Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T15:56:39.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of adult vocal fold length

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2006

Mao-Chang Su
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Chung-Shan Medical University Hospital, Chung-Shan Medical University Graduated Institute of Medicine, Tai-Chung, Taiwan.
Te-Huei Yeh
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ching-Ting Tan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Der Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Oan-Che Linne
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shiann-Yann Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Abstract

Laryngeal photographs from 165 Taiwanese subjects were taken during microlaryngoscopy. Photographs of the vocal fold during the open phase were chosen. For measuring the vocal fold length, both the photograph of a ruler and the larynx were taken under the operating microscope, thus forming a ‘new scale’. Photographs of the vocal fold and the ruler were then processed at the same power of magnification. The length of the vocal folds was measured with the ‘new scale’. In 100 patients receivingdirect laryngoscopy under neuroleptic anaesthesia, the vocal fold length was 14.6 ± 1.2 mm (n = 35) for males and 11.1 ± 1.0 mm (n = 65) for females. In 65 patients under general anaesthesia, the vocal fold length was 15.3 ± 1.6 mm (n = 23) for males and 13.5 ± 1.3 mm (n = 42) for females. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between both groups and both sexes. Elongation of the vocal fold under general rather than neuroleptic anaesthesia may be important when performing functional surgery of the vocal fold.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)