Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T23:56:42.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Addressing historical trauma and healing in Indigenous language cultivation and revitalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

James McKenzie*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Department of Teaching, Learning & Sociocultural Studies
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jmckenzie@email.arizona.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that historical trauma, healing, and wellbeing require attention in Indigenous language cultivation and revitalization. While historical trauma affects Indigenous peoples across the spectrum of language knowledge and use, little is written about the ways it can be addressed in the teaching, learning, and development—the cultivation—of Indigenous languages. For Indigenous language educators, how we address historical trauma in our language cultivation may be one of the most critical factors affecting our potential to cultivate the wellness we seek, and new generations of speakers of our languages. Drawing on a Diné (Navajo) lens and voices from other Indigenous communities, this article focuses on historical trauma, healing, and wellbeing as important considerations in Indigenous language cultivation and revitalization, to which applied linguists, Indigenous peoples, and others interested in Indigenous language revitalization and Indigenous wellbeing should pay attention. It argues that many of the most appropriate approaches can and will come from within our own Indigenous ways of knowing and healing, and that sharing more work of this kind can strengthen cultivation and revitalization efforts. It provides recommendations for applied linguistics and allied fields, educational, governmental and other resource holders, and Indigenous communities, programs, language cultivators and revitalizers.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

As a member of the Diné Nation, a (re)learner of our language, Diné bizaad, and a person who devotes much thought and energy to identifying and contributing to its maintenance and revitalization, I have long tried to understand the most important factors in the teaching, learning and development—the cultivation—of our language. Although such cultivation shares some considerations with broader second language learning situations, Indigenous concepts of language—and language cultivation and revitalization—are often unholistically served by prevalent approaches to language teaching and learning, which, among other things, largely overlook the effects of settler-colonial oppression of Indigenous languages. For Indigenous language cultivation to reach its potential, it must address the effects of this oppression. This article focuses on historical trauma, healing, and wellbeing as important considerations in Indigenous language cultivation and revitalization, to which applied linguists, Indigenous peoples and others interested in Indigenous language revitalization and Indigenous wellbeing should pay attention.

Approaching this article, I draw on experiences learning world languages and how learning my own language has been both more difficult while at the same time healing in a way that is only possible in our language. I approach it with caution, as it can be deeply personal, involving our own families and communities. Wary of damage-oriented depictions of our peoples (Tuck, Reference Tuck2009), I find it important to not only call attention to our challenges but also to emphasize how the same knowledges and resilience that have helped us survive can also help us to heal. While my language community has a sizeable number of first language speakers/users, today we see a dramatic decline in the number of young speakers, and we grapple with historical trauma and its effects on natural cultivation of our sacred language. Becoming aware of historical trauma as a language learner, and then as an educator, I have felt a growing sense of responsibility to address it. Facilitating talking circles, listening to frustrations and pain, and talking through challenges with relatives and friends engaging with our language, I have wished I could do more. This has led me to think more deeply about the how. How do we best help our people, of all ages and walks of life, to heal with and through our languages? (McKenzie, Reference McKenzie2020).

Historical Trauma and Indigenous Language Shift/Loss

Systematic efforts by settler colonial governments of the United States and Canada to remove and eradicate Indigenous peoples from our lands and to forcibly assimilate us have led to Indigenous peoples developing historical trauma (Brave Heart & DeBruyn, Reference Braveheart and DeBruyn1998; Whalen et al., Reference Whalen, Moss and Baldwin2016). Historical trauma has been defined as “cumulative emotional and psychological wounding over the lifespan and across generations, emanating from massive group trauma experiences” (Brave Heart, Reference Brave Heart2003, p. 7). As unresolved grief caused by systemic loss (which will become clear below), it involves assault by dominant culture, affecting those traumatized biologically, psychologically, and societally, and it can be transmitted from the generation directly experiencing it to future generations (Shea et al., Reference Shea, Mosley-Howard, Baldwin, Ironstrack, Rousmaniere and Schroer2019, p. 554).

Among the aspects of Indigeneity most profoundly impacted by historical trauma are Indigenous languages. Though not always addressed, historical trauma affects our peoples across the spectrum of language knowledge and use, including first language speakers, silent speakers (who understand but do not speak the language), as well as (second) language (re)learners (Elijah, Reference Elijah2020; Thompson, Reference Thompson2021).

Elder Indigenous language speakers who experienced violently oppressive treatment for speaking their languages often struggle with emotional pain triggered by using their language. Elders have described to me being forced to keep a bar of soap in their mouth for long periods, or having their mouths washed out. Elsewhere, elders recall children being picked up by their hair and shaken while being threatened with beating in class, toddlers exposed to ice-cold showers and a child being forced to put their tongue on a metal flagpole in winter (Twitchell, Reference Twitchell2018). Due to such experiences, Tahltan educator David Rattray articulates the deep wounds that first language speakers can face in language revitalization work:

The amount of emotional pain that exists is so horrific […] when we talk about language revitalization, we have to factor in a huge healing component [. …] There is so much pain in our Nation that language revitalization […] when you sit back and watch them try to implement it, it's extremely difficult because there's too much pain in our communities. (Thompson, Reference Thompson2012, p. 140)

Often traumatic experiences happened in government-run boarding schools, which were places of terror for many Indigenous children. The traumas, widely inflicted by school personnel, had disastrous effects on the wellbeing of Indigenous youth, particularly with respect to their languages (Twitchell, Reference Twitchell2018). Tlingit residential school survivor Annie Johnston describes her physical inability to speak her language due to her experiences:

But there's others like me that understand but don't speak. And we talk about what happens when we're trying. You get the lump in your throat. Your stomach starts churning. And all the other emotions that come in there. All the walls that were built up. Those walls weren't built by me! […] The nuns did a good job on a lot of us. (Taff et al., Reference Taff, Chee, Hall, Hall, Martin, Johnston, Rehg and Campbell2018, p. 8)

Such trauma led to loss in ability to communicate cross-generationally about love, understanding, and cultivating knowledge (Taff et al., Reference Taff, Chee, Hall, Hall, Martin, Johnston, Rehg and Campbell2018), resulting in deep linguistic disjuncture. Great numbers of our peoples were brainwashed and traumatized into keeping their ancestral languages from next generations. Consequently, historical trauma also affects generations who grew up without their ancestral languages. Younger generations who have not learned their Indigenous languages can suffer from cultural guilt and shame, as they feel alienated from their own language and identity (Elijah, Reference Elijah2020; Twitchell, Reference Twitchell2018). As Choctaw scholar Kari Chew shares, “The far-reaching impact of colonization and the enduring pressures of assimilation had prevented me from knowing my language and, thus, fully knowing myself” (Chew, Reference Chew2015, p. 155).

I have seen this surface as anger toward older generations for not having passed the language on—I still remember the voice cracking, tears, and frustration accompanying one of our learners’ emotions, as they recounted not being raised in our language. Further, learners can experience criticism or judgment for their (perceived lack of) language abilities, or discouragement from learning the language (Abtahian & Quinn, Reference Abtahian, Quinn, Hildebrandt and Jany2017; Lee, Reference Lee2009). These can be caused by internalized oppression carried by speakers due to trauma that they may not know they carry. I will never forget, after committing to (re)learning Diné bizaad as a young adult, being laughed at and told I was too old by a man from my own community. As learners internalize negative feelings surrounding our language, I have heard them put themselves down for not speaking it. They have voiced apprehension at trying to use our language, and they are not alone.

Pausing to think, how do prevalent language pedagogies and praxis address the challenges described in this section? For example, instructors did not address intergenerational language-related trauma, emotions and their relationship to my language development as I learned Mandarin, Spanish, or German. Most attention was on building structural-grammatical knowledge, communicative ability, and cultural competence. Based on the intergenerational struggle to survive with our languages, cultivation and revitalization of Indigenous languages requires additional layers of support.

Returning to Indigenous Languages as Relational Medicine for Healing

Today, researchers are describing both negative health effects of not speaking one's Indigenous language as well as health-related benefits of Indigenous language maintenance and revitalization (Erasmus, Reference Erasmus2019; Jenni et al., Reference Jenni, Anisman, McIvor and Jacobs2017; Shea et al., Reference Shea, Mosley-Howard, Baldwin, Ironstrack, Rousmaniere and Schroer2019; Taff et al., Reference Taff, Chee, Hall, Hall, Martin, Johnston, Rehg and Campbell2018; Whalen et al., Reference Whalen, Moss and Baldwin2016). Some researchers suggest that participation in maintenance and revitalization efforts may help people recover from the effects of historical trauma. By having connection to their Indigenous languages, people better understand who they are, which can promote better health (Jenni et al., Reference Jenni, Anisman, McIvor and Jacobs2017; Moore, Reference Moore2019; Thompson, Reference Thompson2012). This only affirms an understanding long shared by our elders and ceremonial practitioners: language is medicine. In this sense our languages can literally heal us.

The profound effects of (re)learning one's Indigenous language may be difficult to demonstrate empirically. Yet, for Indigenous peoples who experience such effects, it is clear that language, mental, psychosocial, spiritual, and physical wellbeing are inextricably linked. As a participant in one study described:

It opens the gates for emotions, like generations all bottled up inside of people that sometimes just cannot describe why they're so emotional, so grateful and overwhelmed with the relearning of their mother tongue. I think that when we're spiritually in balance, when we're in balance with Creation, we might not always see it scientifically, but OUR SPIRIT can feel it [.…] If one can relearn their language and begin to clean out the generations of trauma, it can create a ripple effect within our bodies, within our communities, within our Nations. (Taff et al., Reference Taff, Chee, Hall, Hall, Martin, Johnston, Rehg and Campbell2018, p. 7)

Still, healing can take many years, even our lifetimes, as wounds from historical trauma cannot be expediently and easily bandaged and fixed (Thompson, Reference Thompson2012). It is complex as we each (individually and as communities) come to and navigate it at our own pace. Thompson asks, “…what specifically would work best for my people? How can we involve community in both healing and in language revitalization?” (Reference Thompson2012, p. 240). Answering these questions means not only looking at how schools teach our languages but also at how all members of a language community help language keepers use and share their languages again, how we help learners feel good about developing and using their language in class, and especially with their families and communities. It is about how the community embraces returning to the language as a relational web of support, offering help for all language users in need of various levels and forms of healing, and embedding wellness and healing in language cultivation.

Supporting Healing in Indigenous Language Cultivation Pedagogy

All who are involved in cultivating Indigenous languages are likely to encounter the effects of historical trauma in our work (Hermes & Kawai‘ae‘a, Reference Hermes and Kawai‘ae‘a2014). For Indigenous language educators, how we address historical trauma in our language cultivation may be one of the most critical factors affecting our potential to cultivate and maintain the wellness we seek and new generations of speakers of our languages. I have received this message clearly at times—in talking circles in which learners shared how their experiences affect their feelings with the language; in supporting a loved one who still gets the lump in their throat, halting them from using the language.

Teachers involved in cultivating our ancestral languages must be acutely aware of, prepared for, and responsive to effects of historical trauma. Anxiety, shame, and challenges with self worth are some of the many effects teachers should be aware of and prepared to address, requiring positive support (Johnson, Reference Johnson2017). Not all (re)learners need the same level of support at the same time in their respective journeys, but we should be attentive to this support, just as we are to things like pronunciation or syntax—even more so—because a person's ability to open up to receiving and using the language is a prerequisite to other learning.

At the same time, we must also provide supportive space for all speakers to experience healing as they engage in our languages, and educators must be able to look inward toward our own experiences and perceptions to find ways to heal. In all that we do, we must carefully think about current language teaching and research practices that might unintentionally reinscribe the effects of historical trauma. These types of critical awareness and skills to address our unique language teaching and learning situations require distinct focus and educator development beyond common second language education pedagogy.

Of particular interest is language cultivation grounded in Indigenous values and ways of restoring balance and wellness (Real Bird, Reference L.2017). Many of the most appropriate approaches can and will come from within our own Indigenous ways of knowing and healing, which we have had for countless generations. For instance, Elijah (Reference Elijah2020) explores applying an Indigenous form of healing to language efforts by considering how Rotinonshión:ni ceremony can support language regeneration with silent speakers of Kanien'kéha. Western mental health approaches may also contribute to healing. The First Peoples Cultural Council's Reclaiming My Language program offers an example, using cognitive behavioral therapy to help silent speakers reclaim their language (First Peoples’ Cultural Council, 2021).

Sharing more work of this kind can bolster efforts to address wellness and healing in our pedagogy. For example, the annual Stabilizing Indigenous Languages Symposium and conferences held by the National Indian Education Association provide important forums for research, workshops, and dialogue. Ideas and inspiration for healing approaches can also be supported by Indigenous peoples sharing our experiences across contexts (see McIvor et al., Reference McIvor, Napoleon and Dickie2009), much in the way Hawaiian educators share with Indigenous groups developing immersion education programs (K. Kawai‘ae‘a, personal communication, April 2016), or as occurred in a 2020 virtual series highlighting Indigenous practitioners’ approaches to language nests (Ojibwemotaadidaa Omaa Gidakiiminaang, 2020).

Moving Forward

Little has been written about what programs, scholars, communities, and individuals are doing to foster healing through and with language cultivation and revitalization. Although it is helpful to articulate broader concepts of wellness integral to language revitalization and maintenance (e.g., Bell & Marlow, Reference Bell and Marlow2009; Twitchell, Reference Twitchell2018), and to hear voices representing the positive effects of revitalization on health, we need more. While important research on language revitalization is being done (e.g., Crowshoe et al., Reference Crowshoe, Genee, Peddle, Smith and Snoek2021; McIvor & Chew, Reference McIvor and Chew2021), to better support our learners and speakers in their language journeys we need more resources that specifically address healing in language cultivation. With that in mind, I highlight the following recommendations, outlined for various roles, which can help us realize interconnected goals of wellness, healing, and language cultivation and revitalization in Indigenous communities:

As we have done in other areas of wellness for generations, sharing knowledge and practices for healing, let us increase Indigenous cross-cultural and cross-community sharing of what we are doing to address historical trauma in language cultivation and revitalization, to offer inspiration and ideas as we identify our own community-specific approaches. Let us support each other in our healing, in all the ways that might take shape, to use, learn, gift, and live with our languages as wellness for today and for our future generations.

References

Abtahian, M. R., & Quinn, C. M. (2017). Language shift and linguistic insecurity. In Hildebrandt, K. A., Jany, C., & W. Silva (Eds.), Documenting variation in endangered languages, (pp. 137–51). University of Hawai‘i Press. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24752.Google Scholar
Bell, L., & Marlow, P. E. (2009). Visibility, healing and resistance: Voices from the 2005 Dena'ina Language Institute. Journal of American Indian Education, 48(1), 118.Google Scholar
Brave Heart, M. Y. H. (2003). The historical trauma response among Natives and its relationship with substance abuse: A Lakota illustration. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 35(1), 713.10.1080/02791072.2003.10399988CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braveheart, M., & DeBruyn, L. (1998). The American Indian holocaust: Healing historical unresolved grief. American Indian Alaskan Native Mental Health Research, 8(2), 5678.Google Scholar
Chew, K. A. B. (2015). Family at the heart of Chickasaw language reclamation. American Indian Quarterly, 39(2), 154–79. https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.39.2.0154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowshoe, L., Genee, I., Peddle, M., Smith, J. & Snoek, C. (Eds.). (2021). Sustaining Indigenous languages: Connecting communities, teachers, and scholars. Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Elijah, K. A. (2020). Saiakwatsirón:ni—We are reigniting the fire: Regeneration of Kanien'kéha silent speakers. [Unpublished master's thesis]. University of Victoria, Canada. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/handle/1828/11873.Google Scholar
Erasmus, M. T. (2019). Goyatıı̀ K'aàt’ıı̀ Ats'edee, K'aàt’ıı̀ Adets'edee: Ho! Healing our languages, healing ourselves: Now is the time [Unpublished master's thesis]. University of Victoria, Canada. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/handle/1828/10855.Google Scholar
First Peoples’ Cultural Council. (2021). Reclaiming My Language Program. https://fpcc.ca/program/silent-speaker/.Google Scholar
Hermes, M., & Kawai‘ae‘a, K. (2014). Revitalizing Indigenous languages through Indigenous immersion education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 2(2), 303–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenni, B., Anisman, A., McIvor, O., Jacobs, P. (2017). An exploration of the effects of mentor-apprentice programs on mentors and apprentices’ wellbeing. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 12(2), 2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. K. (2017). Syilx language house: How and why we are delivering 2,000 decolonizing hours in Nsyilxcn. Canadian Modern Language Review, 73(4), 509–37.10.3138/cmlr.4040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. S. (2009). Language, identity, and power: Navajo and Pueblo young adults’ perspectives and experiences with competing language ideologies. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 8(5), 307–20.10.1080/15348450903305106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, W. Y. (2017). Producing language reclamation by decolonising ‘language.’ In Leonard, W. Y. & De Korne, H. (Eds.), Language documentation and description, Vol. 14, 1536. EL Publishing.Google Scholar
McIvor, O., Napoleon, A., & Dickie, K. M. (2009). Language and culture as protective factors for at-risk communities. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 5(1), 6.10.18357/ijih51200912327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIvor, O., & Chew, K. A. B. (Eds.). (2021). Indigenous language revitalization: Innovation, reflection and future directions [Special issue]. WINHEC: International Journal of Indigenous Education Scholarship, 16(1).Google Scholar
McKenzie, J. (2020). Approaching from many angles: Seeing the connections for our languages to live. The Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 501–06.10.1111/modl.12655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. (2019). Language and identity in an Indigenous teacher education program. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 78(2), 1506213.10.1080/22423982.2018.1506213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojibwemotaadidaa Omaa Gidakiiminaang. (Producer). (2020). Wadiswan workshop: How to start an Indigenous language nest. [Online Workshop Series].Google Scholar
L., Real Bird (2017). Reflections on revitalizing and reinforcing native languages and cultures. Cogent Education, 4(1).Google Scholar
Shea, H., Mosley-Howard, G. S., Baldwin, D., Ironstrack, G., Rousmaniere, K., & Schroer, J. E. (2019). Cultural revitalization as a restorative process to combat racial and cultural trauma and promote living well. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 25(4), 553–65.10.1037/cdp0000250CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taff, A., Chee, M., Hall, J., Hall, M. Y. D., Martin, K. N., & Johnston, A. (2018). Indigenous language use impacts wellness. In Rehg, K. L. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of endangered languages (pp. 861884). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (2012). Hedekeyeh Hots'ih Kāhidi – “Our ancestors are in us”: Strengthening our voices through language revitalization from a Tahltan worldview. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Victoria, Canada.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. (2021). Dah Dzāhge Nodesidē/We are speaking our language again: The implementation of a community-based Tāłtān language reclamation framework. KULA, 5(1), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–28.10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twitchell, X. L. (2018). For our little grandchildren: Language revitalization among the Tlingit [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, HI.Google Scholar
Whalen, D. H., Moss, M., & Baldwin, D. (2016). Healing through language: Positive physical health effects of indigenous language use. F1000Research, 5, 852.10.12688/f1000research.8656.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0