Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T11:09:09.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why and When Narcissistic Employees Are More Creative in the Workplace? A Social Cognitive Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2023

Yi-Xuan Zhao
Affiliation:
Nanjing University, China
Kong Zhou
Affiliation:
Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China
Wen-Xing Liu*
Affiliation:
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, China
*
Corresponding author: Wen-Xing Liu (kekexili24@163.com)

Abstract

The question of whether narcissists are more creative than peers has attracted much scholarly attention in both psychology and organizational management sciences. Drawing from social cognitive theory, we theorized that the relationship between narcissism and creativity could be explained by individual creative self-efficacy, which depends on one's direct and vicarious experiences of creativity. Drawing from trait activation theory, we further proposed organizational valuing of creativity as a key contextual moderator that determines whether narcissism facilitates or inhibits creative self-efficacy and, in turn, creativity. We suggest that high organizational valuing of creativity will energize narcissists to put their attention and effort into both direct and vicarious experiences of creativity, enhancing their creative self-efficacy and creativity. We tested our conceptual model through a field study with data collected from 269 full-time employees working in 86 work teams. The empirical results provided support for the social cognitive explanation for the positive relationship between narcissism and creativity in the context of high organizational valuing of creativity. Our study not only resolved prior debates on the relationship between narcissism and creativity but also provided direct empirical support for social cognitive theory and the person-in-context interactionist perspective of creativity research.

摘要:

针对自恋者是否比其他人更有创造力这一问题,心理学和组织管理科学领域的学者们已经进行了一系列探讨,并得出了不一致的结论。为了化解以往的争论,本研究从社会认知理论出发,提出自恋人格和创造力之间的关系取决于个体对创造力的直接经验和间接经验中得出的创造力自我效能来解释。根据特质激活理论,组织对创造力的重视是决定自恋特质是否会促进或抑制创造力自我效能并影响其创造力的关键情境因素。具体来讲,组织对创造力的高度重视会激发自恋员工将注意力和努力投入到与创造力有关的直接和间接经验中,从而提高他们的创造力自我效能和创造力。通过对来自86个工作团队的269名全职员工进行问卷调查,我们对本研究提出的理论模型进行了实证检验。数据分析结果支持了在高创造力重视环境下,自恋特质正向影响创造力的社会认知解释。本研究不仅化解了自恋特质与创造力之间关系的争论,而且为社会认知理论和情境与人交互视角的创造力研究提供了直接的实证支持。

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

ACCEPTED BY Senior Editor Ning Li

*

Yi-Xuan Zhao and Kong Zhou made equal contributions to the manuscript and are listed in alphabetical order.

References

REFERENCES

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 11541184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. 2006. The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4): 440450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. 2006. The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4): 963970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. 1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. 1986. The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner, W. J. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research: 137164. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Chiodo, L. M. 1991. Narcissistic acts in everyday life. Journal of Personality, 59(2): 179215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, S. M., & Marchisio, G. 2011. Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4): 268284.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. 2007. It's all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3): 351386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, T., Li, F., & Leung, K. 2016. When does supervisor support encourage innovative behavior? Opposite moderating effects of general self-efficacy and internal locus of control. Personnel Psychology, 69(1): 123158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, T., Li, F., Chen, X.-P., & Ou, Z. 2018. Innovate or die: How should knowledge-worker teams respond to technological turbulence? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149: 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahmen-Wassenberg, P., Kämmerle, M., Unterrainer, H.-F., & Fink, A. 2016. The relation between different facets of creativity and the dark side of personality. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1): 6066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decius, J., Schaper, N., & Seifert, A. 2019. Informal workplace learning: Development and validation of a measure. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(4): 495535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Hartog, D. N., De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Belschak, F. D. 2020. Toot your own horn? Leader narcissism and the effectiveness of employee self-promotion. Journal of Management, 46(2): 261286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons, R. A. 1987. Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1): 1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. 2007. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2): 121138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. 2003. Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5): 618630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Hughes, D. J., & Marshall, E. 2013. Creativity, OCD, narcissism and the Big Five. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10: 9198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galang, A. J. R., Castelo, V. L. C., Santos, L. C., Perlas, C. M. C., & Angeles, M. a. B. 2016. Investigating the prosocial psychopath model of the creative personality: Evidence from traits and psychophysiology. Personality and Individual Differences, 100: 2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goncalo, J. A., Flynn, F. J., & Kim, S. H. 2010. Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11): 14841495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. 2009. Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 765778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grapsas, S., Brummelman, E., Back, M. D., & Denissen, J. J. A. 2020. The ‘why’ and ‘how’ of narcissism: A process model of narcissistic status pursuit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1): 150172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, S. G. 1994. Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organization Science, 5(3): 309321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, M. J. 1993. The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 18(4): 657693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, W., Hao, P., Huang, X., Long, L.-R., Hiller, N. J., & Li, S.-L. 2020. Different roles of shared and vertical leadership in promoting team creativity: Cultivating and synthesizing team members’ individual creativity. Personnel Psychology, 73(1): 199225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, S. S., Kausel, E. E., Jackson, A. T., & Reb, J. 2020. When and why narcissists exhibit greater hindsight bias and less perceived learning. Journal of Management, 46(8): 14981528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, L., Krasikova, D. V., & Harms, P. D. 2020. Avoiding or embracing social relationships? A conservation of resources perspective of leader narcissism, leader–member exchange differentiation, and follower voice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(1): 7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. 2010. The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2): 420432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonason, P. K., Richardson, E. N., & Potter, L. 2015. Self-reported creative ability and the dark triad traits: An exploratory study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4): 488494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonason, P. K., Abboud, R., Tomé, J., Dummett, M., & Hazer, A. 2017. The dark triad traits and individual differences in self-reported and other-rated creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 117: 150154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. 2014. Introducing the short dark triad (sd3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1): 2841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kapoor, H. 2015. The creative side of the dark triad. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1): 5867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizan, Z., & Herlache, A. D. 2018. The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1): 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, A. K. Y., Liou, S., Miron-Spektor, E., Koh, B., Chan, D., Eisenberg, R., & Schneider, I. 2018. Middle ground approach to paradox: Within- and between-culture examination of the creative benefits of paradoxical frames. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(3): 443464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H., Li, F., & Chen, T. 2018a. A motivational–cognitive model of creativity and the role of autonomy. Journal of Business Research, 92: 179188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Li, N., Guo, J., Li, J., & Harris, T. B. 2018b. A network view of advice-giving and individual creativity in teams: A brokerage-driven, socially perpetuated phenomenon. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6): 22102229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Chiang, J. T.-J., Fehr, R., Xu, M., & Wang, S. 2017. How do leaders react when treated unfairly? Leader narcissism and self-interested behavior in response to unfair treatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(11): 15901599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y., Li, Y., Hao, X., & Zhang, Y. 2019. Narcissism and learning from entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(3): 496512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsen, L., Arnulf, J. K., Furnham, A., & Lang-Ree, O. C. 2019. Narcissism and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 142: 166171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, M. K., Ning, H., Campbell, W. K., & Goodie, A. S. 2016. Narcissism, overconfidence, and risk taking in U.S. and Chinese student samples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(3): 385400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. 2008. Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism. Journal of Personality, 76(3): 449476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, K. W. 2011. Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5): 10131042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. 2001. Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4): 177196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. 1998–2017. Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Nevicka, B., Baas, M., & Ten Velden, F. S. 2016. The bright side of threatened narcissism: Improved performance following ego threat. Journal of Personality, 84(6): 809823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevicka, B., De Hoogh, A. H. B., Van Vianen, A. E. M., Beersma, B., & McIlwain, D. 2011. All I need is a stage to shine: Narcissists’ leader emergence and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5): 910925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. 2012. A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3): 557579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. 1996. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3): 607634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y., Rowney, J. A., & Peterson, M. F. 2012. The structure of chinese cultural traditions: An empirical study of business employees in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 7795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. 2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1): 89106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, R. N. 1980. Narcissism and creativity: Are they related? Psychological Reports, 46(1): 5560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. 1979. A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45(2): 590590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raskin, R. N., & Terry, H. 1988. A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5): 890902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. 2004. What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1): 3353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. 2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6): 933958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. B., & Webster, B. D. 2018. Narcissus the innovator? The relationship between grandiose narcissism, innovation, and adaptability. Personality and Individual Differences, 121: 6773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R. 1985. Creativity and normal narcissism. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(1): 4755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. 2003. A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3): 500517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. 2002. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 11371148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. 2008. Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8): 862877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, H. M., & Baumeister, R. F. 2002. The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5): 819834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wisse, B., Barelds, D. P. H., & Rietzschel, E. F. 2015. How innovative is your employee? The role of employee and supervisor dark triad personality traits in supervisor perceptions of employee innovative behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 82: 158162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2): 293321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. 2010. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1): 107128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Long, L., Wu, T.-Y., & Huang, X. 2015. When is pay for performance related to employee creativity in the Chinese context? The role of guanxi HRM practice, trust in management, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5): 698719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. 2001. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 682696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Wang, X. M., Bavato, D., Tasselli, S., & Wu, J. 2019. Understanding the receiving side of creativity: A multidisciplinary review and implications for management research. Journal of Management, 45(6): 25702595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar