Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T05:15:51.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phosphorus Uptake as Influenced by Associated Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. E. Chambers  and
L. G. Holm
E. E. Chambers
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
L. G. Holm
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Abstract

P32 was injected into the soil at specific locations to allow determination of the phosphorus uptake pattern of Phaseolus vulgaris (snap bean), Amaranthus retroflexus (pigweed), and Setaria viridis (green foxtail). All species absorbed phosphorus primarily from the top 6 inches of soil. Bean absorbed phosphorus from a zone of relatively small volume. Pigweed roots showed the greatest amount of lateral spread and foxtail roots the deepest soil penetration.

One, two, three, or four plants of each of the above-mentioned species were grown 6 inches from a test bean plant to evaluate the effects of associated plants on the phosphorus uptake of the test bean. The effects observed were quite different for the three species studied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1965 , pp. 312 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burton, G. W. 1957. Role of tracers in root development investigations, p. 71–80. In Atomic energy and agriculture. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Publ. 49.Google Scholar
2. Evenari, M. 1961. Chemical influence of other plants (allelopathy), p. 691–736. In, Ruhland, W. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol. 16, External factors affecting growth and development. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
3. Grummer, G. 1961. The role of toxic substances in the inter-relationships between higher plants. p. 219–228. In Milthrope, F. L. (ed.), Soc. Expt. Biol. Symposia, 15, Mechanisms in biological competition. Academic Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
4. Hall, N. S., Chandler, W. F., van Bavel, C. H. M., Reid, R. H., and Anderson, H. J. 1953. A tracer technique to measure the growth and activity of plant root systems. North Carolina Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 101.Google Scholar
5. Harper, J. L. 1959. The biology of weeds. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford.Google Scholar
6. Harper, J. L. 1961. Approaches to the study of plant competition. p. 1–39. In Milthorpe, F. L. (ed.), Soc. Expt. Biol. Symposia, 15, Mechanisms in biological competition. Academic Press, Inc. New York.Google Scholar
7. Kramer, P. J., and Wiebe, H. H. 1952. Longitudinal gradients of P32 absorption in roots. Plant Physiol. 27:661–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Murdock, J. T., and Engelbert, L. E. 1958. The importance of subsoil phosphorus to corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 22: 53–57.Google Scholar
9. Nye, P. H. and Foster, W. N. M. 1960. The use of radio-isotopes to study plant feeding zones in natural soil. Proc. 7th Intern. Congress of Soil Sci. 2:215–222.Google Scholar
10. Nye, P. H. and Foster, W. N. M. 1961. The relative uptake of phosphorus by crops and natural fallow from different parts of their root zone. J. Agr. Sci. 56:299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Rademacher, B. 1959. Gegenseitige Beeinflussung hoher Pflanzen. p. 655–706. In Rhuland, W. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Plant Physiol. Vol. 11. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
12. Vengris, J., Drake, M., Colby, W. G., and Bart, J. 1953. Chemical composition of weeds and accompanying crop plants. Agron. J. 45:213–218.Google Scholar