Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T11:52:43.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Review of Facts Influencing Egg Yolk Mottling1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

F. E. Cunnigham  and
P. E. Sanford
F. E. Cunnigham
Affiliation:
Dairy and Poultry Science DepartmentKansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506
P. E. Sanford
Affiliation:
Dairy and Poultry Science DepartmentKansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 1974 , pp. 103 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almquist, H. J., 1933. Relation of the candling appearance of eggs to their quality. Univ. of California Agr. Sta. Bul. 561: 1–31.Google Scholar
Baker, R. C., Hill, F. W., van Rienhoven, A. and Bruckner, J. H. 1957. The effect of Nicarbazin on egg production and egg quality. Poultry Sci. 36: 718–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beane, W. L., Siegel, P. B. and Siegel, H. S. 1965. Piperazine compounds and yolk discoloration. Poultry Sci. 44: 666–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, J. G., Newell, G. W., Holder, D. P., Odell, G. V. and Bee, D. E. 1968. The effect of cottonseed products and selected feed additives on egg yolk discoloration. Poultry Sci. 47: 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshear, C. D., Parkes, M. R. and May, K. N. 1967. Effect of certain physical factors on yolk mottling alburmen quality of eggs. Poultry Sci. 46: 952–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshear, C. D., May, K. N. and Noles, R. K. 1968. A survey of egg mottling and other quality attributes in North Georgia flocks. Poultry Sci. 47: 625–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bragg, D. D., 1972. Effect of certain coccidionstats on egg production, egg weight and egg yolk mottling. Poultry Sci. 51: 1786–1787.Google Scholar
Britton, W. M., 1973. Vitelline membrance chemical composition in natural and induced yolk mottling. Poultry Sci. 52: 459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruth, F. E., 1947. Stability of bound gossypol to digestion. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 24-58–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. J., Noles, R. K., Wolford, J. H. and Larzelere, H. E. 1970. An evaluation of consumer acceptance of eggs having mottled yolks. Poultry Sci. 49: 752–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, S. A., 1956. The removal of chicken tapeworms by di-n-butyl tin dilaurate. Poultry Sci. 35: 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. J., Bandemer, S. and Davidson, J. A. 1960. Heat inactivation of substances in crude cottonseed oil causing pink white and large discolored yolks in stored eggs. Poultry Sci. 39: 1478–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. J., Bandemer, S. L., Anderson, M. and Davidson, J. A. 1962. Fatty acid distribution in tissues from hens fed cottonseed oil or Sterculia foetida seeds. 76: 314–319.Google ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, J. L., Barrentine, B. F., Dreesen, L. J., Hill, J. E. and Shawver, C. B. 1953. The use of ferrous sulphate to inactive gossypol in diets of laying hens. Poultry Sci. 32: 740–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frampton, V. L., Kuck, J. C., Pepperman, A. B. Jr., Pons, W. A. Jr., Watts, A. B. and Johnston, C. 1966. Some physiological properties of Halphen-positive cottonseed oils. Poultry Sci. 45: 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frampton, V. L., Piccolo, B. and Heywang, B. 1961. Discolorations in stored shell eggs produced by hens fed cottonseed meal. J. Agr. Food Chem. 9: 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, J. L. and Wilson, H. R. 1965. Influence of dictary piperazing, phenothiozine and dibutyltin dilaurate on yolk defects. Poultry Sci. 44: 1371.Google Scholar
Fry, J. L. and Wilson, H. R. 1967. Studies of dietary piperazine, phenothiazine and dibutyltin dilaurate. Poultry Sci. 46: 319–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, J. L., Herrick, G. M., Prine, G. M. and Harms, R. H. 1972. Effect of bird resistant sorghums and tannic acid on yolk mottling. Poultry Sci. 51: 1540–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halloran, H. R. and Cavanagh, G. C. 1960. Egg tested cottonseed meal. Poultry Sci. 39: 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywang, B. W. 1957a. Relationship between yolk dicsolorations in egg yolks and low dietary 1 levels of free gossypol. Poultry Sci. 36: 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywang, B. W., 1957b. Failure of ferrous sulphate to inactivate free gossypol in diets for laying chickens. Poultry Sci. 36: 715–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywang, B. W., Kemmerer, A. R. and Lowe, R. W. 1962. Yolk discorlorations from cottonseed meal when eggs are oiled before storage. Poultry Sci. 41: 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywang, B. W., Bird, H. R. and Altschul, A. F. 1955. Relationship between discolorations in eggs and dietary free gossypol supplied by different cottonseed products. Poultry Sci. 34: 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, A. R., Hywang, B. W. and Vavich, M. G. 1961. Effect of Sterculia foetida oil on gossypol discoloration in cold storage eggs and the mechanism of gossypol discoloration. Poultry Sci. 40: 1045–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, A. R., Heywang, B. W.Nordby, H. E. and Phelps, R. A. 1962. Effect of cottonseed oil on discoloration of cold storage eggs. Poultry Sci. 41: 1101–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, A. R., Heywang, B. W.Vavich, M. C. and Sheehan, E. T. 1965. Effect of iron sulfate on egg discoloration caused by gossypol. Poultry Sci. 44: 1389.Google Scholar
Kuiken, K. A., Lyman, C. M. and Hale, F. 1948. The effect of feeding isopropanol-extracted cottonseed meal on the storage quality of eggs. Poultry Sci. 27: 742–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamon, H. M. and Lee, A. R. 1917. Feed cost of egg production. U.S.D.A. Bul. 561: 13–42.Google Scholar
Lipstein, B., and Bornstein, S. 1966. Studies with acidulated cottonseed-oil soapstock. Its use as a fat supplement in layer ration. Poultry Sci. 45: 651–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, Clyde E., Groege W., Newell and Robert D., Morrison 1972. Vitelline membrane strength and egg yolk mottling. Poultry Sci. 51: 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCready, S. T., Roland, D. A. and Fry, J. L. 1972. Internal quality, composition and defects of eggs from hens fed a calcium deficient diet. Poultry Sci. 51: 670–675.Google Scholar
McNally, E. H., and Brant, A. W. 1958. Observations on yolk mottling. Poultry Sci. 37: 1225.Google Scholar
Miller, E. C., Sunde, M. L. and Elvehjem, C. A. 1957. Minimum protein requirement of laying pullets at different energy levels. Plultry Sci. 36: 681–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peardon, D. L., Haberman, W. D.Marr, J. E.Garland, F. W. Jr., and Wilcke, H. L. 1965. The effects of piperazine, phenothyiazine and di-N-butyltin dilaurate combinations on egg production and egg quality in chickens. Poultry Sci. 44: 413–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polin, D., and Porter, C. C. 1956. The effect of nicarbazin on porphyrin and yolk formation. Poultry Sci. 35: 1165.Google Scholar
Polin, D., Ott, W. H. and Siegmund, O. H. 1957. The incidence and degree of yolk mottling in eggs from hens fed diets with and without nicarbazin. Poultry Sci. 36: 524–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polin, D., Ott, W. H. and Zeissig, A. 1958. Field studies on the effect of nicarbazin on egg quality. Poultry Sci. 37: 898–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, D. K., Fuller, H. L. and Blackshear, C. D. 1967. Effect of tannic acid on egg production and egg yolk mottling. Poultry Sci. 46: 1508–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, J., Neill, H. J. O.Reillich, H. G.Levi, R. S. and Pons, W. A. 1968. Physiological evaluation of solvent-treated cottonseed meals in rations for laying hens. J. Am. Oil Chem Soc. 45: 393–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reilich, H. G., O'Neil, H. J.Levi, R. S.Proctor, J. and Pons, W. A. 1969. Chemical inactivation of cyclopropenoid fatty acids in cottonseed meals and their physiological evaluation. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 46: 305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I. P., and Rice, J. E. 1891. The effect on fowls of nitrogenous and carbonaceous rations. Experiment Station Rec. 2: 506–507.Google Scholar
Roland, D. A. Sr., Sloan, D. R. and Harms, R. H. 1972. Yolk mottling associated with dietary calcium deficiency. Poultry Sci. 51: 710–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanoff, A. L., and Romanoff, A. J. 1949. The Avian Egg. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 918.Google Scholar
Schaible, P. J., Moore, L. A. and Moore, J. M. 1934. Gossypol, a cause of discoloration in egg yolks. Poultry Sci. 79: 372.Google ScholarPubMed
Schaible, P. J., Davidson, J. A. and Moore, J. M. 1936. The egg yolk surface in fresh eggs. Poultry Sci. 15: 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Milton L., Malden C., Nesheim and Robert J., Young 1969. Nutrition of the chicken. M. L. Scott and Associates, ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Silvestrini, D. A., Dawson, L. E.Evans, R. J. and Davidson, J. R. 1965. Effects of Nicarbazin in diet on mottled yolks. I. Incidence and degree of mottling, and certain yolk proteins. Poultry Sci. 44: 467–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swenson, A. D., Fieger, E. A. and Upp, C. W. 1942. The nature of egg yolk discoloration produced by cottonseed meal. Poultry Sci. 21: 374–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. B., Albright, W. P.Schnetzler, E. E. and Heller, V. G. 1930. Feeds and their relationship to egg quality. Oklahoma Agri. Exp. Sta. Report. 1930-32: 128–136.Google Scholar
van Tienhoven, A., Hill, F. W.Prock, A. and Baker, R. C. 1958. The effect of nicarbazin on yolk quality. Poultry Sci. 37: 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldroup, P. W., and Goodner, T. D. 1973. Tolerance levels of free gossypol in layer diets as influenced by iro: gossypol rations. Poultry Sci. 52: 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, H. S., 1957. Further comments on the effects of nicarbazin on the egg. Poultry Sci. 36: 589–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar