Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T17:20:29.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychology and Politics: The Freudian Connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Get access

Extract

For roughly a century—if we take the years from Fourier and Bentham to the triumph of Freud—the study of politics concerned itself mainly with institutions. Fourier, in plotting a Utopia, took his individuals just as they were, expecting by the perfection of social arrangements to turn individual weakness and vice into virtues. Bentham also by-passed the infinite problem of the individual (this was relegated to religion) and concentrated on the finite reform of institutions; the greatest happiness of the greatest number was never the principle of an individual psychology, although since 1832 Bentham's formula has grown ironically appropriate as the individual in a mass society has become, characteristically, a quantity.

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Freud, Sigmund, An Autobiographical Study, London, 1946, p. 133.Google Scholar

2 Freud, Sigmund, Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, New York, 1933, p. 2.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., p. 41.

4 American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, XXIII (January 1953), pp. 115–16.

5 Alexander, Franz M.D., Our Age of Unreason: A Study of the Irrational Forces in Social Life, Philadelphia and New York, 1942, p. 233.Google Scholar

6 Lasswell, Harold D., Power and Personality, New York, 1948, pp. 162–63.Google Scholar

7 Money-Kyrle, R. E., Psychoanalysis and Politics, New York, 1952, p. 13.Google Scholar

8 Ibid., p. 108.

9 Lasswell, , op.cit., p. 200.Google Scholar