Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:48:03.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Control in No-tillage and Conventional Corn (Zea mays) with ICIA-0051 and SC-0774

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John S. Wilson
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Chester L. Foy
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061

Abstract

Field studies were conducted over a four-year period to determine the weed control efficacy of ICIA-0051 and SC-0774 in no-tillage and conventional corn. Treatments consisted of both pre- and postemergence applications of ICIA-0051, alone and in combination with atrazine, and preemergence applications in combination with metolachlor. SC-0774 was applied preemergence, alone and in combination with atrazine. Results indicated good control of triazine-resistant (TR) smooth pigweed and other annual broadleaf weeds present with no adverse effects on crop vigor and yield with ICIA-0051. Generally, the addition of atrazine to ICIA-0051 improved weed control. SC-0774 provided good control of fall panicum, but generally poorer and less consistent control of giant ragweed, common ragweed, common lambsquarters, and ivyleaf and tall morningglory species.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bhowmik, P. C., and Nandihalli, U. B. 1988. Preemergence activity of SC-0774 in controlling annual weeds in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:1.Google Scholar
2. Harper, J. L. 1956. The evaluation of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicides. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 3:179.Google Scholar
3. Mayonado, D. J. 1988. Field, greenhouse, and laboratory studies on the efficacy and action of the herbicides SC-0051 and SC-0774. PhD. Dissertation. Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg. p. 4363.Google Scholar
4. Miller, S. D. 1987. Evaluation of preemergence herbicides in corn. p. 194195 in West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. Google Scholar
5. Mitich, L. W., and Smith, N. L., 1986. Evaluation of preplant incorporated herbicides in field corn. p. 132133 in West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. Google Scholar
6. Orr, J. P., and Havens, D. 1987. Preemergence, preplant incorporated, and postemergence weed control of field corn. p. 197199 in West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. Google Scholar
7. Retzinger, E. J. Jr. 1986. Weed control in sweet corn and field corn with SC-0051. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:177.Google Scholar
8. Ritter, R. L. 1987. Postemergence weed control in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:60.Google Scholar
9. SC-0051. Experimental Herbicide. Technical Data Sheet. Not dated. Stauffer Chemical Company, Mountain View Research Center, P.O. Box 760, Mountain View, CA. 4 p.Google Scholar
10. SC-0774. Experimental Herbicide. Technical Data Sheet. Not dated. Stauffer Chemical Company, Mountain View Research Center, P.O. Box 760, Mountain View, CA. 5 p.Google Scholar
11. Vencill, W. K., and Foy, C. L. 1988. Distribution of triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in Virginia. Weed Sci. 36:497499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Vidrine, P. R., Rogers, R. L., and Kitchen, L. M. 1987. Weed control in corn using SC-0051. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:70.Google Scholar