Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T20:29:30.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postemergence Weed Management Systems for Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John W. Wilcut ,
Glenn R. Wehtje ,
T. Vint Hicks  and
Tracy A. Cole
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils & Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Glenn R. Wehtje
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils & Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
T. Vint Hicks
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils & Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Tracy A. Cole
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils & Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1985 to 1987 to evaluate postemergence herbicide systems with preemergence systems to control Texas panicum, Florida beggarweed, sicklepod, and pitted morningglory in peanuts. Adding paraquat at 0.14 kg ai/ha to postemergence herbicide systems reduced fresh weight of Florida beggarweed 92% (18% increase over the same systems without paraquat), sicklepod 95% (21% increase), and pitted morningglory 95% (11% increase). Herbicide systems containing paraquat improved peanut yields by 230 kg/ha and net returns by $52/ha over herbicide systems not containing paraquat. Fluazifop-P and sethoxydim systems reduced Texas panicum fresh weight (at least 96%) more than a preemergence system (92% reduction) that used benefin applied preplant incorporated and alachlor plus naptalam and dinoseb applied at cracking (GC) or a postemergence system that used alachlor and naptalam plus dinoseb GC and paraquat applied early postemergence (86% reduction). Systems containing fluazifop-P provided greater yields (4190 kg/ha) and net returns ($383/ha) than systems containing sethoxydim (4010 kg/ha, $305/ha) when averaged across all rates of application.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamidebenefin, N-butyl-N-ethyl-2,6-dinitro-4-trifluoromethyl)benzenaminedinoseb, 2-(1-methylpropyl)-4,6-dinitrophenolfluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidnaptalam, 2-[(1-naphthalenylamino)carbonyl]benzoic acidparaquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ionsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethyoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butanoic acidTexas panicum, Panicum texanum Buckl. ♯3 PANTEsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. ♯ CASOBFlorida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC. ♯ DEDTOpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. ♯ IPOLApeanut, Arachis hypogaea L.Economic analysisnet returnsPanicum texanumCassia obtusifoliaDesmodium tortuosumIpomoea lacunosaCASOBDEDTOIPOLAPANTE
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 239 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Boote, K. J. 1982. Growth stages of peanut. Peanut Sci. 9:35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Braddock, R. L., Teem, D. H., and Currey, W. L. 1980. Influence of seeding depth on control of Texas panicum. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:222.Google Scholar
3. Bridges, D. C., and Walker, R. H. 1987. Economics of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) management. Weed Sci. 35:594–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bridges, D. C., Walker, R. H., McGuire, J. A., and Martin, N. R. 1984. Efficiency of chemical and mechanical methods for controlling weeds in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 32:584–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1983. Weeds and their control in peanuts. p. 206–249 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., ed. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
6. Colvin, D. L., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M., and Walker, R. H. 1985. Weed management in minimum-tillage peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) as influenced by cultivar, row spacing, and herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Davidson, J. I. Jr., Whitaker, T. B., and Dickens, J. W. 1982. Grading, cleaning, storage, shelling, and marketing of peanuts in the United States. p. 571–623 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., ed. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Inc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
8. Elmore, C. D. 1986. Weed Survey–Southern States. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:136–158.Google Scholar
9. Grichar, W. J., and Boswell, T. E. 1986. Postemergence grass control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 34:587–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Nastasi, P., Frans, R., and McClelland, M. 1986. Economic and new alternatives in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) weed management programs. Weed Sci. 34:634–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Porter, D. M., Smith, D. H., and Rodriquez-Kabana, R. 1982. Peanut plant diseases. p. 326–410 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., ed. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
12. Snipes, C. E., Walker, R. H., Whitwell, T., Buchanan, G. A., McGuire, J. A., and Martin, N. R. 1984. Efficacy and economics of weed control methods in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 32:95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Wehtje, G., McGuire, J. A., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1986. Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with paraquat. Weed Sci. 34:308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., and Patterson, M. G. 1987. Economic assessment of weed control systems for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 35:433–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., and Walker, R. H. 1987. Economics of weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with herbicides and cultivations. Weed Sci. 35:711–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Wilcut, J. W., Patterson, M. G., Wehtje, G. R., and Whitwell, T. 1988. Efficacy and economics of pendimethalin herbicide combinations for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Appl. Agric. Res. 3:203–208.Google Scholar
17. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Colvin, D. L., and Patterson, M. G. 1987. Economic assessment of herbicide systems for minimum-tillage peanuts. Peanut Sci. 14:83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Cole, T. A., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems without dinoseb for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar