Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T14:28:17.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transcranial attenuation in bone conduction audiometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Michael Nolan  and
David J. Lyon
Michael Nolan
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology and Education of the Deaf, University of Manchester.
David J. Lyon
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology and Education of the Deaf, University of Manchester.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transcranial attenuation for bone conduction as a function of frequency (0.25 to 4 kHz.) was measured on a group of unilaterally deaf (n 15) and a group of normal (n = 35) ears. The results indicate a positive mean attenuation for all frequencies with a peak value of 13 db. for both groups at 2 kHz. Inter-subject variability was extremely large. This is considered to be a result of variability in skull bone thickness.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 95 , Issue 6 , June 1981 , pp. 597 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American National Standards Institute (1972) Specification of an Artificial Head-bone, ANSI S3.13, American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Bavosi, R. and Rupp, R. R. (1973) The effect of varied mastoid placement of the bone oscillator on threshold acuity. Journal of Auditory Research, 13, 247–250.Google Scholar
Békésy, G. von. (1960) Experiments in hearing. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Billings, B. L. and Winter, M. (1977) Calibration force levels for bone conductor vibrators. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 653–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standards Institution (1966) An artificial mastoid for the calibration of bone vibrators in hearing aids and audiometers, B.S. 4009, British Standards Institution, London.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1972) Specification for a reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone audiometers. Part 4: Normal threshold of hearing for pure tones by bone conduction, B.S. 2497: Part 4: British Standards Institution, London.Google Scholar
Broel, and Kjaer, (1970) Instructions and applications. Orboe Print, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Carhart, R. (1950) Clinical application of bone conduction. Archives of Otolaryngology, (Chicago), 51, 798–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carhart, R. and Jerger, J. (1959) Preferred method for clinical determination of pure tone thresholds. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 24, 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H. and Silverman, S. (1978) Hearing and deafness. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Dirks, D. (1964) Factors related to bone conduction reliability. Archives of Otolaryngology, (Chicago), 79, 551–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirks, D. and Kamm, C. (1975) Bone–vibrator measurements; physical characteristics and behavioural thresholds. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 242–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, D. and Malmquist, C. M. (1969) Comparison of frontal and mastoid bone-conduction thresholds in various conductive lesions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 725–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, A. S. (1961) Problems in the measurement of bone conduction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 26, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glorig, A. (1965) Audiometry: principles and practices. The Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Goodhill, V. and Holcomb, A. L. (1955) Cochlear potentials in the evaluation of bone conduction. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 64, 1213–1233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1973) Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd., Tokyo.Google Scholar
Harris, J. D., Haines, H. L. and Myers, C. K. (1953) A helmet-held bone conduction vibrator. Laryngoscope, 63, 998–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsh, I. J. (1952) The measurement of hearing. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
Hood, J. D. (1957) The principles and practice of bone conduction audiometry; a review of the present position. Proceedings of Royal Society of Medicine, 50, 689–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, J. D. (1979) Clinical implications in calibration requirements in bone conduction standardisation. Audiology, 18, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, R., Clark, S. and Grainger, J. (1968) Air and bone conduction interaural attenuation. Progress 44th Annual Convention of the American Speech and Hearing Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Hurley, R. M. and Berger, K. W. (1970) The relationship between vibrator placement and bone conduction measurements with monaurally deaf subjects. Journal of Auditory Research, 10, 147–150.Google Scholar
International Electrotechnical Commission: An IEC mechanical coupler for the calibration of bone vibrators having a specified contact area and being applied with a specified static force, IEC-373, (1971).Google Scholar
Isele, R. W., Berger, K. W., Lippy, W. H. and Rotolo, A. L. (1968) A comparison of bone conduction thresholds as measured from several cranial locations. Journal of Auditory Research, 8, 415–419.Google Scholar
Katz, J. Ed. (1972) Handbook of clinical audiology. The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore.Google Scholar
Kirikae, I. (1959) An experimental study of the fundamental mechanism of bone conduction. Acta oto-laryngologica, (Stockholm), Supplementum, 145.Google ScholarPubMed
Kobrak, H. G. (1959) The middle ear. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Littler, T. S. (1967) The scientific and clinical aspects of bone conduction, Part 1. Sound, 1, 55–58.Google Scholar
Nilo, E. R. (1968) The relation of vibrator surface area and static application force to the vibrator-to-head coupling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 805–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, J. P. (1970) Clinical technique in bone conduction tests. Sound, 4, 31–34Google Scholar
Sabatino, D. A. and Stromsta, C. P. (1969) Bone conduction thresholds from three locations on the skull. Journal of Auditory Research, 9, 194–198.Google Scholar
Sanders, J. W. and Rintelmann, W. F. (1964) Masking in audiometry: a clinical evaluation of three methods. Archives of Otolaryngology, (Chicago), 80, 541–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Studebaker, G. A. (1964) Clinical masking of air and bone conducted stimuli. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 29, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tonndorf, J. (1968) A new concept of bone conduction. Archives of Otolaryngology, (Chicago), 87, 49–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Weatherton, M. A. and Goetzinger, C. P. (1971) A report on bone conduction thresholds at the mastoid and forehead in normals. Audiology, 10, 22–39.Google Scholar
Whittle, L. S. (1965) A determination of the normal threshold of hearing by bone conduction. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar