Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T05:16:12.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissipation of Amiben

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. A. Schliebe ,
O. C. Burnside  and
T. L. Lavy
K. A. Schliebe
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska
O. C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska
T. L. Lavy
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska
Get access

Abstract

On three soils, 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (amiben) at 1.5 and 15 ppmw did not inhibit the nitrifying microflora, but 150 and 1500 ppmw significantly reduced the nitrate nitrogen produced by the soil microflora. No breakdown of amiben in liquid media was detected during 70 days. Amiben had a net minus charge in solution, and traveled at about the same rate on paper strips in electrophoresis as the dye brilliant blue. The organic matter content of soil was the property most closely associated with adsorption of 14C-labeled amiben. Only kaolinite, of four clays studied, adsorbed amiben significantly. There was no volatilization of amiben from stainless steel planchets stored at temperatures of 15, 25 or 35 C and relative humidities of 0, 33, 66, or 100 per cent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1965 , pp. 321 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ascheman, R. E. 1962. The fate of amiben (3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid) in plants and soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio State Univ. (L. C. Card No. Mic 63–2474) 163 p. Univ. Microfilms. Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C., and Lipke, W. G. 1962. The effect of applied water on preemergence applications of amiben. Weeds 10: 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Coggins, C. W., and Crafts, A. S. 1959. Substituted urea herbicides: Their electrophoretic behavior and the influence of clay colloid in nutrient solution on their phytotoxicity. Weeds 7:349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Harris, C I., and Warren, G. F. 1964. Adsorption and desorption of herbicides by soil. Weeds 12:120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Miller, G. L., and Golder, R. H. 1950. Buffer of pH 2 to 12 for use in electrophoresis. Arch. Biochem. 29:120–123.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Newman, A. S., and Norman, A. G. 1947. Effect of soil microorganisms on the persistence of plant growth regulators in soil. J. Bacteriol. 54:37–38.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Rauser, W. E., and Switzer, C. M. 1962. Factors contributing to the loss of amiben phototoxicity in soils. Weeds 10:62–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rockland, L. B. 1960. Saturated salt solutions for static control of relative humidity between 5° and 40° C. Anal. Chem. 32:1375–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sheets, T. J. 1963. Photochemical alteration and inactivation of amiben. Weeds 11:186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York. 481 p.Google Scholar
11. Talbert, R. E., and Fletchall, O. H. 1962. The adsorption of herbicides by soils as determined by radioisotope techniques. Proc. NCWCC 19:82.Google Scholar
12. Warren, G. F. 1963. Adsorption of amiben in soils. Hormolog 41:15–16.Google Scholar
13. Whiteside, J. S., and Alexander, M. 1960. Measurement of microbiological effects of herbicides. Weeds 8:204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar