Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T07:36:08.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field Bindweed Control by Combinations of Cropping, Cultivation, and 2,4-D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

O. G. Russ
Affiliation:
V. F. Bruns and V. W. Woestemeyer, former superintendents of the experiment field, conducted the early work and gathered the early data
L. E. Anderson
Affiliation:
V. F. Bruns and V. W. Woestemeyer, former superintendents of the experiment field, conducted the early work and gathered the early data
Get access

Extract

Investigations during the past three decades have confirmed that field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) is exceedingly difficult to eradicate. Since the introduction of sodium chlorate by Latshaw and Zahnley various other soil sterilants have been used successfully for spot treatments. Timmons reported the effect of various systems of intensive cultivation on bindweed control as influenced by root reserves. Phillips and Timmons reported the response of bindweed to crop competition and combinations of cropping, cultivation and 2,4-D. The introduction of 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) provided a new tool for bindweed control and an impetus for continued research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Latshaw, W. L., and Zahnley, J. W. Experiments with sodium chlorate and other chemicals as herbicides for field bindweed. Jour. Agr. Res., 35:757767. 1927.Google Scholar
2. Phillips, W. M., and Timmons, F. L. Bindweed… How to control it. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 366. 1954.Google Scholar
3. Timmons, F. L. Results of bindweed control experiments at the Ft. Hays Branch Station, 1935–1940. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 296. 1941.Google Scholar