Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T08:18:23.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tolerance of Early Maturing Corn (Zea mays) Hybrids to DPX-79406

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas J. Doohan
Affiliation:
Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and Marketing, Truro, N.S.
Jerry A. Ivany
Affiliation:
Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Charlottetown, P.E.I.
Ronald P. White
Affiliation:
Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Charlottetown, P.E.I.
William Thomas
Affiliation:
Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and Marketing, Truro, N.S.

Abstract

The effect of DPX-79406 was evaluated on eight corn hybrids in 1993 and on 18 hybrids in 1994. Experiments were conducted each year at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, and Stewiacke, Nova Scotia. Corn tolerance was similiar between sites but varied from year to year with certain hybrids. Generally, tolerance was hybrid dependent. Most hybrids displayed chlorosis and stunting 7 days after treatment (DAT) but recovered quickly. Injury at 7 DAT ranged from 8 to 64%. Grain yield indicated that ‘Pickseed 2444,’ ‘Pioneer 3921,’ ‘Pioneer 3979,’ and ‘DK 302’ were tolerant to 25 g ai/ha of DPX-79406. Pioneer 3979 and Pickseed 2444 grain yields were reduced with DPX-79406 at 50 g/ha in 1 yr. ‘DK 291’ and ‘DK 235’ were severely injured both years and did not recover appreciably from early injury. Responses of ‘Pioneer 3984’ and ‘Pickseed 2477’ varied from year to year, and they were considered sensitive to DPX-79406. ‘Pioneer 3947,’ ‘Pioneer 3962,’ ‘Pickseed 2290,’ ‘Pickseed 2299,’ ‘DK 220,’ ‘G-4011,’ and ‘N0565’ were tested only 1 yr and were tolerant to both rates of DPX-79406.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1990. DPX-79406 Technical Bulletin. Wilmington, DE: Du Pont. 6 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1994. Titus de DuPont: l'antigraminees de post-levee du mais. Dossier Technique. Paris, France: DuPont de Nemours. 23 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996. Important New Corn Hybrid Recommendations for Ultim and Elim EP. News from DuPont. Mississauga, ON: DuPont Canada. 1 p.Google Scholar
APASCC. 1996. 1996 Corn Guide to Hybrid and Pesticide Selection. Publication No. 100C. Charlottetown, PEI: Atlantic Provinces Agricultural Services Coordinating Committee. 4 p.Google Scholar
Atlantic Corn Hybrid Evaluation Committee. 1994. Atlantic corn hybrid evaluation trials—1993 accumulated performance data and 1994 recommendations. Charlottetown, PEI: Atlantic Provinces Agricultural Services Co-ordinating Committee. Pub. 140. 7 p.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C., O'Toole, B. M., and Andaloro, J. 1992. Effects of nicosulfuron on quackgrass (<i>Elytrigia repens</i>) control in corn (<i>Zea mays</i>). Weed Technol. 6:5256.Google Scholar
Bootsma, A., Gates, A. D., and Smith, P. J. 1979. Heat units for corn in the Maritime Provinces. Charlottetown, PEI: Published by authority of Ministers of Agriculture of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. Pub. ACA 79-1. 5 p.Google Scholar
Dobbels, A. F., and Kapusta, G. 1993. Postemergence weed control in corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) with nicosulfuron combinations. Weed Sci. 7:844850.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., and Miller, T. L. 1989. Corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) tolerance and weed control with thiameturon. Weed Technol. 3:255260.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Rosow, K. M., Geadelmann, J. E., and Openshaw, S. J. 1989. Differential tolerance of corn genotypes to DPX-M6316. Weed Sci. 37:651657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee. 1993. Genstat 5 Release 3 Reference Manual. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. 796 p.Google Scholar
Green, J. M., and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:508515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. M., and Ulrich, J. F. 1994. Response of maize (<i>Zea mays</i>) inbreds and hybrids to rimsulfuron. Pestic. Sci. 40:187191.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G., Krausz, R. R., Khan, M., and Matthews, J. L. 1994. Effect of nicosulfuron rate, adjuvant, and weed size on annual weed control in corn (<i>Zea mays</i>). Weed Technol. 8:696702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullan, P. M., and Blackshaw, R. E. 1995. Postemergence green foxtail (<i>Setaria viridis</i>) control in corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) in western Canada. Weed Technol. 9:3743.Google Scholar
Monks, D. W., Mullins, C. A., and Johnson, K. G. 1992. Response of sweet corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) to nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6: 280283.Google Scholar
Morton, C. A., and Harvey, R. G. 1992. Sweet corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) hybrid tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:9196.Google Scholar
Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1991. Effect of DPX-V9360 and terbufos on field and sweet corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) under three environments. Weed Technol. 5:130136.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., Brammall, R. A., and Bouw, W. J. 1995. Response of sweet corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) cultivars to nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:5862.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., Schultheis, J. R., and Worsham, A. D. 1993. Sweet corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) cultivar tolerance to application timing of nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:840843.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Chandler, K., Elmes, M. J., Murphy, S. D., and Anderson, G. W. 1996. Postemergence control of annual grasses and corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) tolerance using DPX-79406. Weed Technol. 10:288294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar