Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T11:42:13.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Limits of Forced Economic Growth in the USSR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Leon M. Herman
Affiliation:
American University
Get access

Extract

Official economic doctrine in the Soviet Union continues to hold fast to the view that growth conquers everything. A rapid rise in the level of economic output remains the magic key to the solution of all problems facing the Soviet Union, large and small alike. First of all, of course, economic growth at the highest possible rate remains an indispensable goal, in the official viewpoint, if the USSR is to be assured a firm position in the forefront of major world powers. There was surely no doubt in Stalin's mind that only a forced pace of growth in the economic capabilities of the Soviet state could prevent a dangerous backward drift in the international power position of Soviet Russia. This theme, as we know, was utilized by the former dictator to the hilt in his fierce drive to mobilize the physical and human resources of his country, and to motivate the political elite, for an all-out campaign against the strategic threat to the survival of the state that he considered to be inherent in economic backwardness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kommunist, No. 12 (1957), 11.Google Scholar

2 Pravda, October 24, 1962.

3 lzvestiia, May 25, 1962.

4 Pravda, December 17, 1962.

5 Izvestiia, October 8, 1963.

6 Pravda, November 17, 1963.

7 Novozhilov, V. V., Proceedings of the Leningrad Engineering-Economic Institute (in Russian), No. 24 (Leningrad 1958), 150–56.Google Scholar

8 Vestnik Statistiki, No. II (1963), 35.Google Scholar

9 Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5 (May 1961), 21.Google Scholar