Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T05:19:25.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Following Through

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

Get access

Extract

The response to the Hartford Appeal has far exceeded the expectations of those who initiated it and of those who participated in drafting the final document. Whatever its faults, it shows every sign of becoming a point of reference that can enliven the kind of debate both its critics and admirers say, they hoped for.

The two most frequent misunderstandings of the Appeal are: (1) that it is aimed mainly, if not exclusively, against the left; and (2) that it is supposed to be some new kind of ecumenical statement of faith. To the second misunderstanding it should be enough to note that the Hartford group had no intention of saying all we believe about God, nature, the Church, the Christ, and human history. We did intend to say some things we thought needed saying about the current state of theology and religion in America.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)