Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:37:17.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Egg Quality Control in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2007

R. J. Hughes
Affiliation:
South Australian Department of Agriculture, Parafield Poultry Research Centre, P. O. Box 3, Salisbury, South Australia. 5108
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atanasoff, J. W. and Wilcke, H. L. (1937). Measurement of the viscosity of eggs by the use of a torsion pendulum. Journal of Agricultural Research, 54: 701.Google Scholar
Buckley, D. J., St. Amour, G. and Fairful, R. W. (1981). An improved electronic gauge for measuring egg albumen quality. Poultry Science, 60: 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R. J. (1977). „Apparent Consumption of Foodstuffs and Nutritrients: Australia 1974-75.” Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra; Reference No. 10. 10.Google Scholar
Fry, J. L., Hinton, C. F. and Harms, R. H. (1974). Reflectance colorimetric evaluation of egg yolk pigmentation. Journal of Food Science. 39: 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, R. W. (1972). Non-destructive egg shell thickness measurement using ultrasonic energy. Poultry Science. 51: 1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groocock, J. M. (1974). „The Cost of Quality”. (The Pitman Press: Bath).Google Scholar
Gulich, A. R. and Fitzerald, J. C. (1969). Egg grading handbook. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Consumer Market Service, Agriculture Handbook 75.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. J. (1975). The effect of refrigeration on the deterioration in internal quality of eggs during marketing. Agricultural Research. 2: 29.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. J. (1976). The use of sealed wrappers for egg cartons. Proceedings First Australasian Poultry and Stock Feed Convention, Melbourne. 337.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. J. (1978). A survey of egg consumption, purchasing habits and egg quality preferences of people living in the Adelaide metropolitan area. South Australian Department of Agriculture, Livestock Branch Technical Information Circular. No. 36.Google Scholar
James, P. E. and Pressly, R. S. (1978). A comparison of beta back-scatter gauges for measuring egg shells. Poultry Science. 58: 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juran, J. M., Gryna, F. M. and Bingham, R. S. (1974). „Quality Control Handbook”. (McGraw Hill: New York).Google Scholar
Oesterle, E. C. (1973). Merchandising eggs in supermarkets. In ‚Egg Science and Technology’. Edited by Stadelman, W. J. and Cotterill, O. J. (Avi Publishing Company: Connecticut).Google Scholar
Philip, T., Weber, C. W. and Berry, J. W. (1977). Color measurement of egg yolks—an instrumental method. Poultry Science. 56: 1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, R. W. (1981). Genetic changes in the performance of egg laying strains of hens in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry. 21: 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stantion, H. (1977). Survey of market research work related to eggs. Report to Poultry Research Advisory Committee, Council of Egg Marketing Authorities of Australia.Google Scholar
Vikram, C. S., Vedam, K. and Buss, E. G. (1980). Non-destructive evaluation of the strength of eggs by holography. Poultry Science. 59: 2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W. and Macdonald, D. C. (1978). Laboratory measurements of egg shell strength. 1. An instrument for measuring shell strength by quasi-static compression, puncture and non-destructive deformation. Poultry Science. 57: 860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, R. G. (1968). The measurement of certain egg quality characteristics: a review. In ‚Egg Quality—A Study of the Hen's Egg’. Edited by Carter, T. C. (Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh).Google Scholar