Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T06:19:23.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of new skeletogenic genes of the sea urchin embryo by use of conserved sequence motifs among the SM50 gene family

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

Youn-Ho Lee
Affiliation:
Polar Research Center, Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute, Ansan, Korea
Jaeil Kwak
Affiliation:
Polar Research Center, Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute, Ansan, Korea
Roy J. Britten
Affiliation:
Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
Eric H. Davidson
Affiliation:
Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Extract

Spicule formation in the sea urchin is one of the conspicuous cellular processes occurring in early embryo-genesis, in which stereotyped spicules form through deposition of minerals onto the spicule matrix protein scaffold. This process requires many genes to be functional: the spicule matrix alone needs more than 50 different genes. Until now, however, only a few skeletogenic genes have been known. Recently SM37, a new putative spicule matrix protein gene, was cloned and found to be linked to SM50 (Lee et al., 1999). The structure of the new gene raised the possibility of the presence of a gene family involved in skeletogenesis which consists of SM50, SM37 and LSM34 (a homologue of SM50) (Benson et al., 1987; Livingston et al., 1991). Characteristics of the gene family include: (1) skeletongenic mesenchyme-specific expression, (2) onset of gene expression as early as the mesenchyme blastula, (3) presence of glycine, proline and glutamine-rich repeats in the middle of the proteins. Another feature of the family is the presence of conserved sequence motifs at both the amino-terminal and carboxyl-terminal regions of the proteins – SCYR(A/Y)F and PNPXXXRPRM(L/Y)QE, respectively – which we speculate play a role in protein guidance.

Type
Special Lecture for Citizens
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, S.C., Sucov, H.M., Stephens, L., Davidson, E.H. & Wilt, F. (1987). Dev. Biol. 120, 499506.Google Scholar
Dion, A.S. & Myers, J.C. (1987). J. Mol. Biol. 193, 127–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exposito, J.Y., D'Alessio, M., di Liberto, M. & Ramirez, F. (1993). J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5249–54.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-H., Britten, R.J. & Davidson, E.H. (1999). Dev. Growth Differ. 41, 303–12.Google Scholar
Livingston, B.T., Shaw, R., Bailey, A. & Wilt, F. (1991). Dev. Biol. 148, 473–80.Google Scholar
Tomita, M., Kinoshita, T., Izumi, S., Tomino, S. & Yoshizato, K. (1994). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1217, 131–40.Google Scholar
Wessel, G.M., Etkin, M. & Benson, S. (1991). Dev. Biol. 148, 261–72.Google Scholar