Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:16:35.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of fetal bovine serum on trophectoderm and primitive endoderm cell allocation of in vitro-produced bovine embryos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2022

Felipe Eduardo Luedke
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Caroline Pereira da Costa
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Camilla Mota Mendes
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Thais Rose dos Santos Hamilton
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Marcella Pecora Milazzotto
Affiliation:
Center for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil
Mayra E. O. A. Assumpção
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Marcelo Demarchi Goissis*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Marcelo Demarchi Goissis. Av. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Department of Animal Reproduction, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05508–270. E-mail: mdgoissis@usp.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Supplementing embryonic culture medium with fetal bovine serum (FBS) renders this medium undefined. Glucose and growth factors present in FBS may affect the results of cell differentiation studies. This study tested the hypothesis that FBS supplementation during in vitro culture (IVC) alters cell differentiation in early bovine embryo development. Bovine embryos were produced in vitro and randomly distributed into three experimental groups at 90 h post insemination (90 hpi): the KSOM-FBS group, which consisted of a 5% (v/v) FBS supplementation; the KSOM33 group, with the renewal of 33% of medium volume; and the KSOM-Zero group, without FBS supplementation nor renewal of the culture medium. The results showed that the blastocyst rate (blastocyst/oocytes) at 210 hpi in the KSOM-FBS group was higher than in the KSOM-Zero group but not different from the KSOM33 group. There were no significant changes in metabolism-related aspects, such as fluorescence intensities of CellROX Green and MitoTracker Red or reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD+). Immunofluorescence analysis of CDX2 revealed that the lack of FBS or medium supplementation reduced the number of trophectoderm (TE) cells and total cells. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed a reduction of SOX17-positive cell numbers after FBS supplementation compared with the KSOM33 group. Therefore, we concluded that FBS absence reduced blastocyst rates; however, no reduction occurred when there was a 33% volume renewal of the medium at 90 hpi. We also concluded that FBS supplementation altered TE and primitive endoderm cell allocation during early bovine embryo development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Recent data presented by the IETS reveal that more than 700,000 in vitro-produced (IVP) embryos are transferred worldwide yearly. The combination of IVP with genomic selection and sexed semen has proven to be successful in the commercial field in several countries, helping professionals and cattle producers to improve the reproductive performance, efficiency, and genetic gain of their herds (Ferré et al., Reference Ferré, Kjelland, Taiyeb, Campos-Chillon and Ross2020).

However, only 40–50% of matured and in vitro fertilized oocytes reach the blastocyst stage (Rizos et al., Reference Rizos, Fair, Papadopoulos, Boland and Lonergan2002), and the pregnancy rate may be lower than that of in vivo-produced embryos (de Sousa et al., Reference de Sousa, da Silva Cardoso, Butzke, Dode, Rumpf and Franco2017). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) supplementation effectively maintains and develops bovine embryos (Saeki et al., Reference Saeki, Hoshi, Leibfried-Rutledge and First1991; Gordon Reference Gordon2003). However, it is linked to deleterious embryonic effects (Farin et al., Reference Farin, Farin and Piedrahita2004), such as alterations in compaction and blastulation, increased incidence of stillbirths and mortality after birth (Abe et al., Reference Abe, Yamashita, Itoh, Satoh and Hoshi1999), increased incidence of large offspring syndrome (Jacobsen et al., Reference Jacobsen, Schmidt, Holm, Sangild, Vajta, Greve and Callesen2000; van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw et al., Reference van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw, Mullaart, de Roos, Merton, den Daas, Kemp and de Ruigh2000; Farin et al., Reference Farin, Farin and Piedrahita2004), low repeatability due to variations between FBS batches (Stringfellow et al., Reference Stringfellow, Givens and Waldrop2004), and lower recovery rates of cryopreserved embryos after thawing (Gómez et al., Reference Gómez, Rodríguez, Muñoz, Caamaño, Hidalgo, Morán, Facal and Díez2008).

In vitro culture of zygotes without adding FBS resulted in slower developing embryos. Compared with calves derived from IVP with FBS, these embryos yielded higher quality morulae that resulted in calves presenting significantly lower birth weight and a significantly easier parturition process (van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw et al., Reference van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw, Mullaart, de Roos, Merton, den Daas, Kemp and de Ruigh2000). These studies led to the search for alternatives to replace FBS with compounds that do not negatively interfere with embryonic quality (Mesalam et al., Reference Mesalam, Kong, Khan, Chowdhury, Choi, Kim, Cho, Jin and Kong2017). Different culture media influence the metabolism and production of blastocysts (Krisher et al., Reference Krisher, Lane and Bavister1999), and FBS contains glucose, which is a limiting growth factor when in low concentrations; however, it is already added to culture media of different species of mammals (Barnett and Bavister, Reference Barnett and Bavister1996).

Early stages of development require low glucose levels for intracellular signalling purposes as glucose metabolism is reduced, (Martin and Leese, Reference Martin and Leese1995), but glucose consumption increases in the morula and blastocyst stages (Thompson, Reference Thompson2000). The embryo changes from a relatively metabolic-inactive cell at ovulation to an active metabolic cell at the blastocyst stage (Leese, Reference Leese2012)

Two distinct cell lines constitute the blastocyst, in which approximately two-thirds of the cells comprise the trophectoderm (TE), and the remainder comprises the inner cell mass (ICM). The ICM results in the embryo itself, whereas the TE cells will give rise to extraembryonic lineages, including the placenta (Frankenberg et al., Reference Frankenberg, de Barros, Rossant and Renfree2016). Diminished TE cell numbers can lead to insufficient placentation and, consequently, to embryonic losses (Koo et al., Reference Koo, Kang, Choi, Park, Kim, Oh, Son, Park, Lee and Han2002).

In murine blastocysts, the TE cells are more metabolically active than ICM cells concerning oxygen consumption, lactate, and ATP production (Houghton Reference Houghton2006). In contrast, cattle cells isolated from TE consumed higher levels of pyruvate and produced lactate, whereas cells isolated from the ICM consumed more glucose (Gopichandran and Leese, Reference Gopichandran and Leese2003). It has been recently shown that glucose plays a decisive role in specifying the trophectoderm in murine embryos through the activation of Cdx2 during the transition from morula to blastocyst (Chi et al., Reference Chi, Sharpley, Nagaraj, Roy and Banerjee2020). Also, it is known that fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF4) is the crucial specification signal during the second cell differentiation between primitive endoderm (PE) and the epiblast (EPI) in the murine blastocyst (Yamanaka et al., Reference Yamanaka, Lanner and Rossant2010; Frankenberg et al., Reference Frankenberg, Gerbe, Bessonnard, Belville, Pouchin, Bardot and Chazaud2011; Kang et al., Reference Kang, Piliszek, Artus and Hadjantonakis2013; Saiz et al., Reference Saiz, Williams, Seshan and Hadjantonakis2016b). As FBS is not a defined supplement, it may contain growth factors such as FGF (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Baker, Hancock, Fawaz, McCaman and Pungor2006), acting in the differentiation of PE.

Therefore, FBS could cause distortions and biased results in studies on early cell differentiation. To verify the impacts of FBS on cell differentiation during the development of bovine embryos, we hypothesized that FBS supplementation during in vitro culture interferes with cell differentiation in early bovine embryo development, increasing the number of TE and PE cells. Therefore, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of FBS on embryonic development in vitro by assessing rates, metabolic aspects that may influence cell differentiation, and the number of cells of bovine blastocysts, using specific markers of cell lineages.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the Animal Use Ethics Council of the College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science of the University of São Paulo, under protocol no. 7375181217.

In vitro maturation and fertilization

Cumulus–oophorus complexes (COCs) were obtained from ovaries at a commercial slaughterhouse. Grade I oocytes were selected based on the number of surrounding cells and cytoplasmic homogeneity. COCs were washed in HECM–HEPES (HH) medium (Bavister et al., Reference Bavister, Leibfried and Lieberman1983) followed by in vitro maturation (IVM) in 199 medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) that was supplemented with 10% FBS; Gibco), 22 μg/ml sodium pyruvate, 50 μg/ml gentamicin, 0.5 μg/ml FSH Folltropin-V (Vetrepharm, Inc. Belleville, ON, Canada), 50 μg/ml hCG (Vetecor Laboratories, Callier, Spain) and 1 μg/ml of estradiol. The COCs were placed in drops of 90 μl IVM medium that were kept under filtered mineral oil for 22 h at 38.5°C, in 5% CO2 and high humidity. After maturation, COCs were washed in HH and transferred to 90 μl drops of IVF medium (Fert-TALP; Parrish et al., Reference Parrish, Susko-Parrish, Winer and First1988) containing 20 μg/ml of heparin under oil. Fertilization was performed using frozen–thawed sperm, and live cells were sorted using a 90/45% Percoll gradient (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) after centrifugation at 6600 g for 5 min. The sperm pellet formed at the bottom of the tube was then washed in IVF medium by centrifugation at 1100 g for 3 min. Before insemination, sperm motility was evaluated using optical microscopy, and sperm concentration was assessed using a haematocytometer. The concentration was adjusted to obtain a final concentration of 1 × 106 sperm per ml in the IVF droplets. The droplets were inseminated, and the gametes were co-incubated for 18 h at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 and high humidity. Sperm straws from the same bull and batch were used throughout the experiment.

In vitro embryo culture

After 18 h of IVF, the presumptive zygotes were removed from the IVF plate, washed in HH medium, vortexed for 3 min to remove excess cumulus cells, and randomly distributed in groups of 20 into 90 μl drops of KSOM (Behringer et al., Reference Behringer, Gertsenstein, Vintersten and Nagy2003) culture medium. KSOM was supplemented with 3 mg/ml of bovine serum albumin (BSA), 1× MEM essential amino acids and 1× MEM non-essential amino acids, and 2.5 μg/ml of gentamicin. Embryos were cultured in an incubator at 38.5°C, with 5% CO2, 5% O2, and high humidity.

Treatments to test FBS influence on embryo cell allocation

Embryos were allocated to the three experimental groups at 90 h post insemination (90 hpi): the KSOM-FBS group was supplemented with 5 µl of FBS (ThermoFisher). In the KSOM33 group, 33% of the medium volume was removed and replaced with fresh medium. Group KSOM-Zero received no treatment during all IVC. Embryos were collected at 186 hpi for trophectoderm cell staining or 210 hpi for all other analyses, including blastocyst rates (blastocysts/inseminated oocytes) and embryonic development (blastocysts/cleaved embryos).

Analyses of metabolic characteristics of embryos

At 210 hpi, embryos were harvested to evaluate intracellular oxidative status using the fluorescent probe CellRox (ThermoFisher), and the mitochondrial membrane potential was observed using MitoTracker Red (ThermoFisher). Blastocysts were stained with 2.5 mM CellROX Green (ThermoFisher) and 1 mM MitoTracker Red (ThermoFisher) for 30 min in KSOM medium in an incubator at 38.5°C 5% CO2, 5% O2, and high humidity (n = 8 blastocysts per group). Blastocysts were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and visualized under an epifluorescence microscope.

The activities of the oxidizing agents nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD+) were measured as previously described (Dumollard et al., Reference Dumollard, Ward, Carroll and Duchen2007; Santos et al., Reference Santos, Fonseca Junior, Lima, Ispada, Silva and Milazzotto2021). Briefly, embryos were imaged individually within the culture drops under an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus IX-81, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) using a long-distance ×20 objective. For NADH autofluorescence measurement, we used a 360–385 nm excitation and 420 nm emission filter (UMWU2 filter cube), and for FAD+ autofluorescence measurement, we used 460–490 nm excitation and 520 emission filter (UMWB2 filter cube). Images were obtained with CellSens Dimension software (Olympus Corporation) using the Z-stack function, obtaining images every 10 μm. Fluorescence intensity was measured using ImageJ software (NIH) on maximum intensity projection images generated by CellSens Dimension. Fluorescence intensity was corrected by a two-step approach in which we subtracted the average of two background values and adjusted the fluorescence decay along the Z-axis, as described previously (Saiz et al., Reference Saiz, Kang, Schrode, Lou and Hadjantonakis2016a).

Immunofluorescence and cell counting

Immunofluorescence protocols were performed on embryos from the different groups to verify whether FBS altered cell allocation. Embryos had their zona pellucida removed by incubation in 0.5% protease in PBS (w/v) for 2 min, and they were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, followed by three washes in phosphate-buffered saline solution with 1 mg/ml polyvinylpyrrolidone (PBS–PVP) and stored at 4°C until use.

Embryos were permeabilized using 0.5% Triton X-100 solution in PBS–PVP for 15 min and then placed for 1 h at room temperature in blocking solution containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 1% BSA, and 10% fetal donkey serum in PBS–PVP. Incubation with the primary antibody occurred under gentle agitation at 4°C for 16 h. The primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-Cdx2 (1:50, ab88129, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and goat anti-SOX17 (1:100, AF1924, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA) diluted in a solution of 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA in PBS/PVP. Embryos were then washed three times for 15 min in a washing solution (WS) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS–PVP and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in the dark with secondary donkey anti-rabbit antibody NL493 (1:200, NL006, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or NL557 anti-goat donkey (1:200, NL001, R&D Systems) diluted in a solution of 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA in PBS/PVP. After this incubation with the secondary antibody, embryos were washed in WS three times for 15 min in the dark, incubated with Hoechst 33342 stain for 10 min, and mounted on slides. Embryos were then analyzed with a fluorescence microscope, and the images were obtained with CellSens Dimension software (Olympus Corporation). Using the same software, we counted trophectoderm cells labelled with anti-Cdx2 antibody, PE cells labelled with anti-SOX17 antibody, and total cells labelled with Hoechst.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), considering replicate as a random variable, treatment as an independent variable, and rates, fluorescence intensity, and cell number as dependent variables using PROC GLM from SAS 9.4. Normality of data and homogeneity of variances were tested using PROC UNIVARIATE and Guided Data Analysis of SAS. Data were transformed when necessary and back-transformed for presentation. A comparison of means was performed using Tukey’s test. The level of significance was set to 0.05. We performed a power analysis using PROC POWER of SAS for each of the dependent variables, and the results varied from 0.845 to 0.999, indicating that the experimental numbers were adequate for these experiments.

Results

Analysis of blastocyst formation and development rates

Among the three groups, the KSOM-FBS group [33.61 ± 2.85%; mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), 134/390] had the highest rate of blastocyst formation (n = 8 replicates) but did not differ statistically (P = 0.85) from the KSOM33 group (31.48 ± 2.85%, 130/460). Results showed that the blastocyst rate in the KSOM-FBS group was higher (P =0.02) than in the KSOM-Zero group (21.57 ± 2.85%, 96/413), which did not differ statistically (P = 0.06) from the KSOM33 group (Figure 1A).

Figure 1. Results from in vitro embryo production in the three experimental groups. (A) Blastocyst rate (blastocysts/oocytes). P-values of mean comparisons are shown within the graph. (B) Development rate (blastocysts/cleaved embryos). Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 8 replicates.

Development rate (n = 8 replicates) was not different when KSOM-FBS (40.79 ± 3.94%, 134/316, P = 0.07) and KSOM33 (39.93 ± 3.94%, 130/370, P = 0.09) groups were compared with the KSOM-Zero group (27.45 ± 3.94%, 96/323). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference between the KSOM-FBS group and the KSOM33 group (P = 0.98; Figure 1B).

Analysis of metabolic activity

There was no significant difference in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and there was also no statistical difference concerning the mitochondrial activity of the analyzed embryos from the different groups (n = 11–16 embryos per group), as verified with the CellROX Green and MitoTracker Red fluorescence intensities respectively (Figure 2A).

Figure 2. Quantitative image analysis of energy metabolism in the three experimental groups. (A) Measurement of mitochondrial activity using CellROX or MitoTracker. n = 16, 11 and 13 for KSOM-FBS, KSOM33 and KSOM-Zero groups, respectively. (B) Measurement of coenzymes NADH and FAD+ through autofluorescence. n = 8, 12 and 13 for KSOM-FBS, KSOM33 and KSOM-Zero groups, respectively. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

The results also did not show statistical differences in cellular energy production in the three groups (n = 8–13 embryos per group), demonstrated by the absence of statistical difference in autofluorescence for NADH and FAD+ (Figure 2B).

Differential cell count

We collected embryos at 186 hpi and stained for CDX2 (Figure 3A) to determine TE, ICM, and total cell numbers (n = 8–13 embryos per group). KSOM-FBS and KSOM33 groups presented a higher number of TE cells and total cell number than the KSOM-Zero group (Table 1). No differences in the number of ICM cells or the ratio of TE/total cells were observed (Table 1).

Figure 3. Immunofluorescence of blastocysts from the three experimental groups. (A) Representative images of embryos stained for CDX2 (green). Nuclei are stained with Hoechst (blue). (B) Representative images of embryos stained for SOX17 (red). Nuclei are stained with Hoechst (blue). Scale bar equals 100 µm.

Table 1. Cell count of CDX2-positive cells (TE), CDX2-negative cells (ICM), total cells after immunostaining of 186 hpi blastocysts. Different superscript letters within columns indicate significant statistical difference (P < 0.05). n = 13, 10 and 8 for KSOM-FBS, KSOM33 and KSOM-Zero groups respectively. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)

Next, we analyzed PE differentiation through SOX17 immunostaining (n = 16–21 embryos per group) in 210 hpi blastocysts (Figure 3B). Surprisingly, the KSOM33 group presented more SOX17-positive cells than the KSOM-FBS group, whereas the KSOM-Zero group was not different from other groups. No differences were observed regarding the number of total cells or the ratio between SOX17-positive cells and total cells (Table 2).

Table 2. Cell count of SOX17-positive and total cells after immunostaining of 210 hpi blastocysts. Different superscript letters within columns indicate significant statistical difference (P < 0.05). n = 16, 17 and 21 for KSOM-FBS, KSOM33 and KSOM-Zero groups respectively. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)

Discussion

The first objective of this study was to verify whether the absence of FBS during embryo culture would reduce blastocyst and development rates in our conditions. This study’s second and foremost objective was to evaluate whether FBS supplemented into embryo culture medium would have consequences on cell differentiation due to alterations in energy metabolism or the presence of growth factors present in the serum.

Three experimental groups were defined: 5% supplementation (v/v) with FBS (KSOM-FBS group), removal and refreshment of 33% of the medium volume (KSOM33), or without any supplementation (KSOM-Zero) at 90 hpi. The values observed for blastocyst rate showed that the absence of FBS reduced the blastocyst and development rates; however, this was not observed when there was a 33% renewal of the medium at 90 hpi. Half-renewal of culture medium reduced ROS and improved blastocyst formation during rabbit embryos in vitro culture (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Cao, Hu, Zhou, Wang, Alam, Qu and Liu2022). In addition, the renewal of medium can remove amino acid degradation products such as ammonium, which can impair embryo development (Gardner and Lane, Reference Gardner and Lane1993). Similar to our results, embryos cultured in synthetic oviduct fluid (SOF) in the absence of FBS presented reduced blastocyst formation (Van Langendonckt et al., Reference Van Langendonckt, Donnay, Schuurbiers, Auquier, Carolan, Massip and Dessy1997).

Cell count results showed that supplementation with FBS or medium renewal at 90 hpi increased the total number of cells compared with lack of supplementation. Corroborating our findings, a more significant amount of total cells was found in D7 blastocysts cultured with serum or BSA compared with non-supplemented medium (Lazzari et al., Reference Lazzari, Wrenzycki, Herrmann, Duchi, Kruip, Niemann and Galli2002). The increased total cell number in these groups could be related to an amplified activity of the pentose phosphate pathway, which generates ribose for DNA synthesis, which led to an increase in TE cell number within these same groups.

The increased proliferation of these cells could be due to the renewal of amino acids in the medium. Supplementation with essential and non-essential amino acids increased the numbers of total cells, ICM cells, and TE cells compared with supplementation with fewer amino acids during bovine embryo culture (Steeves and Gardner, Reference Steeves and Gardner1999; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Fukui, Lee, Lim and Hwang2004). In addition, it was shown that glucose and amino acids enhance the proliferation of porcine and ovine trophoblasts in vitro through activation of the mTOR pathway (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Burghardt, Wu, Johnson, Spencer and Bazer2011, Reference Kim, Song, Wu and Bazer2012), which was shown to be activated by glucose in mouse embryos (Chi et al., Reference Chi, Sharpley, Nagaraj, Roy and Banerjee2020).

Interestingly, even though TE cells were increased and the number of ICM cells was not statistically different, the ratio of TE:Total cells was not different, similar to that observed in a recent study that compared sequential medium with reduced concentrations of glucose and amino acids (Santos et al., Reference Santos, Fonseca Junior, Lima, Ispada, Silva and Milazzotto2021). Interestingly, in this referred study, medium that reduced 50% of nutrient concentration increased total and TE cells. Conversely, when all nutrients were reduced to 25%, the total, TE and ICM cell counts were diminished (Herrick et al., Reference Herrick, Rajput, Pasquariello, Ermisch, Santiquet, Schoolcraft and Krisher2020).

Contrary to our hypothesis, FBS supplementation decreased the number of PE cells, as observed by SOX17 staining, compared with KSOM replacement. In the mouse, FGF4 signalling through the ERK pathway is responsible for PE specification (Yamanaka et al., Reference Yamanaka, Lanner and Rossant2010; Kang et al., Reference Kang, Piliszek, Artus and Hadjantonakis2013), and similar results were observed in bovine embryos (Kuijk et al., Reference Kuijk, van Tol, van de Velde, Wubbolts, Welling, Geijsen and Roelen2012; Canizo et al., Reference Canizo, Ynsaurralde Rivolta, Vazquez Echegaray, Suvá, Alberio, Aller, Guberman, Salamone, Alberio and Alberio2019). FGF4 requires endogenous heparan sulfate for proper signalling (Lanner et al., Reference Lanner, Lee, Sohl, Holmborn, Yang, Wilbertz, Poellinger, Rossant and Farnebo2010), and heparin is often supplemented with FGF4 in exogenous treatments (Yamanaka et al., Reference Yamanaka, Lanner and Rossant2010; Kang et al., Reference Kang, Piliszek, Artus and Hadjantonakis2013). Therefore, if an excess of FGF was present after FBS supplementation, the lack of an excess of heparan sulfate or heparin might not have led to proper FGF4 signalling. However, as the serum is an undefined component, there could be several other possibilities to justify the decrease in SOX17-positive cells after FBS treatment; for example, the ERK pathway is inhibited by protein kinase B (Galetic et al., Reference Galetic, Maira, Andjelkovic and Hemmings2003), which can be activated by insulin or IGF signalling (Navarrete Santos et al., Reference Navarrete Santos, Ramin, Tonack and Fischer2008).

In conclusion, the results of this study confirm that it is possible to produce bovine blastocysts using KSOM medium without the use of FBS, as long as the replacement of 33% of the volume of the culture medium is performed at 90 hpi. It was also observed that the supplementation of FBS did not change the studied metabolic variables, but that the total and TE cell numbers were reduced when no supplementation with FBS or medium was added at 90 hpi, and FBS decreased PE cell number. In conclusion, FBS did not increase the number of TE or PE cells as hypothesized, but an absence of embryo feeding at 90 hpi negatively influenced the number of total cells or cells allocated to the TE.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP; grant 2017/09576–3). FAPESP provided additional financial support to FEL (2019/03014–9), CPC (2018/18924–8) and MDG (2017/25574–0). The authors would like to thank all members of the Laboratory of In Vitro Fertilization, Cloning, and Animal Transgenesis for technical support during the execution of this study.

Author contribution

Felipe Eduardo Luedke: Investigation, Writing – Original Draft, Visualization Caroline Pereira da Costa: Investigation. Camilla Mota Mendes: Investigation, Writing – Review and Editing. Thais Rose dos Santos Hamilton: Investigation, Formal analysis. Marcella Pecora Milazzotto: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – Review and Editing, Mayra E.O.A. Assumpção: Resources, Writing – Review and Editing. Marcelo Demarchi Goissis: Conceptualization, Visualization, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition, Writing – Review and Editing.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

Abe, H., Yamashita, S., Itoh, T., Satoh, T. and Hoshi, H. (1999). Ultrastructure of bovine embryos developed from in vitro-matured and -fertilized oocytes: Comparative morphological evaluation of embryos cultured either in serum-free medium or in serum-supplemented medium. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 53(3), 325335. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199907)53:3<325::AID-MRD8>3.0.CO;2-T 3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, D. K. and Bavister, B. D. (1996). What is the relationship between the metabolism of preimplantation embryos and their developmental competence? Molecular Reproduction and Development, 43(1), 105133. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199601)43:1<105::AID-MRD13>3.0.CO;2-4 3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavister, B. D., Leibfried, M. L. and Lieberman, G. (1983). Development of preimplantation embryos of the golden hamster in a defined culture medium. Biology of Reproduction, 28(1), 235247. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod28.1.235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behringer, R., Gertsenstein, M., Vintersten, K. and Nagy, A. (2003). Manipulating the Mouse Embryo – A Laboratory Manual. Third Edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Canizo, J. R., Ynsaurralde Rivolta, A. E., Vazquez Echegaray, C., Suvá, M., Alberio, V., Aller, J. F., Guberman, A. S., Salamone, D. F., Alberio, R. H. and Alberio, R. (2019). A dose-dependent response to MEK inhibition determines hypoblast fate in bovine embryos. BMC Developmental Biology, 19(1), 13. doi: 10.1186/s12861-019-0193-9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, F., Sharpley, M. S., Nagaraj, R., Roy, S. S., and Banerjee, U. (2020). Glycolysis-independent glucose metabolism distinguishes TE from ICM fate during mammalian embryogenesis. Developmental Cell, 53(1), 926.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.02.015 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Sousa, R. V., da Silva Cardoso, C. R., Butzke, G., Dode, M. A. N., Rumpf, R. and Franco, M. M. (2017). Biopsy of bovine embryos produced in vivo and in vitro does not affect pregnancy rates. Theriogenology, 90, 2531. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumollard, R., Ward, Z., Carroll, J. and Duchen, M. R. (2007). Regulation of redox metabolism in the mouse oocyte and embryo. Development, 134(3) (March), 455465. doi: 10.1242/dev.02744 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farin, C. E., Farin, P. W. and Piedrahita, J. A. (2004). Development of fetuses from in vitro-produced and cloned bovine embryos. Journal of Animal Science, 82(E Suppl), E53E62. doi: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE53x Google ScholarPubMed
Ferré, L. B., Kjelland, M. E., Taiyeb, A. M., Campos-Chillon, F. and Ross, P. J. (2020). Recent progress in bovine in vitro-derived embryo cryotolerance: Impact of in vitro culture systems, advances in cryopreservation and future considerations. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 55(6), 659676. doi: 10.1111/rda.13667 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankenberg, S., Gerbe, F., Bessonnard, S., Belville, C., Pouchin, P., Bardot, O. and Chazaud, C. (2011). Primitive endoderm differentiates via a three-step mechanism involving Nanog and RTK signaling. Developmental Cell, 21(6), 10051013. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenberg, S. R., de Barros, F. R. O., Rossant, J. and Renfree, M. B. (2016). The mammalian blastocyst. Developmental Biology, 5(2), 210232. doi: 10.1002/wdev.220 Google ScholarPubMed
Galetic, I., Maira, S. M., Andjelkovic, M. and Hemmings, B. A. (2003). Negative regulation of ERK and Elk by protein kinase B modulates c-fos transcription. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(7), 44164423. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210578200 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, D. K. and Lane, M. (1993). Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture. Biology of Reproduction, 48(2), 377385. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod48.2.377 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez, E., Rodríguez, A., Muñoz, M., Caamaño, J. N., Hidalgo, C. O., Morán, E., Facal, N. and Díez, C. (2008). Serum free embryo culture medium improves in vitro survival of bovine blastocysts to vitrification. Theriogenology, 69(8), 10131021. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.12.015 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopichandran, N. and Leese, H. J. (2003). Metabolic characterization of the bovine blastocyst, inner cell mass, trophectoderm and blastocoel fluid. Reproduction, 126(3), 299308. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1260299 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, I. (2003). Laboratory production of cattle embryos. CABI Publishing. Available online: doi: 10.1079/9780851996660.0000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrick, J. R., Rajput, S., Pasquariello, R., Ermisch, A., Santiquet, N., Schoolcraft, W. B. and Krisher, R. L. (2020). Developmental and molecular response of bovine embryos to reduced nutrients in vitro . Reproduction and Fertility, 1(1), 5165. doi: 10.1530/RAF-20-0033 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houghton, F. D. (2006). Energy metabolism of the inner cell mass and trophectoderm of the mouse blastocyst. Differentiation; Research in Biological Diversity, 74(1), 1118. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00052.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobsen, H., Schmidt, M., Holm, P., Sangild, P. T., Vajta, G., Greve, T. and Callesen, H. (2000). Body dimensions and birth and organ weights of calves derived from in vitro produced embryos cultured with or without serum and oviduct epithelium cells. Theriogenology, 53(9), 17611769. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00312-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, M., Piliszek, A., Artus, J. and Hadjantonakis, A. K. (2013). FGF4 is required for lineage restriction and salt-and-pepper distribution of primitive endoderm factors but not their initial expression in the mouse. Development, 140(2), 267279. doi: 10.1242/dev.084996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. Y., Burghardt, R. C., Wu, G., Johnson, G. A., Spencer, T. E. and Bazer, F. W. (2011). Select nutrients in the ovine uterine lumen. VII. Effects of arginine, leucine, glutamine, and glucose on trophectoderm cell signaling, proliferation, and migration. Biology of Reproduction, 84(1), 6269. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085738 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J., Song, G., Wu, G. and Bazer, F. W. (2012). Functional roles of fructose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(25), E1619E1628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204298109 Google ScholarPubMed
Koo, D. B., Kang, Y. K., Choi, Y. H., Park, J. S., Kim, H. N., Oh, K. B., Son, D. S., Park, H., Lee, K. K. and Han, Y. M. (2002). Aberrant allocations of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells in bovine nuclear transfer blastocysts. Biology of Reproduction, 67(2), 487492. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod67.2.487 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krisher, R. L., Lane, M. and Bavister, B. D. (1999). Developmental competence and metabolism of bovine embryos cultured in semi-defined and defined culture media. Biology of Reproduction, 60(6), 13451352. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod60.6.1345 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuijk, E. W., van Tol, L. T. A., van de Velde, H., Wubbolts, R., Welling, M., Geijsen, N. and Roelen, B. A. J. (2012). The roles of FGF and MAP kinase signaling in the segregation of the epiblast and hypoblast cell lineages in bovine and human embryos. Development, 139(5), 871882. doi: 10.1242/dev.071688 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanner, F., Lee, K. L., Sohl, M., Holmborn, K., Yang, H., Wilbertz, J., Poellinger, L., Rossant, J. and Farnebo, F. (2010). Heparan sulfation-dependent fibroblast growth factor signaling maintains embryonic stem cells primed for differentiation in a heterogeneous state. Stem Cells, 28(2), 191200. doi: 10.1002/stem.265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazzari, G., Wrenzycki, C., Herrmann, D., Duchi, R., Kruip, T., Niemann, H. and Galli, C. (2002). Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biology of Reproduction, 67(3), 767775. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.004481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, E. S., Fukui, Y., Lee, B. C., Lim, J. M. and Hwang, W. S. (2004). Promoting effect of amino acids added to a chemically defined medium on blastocyst formation and blastomere proliferation of bovine embryos cultured in vitro . Animal Reproduction Science, 84(3–4), 257267. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.02.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leese, H. J. (2012). Metabolism of the preimplantation embryo: 40 years on. Reproduction, 143(4), 417427. doi: 10.1530/REP-11-0484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K. L. and Leese, H. J. (1995). Role of glucose in mouse preimplantation embryo development. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 40(4), 436443. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080400407 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesalam, A., Kong, R., Khan, I., Chowdhury, M., Choi, B. H., Kim, S. W., Cho, K. W., Jin, J. I. and Kong, I. K. (2017). Effect of charcoal:dextran stripped fetal bovine serum on in vitro development of bovine embryos. Reproductive Biology, 17(4), 312319. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2017.09.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navarrete Santos, A., Ramin, N., Tonack, S. and Fischer, B. (2008). Cell lineage-specific signaling of insulin and insulin-like growth factor I in rabbit blastocysts. Endocrinology, 149(2), 515524. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0821 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrish, J. J., Susko-Parrish, J., Winer, M. A. and First, N. L. (1988). Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biology of Reproduction, 38(5), 11711180. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod38.5.1171 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizos, D., Fair, T., Papadopoulos, S., Boland, M. P. and Lonergan, P. (2002). Developmental, qualitative, and ultrastructural differences between ovine and bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro . Molecular Reproduction and Development, 62(3), 320327. doi: 10.1002/mrd.10138 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saeki, K., Hoshi, M., Leibfried-Rutledge, M. L. and First, N. L. (1991). In vitro fertilization and development of bovine oocytes matured in serum-free medium. Biology of Reproduction, 44(2), 256260. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod44.2.256 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saiz, N., Kang, M., Schrode, N., Lou, X. and Hadjantonakis, A. K. (2016a). Quantitative analysis of protein expression to study lineage specification in mouse preimplantation embryos. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, 108(108), 53654. doi: 10.3791/53654 Google Scholar
Saiz, N., Williams, K. M., Seshan, V. E. and Hadjantonakis, A. K. (2016b). Asynchronous fate decisions by single cells collectively ensure consistent lineage composition in the mouse blastocyst. Nature Communications, 7, 13463. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13463 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, É., Fonseca Junior, A., Lima, C. B., Ispada, J., Silva, J. and Milazzotto, M. P. (2021) Less is more: Reduced nutrient concentration during in vitro culture improves embryo production rates and morphophysiology of bovine embryos. Theriogenology, 173, 3747. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.07.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steeves, T. E. and Gardner, D. K. (1999). Temporal and differential effects of amino acids on bovine embryo development in culture. Biology of Reproduction, 61(3), 731740. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.3.731 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stringfellow, D. A., Givens, M. D. and Waldrop, J. G. (2004). Biosecurity issues associated with current and emerging embryo technologies. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 16(1–2), 93102. doi: 10.10371/RD03082 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J. G. (2000). In vitro culture and embryo metabolism of cattle and sheep embryos — A decade of achievement. Animal Reproduction Science, 60–61, 263275. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00096-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Langendonckt, A., Donnay, I., Schuurbiers, N., Auquier, P., Carolan, C., Massip, A. and Dessy, F. (1997). Effects of supplementation with fetal calf serum on development of bovine embryos in synthetic oviduct fluid medium. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 109(1), 8793. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1090087 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw, A. M., Mullaart, E., de Roos, A. P. W., Merton, J. S., den Daas, J. H., Kemp, B. and de Ruigh, L. (2000). Effects of different reproduction techniques: AI MOET or IVP, on health and welfare of bovine offspring. Theriogenology, 53(2), 575597. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(99)00259-9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, H., Cao, W., Hu, H., Zhou, C., Wang, Z., Alam, N., Qu, P. and Liu, E. (2022). Effects of changing culture medium on preimplantation embryo development in rabbit. Zygote, 30(3), 338343. doi: 10.1017/S0967199421000721 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamanaka, Y., Lanner, F. and Rossant, J. (2010). FGF signal-dependent segregation of primitive endoderm and epiblast in the mouse blastocyst. Development, 137(5), 715724. doi: 10.1242/dev.043471 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, X., Baker, H., Hancock, W. S., Fawaz, F., McCaman, M. and Pungor, E. (2006). Proteomic analysis for the assessment of different lots of fetal bovine serum as a raw material for cell culture. Part IV. Application of proteomics to the manufacture of biological drugs. Biotechnology Progress, 22(5), 12941300. doi: 10.1021/bp060121o CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Results from in vitro embryo production in the three experimental groups. (A) Blastocyst rate (blastocysts/oocytes). P-values of mean comparisons are shown within the graph. (B) Development rate (blastocysts/cleaved embryos). Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 8 replicates.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Quantitative image analysis of energy metabolism in the three experimental groups. (A) Measurement of mitochondrial activity using CellROX or MitoTracker. n = 16, 11 and 13 for KSOM-FBS, KSOM33 and KSOM-Zero groups, respectively. (B) Measurement of coenzymes NADH and FAD+ through autofluorescence. n = 8, 12 and 13 for KSOM-FBS, KSOM33 and KSOM-Zero groups, respectively. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Immunofluorescence of blastocysts from the three experimental groups. (A) Representative images of embryos stained for CDX2 (green). Nuclei are stained with Hoechst (blue). (B) Representative images of embryos stained for SOX17 (red). Nuclei are stained with Hoechst (blue). Scale bar equals 100 µm.

Figure 3

Table 1. Cell count of CDX2-positive cells (TE), CDX2-negative cells (ICM), total cells after immunostaining of 186 hpi blastocysts. Different superscript letters within columns indicate significant statistical difference (P < 0.05). n = 13, 10 and 8 for KSOM-FBS, KSOM33 and KSOM-Zero groups respectively. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)

Figure 4

Table 2. Cell count of SOX17-positive and total cells after immunostaining of 210 hpi blastocysts. Different superscript letters within columns indicate significant statistical difference (P < 0.05). n = 16, 17 and 21 for KSOM-FBS, KSOM33 and KSOM-Zero groups respectively. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)