Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:27:44.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DPX-PE350 Does Not Interact with Early-Season Insecticides in Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Robert E. Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Marilyn R. McClelland
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703

Abstract

Cotton tolerance of DPX-PE350 applied POST alone, mixed with acephate, carbaryl, or dimethoate applied at 220, 1100, or 280 g ai ha−1, respectively, or following aldicarb, disulfoton, or phorate applied in the seed furrow at 1.0, kg ai ha−1 was evaluated. DPX-PE350 at 170 g ae ha−1 did not adversely affect seed cotton yield, fiber length, fiber length uniformity, or micronaire but did decrease fiber strength. The insecticides did not alter cotton response to DPX-PE350. Entireleaf morningglory was controlled 92, 95, and 96% with DPX-PE350 applied POST at 56, 110, and 170 g ha−1, respectively. Mixing acephate, carbaryl, or dimethoate with DPX-PE350 did not affect control.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bryson, T. C., Snipes, C. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Effects of DPX-PE350 on weed control and cotton growth and yield. p. 957 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX. Jan. 8–13, 1991. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
2. Byrd, J. D. Jr. and York, A. C. 1988. Interactions of carbaryl and dimethoate with sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 2:433436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Carter, F. L., Tugwell, N. P., and Phillips, J. R. 1989. Thrips control strategy: effect on cotton growth, yield maturity and quality. p. 295297 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 2–7, 1989. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
4. Eisner, J. E., Smith, C. W., and Owen, D. F. 1979. Uniform stage descriptions in upland cotton. Crop. Sci. 19:361363.Google Scholar
5. Frans, R. E., Jordan, D. L., and McClelland, M. R. 1990. Selectivity of KIH-8921 for weed management in cotton. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 30:19.Google Scholar
6. Hacskaylo, J. K., Walker, J. K. Jr., and Pires, E. G. 1964. Response of cotton seedlings to combinations of preemergence herbicides and systemic insecticides. Weeds 12:288291.Google Scholar
7. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:163.Google Scholar
8. Holshouser, D. L. and Chandler, J. M. 1991. Susceptibility of eight morningglory species to DPX-PE350. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:78.Google Scholar
9. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1990. Evaluation of KIH-8921 for weed management systems in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:48.Google Scholar
10. Mitchell, W. H. 1991. Cotton weed control with DPX-PE350 “a southern perspective.” p. 958 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX. Jan. 8–13, 1991. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
11. Mitchell, W. H., Crowder, S. H., and Williams, C. S. 1992. “Staple”—a new cotton herbicide from DuPont. p. 1318 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 6–10, 1992. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
12. Perkins, H. H., Ethridge, D. E., and Bragg, C. K. 1984. Fiber. p. 437509 in Kohel, R. J. and Lewis, C. F., eds. Cotton. Agronomy Monograph 24. Am. Soc. Agron., Crop Sci. Soc. Am., Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
13. Sims, B. D., Guethle, D. R., House, J. L., and Muyanga, C. K. 1991. Effects of DPX-PE350 on weed control, cotton yield and lint quality. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:75.Google Scholar
14. Swanson, C. R. and Swanson, H. R. 1968. Inhibition of degradation of monuron in cotton leaf tissue by carbamate insecticides. Weeds 16: 481485.Google Scholar
15. Thompson, M. A., Witt, W. W., Martin, J. R., and Slack, C. H. 1989. Interaction effects of DPX-V9360 and organophosphate insecticides on corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:278.Google Scholar
16. Vidrine, P. R., Crawford, S. H., and Millhollon, L. P. 1990. Weed control and cotton tolerance with KIH-8921. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:137.Google Scholar
17. Wells, R. G., Guy, C. B., and Beaty, J. D. 1991. Cotton response to DPX-PE350, fluometuron, and MSMA. Abstr. Ark. Pestic. Assoc. 30: 23.Google Scholar
18. York, A. C., Corbin, F. T., and Walls, F. R. Jr. 1991. Effect of in-furrow insecticides on cotton response to Scepter and Pursuit. p. 958 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX. Jan. 8–13, 1991. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
19. York, A. C., Jordan, D. L., and Frans, R. E. 1991. Insecticides modify cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to clomazone. Weed Technol. 5: 729735.Google Scholar