Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T20:38:39.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Support for Governmental Income Redistribution in Nordic Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2021

Bent Greve  and
M. Azhar Hussain Open the ORCID record for M. Azhar Hussain [Opens in a new window]
Bent Greve
Affiliation:
Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
M. Azhar Hussain
Affiliation:
Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. University of Sharjah, University City, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. Email: mazhar@sharjah.ac.ae
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In many countries, we have seen an increase in economic inequality over the past 20 to 25 years. The populations might therefore have changed their attitude about how and how much different countries should intervene to reduce the extent of economic inequality. A question is whether there is any connection between changes in redistribution preferences and trends in economic inequality in the prosperous Nordic welfare states. This article contributes by examining whether there are differences in redistribution attitude and changes herein based upon socio-economic criteria, which might include self-interest arguments. Nordic countries are interesting because there have been differences in development, and even strong growth in economic inequality, especially in Sweden and Denmark, although these countries in the literature have been seen as highly equal societies. The analysis shows that support for redistribution is relatively stable over time in each country, but also that there are major differences between countries, with support being much higher in Finland compared with Denmark. Females, discriminated groups and the unemployed generally support redistribution to a higher degree. Ageing generally increases redistributional support, while more education reduces support for government redistribution in Finland. In all four countries, the highest income groups are less supportive of redistribution of income.

Type
Article
Information
European Review , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 426 - 444
Copyright
© 2021 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albæk, K, Larsen, M and Thomsen, L (2017) Segregation and gender wage gaps in the private and the public sectors: an analysis of Danish linked employer-employee data, 2002–2012. Empirical Economics 53(2), 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A and Giuliano, P (2011) Preferences for redistribution. In Handbook of Social Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Vol 1, pp. 93–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arts, W and Gelissen, J (2002) Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy 12(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952872002012002114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, AB and Bourguignon, F (2014) Handbook of Income Distribution. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Atkinson, AB, Casarico, A and Voitchovsky, S (2018) Top incomes and the gender divide. The Journal of Economic Inequality 16(2), 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, P (1990) The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balestra, C, Boarini, R and Tosetto, E (2018) What matters most to people? Evidence from the OECD Better Life Index users’ responses. Social Indicators Research 106(3), 907–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1538-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, S, Ferrarini, T, Nelson, K and Palme, J (2017) The Generational Welfare Contract: Justice, Institutions and Outcomes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Blekesaune, M and Quadagno, J (2003) Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: a comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review 19(5), 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breznau, N and Hommerich, C (2019) No generalizable effect of income inequality on public support for governmental redistribution among rich democracies 1987–2010. Social Science Research 81, 170–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgoon, B, Koster, F and Van Egmond, M (2012) Support for redistribution and the paradox of immigration. Journal of European Social Policy 22(3), 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, MR and Julian, G (2018) Compensation or social investment? Revisiting the link between globalisation and popular demand for the welfare state. Journal of Social Policy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279418000569.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, MR and Lober, D (2019) Between solidarity and self-interest: the elderly and support for public education revisited. Journal of Social Policy, 1–20.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, MR and Neimanns, E (2017) Conflictive preferences towards social investments and transfers in mature welfare states: the cases of unemployment benefits and childcare provision. Journal of European Social Policy 27(3), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caminada, K, Goudswaard, K, Wang, C and Wang, J (2019) Income inequality and fiscal redistribution in 31 countries after the crisis. Comparative Economic Studies 61(1), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-018-0079-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, H (2016) Dualization and subjective employment insecurity: explaining the subjective employment insecurity divide between permanent and temporary workers across 23 European countries. Economic and Industrial Democracy 40(3), 700–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X16656411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, H and Meuleman, B (2017) European parents’ attitudes towards public childcare provision: the role of current provisions, interests and ideologies. European Societies 19(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2016.1235218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, C and Arqueros-Fernández, F (2019) The distortions of the Irish ‘recovery.’ Critical Social Policy, 0261018319838912.Google Scholar
Deeming, C (2018) The politics of (fractured) solidarity: a cross-national analysis of the class bases of the welfare state. Social Policy & Administration 52(5), 1106–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimick, M, Rueda, D and Stegmueller, D (2018) Models of other-regarding preferences, inequality, and redistribution. Annual Review of Political Science 21, 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ejrnæs, A (2020) Relative deprivation and subjective social position. In Greve, B (ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Poverty, 1st edn. Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ennser-Jedenastik, L (2018) Welfare chauvinism in populist radical right platforms: the role of redistributive justice principles. Social Policy & Administration 52(1), 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
ESS (2020) https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round9/fieldwork/source/ESS9_source_questionnaires.pdf. European Social Survey (accessed 17 September 2020).Google Scholar
ESS (2021) https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/. European Social Survey (accessed 23 January 2021).Google Scholar
Commission, EU (2009) Economic crisis in Europe: causes, consequences and responses. European Economy 7, 1–87.Google Scholar
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A and Frijters, P (2004) How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, WH (2019) Econometric Analysis, Global Edition. Essex: Pearson Education Canada.Google Scholar
Greve, B (2019) Welfare, Populism and Welfare Chauvinism. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Guiraudon, V and Martin, C (2019) Drivers for change. In Greve, B (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, 2nd edn. Oxfordshire: Routledge, pp. 288–299.Google Scholar
Helliwell, JF and Wang, S (2011) Trust and wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing 1(1), 42–78.Google Scholar
Helliwell, JF and Huang, H (2014) New measures of the costs of unemployment: evidence from the subjective well-being of 3.3 million Americans. Economic Inquiry 52(4), 1485–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, MA, Siersbæk, S and Østerdal, LP (2020) Multidimensional welfare comparisons of EU member states before, during, and after the financial crisis: a dominance approach. Social Choice and Welfare 55(4), 645–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, MM (2006) What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision: self-interest or political ideology? A longitudinal approach. Acta Sociologica. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699306067718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, G and Stefánsson, K (2013) Retrenchment or Renewal? Welfare States in Times of Economic Crisis. Helsinki: The Nordic Centre of Excellence NordWel.Google Scholar
Kangas, O and Kvist, J (2019) Nordic welfare states. In Greve, B (ed.), Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, 2nd edn. Oxfordshire: Routledge, pp. 124–136.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, L and McCall, L (2008) Inequality, public opinion and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review 6(1), 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevins, A, Horn, A, Jensen, C and van Kersbergen, K (2018) The illusion of class in welfare state politics? Journal of Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279418000247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovalainen, A (2019) Working Europe: Reshaping European Employment Systems. Oxon: Taylor and Francis, pp. 137–154.Google Scholar
Likert, R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 140, 1–55.Google Scholar
Martela, F, Greve, B, Rothstein, B and Saari, J (2020) The Nordic exceptionalism: what explains why the Nordic countries are constantly among the happiest in the world. In Emmanuel De Neve, J, Helliwell, J, Layard, R and Sachs, JD (eds), World Happiness Report, 2020. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network. https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2020/#read.Google Scholar
Oorschot, W and Roosma, F (2015) The social legitimacy of differently targeted benefits. Discussion Paper No. 15/11.Google Scholar
Palviainen, H (2019) Changing Nordic model? A policy analysis. EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research. EM 15/19.Google Scholar
Rehm, P, Hacker, JS and Schlesinger, M (2012) Insecure alliances: risk, inequality, and support for the welfare state. American Political Science Review 106(2), 386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, D (2013) Beyond welfare regimes: from empirical typology to conceptual ideal types. Social Policy & Administration 47(1), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, T and Rosenthal, H (1979) The elusive median voter. Journal of Public Economics 12(2), 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, D and Stegmueller, D (2016) The externalities of inequality: fear of crime and preferences for redistribution in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science 60(2), 472–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salverda, W, Nolan, B and Smeeding, TM (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, R and Grasso, MT (2020) The attitudinal gender gap across generations: support for redistribution and government spending in contexts of high and low welfare provision. European Political Science Review 12(3), 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silber, J (1999) Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement. Edited by Silver, J. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S (1997) Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: a comparison of eight Western nations. European Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P and Leruth, B (eds) (2018) Attitudes, Aspirations and Welfare Social Policy Directions in Uncertain Times, 1st edn. Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75783-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, R (2006) Universalism versus selection. In The Welfare State Reader, 2nd edn, edited by Pierson, F and Castles, C. Bristol: Polity, pp. 40–48.Google Scholar
Von Kersbergen, K (2019) What are welfare state typologies and how are they useful, if at all? In Greve, B (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, pp. 115–123.Google Scholar