Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T01:35:31.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale Implementation Guidelines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Michael Murray ,
Michael Bullard ,
Eric Grafstein ,
the CTAS  and
CEDIS National Working Groups
Michael Murray*
Affiliation:
Royal Victoria Hospital, Barrie, Ont., and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
Michael Bullard
Affiliation:
University of Alberta Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
Eric Grafstein
Affiliation:
St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
*
Emergency Services, Royal Victoria Hospital, 201 Georgian Dr., Barrie ON L4M 6M2; murraym@rvh.on.ca or ctas@caep.ca

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There has been widespread implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) across Canada since it was introduced in 1999. This consensus document, developed by the CTAS National Working Group (NWG) of nurse and physician leaders in emergency department (ED) triage, continues to be viewed as a dynamic document that requires modification over time as experience is gained in its application. This article presents the first major modification to the CTAS.

Keywords

Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity ScaleCTASpain measurementpresenting complainttrauma severity indiciestriage
Type
Ed Administration • L’administration de la Mu
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 6 , November 2004 , pp. 421 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2004

References

1.Beveridge, R, Clarke, B, Janes, L, Savage, N, Thompson, J, Dodd, G, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines. Can J Emerg Med 1999; 1(3 suppl):S2–28.Google Scholar
2.Beveridge, R.CAEP Issues. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: a new and critical element in health care reform. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. J Emerg Med 1998;16:507–11.Google Scholar
3.Manos, D, Petrie, DA, Beveridge, RC, Walter, S, Ducharme, J.Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale. Can J Emerg Med 2002;4(1);16–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Beveridge, R, Ducharme, J, Janes, L, Beaulieu, S, Walter, S.Reliability of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: inter-observer agreement. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34(2):155–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Worster, A, Gilboy, N, Fernandes, CM, Eitel, D, Eva, K, Geisler, R, Tanabe, P.Assessment of inter-observer reliability of two fivelevel triage and acuity scales: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Emerg Med 2004;6(4):240–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Stenstrom, R, Grafstein, E, Innes, G, Christenson, J.Real-time predictive validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10(5):512.Google Scholar
7.Murray, MJ, Levis, G.Does triage level (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale) correlate with resource utilization for emergency department visits? [abstract]. Can J Emerg Med 2004;6(3):180.Google Scholar
8.Jiminez, JG, Murray, MJ, Beveridge, R, Pons, JP, Cortes, EA, Fernando Garrigos, JB, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(5):315–22.Google Scholar
9.Grafstein, E, Unger, B, Bullard, M, Innes, G, for the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Working Group. Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List (Version 1.0). Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(1):27–34.Google Scholar
10.Grafstein, E, Innes, G, Westman, J, Christenson, J, Thorne, A.Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint linked triage system in an urban emergency department. Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(5):323–9.Google Scholar
11.Bullard, MJ, Dong, SL, Meurer, DP, Blitz, S, Colman, I, Rowe, BH.Emergency department triage: evaluating the implementation of a computerized triage tool [abstract]. Can J Emerg Med 2004;6(3):188.Google Scholar
12.Warren, D, Jarvis, A, Leblanc, L; and the National Triage Task Force members. Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines for emergency departments. Can J Emerg Med 2001;3 (4 suppl):S1–27.Google Scholar