Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T02:07:09.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Germination and Emergence of Winged Elm Seed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. Kirby
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater, Oklahoma
P. W. Santelmann
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater, Oklahoma
Get access

Abstract

Seeds of winged elm (Ulmus alata Michx.) stored under moist conditions lost viability rapidly. Under dry conditions the seeds lived longer. Winged elm seeds would not germinate at 4 C or 42 C but did at temperatures between these points. Salt concentrations above 20,000 ppm killed the seed; concentrations below this inhibited germination; twelve per cent manitol solutions (16 atmospheres osmotic pressure) prevented germination; pressures lower than this decreasingly affected germination. If the soil moisture level was below 2%, winged elm seeds would not germinate. Removal of the outer husk of the seed did not affect germination. Winged elm seedlings did not emerge if planted at depths below ¼ inch.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , October 1964 , pp. 277 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barton, L. V. 1939. Storage of elm seed. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 10:221233.Google Scholar
2. Barton, L. V. 1961. Seed preservation and longevity. Pp. 37 and 83. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
3. George, E. J. 1937. Storage and dewinging of American elm seed. J. Forestry 35:769772.Google Scholar
4. Glendening, G. E., and Paulsen, H. A. Jr. 1955. Reproduction and establishment of velvet mesquite as related to invasion of semidesert grasslands. U. S. Dept. of Agr. Tech. Bull. No. 1127.Google Scholar
5. Steinbauer, C. E. and Steinbauer, G. P. 1931. Effect of temperature and desiccation during storage on germination of seeds of American elm (Ulmus americana L.) Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 28:441443.Google Scholar
6. Tomanek, G. W. and Ziegler, R. L. 1960. Ecological studies of salt cedar, Pp. 2123. Bull. Div. of Biol. Sci., Fort Hays, Kansas, State College, Hays, Kansas.Google Scholar
7. Uhvits, Rachel. 1946. Effect of osmotic pressure on water absorption and germination of alfalfa seed. Am. T. Bot. 33:278285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar