Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T15:12:27.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regulatory Autonomy and International Trade in Services: The EU under GATS and RTAs by Bregt Natens Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016

Review products

Regulatory Autonomy and International Trade in Services: The EU under GATS and RTAs by Bregt Natens Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2017

Marina Trunk-Fedorova*
Affiliation:
St Petersburg State University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The author includes Free Trade Agreements, Economic Integration Agreements etc. into the notion of ‘RTAs’.

2 The EU and Singapore completed the negotiations for a comprehensive free trade agreement on 17 October 2014. The initialed text of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=961.

3 Trade Agreement between the European Union and Its member States, of the One Part, and Colombia and Peru, of the Other Part (OJ L 354, 21.12.2012, p.3). On 11 November 2016, the EU together with Ecuador, Colombia, and Peru, signed the Protocol of Accession of Ecuador to the Trade Agreement with Colombia and Peru, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1576.

4 Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part (OJ L 261, 30.08.2014, p.4).

5 den Bossche, Peter Van and Zdouc, Werner, The Law and Policy of International Trade Organization, 3rd edn, (Cambridge University Press, 2013), p. 51 Google Scholar.

6 Although the practice, indeed, demonstrates that it is expected that previous reports on the same legal question are followed.