Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T03:26:18.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sperm-derived factors enhance the in vitro developmental potential of haploid parthenotes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2017

Ramya Nair
Affiliation:
Clinical Embryology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal 576 104, Karnataka, India.
Shahin Aboobacker
Affiliation:
Clinical Embryology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal 576 104, Karnataka, India.
Srinivas Mutalik
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal 576 104, Karnataka, India.
Guruprasad Kalthur*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Embryology, Central Research Laboratory, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Satish Kumar Adiga
Affiliation:
Clinical Embryology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal 576 104, Karnataka, India.
*
All correspondence to: Guruprasad Kalthur. Department of Clinical Embryology, Central Research Laboratory, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India. E-mail: guru.kalthur@manipal.edu

Summary

Parthenotes are characterized by poor in vitro developmental potential either due to the ploidy status or the absence of paternal factors. In the present study, we demonstrate the beneficial role of sperm-derived factors (SDF) on the in vitro development of mouse parthenotes. Mature (MII) oocytes collected from superovulated Swiss albino mice were activated using strontium chloride (SrCl2) in the presence or absence of various concentrations of SDF in M16 medium. The presence of SDF in activation medium did not have any significant influence on the activation rate. However, a significant increase in the developmental potential of the embryos and increased blastocyst rate (P < 0.01) was observed at 50 µg/ml concentration. Furthermore, the activated oocytes from this group exhibited early cleavage and cortical distribution of cortical granules that was similar to that of normally fertilized zygotes. Culturing 2-cell stage parthenotes in the presence of SDF significantly improved the developmental potential (P < 0.05) indicating that they also play a significant role in embryo development. In conclusion, artificial activation of oocytes with SDF can improve the developmental potential of parthenotes in vitro.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A.L. & Ducibella, T. (2001). Calcium and the control of mammalian cortical granule exocytosis. Front. Biosci. 6, 792806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acton, B.M., Jurisicova, A., Jurisica, I. & Casper, R.F. (2004). Alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential during preimplantation stages of mouse and human embryo development. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 10, 2332.Google Scholar
Aarabi, M., Balakier, H., Bashar, S., Moskovtsev, S.I., Sutovsky, P., Librach, C.L. & Oko, R. (2014). Sperm-derived WW domain-binding protein, PAWP, elicits calcium oscillations and oocyte activation in humans and mice. FASEB J. 28, 4434–40.Google Scholar
Baker, M.A., Reeves, G., Hetherington, L. & Aitken, R.J. (2010). Analysis of proteomic changes associated with sperm capacitation through the combined use of IPG-strip pre-fractionation followed by RP chromatography LC-MS/MS analysis. Proteomics 10, 482–95.Google Scholar
Beatty, R.A. & Fischberg, M. (1951). Cell number in haploid, diploid and polyploid mouse embryos. J. Exp. Biol. 28, 541–52.Google Scholar
de Paola, M., Bello, O.D. & Michaut, M.A. (2015). Cortical granule exocytosis is mediated by alpha-SNAP and N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor in mouse oocytes. PLoS One 10, p.e0135679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domagała, A., Pulido, S., Kurpisz, M. & Herr, J.C. (2007). Application of proteomic methods for identification of sperm immunogenic antigens. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 13, 437–44.Google Scholar
Eid, L.N., Lorton, S.P. & Parrish, J.J. (1994). Paternal influence on S-phase in the first cell cycle of the bovine embryo. Biol. Reprod. 56, 1232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, P., Zeng, P., Wang, Z., Liu, M., Xu, W., Dai, J., Zhao, X., Zhang, D., Liang, D., Chen, X. & Shi, S. (2014). Estimated diversity of messenger RNAs in each murine spermatozoa and their potential function during early zygotic development. Biol. Reprod. 90, 94.Google Scholar
Fingar, D.C., Richardson, C.J., Tee, A.R., Cheatham, L., Tsou, C. & Blenis, J. (2004). mTOR controls cell cycle progression through its cell growth effectors S6K1 and 4E-BP1/eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 200–16.Google Scholar
Fulka, J., First, N.L., Fulka, J. & Moor, R.M. (1999). Checkpoint control of the G2/M phase transition during the first mitotic cycle in mammalian eggs. Hum. Reprod. 14, 1582–7.Google Scholar
Guo, X., Shen, J., Xia, Z., Zhang, R., Zhang, P., Zhao, C., Xing, J., Chen, L., Chen, W., Lin, M. & Huo, R. (2010). Proteomic analysis of proteins involved in spermiogenesis in mouse. J. Proteome Res. 9, 1246–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Y.M., Abeydeera, L.R., Kim, J.H., Moon, H.B., Cabot, R.A., Day, B.N. & Prather, R.S. (1999). Growth retardation of inner cell mass cells in polyspermic porcine embryos produced in vitro . Biol. Reprod. 60, 1110–3.Google Scholar
Hao, Y.H., Lai, L.X., Liu, Z.H., Im, G.S., Wax, D., Samuel, M., Murphy, C.N., Sutovsky, P. & Prather, R.S. (2006). Developmental competence of porcine parthenogenetic embryos relative to embryonic chromosomal abnormalities. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 73, 7782.Google Scholar
Henery, C.C. & Kaufman, M.H. (1992). Cleavage rate of haploid and diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos during the preimplantation period. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 31, 258–63.Google Scholar
Homa, S.T. & Swann, K. (1994). Fertilization and early embryology: A cytosolic sperm factor triggers calcium oscillations and membrane hyperpolarizations in human oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 9, 2356–61.Google Scholar
Horvath, P.M., Kellom, T., Caulfield, J. & Boldt, J. (1993). Mechanistic studies of the plasma membrane block to polyspermy in mouse eggs. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 34, 6572.Google Scholar
Isom, S.C., Whitworth, K.M. & Prather, R.S. (2012). Timing of first embryonic cleavage is a positive indicator of the in vitro developmental potential of porcine embryos-derived from in vitro fertilization, somatic cell nuclear transfer and parthenogenesis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 79,197207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janny, L. & Menezo, Y.J. (1994). Evidence for a strong paternal effect on human preimplantation embryo development and blastocyst formation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 38, 3642.Google Scholar
Jeong, Y.J., Cui, X.S., Kim, B.K., Kim, I.H., Kim, T., Chung, Y.B. & Kim, N.H. (2005). Haploidy influences Bak and Bcl-xL mRNA expression and increases incidence of apoptosis in porcine embryos. Zygote 13, 1721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalthur, G., Salian, S.R., Nair, R., Mathew, J., Adiga, S.K., Kalthur, S.G., Zeegers, D. & Hande, M.P. (2016). Distribution pattern of cytoplasmic organelles, spindle integrity, oxidative stress, octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4) expression and developmental potential of oocytes following multiple superovulation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 28, 2027–38.Google Scholar
Katayama, M., Zhong, Z., Lai, L., Sutovsky, P., Prather, R.S. & Schatten, H. (2006). Mitochondrial distribution and microtubule organization in fertilized and cloned porcine embryos: implications for developmental potential. Dev. Biol. 299, 206–20.Google Scholar
Kaufman, M.H. & Sachs, L. (1975). The early development of haploid and aneuploid parthenogenetic embryos. Development 34, 645–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiani, J. & Rassoulzadegan, M. (2013). A load of small RNAs in the sperm—how many bits of hereditary information? Cell. Res. 23, 18–9.Google Scholar
Kim, N.H., Day, B.N., Lee, H.T. & Chung, K.S. (1996). Microfilament assembly and cortical granule distribution during maturation, parthenogenetic activation and fertilisation in the porcine oocyte. Zygote 4, 145–9.Google Scholar
Kline, D. & Kline, J.T. (1992). Repetitive calcium transients and the role of calcium in exocytosis and cell cycle activation in the mouse egg. Dev. Biol. 149, 80–9.Google Scholar
Krawetz, S.A., Kruger, A., Lalancette, C., Tagett, R., Anton, E., Draghici, S. & Diamond, M.P. (2011). A survey of small RNAs in human sperm. Hum. Reprod. 26, 3401–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuretake, S., Kimura, Y., Hoshi, K. & Yanagimachi, R. (1996). Fertilization and development of mouse oocytes injected with isolated sperm heads. Biol. Reprod. 55, 789–95.Google Scholar
Li, L., Zheng, P. & Dean, J. (2010). Maternal control of early mouse development. Development 137, 859–70.Google Scholar
Liu, L., Trimarchi, J.R. & Keefe, D.L. (2002). Haploidy but not parthenogenetic activation leads to increased incidence of apoptosis in mouse embryos. Biol. Reprod. 66, 204–10.Google Scholar
Liu, W.M., Pang, R.T., Chiu, P.C., Wong, B.P., Lao, K., Lee, K.F. & Yeung, W.S. (2012). Sperm-borne microRNA-34c is required for the first cleavage division in mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 490–4.Google Scholar
Lomeo, A.M. & Giambersio, A.M. (1991). ‘Water-test’: a simple method to assess sperm-membrane integrity. Int. J. Androl. 14, 278–82.Google Scholar
Martínez-Heredia, J., Estanyol, J.M., Ballescà, J.L. & Oliva, R. (2006). Proteomic identification of human sperm proteins. Proteomics 6, 4356–69.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. & Solter, D. (1984). Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37, 179–83.Google Scholar
Nair, R., Singh, V.J., Salian, S.R., Kalthur, S.G., D'Souza, A.S., Shetty, P.K., Mutalik, S., Kalthur, G. & Adiga, S.K. (2014). Methyl parathion inhibits the nuclear maturation, decreases the cytoplasmic quality in oocytes and alters the developmental potential of embryos of Swiss albino mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 279, 338–50.Google Scholar
Newton, L.D., Kastelic, J.P., Wong, B., Van der Hoorn, F. & Thundathil, J. (2009). Elevated testicular temperature modulates expression patterns of sperm proteins in Holstein bulls. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 76, 109–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oko, R. & Sutovsky, P. (2009). Biogenesis of sperm perinuclear theca and its role in sperm functional competence and fertilization. J. Reprod. Immunol. 83, 27.Google Scholar
Palmieri, S.L., Peter, W., Hess, H. & Schöler, H.R. (1994). Oct-4 transcription factor is differentially expressed in the mouse embryo during establishment of the first two extraembryonic cell lineages involved in implantation. Dev. Biol. 166, 259–67.Google Scholar
Park, S.J., Komata, M., Inoue, F., Yamada, K., Nakai, K., Ohsugi, M. & Shirahige, K. (2013). Inferring the choreography of parental genomes during fertilization from ultralarge-scale whole-transcriptome analysis. Genes. Dev. 27, 2736–48.Google Scholar
Parrington, J., Swann, K., Shevchenko, V.I., Sesay, A.K. & Lai, F.A. (1996). Calcium oscillations in mammalian eggs triggered by a soluble sperm protein. Nature 379, 364–8.Google Scholar
Perry, A.C., Wakayama, T., Cooke, I.M. & Yanagimachi, R. (2000). Mammalian oocyte activation by the synergistic action of discrete sperm head components: induction of calcium transients and involvement of proteolysis. Dev. Biol. 217, 386–93.Google Scholar
Renard, J.P. & Babinet, C.H. (1986). Identification of a paternal developmental effect on the cytoplasm of one-cell-stage mouse embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 6883–6.Google Scholar
Rogers, N.T., Hobson, E., Pickering, S., Lai, F.A., Braude, P. & Swann, K. (2004). Phospholipase Cζ causes Ca2+ oscillations and parthenogenetic activation of human oocytes. Reproduction 128, 697702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadi, H.A.S., van Riemsdijk, E., Dance, A.L., Rajamanickam, G.D., Kastelic, J.P. & Thundathil, J.C. (2013). Proteins associated with critical sperm functions and sperm head shape are differentially expressed in morphologically abnormal bovine sperm induced by scrotal insulation. J. Proteomics 82, 6480.Google Scholar
Saunders, C.M., Larman, M.G., Parrington, J., Cox, L.J., Royse, J., Blayney, L.M., Swann, K. & Lai, F.A. (2002). PLCζ: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca2+ oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development 129, 3533–44.Google Scholar
Schabronath, J. & Gärtner, K. (1988). Paternal influence on timing of pronuclear DNA synthesis in naturally ovulated and fertilized mouse eggs. Biol. Reprod. 38, 744–9.Google Scholar
Schatten, H. & Sun, Q.Y. (2009). The role of centrosomes in mammalian fertilization and its significance for ICSI. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 15, 531–8.Google Scholar
Schatten, H., Sun, Q.Y. & Prather, R. (2014). The impact of mitochondrial function/dysfunction on IVF and new treatment possibilities for infertility. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 12, 1.Google Scholar
Secciani, F., Bianchi, L., Ermini, L., Cianti, R., Armini, A., La Sala, G.B., Focarelli, R., Bini, L. & Rosati, F. (2009). Protein profile of capacitated versus ejaculated human sperm. J. Proteome Res. 8, 3377–89.Google Scholar
Sendler, E., Johnson, G.D., Mao, S., Goodrich, R.J., Diamond, M.P., Hauser, R. & Krawetz, S.A. (2013). Stability, delivery and functions of human sperm RNAs at fertilization. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 4104–17.Google Scholar
Sette, C., Bevilacqua, A., Bianchini, A., Mangia, F., Geremia, R. & Rossi, P. (1997). Parthenogenetic activation of mouse eggs by microinjection of a truncated c-kit tyrosine kinase present in spermatozoa. Development 124, 2267–74.Google Scholar
Solter, D. (1988). Differential imprinting and expression of maternal and paternal genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 22, 127–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, K.K., Go, J.C., Lane, W.S., Primakoff, P. & Myles, D.G. (2006). Proteomic analysis of sperm regions that mediate sperm-egg interactions. Proteomics 6, 3533–43.Google Scholar
Surani, M.A.H., Barton, S.C. & Norris, M.L. (1984). Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 308, 548–50.Google Scholar
Swann, K.A.R.L. (1990). A cytosolic sperm factor stimulates repetitive calcium increases and mimics fertilization in hamster eggs. Development 110, 1295–302.Google Scholar
Swann, K., Larman, M.G., Saunders, C.M. & Lai, F.A. (2004). The cytosolic sperm factor that triggers Ca2+ oscillations and egg activation in mammals is a novel phospholipase C: PLCζ. Reproduction 127, 431–9.Google Scholar
Tang, T.S., Dong, J.B., Huang, X.Y. & Sun, F.Z. (2000). Ca (2+) oscillations induced by a cytosolic sperm protein factor are mediated by a maternal machinery that functions only once in mammalian eggs. Development 127, 1141–50.Google Scholar
Tatone, C., Van Eekelen, C.G. & Colonna, R. (1994). Plasma membrane block to sperm entry occurs in mouse eggs upon parthenogenetic activation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 38, 200–8.Google Scholar
Tesarik, J., Mendoza, C. & Greco, E. (2002). Paternal effects acting during the first cell cycle of human preimplantation development after ICSI. Hum. Reprod. 17, 184–9.Google Scholar
Wu, H., He, C.L. & Fissore, R.A. (1998). Injection of a porcine sperm factor induces activation of mouse eggs. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 49, 3747.Google Scholar
Wu, H., Smyth, J., Luzzi, V., Fukami, K., Takenawa, T., Black, S.L., Allbritton, N.L. & Fissore, R.A. (2001). Sperm factor induces intracellular free calcium oscillations by stimulating the phosphoinositide pathway. Biol. Reprod. 64, 1338–49.Google Scholar
Wu, A.T., Sutovsky, P., Manandhar, G., Xu, W., Katayama, M., Day, B.N., Park, K.W., Yi, Y.J., Xi, Y.W., Prather, R.S. & Oko, R. (2007). PAWP, a sperm-specific WW domain-binding protein, promotes meiotic resumption and pronuclear development during fertilization. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 12164–75.Google Scholar
Wu, G. & Schöler, H.R. 2014. Role of Oct4 in the early embryo development. Cell Regen. 3, 1.Google Scholar
Yoon, S.Y., Jellerette, T., Salicioni, A.M., Lee, H.C., Yoo, M.S., Coward, K., Parrington, J., Grow, D., Cibelli, J.B., Visconti, P.E., Mager, J. & Fissore, R.A. (2008). Human sperm devoid of PLC, zeta 1 fail to induce Ca2+ release and are unable to initiate the first step of embryo development. J Clin. Invest. 118, 3671–81.Google Scholar
Yoon, S.Y., Eum, J.H., Lee, J.E., Lee, H.C., Kim, Y.S., Han, J.E., Won, H.J., Park, S.H., Shim, S.H., Lee, W.S. & Fissore, R.A. (2012). Recombinant human phospholipase C zeta 1 induces intracellular calcium oscillations and oocyte activation in mouse and human oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 27, 1768–80.Google Scholar
Yu, Y., Saunders, C.M., Lai, F.A. & Swann, K. (2008). Preimplantation development of mouse oocytes activated by different levels of human phospholipase C zeta. Hum. Reprod. 23, 365–73.Google Scholar
Zuccotti, M., Merico, V., Bellone, M., Mulas, F., Sacchi, L., Rebuzzini, P., Prigione, A., Redi, C.A., Bellazzi, R., Adjaye, J. & Garagna, S. (2011). Gatekeeper of pluripotency: a common Oct4 transcriptional network operates in mouse eggs and embryonic stem cells. BMC Genomics 12, 345.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nair et al supplementary material

Table S1

Download Nair et al supplementary material(File)
File 73.6 KB