Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:26:11.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Wind on Delivery Patterns of Nozzles used for Weed Spraying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

M. J. Morgan ,
L. W. Rasmussen  and
L. W. Orton
M. J. Morgan
Affiliation:
Dept. of Agricultural Engineering, Agronomist and Asst. Director, Agricultural Experiment Stations, State College of Washington, Pullman
L. W. Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Dept. of Agricultural Engineering, Agronomist and Asst. Director, Agricultural Experiment Stations, State College of Washington, Pullman
L. W. Orton
Affiliation:
Agronomy Dept., State College of Washington, Pullman
Get access

Extract

Growth regulating type herbicides have been found to be effective when applied in low volume sprays. Uniformity of spray application has become a paramount requirement because of the high concentration of the spray solution. Volumes of one to ten gallons of solution per acre are not uncommon. Low volume application requires good design, construction, and operation of equipment. Air movement, temperature, and humidity also influence the spray deposition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1957 , pp. 350 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akesson, N. B., and Harvey, W. A. Equipment for the application of herbicides. Ag. Eng. 29:384–389. 1948.Google Scholar
2. Akesson, N. B., and Harvey, W. A. Chemical weed-control equipment. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir. 389. 1948.Google Scholar
3. Barger, E. L., Collins, E. V., Norton, R. A., and Liljedahl, J. B. Problems in the design of chemical weed control equipment for row crops. Ag. Eng. 28:381–383. 1948.Google Scholar
4. French, Orval C. Machinery for applying atomized oil spray. Ag. Eng. 15:324–336. 1934.Google Scholar
5. French, Orval C., and Crafts, A. S. Characteristics of spray nozzles for vegetables and weed spraying. Ag. Eng. 17:115–119. 1936.Google Scholar
6. Page, G. E. Weed spraying equipment. Oreg. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 493. 1951.Google Scholar
7. Price, F. E., Lunde, R. N., Bursik, John, and Freed, Virgil. Recommendations for weed spraying equipment. Oreg. Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 170. 1946.Google Scholar
8. Shanks, G. L., and Peterson, J. J. Technique for spray nozzle testing. Ag. Eng. 29: 539–540. 1948.Google Scholar
9. Smith, H. H. Quantitative aspects of aqueous-spray applications of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid for herbicidal purposes. Bot. Gaz. 107:544–551. 1946.Google Scholar