Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T07:57:55.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maritime Archaeological Research, Sustainability, and Climate Resilience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2022

Katerina Velentza*
Affiliation:
Department of Cultures, University of Helsinki, Finland
*
*Corresponding author: Katerina Velentza email: aikaterini.velentza@helsinki.fi

Abstract

Maritime archaeology has been identified as a significant field among the humanities that could contribute to the global sustainable development agenda. This article explores the relevance of maritime archaeological studies to initiatives of climate action. Βy reviewing the contributions of various state-of-the-art projects and by linking their aims and outcomes to specific targets of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, the author highlights the benefits of involving maritime archaeological research in the pursuit of sustainability and climate resilience. This involvement could play a key role in reinforcing human-centred and culturally aware solutions to the current climate change effects that threaten human populations, especially in maritime regions. It is hoped that this discussion will inspire researchers in the humanities, archaeology, and maritime archaeology in particular, to use their expertise within the framework provided by the sustainable development agenda to help build a better future.

L'archéologie maritime a été reconnue comme un domaine important des sciences humaines capable de contribuer au programme mondial de développement durable. Cet article concerne la pertinence des recherches en archéologie maritime par rapport aux initiatives de lutte contre les changements climatiques. Un examen des intentions et résultats de projets récents et de leurs liens avec les objectifs de développement durable des Nations Unies met en relief les avantages qu'une participation de l'archéologie maritime offre pour atteindre ces objectifs de durabilité et de résilience climatique. Cet engagement pourrait jouer un rôle décisif car, en mettant l'accent sur les dimensions humaines et culturelles, on pourrait trouver des solutions aux problèmes posés par les effets du dérèglement climatique menaçant l'humanité, en particulier dans les zones maritimes. L'auteur espère que cet article encouragera les chercheurs en sciences humaines, en archéologies et tout particulièrement en archéologie maritime de mettre leur expertise au profit d'un monde meilleur dans le cadre des objectifs de développement durable. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Man zählt die maritime Archäologie zu den bedeutendsten geisteswissenschaftlichen Fächern, welche zu dem Agenda für eine globale nachhaltige Entwicklung beitragen könnten. In diesem Artikel erforscht die Verfasserin die Relevanz von maritimen archäologischen Untersuchungen für Klimaschutzinitiativen. Der Beitrag von verschiedenen kürzlich durchgeführten Projekten wird besprochen und die Übereinstimmung von deren Absichten und Ergebnissen mit den Zielen für nachhaltige Entwicklung der Vereinten Nationen wird bewertet. Dies unterstreicht die Vorteile einer Beteiligung der maritimen Archäologie im Streben nach Nachhaltigkeit und Anpassung an die Auswirkungen des Klimawandels. Solch eine Einbeziehung könnte eine wichtige Rolle bei einer menschengerechten und kulturbewussten Lösung der Probleme des heutigen Klimawandels, der Bevölkerungen besonders in Küstenregionen Einbeziehung. Die Verfasserin hofft, dass diese Besprechung als Anreiz für den Einsatz der Kompetenzen von Geisteswissenschaftlern und Archäologen (besonders im Bereich der maritimen Archäologie) dienen kann. Zusammenarbeit im Rahmen der Ziele für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung kann eine bessere Zukunft gestalten. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Association of Archaeologists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. 2002. Maritime Archaeology. In: Orser, C., ed. Encyclopedia of Historical Archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 57.Google Scholar
Aegean Cargo Sailing n.d. Network website [online] [accessed 22 February 2022]. Available at: <https://aegeancargosailing.org/>>Google Scholar
Andersson, R.-H., Cothran, B. & Kekki, S. 2021. Traditional Indigenous Knowledge and Nature Protection. In: Andersson, R.-H., Cothran, B. & Kekki, S., eds. Bridging Cultural Concepts of Nature: Indigenous People and Protected Spaces of Nature. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, pp. 125. https://doi.org/10.33134/AHEAD-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, A. 1969. Έρευνα επί των Ναυπηγικών Δεδομένων των Ελληνικού Τύπου Σκαφών [Research on the Nautical Data of Greek Vessels] (unpublished PhD dissertation, National Technical University of Athens).Google Scholar
Báez Santos, L.V. & Riera, C. 2022. Approaches to the Effects of Climate-Change in the Coastal Archeological Sites of Cartagena de Indias (Colombia). IKUWA (Internationaler Kongreß für Unterwasserarchäologie) 7 poster presentation, Helsinki 6–10 June 2022.Google Scholar
Bass, G. 2011. The Development of Maritime Archaeology. In: Ford, B., Hamilton, D.L. & Catsambis, A., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Maritime Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 324. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336005.001.0001Google Scholar
Casi, C., Guttorn, H.E. & Virtanen, P.K. 2021. Traditional Ecological Knowledge. In: Krieg, C.P. & Toivanen, R., eds. Situating Sustainability: A Handbook of Contexts and Concepts. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, pp. 181–94. https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CCAT (Coastal Communities Adapting Together) n.d. Project website [online] [accessed 5 July 2022]. Available at: <https://www.ccatproject.eu/>>Google Scholar
CHERISH (Climate Change and Coastal Heritage) n.d. Protecting our Marine Heritage [online] [accessed 22 February 2022]. Available at: < http://cherishproject.eu/en/>>Google Scholar
CITiZAN (Coastal and Intertidal Zone Archaeological Network) 2021. How Can We Tackle Climate Change? [online] [accessed 25 January 2022]. Available at: <https://citizan.org.uk/blog/2021/Nov/01/how-can-we-tackle-climate-change/?fbclid=IwAR2cG86KGolmHSvKxIV86v7M70waezgcBOSeya5LahN9JP_XD2QwxBmIZqw>>Google Scholar
Climate Heritage Network 2021. Manifesto: Accelerating Climate Action through the Power of Arts, Culture and Heritage [online] [accessed 12 December 2021]. Available at: <https://climateheritage.org/wp-content/uploads/Manifesto_CultureAtCOP_en-final-Full-text.pdf>>Google Scholar
Croft, A. (Atkins Heritage) 2013. Assessment of Heritage at Risk from Environmental Threat. Historic England report 72/2013 [online] [accessed 20 January 2022]. Available at: <https://research.historicengland.org.uk/Report.aspx?i=15749>>Google Scholar
Crumley, C.L. 1994. Historical Ecology: Cultural Knowledge and Changing Landscapes. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400024967Google Scholar
Crumley, C.L. 2018. Historical Ecology. In: Callan, H., ed. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1887Google Scholar
Crumley, C.L. 2021. Historical Ecology: A Robust Bridge between Archaeology and Ecology. Sustainability, 13: 8210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damianidis, K. & Zivas, A. 1986. Το τρεχαντήρι στην ελληνική ναυπηγική τέχνη [The trechantiri in Greek shipbuilding art]. Athens: Hellenic Organization of Small and Medium Sized Industries and Handicrafts.Google Scholar
Dawson, T., Hambly, J., Kelley, A., Lees, W. & Miller, S. 2020. Coastal Heritage, Global Climate Change, Public Engagement, and Citizen Science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117: 8280–86. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912246117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delaney, A.E. 2020. Preserving and Sustainably Governing Cultural Heritage and Landscapes in European Coastal and Maritime Regions (PERICLES). Journal of European Landscapes, 1: 2930. https://:doi.org/10.5117/JEL.2020.1.46900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delis, A. 2020. Seafaring Lives at the Crossroads of Mediterranean Maritime History. International Journal of Maritime History, 32: 464–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/084387142092424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marco, L., Bourdin, G., Buckley, K., Leitão, L., Thibault, M. & Wigboldus, L. 2020. Connecting Practice Phase III: Final Report (ICOMOS Project Report). ICOMOS Open Archive [online] [accessed 26 September 2022]. Available at: <https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/2477/>Google Scholar
EAA (European Association of Archaeologists) 2021. EAA 2021 Kiel Statement on Archaeology and Climate Change [online] [accessed 15 February 2022]. Available at: <https://www.e-a-a.org/2021Statement>>Google Scholar
Erlandson, J.M. & Braje, T.J. 2013. Archaeology and the Anthropocene. Anthropocene, 4: 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2014.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezcurra, P. & Rivera-Collazo, I.C. 2018. An Assessment of the Impacts of Climate Change on Puerto Rico's Cultural Heritage with a Case Study on Sea-Level Rise. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32: 198209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.01.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO & FILAC 2021. Forest Governance by Indigenous and Tribal People: An Opportunity for Climate Action in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago di Chile: FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb2953enGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, S.M. & Erlandson, J.M. 2018. Island Archaeology, Model Systems, the Anthropocene, and How the Past Informs the Future. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 13: 283–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2018.1447051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flatman, J. 2012. Conclusion: The Contemporary Relevance of Archaeology – Archaeology and the Real World? In: Rockman, M. & Flatman, J., eds. Archaeology in Society: Its Relevance in the Modern World. New York: Springer, pp. 291303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9881-1Google Scholar
Flexner, J.L. 2020. Degrowth and a Sustainable Future for Archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues, 27: 159–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203820000203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluck, H. 2016. Climate Change Adaptation Report. Historic England report 28/2016 [online] [accessed 20 January 2022]. Available at: <https://research.historicengland.org.uk/Report.aspx?i=15500>>Google Scholar
Fluck, H. 2022. Letter to a Young Archaeologist. Council for British Archaeology [online] [accessed 15 January 2022]. Available at: <https://www.archaeologyuk.org/resource/letter-to-a-young-archaeologist-january-2022.html>>Google Scholar
Fluck, H. & Guest, K. 2022. Climate Change and Archaeology: An Introduction. Internet Archaeology, 60. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.60.1Google Scholar
Ford, B., Halligan, J. & Catsambis, A. 2020. Our Blue Planet: An Introduction to Maritime and Underwater Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gillmer, T. 1973. Working Watercraft: A Survey of the Surviving Local Boats of Europe and America. London: Patrick Stephens.Google Scholar
Hambly, J. 2017. A Review of Heritage at Risk from Coastal Processes in Scotland: Results from the Scotland's Coastal Heritage at Risk Project 2012–2016. St Andrews: The SCAPE Trust.Google Scholar
Hamdan, L.J., Hampel, J.J., Moseley, R.D., Mugge, R.L., Ray, A., Salerno, J.L., et al. 2021. Deep-Sea Shipwrecks Represent Island-Like Ecosystems for Marine Microbiomes. International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal, 15: 2883-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-00978-yGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harkin, D., Davies, M., Hyslop, E., Fluck, H., Wiggins, M., Merritt, O., et al. 2020. Impacts of Climate Change on Cultural Heritage. Marine Climate Change Impacts Partnership Science Review : 616–41. https://doi.org/10.14465/2020.arc26.cheGoogle Scholar
Hegmon, M. 2017. The Give and Take of Sustainability: Archaeological and Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139939720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hein, C. 2020. Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage: Past, Present and Future. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00268-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. 2019. Oceans Without History? Marine Cultural Heritage and the Sustainable Development Agenda. Sustainability, 11: 5080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillis, D., Gustas, R., Pauly, D., Cheung, W.W.L., Salomon, A.K. & McKechnie, I. 2022. A Palaeothermometer of Ancient Indigenous Fisheries Reveals Increases in Mean Temperature of the Catch OVER Five Millennia. Environmental Biology of Fishes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-022-01243-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiwasaki, L., Luna, E., Syamsidik, & Marçal, J.A. 2015. Local and Indigenous Knowledge on Climate-Related Hazards of Coastal and Small Island Communities in Southeast Asia. Climatic Change, 128: 3556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1288-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holly, G., da Silva, Rey, Henderson, A., Bita, J., Forsythe, C., Ombe, W., et al, Z.A.. 2022. Utilizing Marine Cultural Heritage for the Preservation of Coastal Systems in East Africa, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10: 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10050693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, O., Newman, D. & Northall, L. 2021. Changing Minds Changing Coasts: Mapping 100 Years of Coastal Change on Mersea Island [online] [accessed 25 January 2022]. Available at: <https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/bf480b2db6864b2091f3639eea058741>>Google Scholar
Ibrahim, H.O. 2021. Indigenous Knowledge is Essential to Solving the Climate Crisis. Thomson Reuters Foundation News [online] [accessed 21 January 2022]. Available at: <https://news.trust.org/item/20210809165900-406vq/>>Google Scholar
ICOMOS (Climate Change and Cultural Heritage Group). 2019. The Future of Our Pasts: Engaging Cultural Heritage in Climate Action. Paris: International Council on Monuments and Sites [online] [accessed 15 November 2021]. Available at: http://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/2459/Google Scholar
ICOMOS 2021. ICOMOS’ Work on Connections between Culture and Nature. Paris: International Council on Monuments and Sites [online] [accessed 5 July 2022]. Available at: <https://www.icomos.org/en/focus/culture-nature/93567-icomos-work-on-connections-between-culture-and-nature>>Google Scholar
Ilves, K. 2022. Survivors of Ragnarök: Tracing Late Iron Age and Early Medieval Maritime Migrations in the Baltic Sea Region [online] [accessed 5 July 2022]. Available at: < https://blogs.helsinki.fi/survivors-of-ragnarok/>>Google Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2019. Climate Change and Land. IPCC special report [online] [accessed 20 November 2021]. Available at: <https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/>>Google Scholar
IPCC 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. IPCC sixth assessment report [online] [accessed 20 November 2021] Available at: <https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/>>Google Scholar
IPCC 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. IPCC Working Group II contribution to the sixth assessment report [online] [accessed 1 March 2022]. Available at: <https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/>>Google Scholar
Isendahl, C. & Stump, D. eds. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Historical Ecology and Applied Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199672691.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenter, J.O. & Martino, S. 2021 Sustainable Governance of Marine and Coastal Heritage: Methods, Tools, and Approaches. Brussels: European Commission-PERICLES [online] [accessed 26 September 2022]. Available at: <https://www.pericles-heritage.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/52458_Pericles-e-book.pdf>Google Scholar
Kountouri, E., Benissi, C. & Spyropoulou, S. 2022. Integrating Climate Change into Protection Policies in Greece. Internet Archaeology, 60. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.60.8Google Scholar
Kowarik, K., Brandner, D., Hofmann, K., Strasser, M. & Reschreiter, H. 2022. Researching Change – Understanding Change – Facing Change: 3500 Years of Human-Environment Relations in the Hallstatt/Dachstein Region. Internet Archaeology, 60. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.60.7Google Scholar
Kyvelou, S.S., Henocque, Y. & Serebryakova, A. 2022. How to Incorporate Underwater Cultural Heritage into Maritime Spatial Planning: Guidelines and Good Practices. Brussels: European Commission, European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency [online] [accessed 26 September 2022]. Available at: <https://maritime-spatial-planning.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/hz0622216enn.en_.pdf>Google Scholar
Lauer, M. and Aswani, S. 2009. Indigenous Ecological Knowledge as Situated Practices: Understanding Fishers’ Knowledge in the Western Solomon Islands. American Anthropologist, 111: 317–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01135.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.H. 2019. Ocean Cultural Heritage and Ocean Literacy Programs in the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021–30). Journal of Ocean & Culture, 2: 136–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LIVE (Llŷn IVeragh Eco-Museums) n.d. Network website [online] [accessed 7 February 2022]. Available at: <https://www.ecomuseumlive.eu/>>Google Scholar
McCormick, F. & Nicolas, M. 2022. Impacts of Climate Change on Coastal Archaeological Sites in County Kerry, Ireland. Internet Archaeology, 60. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.60.2Google Scholar
McGrail, S. 1984. Aspects of Maritime Archaeology and Ethnography. London: National Maritime Museum.Google Scholar
McKinnon, J.F. 2014. Archaeology and the Emergence of Fields: Maritime. In: Smith, C., ed. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York; Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1005Google Scholar
Meyer, H. 2020. Toward a Cultural Heritage of Adaptation: A Plea to Embrace the Heritage of Culture of Risk, Vulnerability and Adaptation. In: Hein, C., ed. Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage: Past, Present and Future. Cham: Springer, pp. 401–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00268-8_21Google Scholar
Miliou, A., Flashner, N., Robbins, M. & Dias, V. 2018. Shipping Risk Assessment: A Case Study For Greek Waters. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Industrial and Hazardous Waste Management, Chania, Crete; 4–7 September 2018 [online] [accessed 26 September 2022]. Available at: <https://archipelago.gr/en/documentation/shipping-risk-assessment-a-case-study-for-greek-waters/>Google Scholar
Muckelroy, K. 1978. Maritime Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neal, A. 2020. Cultural Heritage is a Necessary Component of Climate Solutions. Washington DC: Environmental and Energy Study Institute [online] [accessed 25 January 2022]. Available at: <https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/cultural-heritage-is-a-necessary-component-of-climate-solutions>Google Scholar
Perez-Alvaro, E. 2016. Climate Change and Underwater Cultural Heritage: Impacts and Challenges. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 21: 842–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peuramaki-Brown, M.M. & Morton, S.G. 2021. People, Animals, Protected Places, and Archaeology: A Complex Collaboration in Belize. In: Andersson, R.-H., Cothran, B. & Kekki, S., eds. Bridging Cultural Concepts of Nature: Indigenous People and Protected Spaces of Nature. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, pp. 97137. https://doi.org/10.33134/AHEAD-1-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preshlenov, H. 2022. Postglacial Black Sea Level Rising, Urban Development and Adaptation of Historic Places: The Case-Study of the City-Peninsula of Nesebar (Bulgaria). Internet Archaeology, 60. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.60.5Google Scholar
Rassia, S. & Tsikis, T. 2020. Wooden Boats and our ‘Smart Sea Energy Gene’: An Evolutionary Approach to Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering through History, Optimization, Renewable Energy, and Sustainability. SN Operations Research Forum, 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-020-00018-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, C. 2005. Resilience Theory in Archaeology. American Anthropologist, 107: 7077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Re-imagining the Use of Traditional Watercraft in the Aegean Sea for a Sustainable Environment and Economy. n.d.. Project website [online] [accessed 24 November 2021]. Available at: <https://traditionalwatercraftaegeansea.wordpress.com/>>Google Scholar
Rey da Silva, A. 2020. Sailing the Waters of Sustainability: Reflections on the Future of Maritime Cultural Heritage Protection in the Global Sea of Development. Post-Classical Archaeologies 10: 107–34.Google Scholar
Ricca, M., Alexandrakis, G., Bonazza, A., Bruno, F., Davidde Petriaggi, B., Elkin, D., et al. 2020. A Sustainable Approach for the Management and Valorization of Underwater Cultural Heritage: New Perspectives from the TECTONIC Project. Sustainability, 12: 5000. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rick, T.C. & Erlandson, J.M. ed. 2008. Human Impacts on Ancient Marine Ecosystems: A Global Perspective. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riede, F. & Krogh, U. 2019. Combatting Climate Change Culturally: How Cultural and Natural Heritage Can Strengthen Climate Change Adaptation. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Rising from the Depths 2017. Utilising Marine Cultural Heritage in East Africa to Help Develop Sustainable Social, Economic and Cultural Benefits [online] [accessed 5 July 2022]. Available at: <https://risingfromthedepths.com/>>Google Scholar
Rivera-Collazo, I.C. 2020. Severe Weather and the Reliability of Desk-Based Vulnerability Assessments: The Impact of Hurricane Maria to Puerto Rico's Coastal Archaeology. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 15: 244–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2019.1570987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, P. 2021. Lost Landscapes: A Glimpse into the Past and Warning for the Future! CHERISH [online] [ accessed 2 February 2022]. Available at: <http://cherishproject.eu/en/project-news/blog-posts/lost-landscapes-a-glimpse-into-the-past-and-warning-for-the-future/>>Google Scholar
Rockman, M. & Hritz, C. 2020 Expanding Use of Archaeology in Climate Change Response by Changing its Social Environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117: 8295–302. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914213117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCAPE n.d. The Scape Trust [online] [accessed 21 January 2022]. Available at: <https://scapetrust.org/>>Google Scholar
Sesana, E., Gagnon, A.S., Ciantelli, C., Cassar, J. & Hughes, J.J. 2021. Climate Change Impacts on Cultural Heritage: A Literature Review. WIREs Climate Change, 12: e710. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K., Hardy, R.D., Lazrus, H., Mendez, M., Orlove, B., Rivera-Collazo, I., et al. 2019. Explaining Differential Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Social Science Review. WIREs Climate Change, 10: e565. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.565CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trakadas, A. 2021. Maritime Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Role Within the Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development 2021–30. Intangible Cultural Heritage Courier, 47: 47.Google Scholar
Trakadas, A. 2022a. The Cultural Heritage Framework Programme: Ensuring a Place for Cultural Heritage's Contribution to the UN Decade of Ocean Science. Marine Technology Society Journal, 56: 110–11. https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.56.3.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trakadas, A. 2022b. ODHN Lisbon Statement – UN Oceans 2022, Ocean Decade Heritage Network News [online] [accessed 5 July 2022]. Available at: <https://www.oceandecadeheritage.org/odhn-lisbon-statement-un-oceans-2022/>>Google Scholar
Trakadas, A., Firth, A. Gregory, D., Elkin, D., Guerin, U., Henderson, J., et al. 2019. The Ocean Decade Heritage Network: Integrating Cultural Heritage Within the UN Decade of Ocean Science 2021–2030. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, 14: 153–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-019-09241-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development 2021–2030. The Ocean Decade: The Science We Need for the Ocean We Want [online] [accessed 14 December 2021]. Available at: <https://www.oceandecade.org/>>Google Scholar
UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development 2022. Indigenous People, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and Climate Change: The Iconic Underwater Cultural Heritage of Stone Tidal Weirs [online] [accessed 7 July 2022]. Available at: <https://www.oceandecade.org/actions/indigenous-people-traditional-ecological-knowledge-and-climate-change-the-iconic-underwater-cultural-heritage-of-stone-tidal-weirs/>>Google Scholar
UN SDG (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development) n.d. Sustainable Development Goals [online] [accessed 15 December 2021]. Available at: <https://sdgs.un.org/goals>>Google Scholar
Van de Noort, R. 2011. Conceptualising Climate Change Archaeology. Antiquity, 85: 1039–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00068472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Noort, R. 2013. Climate Change Archaeology: Building Resilience from Research in the World's Coastal Wetlands. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199699551.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varmer, O., Spalding, M.J. & Refosco, A. 2020. Integrating Underwater Cultural Heritage into the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. In: Mastone, V. & Mires, C., eds. ACUA Underwater Archaeology Proceedings 2020. Pensacola (FL): Advisory Council on Underwater Archaeology, pp. 514.Google Scholar
Vousdoukas, M.I., Clarke, J., Ranasinghe, R., Reimann, L., Khalaf, N., Minh Duong, T., et al. 2022. African Heritage Sites Threatened as Sea-Level Rise Accelerates. Nature Climate Change, 12: 256–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01280-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerdahl, C. 2011 The Maritime Cultural Landscape. In: Ford, B., Hamilton, D.L. & Catsambis, A., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Maritime Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 735–62.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 2016. Maritime Archaeology and Climate Change: An Invitation. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, 11: 255–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-016-9164-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorzin, N. 2021. Is Archaeology Conceivable Within the Degrowth Movement? Archaeological Dialogues, 28: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203821000015CrossRefGoogle Scholar