Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:44:57.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combined Effects of Acetolactate Synthase-Inhibiting Herbicides with Terbufos and Piperonyl Butoxide on Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chae Soon Kwon ,
James J. Kells  and
Donald Penner
Chae Soon Kwon
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the response of six corn hybrids and two soybean varieties to acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor herbicides applied with terbufos and/or piperonyl butoxide (PBO), a mixed function oxidase (MFO) inhibitor. Field experiments also were conducted to determine the response of six corn hybrids to the combination treatments, terbufos plus ALS inhibitor herbicides and/or PBO and/or antidote. PBO at 0.33 kg/ha tank-mixed with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron injured the Northrup King 9283 corn hybrid. Great Lakes 584 corn was less sensitive than Northrup King 9283 to these combination treatments. Pioneer 3377 IR corn hybrid was resistant to the combination of nicosulfuron or primisulfuron plus PBO at 2 kg/ha and also to the combination treatments of imazethapyr herbicide plus PBO even though terbufos was previously applied. ICI 8532 IT, ICI 8532, and Pioneer 3377 hybrids were injured by the combination of nicosulfuron or primisulfuron and/or terbufos and/or PBO at 2 kg/ha. ICI 8532 IT corn hybrid was not injured by the combination treatment of imazethapyr or thifensulfuron and terbufos. In the field studies, Pioneer 3377 IR and Ciba 4393 RSC hybrids were resistant to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides even when applied with PBO regardless of the presence of terbufos. All treatments of chlorimuron plus terbufos caused considerable injury to ICI 8532 IT, ICI 8532, Pioneer 3377, and Ciba 4393, but not Pioneer 3377 IR and Ciba 4393 RSC. The combination of thifensulfuron with PBO injured Elgin ‘87 soybean, but the W20 soybean was tolerant to this combination treatment. Combination of imazethapyr with PBO did not affect the growth of Elgin ‘87 soybean.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-1[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidnicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino] sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamideprimisulfuron, 2-[[[[[4,6-bis(difluromethoxy)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidthifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidterbufos, S-[[(1,1-dimethylethyl)thio]methyl]O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioatepiperonyl butoxide (PBO), α-(2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethoxy]-4,5-methylenedioxy-2-propyltoluenecorn, Zea mays L. ‘Great Lakes 584,’ ‘Northrup King 9283,’ ‘Ciba 4393 RSC,’ ‘Ciba 4393,’ ‘ICI 8532,’ ‘ICI 8532 IT,’ ‘Pioneer 3377 IR,’ ‘Pioneer 3377’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., ‘Elgin ‘87,’ ‘W20.’Antidotecombinationcrop safetycross-resistancetank-mixturetolerance
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 696 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H. 1990. Enhancement of soybean (Glycine max) injury and weed control by thifensulfuron-insecticide mixtures. Weed Technol. 4:524–528.Google Scholar
2. Barrett, M. and Polge, N. 1993. In-vitro nicosulfuron metabolism by corn microsomal preparations. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 86.Google Scholar
3. Bauman, T. T., Owen, M.D.K., and Liebl, R. A. 1992. Evaluation of Garst 8532 IT corn for herbicide tolerance. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 15.Google Scholar
4. Brown, H. M., Brattsten, L. B., Lilly, D. E., and Hanna, P. J. 1993. Metabolic pathways and residue levels of thifensulfuron methyl in soybeans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 41:1724–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brown, H. M., Wittenbach, V. A., Forney, D. R., and Strachan, S. D. 1990. Basis for soybean tolerance to thifensulfuron methyl. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Mukaida, H., Diehl, K. E., Liebl, R. A., and Wax, L. M. 1993. Tolerance and acetolactate synthase activity of imidazolinone tolerant corn to imazethapyr and chlorimuron-ethyl. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 64.Google Scholar
7. Rowe, L., Rossman, E., and Penner, D. 1990. Differential response of corn hybrids and inbreds to metolachlor. Weed Sci. 38:563–566.Google Scholar
8. Rubin, B., Leavitt, J.R.C., Penner, D., and Saettler, A. W. 1980. Interaction of antioxidants with ozone and herbicide stress. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 25:623–629.Google Scholar
9. Sebastian, G., Fader, M., Ulrich, J. F., Forney, D. R., and Chaleff, R. S. 1989. Semidominant soybean mutation for resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides. Crop Sci. 29:1403–1408.Google Scholar
10. Siminszky, B., Corbin, F. T., Sheldon, B. S., and Walls, F. R. Jr. 1993. Nicosulfuron resistance mechanisms and metabolism in terbufos and/or naphthalic anhydride treated corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 112.Google Scholar
11. Walker, L. M., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1994. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-thifensulfuron in soybean (Glycine max), spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Plant Growth Regul. 13:27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wilcut, J. W., Eastin, E. F., Richburg, J. S. III., Vencill, W. K., Walls, F. R., and Wiley, G. 1993. Imidazolinone systems for southern weed management in resistant corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 5.Google Scholar