Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-16T02:08:47.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An empirical assessment of the trade facilitation initiative: econometric evidence and global economic effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2013

C. ZAKI
C. ZAKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
*
Email: chahir.zaki@feps.edu.eg and chahir_zaki@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper attempts to model trade facilitation in a multi-regional and multi-sectoral computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, MIRAGE. It follows Decreux and Fontagné (2009) in modeling trade facilitation and in assuming that administrative barriers are an iceberg cost. I extend their model using more comprehensive measures of ad-valorem equivalents (AVEs) of red tape costs, which are computed from a gravity model, and are introduced in the CGE model. The novelty in using those AVEs is that they take into account the effects of bureaucracy, internet coverage, corruption, and geographical barriers on the time to trade. The paper has four major findings. Gains derived from trade facilitation are more significant for developing economies (especially for the Middle East and North Africa region and Sub-Saharan countries) than for developed ones, whether in terms of welfare gain (either in the short or long run) or increase in trade. Second, long-run welfare effects of trade facilitation are much higher than in the short run. Third, trade facilitation helps boost both intra-regional trade and inter-regional trade. Fourth and most interestingly, it also helps improve export diversification, leading to an expansion in those sectors that are more sensitive to time, such as food, textiles, and electronics.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 103 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © C. Zaki 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armington, P. (1969), ‘A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production’, International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 16: 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) (1999), ‘Assessing APEC Trade Liberalization and Facilitation: 1999 Update’, Economic Committee, September, APEC, Singapore.Google Scholar
Attanasio, O., Goldberg, P., and Pavcnik, N. (2004), ‘Trade Reforms and Wage Inequality in Colombia’, Journal of Development Economics, 74(2): 331–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badri, N. and Walmsley, T. (eds.) (2008), ‘Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 7 Data Base’, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Bchir, M., Decreux, Y., Guérin, J.-L., and Jean, S. (2002), ‘MIRAGE, a Computable General Equilibrium Model for Trade Policy Analysis’, CEPII Working Papers, No. 2002-17, December.Google Scholar
Cernat, L. (2001), ‘Assessing Regional Trade Arrangements: Are South–South More Trade Diverting?’, Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities, Study Series, No. 16, UNCTD, New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
Decreux, Y. and Fontagné, L. (2009), ‘Economic Impact of Potential Outcome of the DDA’, CEPII Research Reports, No. 2009-01, May.Google Scholar
Decreux, Y. and Valin, H. (2007), ‘MIRAGE, Updated Version of the Model for Trade Policy Analysis: Focus on Agriculture and Dynamics’, CEPII Working Papers, No. 2007-15, May.Google Scholar
Dennis, A. (2006), ‘The Impact of Regional Trade Agreements and Trade Facilitation in the Middle East North Africa Region’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3837, February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, A. and Shepherd, B. (2011), ‘Trade Facilitation and Export Diversification’, The World Economy, 34(1): 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, R. and Hanson, G. (2001), ‘Global Production Sharing and Rising Inequality: A Survey of Trade and Wages’, NBER Working Paper 8372, July.Google Scholar
Ferrantino, M. (2006), ‘Evaluation Quantitative des Effets Economiques et Commerciaux des Mesures Non-Tarifaires’, Working Paper on Trade Policy, No. 28, Working Party of the Trade Committee, OECD, TD/ TC/ WP(2005)26/ FINAL, March.Google Scholar
Fontagné, L. and Freundenberg, M. (1997), ‘Intra-Industry Trade: Methodological Reconsidered’, CEPII Working Papers, No. 1997-01.Google Scholar
Fox, A., Francois, J., and Londoo-Kent, P. (2003), ‘Measuring Border Crossing Costs and their Impact on Trade Flows: The United States-Mexican Trucking Case’, Document presented at the sixth conference on Global Economic Analysis, LaHaye, Pays-Bas, http://www-personal.umich.edu/∼alanfox/gtap/bcc/MeasuringBCC.pdf.Google Scholar
Francois, J., van Meil, H., and van Tongeren, F. (2003), ‘Economic Benefits of the Doha Round for the Netherlands’, Project Report, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, La Haye, https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/1255.pdf.Google Scholar
Francois, J., van Meil, H., and van Tongeren, F. (2005), ‘Trade liberalization in the Doha development Round’, Economic Policy, 42 (April): 349–391.Google Scholar
Head, K. and Mayer, T. (2002), ‘Effet frontière, intégration Economique et Forteresse Europe’, Economie et Prévision, 152–153(1–2): 71–92.Google Scholar
Hertel, T., Walmsley, T., and Itakura, K. (2001), ‘Dynamic Effect of the “New Age” Free Trade Agreement between Japan and Singapore’, Journal of Economic Integration, 16(4): 446–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, B. and Konan, D. (1999), ‘Deep Integration, Nondiscrimination, and Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2130, World Bank, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummels, D. (2001), ‘Time as a Trade Barrier’, mimeo, Department of Economics, Purdue University, Indiana, http://www.krannert.purdue.edu/faculty/hummelsd/research/time3b.pdf.Google Scholar
Kee, H., Nicita, A., and Olarreaga, M. (2008), ‘Import Demand Elasticities and Trade Distortions’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4): 666–682, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kee, H., Nicita, A., and Olarreaga, M. (2009), ‘Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices’, Economic Journal, 119(534): 172–199, Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Logistics Performance Indicators (2007), Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Minor, P. and Tsigas, M. (2008), ‘Impacts of Better Trade Facilitation in Developing Countries: Analysis with a New GTAP Database for the Value of Time in Trade’, mimeo, June, https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=2762.Google Scholar
Njinkeu, D., Wilson, J., and Fosso, B. (2007), ‘Trade facilitation: what is it and how does it help?’, paper prepared for AERC collaborative research project on Supply Response, July, http://www.aercafrica.org/documents/export_supply_working_papers/NjinkeuD_Trade18DB34.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD (2002a), ‘La Relation entre les Accords Commerciaux Régionaux et le Système Commercial Multilatéral: Facilitation des Echanges’, prepared by Evokia Moisé, Working Party of the Trade Committee, TD/TC/WP(2002)17/FINAL, June.Google Scholar
OECD (2002b), ‘Avantages pour les Entreprises de la Facilitation des Echanges’, repared by T. Matsudaira and Evokia Moisé, Working Party of the Trade Committee, D/ TC/ WP(2001)21/ FINAL, August.Google Scholar
OECD (2005), ‘Couts et avantages de la facilitation des échanges’, Synthèse de l'OCDE, ‘Division des relations publiques de la Direction des relations publiques et de la communication’, November.Google Scholar
OECD/WTO (2011), ‘Aid for Trade at a Glance 2011: Showing Results’, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Park, S. (2002), ‘Measuring Tariff Equivalents in Cross-Border Trade in Services’, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Working Paper No. 02-15.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. (1954), ‘The Transfer Problem and Transport Costs, II: Analysis of Effects of Trade Impediments’, Economic Journal, 64: 264–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, K. (2006), ‘Trade in Services: Does Gravity Hold? A Gravity Model Approach to Estimating Barriers to Services Trade’, Discussion Paper No. 183, Insitute for International Integration Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaki, C. (2009), ‘Does Trade Facilitation Matter in Bilateral Trade’, ERF Working Paper 472, March.Google Scholar
Zaki, C. (2010), ‘Towards an Explicit Modeling of Trade Facilitation in CGE Models: Evidence from Egypt’, ERF Working Paper 515, April.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Zaki Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Zaki Supplementary Material(File)
File 890.9 KB