Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:25:14.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Influencing the Tolerance of Peas to MCPA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

M. L. Weaver  and
R. E. Nylund
M. L. Weaver
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Minnesota Washington State University, Pullman
R. E. Nylund
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Minnesota
Get access

Abstract

2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) is widely used to control broad-leaved weeds in pea fields. Occasionally, peas are severely injured by MCPA. This study was conducted in 1959 and 1960 to determine the relationships, if any, of environmental factors and of chemical constituents of plants at the time of spraying to the tolerance of peas to MCPA. Plants were equally susceptible to MCPA at either the 5- or 10-node stages. The time of day at which plants were sprayed appeared to be the most important factor associated with the tolerance of pea to MCPA. Fresh weights of vines and yields of shelled peas from plants sprayed at noon and 4:00 pm were significantly lower than those from unsprayed plants or plants sprayed at other times of the day. The carbohydrate content of pea plants varied with the time of day (exposure to light). The carbohydrate content was associated with susceptibility to injury by MCPA. A high carbohydrate content at the time of spraying was associated with a high degree of susceptibility to MCPA. High temperature at the time of spraying tended to increase the rate of translocation of MCPA. However, in the absence of prolonged exposure to light prior to treatment, high temperature alone did not predispose peas to injury by MCPA.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 1963 , pp. 142 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alban, E. K. 1953. Temperature and humidity effects of pre- and post-emergence applications of 2,4-D and dinitrophenol on sweet corn. Proc. NCWCC 10:46–47.Google Scholar
2. Ashwell, G. 1957. Colorimetric analysis of sugars. Methods in enzymology. III. Academic Press, Inc. New York. p. 79–80.Google Scholar
3. Blackman, G. E. and Robertson-Cunninghame, R. C. 1955. Inter-relationships between light intensity, temperature, and the physiological effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on the growth of Lemna minor . Expt. Bot. 6:156–176.Google Scholar
4. Blackman, G. E. and Robertson-Cunninghame, R. C. 1955. Inter-relationships between light intensity and physiological effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on the growth of Helianthus annuus . Expt. Bot. 6:177–211.Google Scholar
5. Buchholtz, K. P. 1952. Control of weeds in canning peas with MCP. Proc. NCWCC 9:75–76.Google Scholar
6. Egler, F. E. 1950. Herbicide effects in Connecticut vegetation in 1949. Bot. Gaz. 112:76–85.Google Scholar
7. Federer, W. T. 1955. Experimental design. Fifth Edition. Macmillan Company, New York.Google Scholar
8. Fiske, C. H. and Subba Row, Y. 1925. The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Biol. Chem. 66:375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Jordan, L. S., Dunham, R. S., and Linck, A. J. 1960. Effects of the interaction of varying temperature and light intensities on the response of flax to 2,4-D. Minn. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 237.Google Scholar
10. Lee, O. C. and Bewick, L. F. 1947. Results of uniform experiments. III. The relative susceptibility to 2,4-D of annuals and winter annuals at different stages of growth. Proc. NCWCC. 4:210–213.Google Scholar
11. Leloir, L. F. and Cardini, C. F. 1957. Characterization of phosphorus compounds by acid lability. Methods in enzymology. III. Academic Press, Inc., New York p. 843–844.Google Scholar
12. Lindner, P. J., Brown, J. W., and Mitchell, J. W. 1948. Movement of externally-applied phenoxy compounds in bean plants in relation to condition favoring carbohydrate movement. Bot. Gaz. 110:628–632.Google Scholar
13. Lowry, O. H., Rosenbrough, N. J., Farr, A. R., and Randall, R. J. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Biol. Chem. 193:265–275.Google Scholar
14. Mitchell, J. W. and Brown, J. W. 1945. Movement of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid stimulus and its relation to the translocation of organic food materials in plants. Bot. Gaz. 107:393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Pallas, J. E. Jr. 1960. Effects of temperature and humidity on foliar absorption and translocation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and benzoic acid. Plant Physiol. 35:575–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Robinson, R. G. and Dunham, R. S. 1950. A sprayer for experimental plots. Agron. J. 42:57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Rohrbaugh, L. M. and Rice, E. L. 1949. Effect of application of sugar on the translocation of sodium 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate on bean plants in the dark. Bot. Gaz. 111:85–89.Google Scholar
18. Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical methods. Fifth edition. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
19. Somogyi, M. 1951. Notes on sugar determination. Biol. Chem. 195:19–23.Google Scholar
20. Strait, J. and Schwantes, A. J. 1944. Pea sheller plan sheet M-112. Minn. Ext. Service.Google Scholar
21. Weaver, M. L. and Nylund, R. E. 1961. The factors influencing the tolerance of peas to MCPA. Proc. Weed Soc. Am. 18:39.Google Scholar
22. Yemm, E. W. and Cocking, E. C. 1955. The determination of amino acids with ninhydrin. Analyst 80:209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar