Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:56:32.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiology of fowl typhoid in Haryana, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2010

T. KUMAR
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004
N.K. MAHAJAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004
N.K. RAKHA
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004
*
Corresponding author: mahajan448@rediffmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Fowl typhoid caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum is one of the most important bacterial diseases of poultry. The present study was undertaken to ascertain the epidemiological status of fowl typhoid in broilers in Haryana for the past four years (2005-2008) and to establish the role of hatcheries in spreading the Salmonella infection. A total of 227 outbreaks of fowl typhoid were recorded in chickens during the period from January 2005 to December 2008. The maximum number of outbreaks (96) was recorded in the age group of 7-9 days during the past four years. Maximum mortality and case fatality rate were found in chickens of 1-2 weeks of age. Temporal distribution of the disease indicates more outbreaks in extreme weather conditions. From spatial distribution of the disease, it was evident that the disease was prevalent in nine districts of Haryana out of 20. By analysing the data regarding the prevalence of Salmonella infection in hatcheries, more than one third (37.8%) of hatcheries were found to be infected with Salmonella, which is an alarming situation for the region.

Type
Small-scale Family Poultry Production
Copyright
World's Poultry Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

FALADE, S. and EHIZOKHALE, M. (1981) Salmonella and Escherichia coli strains isolated from poultry in Ibadan, Nigeria. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production In Africa 29: 99.Google ScholarPubMed
GLOVER, J.S. and HANDERSON, W. (1946) FT- Report of a record outbreak in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 10: 241-249.Google Scholar
GRIMES, T.F. and SIMMONS, G.C. (1972) Non- specific reactions to rapid whole blood Salmonella pullorum antigens. Australian Veterinary Journal 48: 609-610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GUPTA, B.R. and VERMA, J.C. (1989) Prevalence of Salmonella from Avian sources. Indian Journal of Comparative Microbiology Immunology and Infectious Diseases. 10: 140-145.Google Scholar
GUPTA, B.R. and VERMA, J.C. (1990) Prevalence of Salmonella in farm animals and birds in India. Indian Journal of Comparative Microbiology Immunology and Infectious Diseases 11: 169-174.Google Scholar
HAFEJI, Y.A., JOSHI, B.P., PRAJAPATI, K.S., DAVE, C.J., GHODASARA, D.J. and ROY. A., (2000) Aetiopathological investigation of Salmonella gallinarum infection in broilers. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology 24(2): 119-120Google Scholar
KAUSHIK, R.K., SINGH, J., KUMAR, S. and KULSHRESHTHA, R.C. (1988) FT in a few poultry farms of Haryana state Indian Journal of Animal Science 56: 511-514Google Scholar
PRAKASH, B., KRIHNAPPA, G., MUNIYAPPA, L. and KUMAR, S. (2005) Epidemiological characterization of Avian Salmonella enterica serovar infections in India. International Journal of Poultry Science 4: 388-395.Google Scholar
SHARMA, N.K. and KAUSHIK, R.K. (1986) . Surveillance of disease in poultry in Haryana state. Indian Journal of Animal Science 56: 650-662.Google Scholar
SHIVAPRASAD, H.L. (2000) FT and Pullorum disease. Reviews in Science and Technology 19: 405-424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SMITH, JS. and BUXTON, W. (1951) Isolation of Salmonella from faeces of domestic animals. British Medical Journal 1: 1479-1483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed