Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T12:53:28.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determining Minimum Amounts of Herbicide Needed for Aerial Brush Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eugene I. Roe*
Affiliation:
Lake States Forest Experiment Station
Get access

Extract

Since the aerial brush control spraying operations in northern Minnesota have little research basis, the Lake States Forest Experiment Station has been carrying on some fundamental.studies aimed at improving the results of this increasingly important aid to forest management. These consist of analyzing two factors basic to all foliage spraying jobs whether they are done from the air or from the ground. These are:

1. The minimum amount of herbicide (in terms of acid equivalent) required to control a unit-area of brush of a given species and density, and

2. The minimum amount of solution needed to distribute the herbicide uniformly over the sprayed area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 1959 , pp. 178 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © 1959 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchholtz, K. P. A carbon dioxide-powered sprayer for small plots. Agron. Jour. 42:614. 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Davis, J. M., and Elliott, K. R. A rapid method for estimating aerial spray deposits. Jour. Econ. Entom. 46:696698. 1953.Google Scholar
3. Derscheid, L. A. Sprayers for use on experimental plots. Weeds 1:329337. 1952.Google Scholar
4. Robinson, R. G., and Dunham, R. S. A sprayer for experimental plots. Agron. Jour. 42:5859. 1950.Google Scholar
5. Shaw, W. C., and Swanson, C. R. Techniques and equipment used in evaluating chemicals for their herbicidal properties. Weeds 1:352365. 1952.Google Scholar