Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T16:09:57.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ram semen quality can be assessed by flow cytometry several hours after post-fixation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2020

Jaromír Vašíček*
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production in Nitra, NPPC, Lužianky, Slovak Republic Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Nitra, Slovak Republic
Andrea Svoradová
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production in Nitra, NPPC, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
Andrej Baláži
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production in Nitra, NPPC, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
Rastislav Jurčík
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production in Nitra, NPPC, Lužianky, Slovak Republic
Marián Macháč
Affiliation:
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Nitra, Slovak Republic
Peter Chrenek
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production in Nitra, NPPC, Lužianky, Slovak Republic Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Nitra, Slovak Republic University of Science and Technology, Department of Animal Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Author for correspondence: Jaromír Vašíček, Research Institute for Animal Production in Nitra, NPPC, Lužianky, Slovak Republic. Tel: +421 37 6546 600. E-mail: jaromir.vasicek@nppc.sk

Summary

Ram spermatozoa are very sensitive to any cold shock or oxidative damage, therefore making them unsuitable for prolonged storage or distant transport to specialized laboratories for flow-cytometric analysis. The aim of this study was to stain ram semen samples with several fluorescent markers and analyse their stability during formaldehyde fixation. Briefly, freshly collected semen samples were stained for apoptosis (annexin V-FITC, YO-PRO™-1 and FLICA), acrosomal damage (PNA-AF488 and FITC-conjugated antibody against GAPDHS), mitochondrial activity (Mitotracker probes), oxidative damage [dihydroethidium (DHE) and CellROX™ Green] and cell viability (live/dead fixable viability dyes). Next, samples were fixed in buffer containing formaldehyde and then washed. Stained sample were analyzed using flow cytometer before fixation, immediately after fixation, and at 5 h and 20 h post-fixation. Fluorescent signals and the proportion of positively stained spermatozoa were compared statistically in fresh and post-fixed samples. All examined markers, except YO-PRO-1 (decreased significantly, P < 0.05), retained their fluorescence intensities after fixation. In conclusion, several tested markers were able to withstand formaldehyde fixation of ram semen samples as follows: annexin V and FLICA for apoptosis; PNA for acrosomal status; MitoTracker Red CMXRos for mitochondrial activity; and CellROX Green for oxidative status in combination with a suitable live/dead fixable viability dye. This optimized methodology could help to comprehensively analyse the quality of ram semen from local farms countrywide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, RJ, De Iuliis, GN and Baker, MA (2012). Direct methods for the detection of reactive oxygen species in human semen samples. In Studies on Men’s Health and Fertility (eds A Agarwal, RJ Aitken and JG Alvarez), pp. 275–99. Humana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, MBR, de Andrade, AFC, de Arruda, RP, Batissaco, L, Florez-Rodriguez, SA, Lançoni, R, de Oliveira, BMM, Tores, MA, Ravagnani, GM, de Almeida, TG, Vellone, VS and Celeghini, ECC (2015). An efficient technique to detect sperm reactive oxygen species: the CellROX deep red fluorescent probe. Biochem Physiolol 4, 1000157.Google Scholar
Baláži, A, Vašíček, J, Svoradová, A, Macháč, M, Jurčík, R, Huba, J, Pavlík, I and Chrenek, P (2020). Comparison of three different methods for the analysis of ram sperm concentration. Slovak J Anim Sci 53, 53–8.Google Scholar
Bradford, JA and Buller, GM (2008). Dead cell stains in flow cytometry: a comprehensive analysis. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 74, 365.Google Scholar
Chazotte, B (2011). Labeling mitochondria with MitoTracker dyes. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, pdb-prot5648.Google ScholarPubMed
Chrenek, P, Kubovicova, E and Makarevich, A (2017). Current situation in the gene bank of animal genetic resources in Slovakia. Slovak J Anim Sci 50, 135–8.Google Scholar
Chrenek, P, Makarevich, AV, Kubovicova, E, Bulla, J and Supuka, P (2019). Slovak National Animal Breeds. Nitra, Slovak Republic: Slovak University of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Cossarizza, A, Chang, HD, Radbruch, A, Acs, A, Adam, D, Adam-Klages, S, et al. (2019). Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies. Eur J Immunol 49, 1457–973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davila, MP, Muñoz, PM, Tapia, JA, Ferrusola, CO and Peña, FJ (2015). Inhibition of mitochondrial complex I leads to decreased motility and membrane integrity related to increased hydrogen peroxide and reduced ATP production, while the inhibition of glycolysis has less impact on sperm motility. PLoS One 10, e0138777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castro, LS, de Assis, PM, Siqueira, AF, Hamilton, TR, Mendes, CM, Losano, JD, Nichi, M, Visintin, JA and Assumpção, ME (2016). Sperm oxidative stress is detrimental to embryo development: a dose-dependent study model and a new and more sensitive oxidative status evaluation. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016, 821307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikalov, SI and Harrison, DG (2014). Methods for detection of mitochondrial and cellular reactive oxygen species. Antioxid Redox Signal 20, 372–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, AH, Jacobson, KA, Rose, J and Zeller, R (2008). Fixation and permeabilization of cells and tissues. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2008, pdb-top36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallardo Bolanos, JM, Balao da Silva, CM, Martin Muñoz, P, Morillo Rodriguez, A, Plaza Davila, M, Rodriguez-Martínez, H, Aparico, IM, Tapia, JA, Ferrusola, CO and Peña, FJ (2014). Phosphorylated AKT preserves stallion sperm viability and motility by inhibiting caspases 3 and 7. Reproduction 148, 221–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Givan, AL (2000). The basics of staining for cell surface proteins. In In Living Color (eds RA Diamond and S Demaggio) pp. 142–64. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57049-0_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinberg, YY, Dibbern, ME, Levasseur, VA and Kraig, RP (2013). Insulin-like growth factor-1 abrogates microglial oxidative stress and TNF-α responses to spreading depression. J Neurochem 126, 662–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grunewald, S, Rasch, M, Reinhardt, M, Baumann, T, Paasch, U and Glander, HJ (2008). Stability of fluorochrome based assays to measure subcellular sperm functions. Asian J Androl 10, 455–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, TRDS, Mendes, CM, Castro, LSD, Assis, PMD, Siqueira, AFP, Delgado, JDC, Goissis, MD, Muiño-Blanco, T, Cebrián-Pérez, JA, Nichi, M, Visintin, JA and D’Ávila Assumpção, MEO (2016). Evaluation of lasting effects of heat stress on sperm profile and oxidative status of ram semen and epididymal sperm. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016, 1687657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haughland, RP (2005). The Handbook: A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and Labeling Technologies. Invitrogen Corp, Eugene.Google Scholar
Idziorek, T, Estaquier, J, De Bels, F and Ameisen, JC (1995). YOPRO-1 permits cytofluorometric analysis of programmed cell death (apoptosis) without interfering with cell viability. J Immunol Methods 185, 249–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobberger, JW (2000). Stoichiometry of immunocytochemical staining reactions. Methods Cell Biol 2001, 271–99.Google Scholar
Koppers, AJ, De Iuliis, GN, Finnie, JM, McLaughlin, EA and Aitken, RJ (2008). Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93, 3199–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulíková, B, Baláži, A, Tóthová, J, Jurčík, R, Huba, J and Chrenek, P (2018). Dilution factor affects the ability of ram sperm to survive cryopreservation. Slovak J Anim Sci 51, 41–4.Google Scholar
Margaryan, H, Dorosh, A, Capkova, J, Manaskova-Postlerova, P, Philimonenko, A, Hozak, P and Peknicova, J (2015). Characterization and possible function of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-spermatogenic protein GAPDHS in mammalian sperm. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariotti, S, Pardini, M, Teloni, R, Gagliardi, MC, Fraziano, M and Nisini, R (2017). A method permissive to fixation and permeabilization for the multiparametric analysis of apoptotic and necrotic cell phenotype by flow cytometry. Cytometry Part A, 91, 1115–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Pastor, F, Mata-Campuzano, M, Álvarez-Rodríguez, M, Álvarez, M, Anel, L and De Paz, P (2010). Probes and techniques for sperm evaluation by flow cytometry. Reprod Domest Anim 45, 6778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melan, MA (1994). Overview of cell fixation and permeabilization. Methods Mol Biol 34, 55-66.Google ScholarPubMed
Mendoza, N, Casao, A, Pérez-Pé, R, Cebrián-Pérez, JA and Muiño-Blanco, T (2013). New insights into the mechanisms of ram sperm protection by seminal plasma proteins. Biol Reprod 88, 149–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazarewicz, RR, Bikineyeva, A and Dikalov, SI (2013). Rapid and specific measurements of superoxide using fluorescence spectroscopy. J Biomol Screen 18, 498503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortega Ferrusola, C, Anel-López, L, Ortiz-Rodriguez, JM, Martin Muñoz, P, Álvarez, M, De Paz, P, Masot, J, Redondo, E, Balao da Silva, C, Morrell, JM, Rodriguez Martinez, H, Tapai, JA, Gil, MC, Anel, L and Pena, FJ (2017). Stallion spermatozoa surviving freezing and thawing experience membrane depolarization and increased intracellular Na+ . Andrology 5, 1174–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peña, FJ, Ball, BA and Squires, EL (2018). A new method for evaluating stallion sperm viability and mitochondrial membrane potential in fixed semen samples. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 94, 302–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetto, SP, Chattopadhyay, PK, Lamoreaux, L, Nguyen, R, Ambrozak, D, Koup, RA and Roederer, M (2010). Amine-reactive dyes for dead cell discrimination in fixed samples. Curr Protoc Cytom Chapter 9, Unit-9.34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plenchette, S, Filomenko, R, Logette, E, Solier, S, Buron, N, Cathelin, S and Solary, E (2004). Analyzing markers of apoptosis in vitro. In Checkpoint Controls and Cancer, pp. 313–31. Humana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poot, M, Zhang, YZ, Krämer, JA, Wells, KS, Jones, LJ, Hanzel, DK, Lugade, AG, Singer, VL and Haugland, RP (1996). Analysis of mitochondrial morphology and function with novel fixable fluorescent stains. J Histochem Cytochem 44, 1363–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shankey, TV, Forman, M, Scibelli, P, Cobb, J, Smith, CM, Mills, R, Holdaway, K, Bernal-Hoyos, E, Van Der Heiden, M, Popma, J and Keeney, M (2006). An optimized whole blood method for flow cytometric measurement of ZAP-70 protein expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 70, 259–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svoradová, A, Kuželová, L, Vašíček, J and Chrenek, P (2017). Viability assessment of fresh chicken blastodermal cells by flow cytometry. Slovak J Anim Sci 50, 6972.Google Scholar
Svoradová, A, Kuželová, L, Vašíček, J, Olexíková, L, Baláži, A, Kulíková, B, Hrnčár, C, Ostro, A, Bednarczyk, M and Chrenek, P (2018). The assessment of cryopreservation on the quality of endangered oravka rooster spermatozoa using casa and cytometry. CryoLetters 39, 359–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Wlodkowic, D, Telford, W, Skommer, J and Darzynkiewicz, Z (2011). Apoptosis and beyond: cytometry in studies of programmed cell death. Methods Cell Biol 103, 5598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zielonka, J and Kalyanaraman, B (2010). Hydroethidine- and MitoSOX-derived red fluorescence is not a reliable indicator of intracellular superoxide formation: another inconvenient truth. Free Radical Biol Med 48, 9831001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Vašíček et al. supplementary material

Vašíček et al. supplementary material 1

Download Vašíček et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Vašíček et al. supplementary material

Vašíček et al. supplementary material 2

Download Vašíček et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.5 MB