Introduction
Many raptor species around the world are declining and large scavengers such as vultures have shown some of the strongest population declines (Prakash et al. Reference Prakash, Pain, Cunningham, Donald, Prakash, Verma, Gargi, Sivakumar and Rahmani2003, Thiollay Reference Thiollay2006, Virani et al. Reference Virani, Kendall, Njoroge and Thomsett2011, Ogada et al. Reference Ogada, Keesing and Virani2012). The Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus is a relatively small vulture with a broad distribution throughout the southern Palearctic and North Africa, and populations of this species are declining throughout its range. West African populations declined by about 86% between 1969 and 2004 (Thiollay Reference Thiollay2006, Reference Thiollay2007, Virani et al. Reference Virani, Kendall, Njoroge and Thomsett2011), and the population in India declined by 80% between 1999 and 2003 (Cuthbert et al. Reference Cuthbert, Green, Ranade, Saravanan, Pain, Prakash and Cunningham2006). As a consequence of the long term decline in Europe and West Africa and the rapid decline in India, the species is listed as globally ‘Endangered’ (BirdLife International 2014).
Egyptian Vultures used to be widely distributed throughout southern Europe, and the current breeding population is estimated at 3,300–5,050 breeding pairs (Iñigo et al. Reference Iñigo, Barov, Orhun and Gallo-Orsi2008). The largest European populations are in Spain and Turkey (1,270–1,300 and 1,500–3,000 pairs, respectively, Iñigo et al. Reference Iñigo, Barov, Orhun and Gallo-Orsi2008), and the trend of the Spanish population differs between regions (Donázar Reference Donázar, Madroño, González and Atienza2004). However, little is known about the size and population trajectory of Egyptian Vultures in Eastern Europe. The Egyptian Vulture used to be common in all Balkan countries (Patev Reference Patev1950, Grubač Reference Grubač and Meyburg1989, Handrinos and Akriotis Reference Handrinos and Akriotis1997, Grubač Reference Grubač2000), but declines have been documented in Bulgaria (Kurtev et al. Reference Kurtev, Angelov, Demerdjiev, Stoynov, Iankov, Hristov and Iankov2007), Greece (Vlachos et al. Reference Vlachos, Papageorgiou, Bakaloudis, Chancellor, Meyburg and Ferrero1998) and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (hereafter FYR of Macedonia, Grubač et al. Reference Grubač, Velevski and Avukatov2014). The species became extinct in Croatia (Sušić Reference Sušić1993), Montenegro (last observation from 1991; Ljucović Reference Ljucović1995), Bosnia and Herzegovina (last observation from 1989; Marinković et al. Reference Marinković, Orlandić, Micković and Karadžić2007), and probably in Serbia (last confirmed breeding in 1999; Grubač Reference Grubač1999). However, there is no current quantitative synthesis of the population status and trends of Egyptian Vultures in different Balkan countries.
In this paper, we collated Egyptian Vulture monitoring data from three Balkan countries (Bulgaria, Greece and the FYR of Macedonia) and estimated population trends using a state-space model. We hypothesized that the spatial distribution of Egyptian Vultures has declined over the past decades and that the current population became fragmented. We used the results of our analysis to discuss the possible underlying causes of the similar population trends across the countries and the need for conservation action.
Methods
Population monitoring
Breeding territories of Egyptian Vultures have been monitored in several Balkan countries with varying intensity since 1980. We first collated monitoring and distribution data from published sources (Sušić Reference Sušić1993, Ljucović Reference Ljucović1995, Handrinos and Akriotis Reference Handrinos and Akriotis1997, Grubač Reference Grubač1999, Marinković et al. Reference Marinković, Orlandić, Micković and Karadžić2007, Kurtev et al. Reference Kurtev, Angelov, Demerdjiev, Stoynov, Iankov, Hristov and Iankov2007, Reference Kurtev, Iankov and Angelov2008, Xirouchakis and Tsiakiris Reference Xirouchakis, Tsiakiris, Donázar, Margalida and Campion2009, Skartsi et al. Reference Skartsi, Vasilakis and Elorriaga2010, Poirazidis et al. Reference Poirazidis, Schindler, Kakalis, Ruis, Bakaloudis, Scandolara, Eastham, Hristov and Catsadorakis2011, Grubač et al. Reference Grubač, Velevski and Avukatov2014) and complemented these data with unpublished data collected by the authors. Breeding territories were generally monitored during the breeding season (between April and August). Each known or potential territory was visited at least once during a breeding season to determine the presence or absence of a breeding pair. The data prior to 2003 were often collected with lower intensity and survey effort, or collated from a variety of sources and confirmed breeding territories. Some of the historic data may thus understate the actual population size in a given year, and it is therefore possible that populations in the past were marginally larger and our trend estimates should therefore be considered as conservative.
Because some historic data reported population sizes either as number of pairs or occupied territories, we assumed that all occupied territories consisted of pairs and used the number of pairs as our unit of population size.
Estimation of trends
For Bulgaria, Greece and the FYR of Macedonia, good quality monitoring data were available that facilitated quantitative trend estimation. We used the longest available time series of population counts for each country, dating back to 1980 (Bulgaria and Greece) and 1983 (the FYR of Macedonia), to estimate the rate of population change. Before 2003, data were available only for some years in which survey effort had sufficient spatial coverage and intensity. Because the quality of monitoring data in Bulgaria and the FYR of Macedonia improved considerably after 2002, we separately estimated trends also for the time period 2003–2013 in these two countries.
We estimated the population growth rate (λ) for each country by using a hierarchical state-space model for population counts, which separated the Egyptian Vulture monitoring data into a population process and an observation error component (De Valpine Reference De Valpine2003, Clark and Bjørnstad Reference Clark and Bjørnstad2004, Kéry and Schaub Reference Kéry and Schaub2012). State-space models allow a more accurate estimate of population trend than standard linear models because they explicitly allow for environmental stochasticity (Wilson et al. Reference Wilson, Kendall and Possingham2011, Kéry and Schaub Reference Kéry and Schaub2012). Briefly, a state-space model assumes that the annual population growth rate is a realisation from a normal random process, and uses the observed data to estimate the mean and variance of this process. The model thus provides an estimate of population size and growth rate for each year even if data are missing, but the estimates are much more precise for years in which data exist because the estimates can be constrained. State-space models are therefore ideal to estimate trends from time series with missing data, as was the case for our historic vulture data. The overall trend for each country was estimated by averaging the annual growth rate estimates for that country. Although the historic monitoring data did not overlap temporally in the three target countries, we used estimated population sizes for each country to derive a total population size for each year. The overall trend of the Balkan population was then estimated with the total population size in the same way as the country-specific trends were estimated.
We implemented the state-space model in a Bayesian framework to properly account for error propagation when summing population sizes and averaging growth rates over time and across the three countries. We fitted the state-space models using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in JAGS 3.3 (Plummer Reference Plummer2012) via the R2jags library (Su and Yajima Reference Su and Yajima2012) in R 3.0.1 (R Core Team 2013). We ran three Markov chains each with 5,000,000 iterations and discarded the first 2,500,000 iterations to ensure that the models converged. From the remaining iterations we only used every 25th iteration for inference, and we report results as the posterior median and 95% credible intervals (Kéry and Schaub Reference Kéry and Schaub2012). Convergence was tested using the Gelman-Rubin diagnostic (Brooks and Gelman Reference Brooks and Gelman1998), and all reported parameters had values of R-hat < 1.02. The computer code to repeat this analysis is provided in the online supplementary material; the raw data are provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Number of Egyptian Vulture breeding pairs in the three focal countries in the Balkan Peninsula.
Spatial distribution data
The coordinates of Egyptian Vulture nests or territories have been recorded in most Balkan countries since the mid 1980s, either by using detailed topographic maps or (since the 2000s) using handheld GPS receivers. We compiled historic (1980–1990) and recent (2012–2013) distribution data to delineate the extent of occurrence of the Egyptian Vulture in the Balkan Peninsula in these two periods. We assumed that all territories occupied in recent years were also occupied in the past, because high quality territories are generally very persistent (Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Grande, Tella, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar, Díaz-Delgado and Romo2007). For the recent period, we pooled territories into continuous spatial aggregations of territories (hereafter referred to as ‘clusters’) that contained > 1 active territory and were separated by a considerable distance, and we report the number of unique clusters, the number of territories in each cluster, and the nearest distance between adjacent clusters.
Results
A consistent long-term decline of the Egyptian Vulture population was observed in all Balkan countries, and the average population growth rate over the past three decades across the three focal countries was 0.937 (95% CrI 0.920–0.957, Figure 1). Mean annual growth rates (λ) were largely similar in the FYR of Macedonia (0.940, 95% CrI 0.920–0.961), Bulgaria (0.951, 95% CrI 0.927–0.976), and Greece (0.920, 95% CrI 0.877–0.973) (Table 1). The population trend for the period 2003–2013, where the data quality was high for Bulgaria and the FYR of Macedonia, confirmed the similarity in the annual growth rates between the two countries (0.930, 95% CrI 0.922–0.948 and 0.943, 95% CrI 0.935–0.948, respectively).
Figure 1. Estimated population size and trajectory of the Egyptian Vulture population summed across three countries in the Balkan Peninsula (black solid line and points), and for each country separately (dark grey lines). Points and lines are median posterior estimates from a Bayesian state-space model fitted to population counts; error bars reflect 95% credible intervals.
Qualitative data from Albania, where 20 pairs were recorded in 2006, but only 9 pairs were confirmed in 2012–2013, suggest similar decline rates in other Balkan countries. The range of Egyptian Vultures in the Balkan Peninsula shrank considerably between 1980 and 2013, and all territories in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, and in north-western Bulgaria were abandoned (Figure 2). Thirty years ago, the Egyptian Vulture occurred in a single, more or less spatially continuous population in the Balkan Peninsula. In 2012 and 2013, the occurrence pattern had shrunk to three core areas with > 10 active territories and three relict clusters with 2–6 active territories (Table 2), plus two single isolated pairs in Greece and northern Bulgaria (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Historic and recent distribution of Egyptian Vulture breeding territories in the Balkan Peninsula. Black circles – active territories in 2012–2013, grey circles – territories occupied 1980–1990, but no longer occupied in 2012–2013. AL – Albania, BG – Bulgaria, BiH – Bosnia and Herzegovina, CRO – Croatia, GR – Greece, MK – the FYR of Macedonia, MNG – Montenegro, RO – Romania, SRB – Serbia, TR – Turkey. Question marks indicate data gaps for historic (grey) or current (black) distribution.
Table 2. Distribution and abundance of Egyptian Vultures in the Balkan Peninsula in 2013, separated into six spatially discrete concentrations of breeding territories (‘population cluster’, Figure. 2).
Discussion
Our findings provide evidence that the Egyptian Vulture population in the Balkan Peninsula has declined by about 4–8% per year over the past three decades, continuing a long-term decline that started more than six decades ago (Nisbet and Smout Reference Nisbet and Smout1957). We found similar long-term population decline rates between the FYR of Macedonia, Greece, and Bulgaria, suggesting that over the past three decades Egyptian Vultures were exposed to large scale threats that affected birds breeding in different countries similarly.
The observed population decline rates are of a similar order of magnitude found for Egyptian Vultures in western Europe (Liberatori and Penteriani Reference Liberatori and Penteriani2001, Sarà and Di Vittorio Reference Sarà and Di Vittorio2003, Grande et al. Reference Grande, Serrano, Tavecchia, Carrete, Ceballos, Díaz-Delgado, Tella and Donázar2009), and it is likely that similar or more extreme declines have occurred in other Balkan countries for which no quantitative data are available. The population declines in the Balkan Peninsula are apparently slower than those reported from India where diclofenac poisoning has devastated vulture populations since the 1990s (Green et al. Reference Green, Newton, Shultz, Cunningham, Gilbert, Pain and Prakash2004, Cuthbert et al. Reference Cuthbert, Green, Ranade, Saravanan, Pain, Prakash and Cunningham2006, Prakash et al. Reference Prakash, Bishwakarma, Chaudhary, Cuthbert, Dave, Kulkarni, Kumar, Paudel, Ranade, Shringarpure and Green2012), but a direct comparison of the trends is not possible due to different survey and trend estimation approaches (territory monitoring vs. road counts in India; Cuthbert et al. Reference Cuthbert, Green, Ranade, Saravanan, Pain, Prakash and Cunningham2006). Nonetheless, gradual changes in demographic parameters due to a growing variety of threats are a more likely underlying cause of population declines in the Balkans than the sudden appearance of a single lethal factor. Because the breeding performance of Balkan populations is largely comparable with productivity estimates from western European populations (for details see Kurtev et al. Reference Kurtev, Iankov and Angelov2008, Mateo-Tomás et al. Reference Mateo-Tomás, Olea and Fombellida2010, Grubač et al. Reference Grubač, Velevski and Avukatov2014), the drivers of population declines are likely to be threats that reduce survival rates of adult and immature birds (Grande et al. Reference Grande, Serrano, Tavecchia, Carrete, Ceballos, Díaz-Delgado, Tella and Donázar2009, Velevski et al. Reference Velevski, Grubač and Tomović2014). Understanding and mitigating the factors that reduce Egyptian Vulture survival is therefore the most pressing conservation challenge. Human activities have been shown to gradually alter the survival of immature and adult birds in other vulture species (Margalida et al. Reference Margalida, Colomer and Oro2014b), and more research is now required to identify the key threats that cause Egyptian Vulture population declines.
Large-scale threats like accidental poisoning, electrocution, food shortages through changes in land use, pastoral systems, veterinary and sanitary practices and direct persecution, are likely to affect vultures on breeding grounds as well as along their migration routes and wintering areas (Thiollay Reference Thiollay2006, Hernández and Margalida Reference Hernández and Margalida2009, Virani et al. Reference Virani, Kendall, Njoroge and Thomsett2011, Angelov et al. Reference Angelov, Hashim and Oppel2013, Wacher et al. Reference Wacher, Newby, Houdou, Harouna and Rabeil2013). High adult and immature mortality during the migration and non-breeding season could explain the observed population declines in a long-lived species with delayed maturity such as the Egyptian Vulture (Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Grande, Tella, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar, Díaz-Delgado and Romo2007, Grande et al. Reference Grande, Serrano, Tavecchia, Carrete, Ceballos, Díaz-Delgado, Tella and Donázar2009). A recent study of migrating raptors found that more than half of the annual mortality occurred on migration (Klaassen et al. Reference Klaassen, Hake, Strandberg, Koks, Trierweiler, Exo, Bairlein and Alerstam2014), and a similar pattern may exist for Egyptian Vultures. However, there is evidence that significant Egyptian Vulture mortality also occurs on breeding grounds (Kurtev et al. Reference Kurtev, Angelov, Demerdjiev, Stoynov, Iankov, Hristov and Iankov2007, Grubač et al. Reference Grubač, Velevski and Avukatov2014). For example, in the FYR of Macedonia approximately half of all recent losses for which the time of death was known have occurred in breeding territories (Grubač et al. Reference Grubač, Velevski and Avukatov2014), and there are at least 16 known deaths of adult birds in Bulgaria and 11 more in Greece (most of them resulting from the accidental ingestion of poison baits) in the last 10 years (unpublished data of the Bulgarian Society for Protection of Birds and the Hellenic Ornithological Society). Although the use of poisonous baits is illegal under current EU legislation, the relevant laws are not properly enforced (Hernández and Margalida Reference Hernández and Margalida2009, Margalida Reference Margalida2012). Direct persecution and disturbance at nest sites are also known to affect survival and reproductive output in the Balkans (Kurtev et al. Reference Kurtev, Iankov and Angelov2008, Grubač et al. Reference Grubač, Velevski and Avukatov2014), and hunting may be a significant threat along migration and in wintering areas (Klaassen et al. Reference Klaassen, Hake, Strandberg, Koks, Trierweiler, Exo, Bairlein and Alerstam2014). Lastly, the quality of breeding territories is likely to be affected by habitat loss due to infrastructure development, changes in agriculture and livestock breeding and veterinary practices, as well as garbage treatment (open garbage dumps are illegal and no longer available in EU countries; Xirouchakis and Tsiakiris Reference Xirouchakis, Tsiakiris, Donázar, Margalida and Campion2009) and construction of energy production and transportation structures. Overall, there is a large and complex array of different threats that are likely to reduce the survival and – to a lesser extent – the annual productivity of Egyptian Vultures and thus account for the observed population declines.
The observed population declines across the Balkan Peninsula were associated with a range contraction and fragmentation into several clusters. A reduction of the breeding range has also been associated with population declines in mainland Italy and Sicily (Liberatori and Penteriani Reference Liberatori and Penteriani2001, Sarà and Di Vittorio Reference Sarà and Di Vittorio2003), but not in Spain (Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Grande, Tella, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar, Díaz-Delgado and Romo2007), possibly because the Spanish population is still relatively large, and fragmentation has only recently begun to affect peripheral subpopulations (Donázar et al. Reference Donázar, Margalida and Campión2009, Margalida et al. Reference Margalida, Benítez, Sánchez-Zapata, Ávila, Arenas and Donázar2012). Our observation of a shrinking range is consistent with earlier reported extinctions farther north. Egyptian Vultures became extinct in Romania (Grubač Reference Grubač2005) and the Crimean Peninsula in the 1950s (last breeding 1958, Zubarovsky Reference Zubarovsky1977, Kostin Reference Kostin1983), and from the Dniester region (Ukraine-Moldova) in the 1980s (Zhurminsky and Tsurkanu Reference Zhurminsky and Tsurkanu2001, Tyschenkov Reference Tyschenkov2004), indicating that population decline and range contraction started much earlier than any monitoring and conservation measures. The presence of conspecifics generally affects where young adults select a territory and recruit into the breeding population. In addition, higher-quality territories are usually occupied more consistently than those of poorer quality (Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Grande, Tella, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar, Díaz-Delgado and Romo2007), and will therefore attract conspecific recruits in their vicinity. The persistence and attraction of high-quality territories is the possible underlying mechanism behind the cluster formation in Egyptian Vulture territories in the Balkans, and is known in many other declining species (Lawton Reference Lawton1999). Nonetheless, Egyptian Vultures are known for their high natal philopatry (Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Grande, Tella, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar, Díaz-Delgado and Romo2007, Elorriaga et al. Reference Elorriaga, Zuberogoitia, Castillo, Azkona, Hidalgo, Astorkia, Ruiz-Moneo and Iraeta2009, Grande et al. Reference Grande, Serrano, Tavecchia, Carrete, Ceballos, Díaz-Delgado, Tella and Donázar2009), which may explain the persistence of remote territories, and may slow the range contraction. However, increasingly isolated clusters with few pairs face increasing extinction probability due to demographic, environmental, and potentially genetic stochasticity. These effects are exacerbated by the simultaneous decline of all major populations, rendering rescue effects from healthy source populations extremely unlikely. Very little is known about where immature Egyptian Vultures recruit into the breeding population in the Balkans, and more research is required to understand the causes of the fragmentation and increasing isolation of core breeding areas in the Balkan Peninsula. We recommend maintaining or improving annual monitoring of breeding populations and considering long-term individual marking studies to provide information about survival and recruitment of individuals into breeding populations.
In summary, we have shown that the Balkan population of Egyptian Vultures is declining rapidly across a large range. While the causes for these population declines are poorly understood, it is likely that poisoning, electrocution and direct persecution have affected survival and reproductive rates of Egyptian Vultures (Grubač Reference Grubač2005, Kurtev et al. Reference Kurtev, Angelov, Demerdjiev, Stoynov, Iankov, Hristov and Iankov2007, Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Grande, Tella, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar, Díaz-Delgado and Romo2007, Grubač et al. Reference Grubač, Velevski and Avukatov2014). All these factors operate at very large spatial scales, and alleviating these threats will require large-scale changes in human attitudes, activities and landscape use. Conservation activities that have been implemented in the Balkan Peninsula since 2003, have so far failed to reverse the population declines, presumably because they are too limited in geographic scale. Although supplementary feeding and other conservation interventions can help local populations (García-Ripollès and López-López Reference García-Ripollès and López-López2006, Donázar et al. Reference Donázar, Margalida and Campión2009, Margalida et al. Reference Margalida, Colomer and Oro2014b), larger-scale policy and management changes are required to address the threats facing Egyptian Vultures across their range. We recommend the implementation and enforcement of anti-poisoning laws to reduce the accidental killing of scavenging birds across Europe and Africa, substitution of hazardous electrical infrastructure with safe structures across Europe, the Middle East and Africa to reduce electrocutions, and the retention of small-scale livestock grazing and carcass disposal systems that provide sufficient food for vultures. Certain non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g. diclofenac, ketoprofen) should be banned for veterinary use in Europe and Africa in order to reduce the risk of vulture mortality (Cuthbert et al. Reference Cuthbert, Green, Ranade, Saravanan, Pain, Prakash and Cunningham2006, Naidoo et al. Reference Naidoo, Wolter, Cromarty, Diekmann, Duncan, Meharg, Taggart, Venter and Cuthbert2010, Margalida et al. Reference Margalida, Sánchez-Zapata, Blanco, Hiraldo and Donázar2014a). Identification and establishment of protected areas in the wintering range of the species where direct persecution and other threats are eliminated could potentially increase the survival rates of sub-adult and adult individuals (Velevski et al. Reference Velevski, Grubač and Tomović2014). Although implementing these policies and actions at a sufficiently large scale is a daunting challenge, there is hope that concerted efforts that address key threats to vultures may result in a stabilisation or recovery of endangered vulture populations if implemented at a sufficiently large scale (Donázar et al. Reference Donázar, Margalida and Campión2009, Prakash et al. Reference Prakash, Bishwakarma, Chaudhary, Cuthbert, Dave, Kulkarni, Kumar, Paudel, Ranade, Shringarpure and Green2012, Galligan et al. Reference Galligan, Amano, Prakash, Kulkarni, Shringarphure, Prakash, Ranade, Green and Cuthbert2014).
Supplementary Material
The online supplementary materials for this article can be found at journals.cambridge.org.bci
Acknowledgements
Many people assisted in monitoring efforts in various countries over the past decades, and our special thanks go to T. Lisičanec, E. Dimitrovska, B. Delov, M. Pop Trajkov, J. Andevski, S. Stefanovski, Ž. Brajanoski, D. Uzunova, E. Jordanovska, A. Todorovska, T. Bounas, D. Bousbouras, S. Bourdakis, K. Poirazidis, C. Ruiz, S. Schindler, P. Babakas, T. Skartsi, D. Vasilakis, A. Aptourahman, A. Christopoulos, T. Dimalexis, G. Rousopoulos, G. Catsadorakis, P. Azmanis, P. Konstantinou, N. Boukas, M. Diamantopoulos, K. Vlachopoulos, M. Pasiakos, P. Pavlidis, T. Angelova, I. Angelov, D. Demerdzhiev, P. Iankov, H. Hristov, M. Kurtev, S. Stoychev, S. Avramov, B. Stumberger, P. Knaus and D. Dobrev. D. Querido and E. Tabur contributed valuable discussions. M. Osipova provided some of the needed literature. A. Margalida, R. Moreno-Opo, J. A. Donázar and an anonymous referee provided valuable comments on the earlier drafts of the manuscript. We appreciate the financial support of the Black Vulture Conservation Foundation, Vulture Conservation Foundation and Frankfurt Zoological Society (for implementation of the field surveys and monitoring, through the Balkan Vulture Action Plan). This paper was initiated by the LIFE+ project “The Return of the Neophron” (LIFE10 NAT/BG/000152, www.LifeNeophron.eu) funded by the European Union and co-funded by the A. G. Leventis Foundation.
