Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T18:58:32.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A survey of layer-type pullet rearing in Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

B. Huber-Eicher
B. Huber-Eicher
Affiliation:
Federal Veterinary Office, Centre for Proper Housing of Poultry and Rabbits, Burgenveg 22, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

Battery cages for laying birds were banned in Switzerland in 1981. Several new systems were developed in the years that followed, but to date only the deep litter and aviary systems have complied with both the regulations of the Swiss Animal Welfare Act and given satisfactory production results. The ways in which layer replacements are reared has been found to be crucial if they are to be able to cope optimally with the new aviary system. For this reason, the Federal Veterinary Office commissioned a survey to investigate how layer replacement pullets were reared in Switzerland. Sixty six out of a total of 155 farms that had facilities to rear 500 or more chicks at one time were visited between April and December 1997. Data were gathered on the type of housing system, management methods and the prevalence of feather pecking. The results of the survey are presented in a descriptive way and discussed in relation to the conditions during the laying period.

Keywords

Layerschicksrearinghousing systemmanagementfeather pecking
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 83 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. and Perry, G.C. (1975) Feather pecking and cannibalism in a caged layer flock. British Poultry Science 16: 441–451Google Scholar
Appleby, M.C. and Hughes, B.O. (1991) Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. World's Poultry Science Journal 47: 109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessei, W. and Damme, K. (1998) Neue Verfahren fur die Legehennenhaltung, KTBL-Schrift 378. KTBL, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Blokhuis, H.J. and Van Der Haar, J.W. (1989) Effects of floor type during rearing and of beak trimming on ground pecking and feather pecking in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 359–369Google Scholar
Braastad, B.O. (1990) Effects on behaviour and plumage of a key-stimuli floor and a perch in triple cages for laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FrÖhlich, E. K. F. (1989) Effects of the behaviour related to rearing systems: the possible extent of adaptation of chicks to restrictive rearing system and the consequences of such rearing environments on the resting behaviour and self maintenance of laying hens. Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Poultry Welfare 1989Tours, France pp. 137–148Google Scholar
Federal Veterinary Office (1993) Kurzbeschreibung der für den Verkauf nicht zugelassenen Haltungssysteme für Legehennen. Information Tierschutz, 800.107.06, Bundesamt fur Veterinärwesen, CH-3097 Liebefeld-BernGoogle Scholar
Federal Veterinary Office (1995) Kurzbeschreibung der in der Schweiz verfüjgbaren, serienmässig hergestellten Haltungssysteme für Legehennen. Information Tierschutz, 800.107.04, Bundesamt für Veterinärwesen, CH-3097 Liebefeld-BernGoogle Scholar
Hughes, B.O.and Duncan, I. J. H. (1972) The influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowls. British Poultry Science 13: 525–547Google Scholar
Johnsen, P.F., Vestergaard, K.S. and Norgaard-Nielsen, G. (1998) Influence of early rearing conditions on the development of feather pecking and cannibalism in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 60: 25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oester, H. and FrÖhlich, E. (1986) Die Beurteilung der Tiergerechtheit der neuen Haltungssysteme für Legehennen im Rahmen der Tierschutzgesetzgebung. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 128: 521–534Google Scholar
Oester, H. and FrÖhlich, E. (1988) New housing system for laying hens in Switzerland. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Animal HygieneSkara, Sweden pp. 709–712Google Scholar
Steiger, A. (1988) Swiss Animal Welfare Legislation and the examination of housing systems Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on the Protection of Farm Animals 1988Brussels, Belgium pp. 89–92Google Scholar
Sts Swiss Society for the Protection of Animals (Ed.) (1994) Laying hens: 12 years of Experience with New Husbandry Systems in Switzerland. Bern, Kümmerli & Frey AGGoogle Scholar
Webster, J. (1994) Animal Welfare: A Cool Eye Towards Eden. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, B., FrÖhlich, E., Oester, H., Oswald, T., Troxler, J., Weber, R. and Schmid, H. (1997) The contribution of applied ethology in judging animal welfare in farm animal housing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 53: 33–43Google Scholar
Wennrich, G. (1975) Studien zum Verhalten verschiedener Hybrid-Herkünfte von Haushühnern (Gallus domesticus) in Bodenintensivhaltung mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des aggressiven Verhaltens sowie des Federpickens und des Kannibalismus. 5. Mitteilung: Verhaltensweisen des Federpickens. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 39: 37–44Google Scholar