Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T14:31:07.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photochemical Decomposition of Diquat and Paraquat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. H. Funderburk Jr.
Affiliation:
Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama
N. S. Negi
Affiliation:
Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama
J. M. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama
Get access

Abstract

The effect of ultraviolet (UV) light (240–260 mμ range) on 6, 7-dihydrodipyrido (1, 2-a:2’,1′-c)-pyrazidiinium salt (diquat) and 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium salt (paraquat) was studied. Both dipyridyls were very stable in dark but were altered rapidly in the presence of UV light. Radioassay data collected from planchets containing solidified diquat or paraquat indicated a loss of more than 50% of the C14 from both compounds after 48 hr and more than 75% after 96 hr. When radioactive aqueous solutions were placed under UV lights, little change in the radioactivity occurred during an 8-day period as determined by liquid scintillation. When the concentration of diquat or paraquat in these solutions was determined by chemical analysis, degradation of the original molecules was observed.

Information obtained by autoradiography of chromatograms, spotted with radioactive aqueous solutions exposed to UV light, indicated that two or possibly more C14-containing degradation products were formed from both diquat and paraquat. Co-chromatography indicated that one degradation product from paraquat was 1-methyl-4-carboxy-pyridinium ion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Calderbank, A., Morgan, C. B., and Yuen, S. M. 1961. Determination of diquat residues in potato tubers. The Analyst 86:569579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Coats, G. E., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., Lawrence, J. M., and Davis, D. E. Factors affecting persistence and inactivation of diquat and paraquat. Weed Research (In Press).Google Scholar
3. Comes, R. D. and Timmons, F. L. 1965. Effect of sunlight on the phytotoxicity of some phenylurea and triazine herbicides on a soil surface. Weeds 13:8184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Lawrence, J. M. 1964. Mode of action and metabolism of diquat and paraquat. Weeds 12:259264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Jordan, L. S., Day, B. E., and Clerx, W. A. 1964. Photodecomposition of triazines. Weeds 12:56.Google Scholar
6. Jordan, L. S., Goggins, C. W., Day, B. E., and Clerx, W. A. 1964. Photodecomposition of substituted phenylureas. Weeds 12:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Jordan, L. S., Mann, J. D., and Day, B. E. 1965. Effects of ultraviolet light on herbicides. Weeds 13:4346.Google Scholar
8. Mitchell, L. C. 1961. The effect of ultraviolet light (2537 Å) on 141 pesticide chemicals by paper chromatography. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chem. J. 44:643712.Google Scholar
9. Sheets, T. J. 1963. Photochemical alteration and inactivation of amiben. Weeds 11:186190.Google Scholar
10. Weldon, L. W. and Timmons, F. L. 1961. Photochemical degradation of diuron and monuron. Weeds 9:111116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar