigants applied with standard and virtually impermeable mulches for tomato. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 115:192–194.Google Scholar
Locascio, S. J., Gilreath, J. P., Dickson, D. W., Kucharek, T. A., Jones, J. P., and Noling, J. W. 1997. Fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for polyethylene-mulched tomato. Hort. Sci. 32:1208–1211.Google Scholar
Maynard, D. N., Hochmuth, G. J., Olson, S. M., Vavrina, C. S., Stall, W. M., Kucharek, T. A., Webb, S. E., Taylor, T. G., and Smith, S. A. 2003. Tomato production in Florida. in Olson, S. O. and Maynard, D. N., eds. Vegetable Production Guide for Florida, 2002–2003. Gainesville, FL: Institute of Food and Agricultural Science Publications. Pp. 259–270.Google Scholar
Morales-Payan, J. P., Santos, B. M., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 1997. Effects of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) vegetative growth and fruit yield. Weed Technol. 11:672–676.Google Scholar
Morales-Payan, J. P., Santos, B. M., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 2000. Nitrogen effects on the competitive interactions of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and cilantro (Coriandrum sativum). J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 6:59–66.Google Scholar
Motis, T. N., Locascio, S. J., and Gilreath, J. P. 2002. Efficacy of 1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin and metam-Na on yellow nutsedge tubers planted at varying growing stages. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 115:189–192.Google Scholar
Motis, T. N., Lacascio, S. J., Gilreath, J. P., and Stall, W. M. 2003. Season-long interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with polyethylene-mulched bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). Weed Technol. 17:543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S. M. 2003. Mulching. in Olson, S. O. and Maynard, D. N., eds. Vegetable Production Guide for Florida, 2002–2003. Gainesville, FL: Institute of Food and Agricultural Science Publications. Pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Bewick, T. A., Stall, W. M., and Shilling, D. G. 1997a. Competitive interactions of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and nutsedges (Cyperus spp). Weed Sci. 45:229–233.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Morales-Payan, J. P., Bewick, T. A., and Shilling, D. G. 1997b. Effects of shading on the growth of nutsedges (Cyperus spp). Weed Sci. 45:670–673.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Morales-Payan, J. P., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 1997c. Influence of tuber size and shoot removal on purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) regrowth. Weed Sci. 45:681–683.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Morales-Payan, J. P., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 1998. Influence of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) density and nitrogen rate on radish (Raphanus sativus) yield. Weed Sci. 46:661–664.Google Scholar
Sargent, S. A. 1997. Tomato production guide for Florida: Harvest and handling. Gainesville, FL: Institute of Food and Agricultural Science Publications. SP-214. 5 p.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2000. SAS User's Guide. Version 8. Cary. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 3884 p.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Sweet, R. D. 1987. Biology and life cycle of purple and yellow nutsedges (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:66–73.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2003. Vegetables: 2002 summary. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service. 84 p.Google Scholar
Watson, R. T., Albritton, D. T., Anderson, S. O., and Lee-Bapty, S. 1992. Methyl bromide: Its atmospheric science, technology and economics. Nairobi, Kenya: Montreal Protocol Assessment Suppl., United Nations Environmental Program. 234 p.Google Scholar
Williams, R. D. 1982. Growth and reproduction of Cyperus esculentus L. and Cyperus rotundus L. Weed Res. 22:149–154.Google Scholar