Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T23:20:00.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of DCB, DCB-xylene Mixtures, Amitrol, and Sodium Salt of Dalapon in Irrigation Water on Corn and Rutabagas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

V. F. Bruns  and
J. H. Dawson
V. F. Bruns
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, Irrigation Experiment Station, Prosser, Washington. The authors express their appreciation to C. E. Anderson, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
J. H. Dawson
Affiliation:
Alf Hammer, State College of Washington, for their assistance in these investigations
Get access

Extract

In tests conducted at Prosser, Washington, during 1955 and 1956, DCB (orthodichlorobenzene), alone or in combination with xylene, showed considerable promise for controlling submersed aquatic weeds when introduced into irrigation channels. The first objective of the experiment reported herein was to determine whether irrigation water treated with DCB or DCB-xylene mixtures would injure certain crop plants. In other tests amitrol (3–amino–1,2,4–triazole) and sodium salt of dalapon (sodium 2,2–dichloropropionate) were effective in controlling certain emergent aquatic and ditchbank weeds. Frequently, the application of herbicides to control such weeds results in inadvertent or unavoidable contamination of water used to irrigate crop plants. Consequently, a second objective of this investigation was to determine the approximate quantities of amitrol and sodium salt of dalapon required to injure certain crop plants when applied in irrigation water, and to study the symptoms of injury.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 1959 , pp. 333 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © 1959 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. American Chemical Paint Company. Weedazol. Technical Service Data Sheet H-60. 1955.Google Scholar
2. American Chemical Paint Company. Soil residual after amizol application. Technical Service Data Sheet H-56. 1955.Google Scholar
3. American Cyanamid Company. Amino triazole. Technical Data. February, 1955.Google Scholar
4. Buchholtz, K. P., and Peterson, D. R. Control of quackgrass with dalapon. Down to Earth 13(3):2–3. 1957.Google Scholar
5. Bruns, V. F. The response of certain crops to 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in irrigation water. Part I. Red Mexican beans. Weeds 3:359–376. 1954.Google Scholar
6. Bruns, V. F., and Clore, W. J. The response of certain crops to 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in irrigation water. Part III. Concord grapes. Weeds 6:187–193. 1958.Google Scholar
7. Bruns, V. F., Hodgson, J. M., Arle, H. F., and Timmons, F. L. The use of aromatic solvents for control of submersed aquatic weeds in irrigation channels. U.S. Department of Agriculture Circular 971. 1955.Google Scholar
8. Ercegovich, Charles D. Analysis and persistence of 3–amino–1,2,4–triazole in plant tissue and soil. Dissertation Abstr. 18:378. 1958.Google Scholar
9. Hall, Wayne C., Johnson, S. P., and Leinweber, C. L. Amino triazole—a new abscission chemical and growth inhibitor. Texas Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 789. 1954.Google Scholar
10. Holstun, J. T. Jr., and Loomis, W. E. Leaching and decomposition of 2,2–dichloropropionic acid in several Iowa soils. Weeds 4:205–217. 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Josephs, M. J. The tolerance of various cover crops to Dowpon in the soil. Down to Earth 13(3):2–3. 1957.Google Scholar
12. McWhorter, C. G., and Porter, W. K. Jr. The effects of 3–amino–1,2,4–triazole on respiration and oxidative enzymes of corn leaves. Abstracts, WSA, pp. 40. 1953.Google Scholar
13. Thiegs, B. J. The stability of dalapon in soils. Down to Earth 11(2):2–4. 1955.Google Scholar