Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T07:54:34.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2021

Ayumi Arai
Affiliation:
Center for Spatial Information Science The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Erwin Knippenberg*
Affiliation:
The World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Moritz Meyer
Affiliation:
The World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Apichon Witayangkurn
Affiliation:
Center for Spatial Information Science The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: eknippenberg@worldbank.org

Abstract

Aggregated data from mobile network operators (MNOs) can provide snapshots of population mobility patterns in real time, generating valuable insights when other more traditional data sources are unavailable or out-of-date. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the value of remotely-collected, high-frequency, localized data in inferring the economic impact of shocks to inform decision-making. However, proper protocols must be put in place to ensure end-to-end user-confidentiality and compliance with international best practice. We demonstrate how to build such a data pipeline, channeling data from MNOs through the national regulator to the analytical users, who in turn produce policy-relevant insights. The aggregated indicators analyzed offer a detailed snapshot of the decrease in mobility and increased out-migration from urban to rural areas during the COVID-19 lockdown. Recommendations based on lessons learned from this process can inform engagements with other regulators in creating data pipelines to inform policy-making.

Type
Translational Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The World Bank, 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Policy Significance Statement

Decision-makers in the public and private sectors aim to take decisions on policy and project design based on a robust evidence base. This paper demonstrates that the analysis of data consisting of anonymized and de-identified call detail records (CDRs) provides new insights about patterns and trends of human mobility. Information is available on a highly localized level and in real time, but also requires investments into statistical capacity and special safeguards on data privacy. Findings from the analysis highlight population dynamics during COVID-19, and inform the government response to a quickly evolving health crisis, including the placement of health centers, testing facilities, and smart containment policies. Future data analysis supports urban planning and investment decisions in the public and private sectors.

1. Introduction

1.1. Unlocking the potential of mobile phone data

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the value of real-time, high resolution data to inform decision-making in a crisis situation. External shocks, such as climate change, conflicts, and pandemics trigger population movements and displacement. In response, decision-makers require information about origins and destinations of refugees and migrants to inform rapid policy responses. Yet, survey and administrative data exhibit severe shortcomings which complicate any crisis assessment: traditional data are likely to be outdated during a quickly evolving crisis situation, and rapid data collection is expensive, slow in relation to how quickly crises tend to unfold, and often incompatible with a lockdown situation. By contrast, new data sources that are readily available have recently gained prominence--notably, satellite and location data. These offer real-time snapshots at a high level of spatial resolution.

Call detail record (CDR) data offer the potential to document population dynamics in near real time. CDR data are available as high-frequency, highly localized data which can be collected and processed in real time and at relatively low cost. In developing countries where smart-phone penetration is low, CDR is likely to have much more coverage than GPS data. The analysis of CDR data involves investments in technical capacity and information technology (IT) infrastructure. One defining characteristic of such data is that it is updated in near real time and requires terabytes of storage capacity, either on the cloud or servers on premise. A so-called data pipeline is required to automate the data flow. The raw data from the mobile network operators (MNO) is encrypted and shared with the regulator, who in turn aggregates it into indicators available for analysis. It is also essential to build the technical capacity of analysts in managing and analyzing data, ensuring the sustainability of the initiative.

The use of CDR data raises privacy concerns and requires a strong institutional framework to regulate access and ensure confidentiality. Researchers and governments have worked closely with regulatory authorities and MNOs to leverage CDR data in measuring changes in mobility patterns (Oliver et al., Reference Oliver, Lepri, Sterly, Lambiotte, Deletaille, De Nadai, Letouzé, Salah, Benjamins, Cattuto, Colizza, de Cordes, Fraiberger, Koebe, Lehmann, Murillo, Pentland, Pham, Pivetta, Saramäki, Scarpino, Tizzoni, Verhulst and Vinck2020). However, most of these efforts are concentrated in countries with established institutional frameworks, which also reflect recent efforts to integrate CDR data and other big data into the national statistical system.

1.2. Use-case: tracking mobility in The Gambia

This paper showcases the use of CDR data to track changes in mobility across The Gambia between March and May 2020, when COVID-19 led to an exodus of the capital city region. This project was undertaken in collaboration with the national regulator Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) and The Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBoS) to establish a durable CDR data pipeline in The Gambia. This partnership allows for government ownership and sustainability, investing in both the necessary systems and technical capacity.

Analysis of CDR data suggests that economic lockdown measures reduced human mobility and pushed people to leave the capital city region and return to rural areas. We validate the use of CDR data against the known population distribution from the population census and WorldPop data. Our contribution demonstrates how a system-building approach can make timely, disaggregated analysis based on CDR data available for quick decision-making.

This use-case demonstrates how to build an end-to-end data pipeline for CDR data. This pipeline draws raw data produced by the mobile phone operators and encrypts and aggregates it on the regulator’s premise before making it available to researchers for analysis. Once automated, it can facilitate the production of rapid, high-resolution insights on population mobility patterns and their economic implications.

1.3. Roadmap

Section 2 positions our paper in the literature and describes the country context. Section 3 outlines the engagement model used to work with the PURA and the GBoS on access to CDR data and produces statistical information from CDR data in The Gambia. Section 4 presents the data and defines the methodology to analyze it. Section 5 showcases key results. Section 6 summarizes lessons learned from the ongoing engagement in The Gambia. Finally, Section 7 concludes and outlines the next steps.

2. Context and Literature Review

2.1. Policy relevance of CDR data

There is a rich and growing literature seeking to leverage the potential of CDR data to inform policy-making. With mobile penetration rising in developing countries (GSM Association, 2020), researchers have demonstrated the use of CDR data to create poverty maps (Blumenstock et al., Reference Blumenstock, Cadamuro and On2015), understand migration patterns, and estimate a household’s economic characteristics (Blumenstock, Reference Blumenstock2018). There have been sustained improvements in forecasting population density by combining high-resolution satellite data with powerful algorithms (Stevens et al., Reference Stevens, Gaughan, Linard and Tatem2015). WorldPop trains its algorithms on historical census data and projects annual population density at 100-m resolution in a publicly available dataset (Stevens et al., Reference Stevens, Gaughan, Linard and Tatem2015). However, these datasets rely on slow-moving indicators and are computationally intensive. Forward-looking projections are based on linear extrapolation and do not account for short- or medium-term population movement dynamics.

Researchers have harnessed mobile phone data to map population movements. Deville et al. (Reference Deville, Linard, Martin, Gilbert, Stevens, Gaughan, Blondel and Tatem2014) showed that the density of unique users in a cell tower’s catchment area scales with population density, and can be plotted on a logarithmic curve. Researchers can therefore extrapolate shifts in the number of unique users to predict shifts in population densities over time, day-by-day or week-by-week. Accordingly, CDR aggregates provide insights on population movements, which are useful for estimating regional connectivity and the impact of mobility restrictions (Wesolowski et al., Reference Wesolowski, Buckee, Engø-Monsen and Metcalf2016). It also helps to identify areas with higher risks of importation due to population flows from other regions, and develop spatial epidemiological models (Aledort et al., Reference Aledort, Lurie, Wasserman, Bozzette, Lurie-Nicole, Wasserman-Jeffrey and Bozzette-Samuel2007; Wesolowski et al., Reference Wesolowski, Eagle, Tatem, Smith, Noor, Snow and Buckee2012).

Combining CDR data with administrative and survey data offers insights on fast-moving health and well-being indicators. Drawing from survey data on the incidence of poverty in Rwanda, Blumenstock et al. (Reference Blumenstock, Cadamuro and On2015) use machine learning algorithms to predict poverty outcomes based solely on patterns in mobile network data. Zu Erbach-Schoenberg et al. (Reference Zu Erbach-Schoenberg, Alegana, Sorichetta, Linard, Lourenço, Ruktanonchai and Tatem2016) combine CDR data with public health datasets in Namibia to link mobility and malaria incidence. When compared with estimates using static maps, this leads to discrepancies of up to 30%. These applications showcase the value-added of high-resolution, high-frequency proxy data like CDR in the context of an epidemic such as COVID-19.

CDR data can also be used to rapidly update estimates of population distribution when a natural disaster leads to widespread displacement. Bengtsson et al. (Reference Bengtsson, Lu, Thorson, Garfield and von Schreeb2011) used CDR data from a major telecommunications company to track displacement in Haiti after the 2010 earthquake. This allowed them to track shifts in population distribution and estimate that up to 20% of the population of the capital city left in the 19 days after the earthquake. Lu et al. (Reference Lu, Wrathall, Sundsøy, Nadiruzzaman, Wetter, Iqbal and Bengtsson2016) used CDR data to track short-term mobility in the hours and days after Cyclone Mahasen hit Bangladesh in May 2013.

2.2. Methodological innovations CDR data

The most commonly used methods for processing CDR data are traditional data mining techniques. These include frequency-based analysis, data clustering using unsupervised machine learning, and geo-visualization techniques by mapping geolocation (Calabrese et al., Reference Calabrese, Ferrari and Blondel2014). In recent years, researchers have used de-identified CDR data to compute origin–destination (OD) matrices in order to better map patterns in travel behavior (Calabrese et al., Reference Calabrese, Di Lorenzo, Liu and Ratti2011). In combination with additional administrative or survey data, supervised machine-learning methods can inform the prediction of outcomes based on patterns in the cell network (Sundsøy et al., Reference Sundsøy, Johannes, Reme, Iqbal and Jahani2016).

The preprocessing of the raw CDR data is essential to accommodate positioning errors in data collection and the first step for processing. The oscillation problem of the user’s location is the leading cause of noise in position data collected from the cellular network as they transfer calls to the nearest base station for traffic management, creating imprecise and overlapping Voronoi polygons (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Ma, Susilo, Liu and Wang2016). The time-based filter is used to ignore oscillation and agglomerative (hierarchical clustering) methods to extract truthful location data from raw CDR.

However, handling such sensitive data requires appropriate protocols to address concerns around data privacy. While anonymizing data is necessary, Kondor et al. (Reference Kondor, Thebault, Grauwin, Gódor, Moritz, Sobolevsky and Ratti2015) show that it is theoretically possible to identify users based on their mobility patterns alone (Kondor et al., Reference Kondor, Thebault, Grauwin, Gódor, Moritz, Sobolevsky and Ratti2015). It is, therefore, best practice to restrict access to individual observations and use aggregated indicators for the purpose of analysis.

2.3. Country context: The Gambia

The Gambia is a West African country of 2.3 million people surrounded by Senegal. The country has experienced prolonged spells of violence and instability and is currently undergoing a transition process to restore its democratic institutions. With a Gross National Income (GNI) of 740 USD (current, Atlas method), The Gambia is classified as a low-income country, with more than 10% of the population living in extreme poverty. The capital city region at the mouth of the Gambia river encompasses Banjul city and the Kanifing region, with tourist resorts strung southwards along the coast (see Figure 1). Tourism and the civil service are the largest drivers of formal employment. Inland is largely rural, its economy is driven by agriculture, and largely dependent on the flow of domestic and international remittances from migrants. These disparities in access to services and opportunities have led to high levels of internal migration, especially among the young who left rural areas to look for better jobs in the capital city region (The World Bank, 2020).

Figure 1. Administrative boundaries of The Gambia. Source: Authors. Note: Names on the map indicate eight local government areas (LGAs). Boundaries present 48 Districts. LGA boundaries are highlighted in bold.

The Gambia confirmed its first case of COVID-19 on March 17, 2020. As an immediate response to prevent the spread of the disease, the government imposed a social-distancing policy on March 18. A state of emergency was declared on March 27 and extended on April 3 and May 19. In response to the spread of COVID-19 and the closure of international borders, the burgeoning tourism economy collapsed near the height of the tourist season, driving up unemployment. Many migrants returned to their home villages, creating an urban exodus. Trade and travel within the country were reduced to the strict minimum, as authorities enforced restrictions on movement. The period of analysis also includes Ramadan (April 23 and May 23), which, in this majoritarian Muslim country, is traditionally a time of reduced economic activity as many travel to be with family.

PURA is an autonomous government entity that oversees water, electricity, and telecommunication services in The Gambia. As part of its oversight activities, the regulator collects aggregated indicators from MNOs to monitor service quality. With technical support from the World Bank and the University of Tokyo, it has worked with mobile phone operators to expand the list of indicators routinely collected for the purpose of mobility analysis and store them in a secure on-site server. In this effort, it has collaborated closely with both The Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBoS), and the Ministry of Health.

3. Building the Data Pipeline

3.1. Securing institutional and organizational access

The analysis of CDR data in The Gambia goes back to a dialog among The World Bank, the GBoS, and the PURA to explore the use of big data to create an evidence base for policy and project design in the context of economic and social development. The Gambia experiences high levels of domestic and international migration, which provides access to opportunities and services and triggers a steady flow of remittances. In 2019, the share of emigrants relative to the total population was around 5%, and personal remittances were equivalent to 16% of GDP (World Development Indicators, 2020). As survey and administrative data were outdated, the three parties agreed to pilot the use of de-identified, anonymized, and aggregated CDR data to identify locations with high levels of outmigration and describe patterns of human mobility. Initially, this analysis was based on summary statistics of incoming and outgoing international calls on the level of cell towers which overlap with known hotspots of international migration. This use-case relied solely on de-identified and aggregated data and allowed the team to demonstrate a proof of concept while building trust with government counterparts. The spread of COVID-19 prompted interest in internal mobility, altering the development objective for this partnership.

A workshop in February 2020 was instrumental to initiate a partnership on “Big Data for Development” that evolved around ownership and sustainability. A joint vision and a clearly specified use-case to focus the analysis on internal migration helped to coordinate expectations and build capacity using a practical example. Moreover, a broader audience during the initial workshop—involving stakeholders from the private sector, government ministries and agencies, academia, civil society, and development partners—confirmed the demand and interest for access to and analysis of CDR data. During this discussion, it was instrumental to convince the MNO to join this initiative, as they are collecting and providing the CDR data. Their agreement was based on the idea that training would also enhance their in-house capacity to analyze CDR data in order to improve their business operations and enhance customer relations. The workshop also offered a forum to discuss any institutional, organizational, or technical challenges, and to showcase how other countries have managed these concerns.

Once COVID-19 hit The Gambia in March 2020, all parties agreed to revisit the focus of the collaboration and explore the use of CDR data to respond to the health and economic crisis brought on by COVID-19. In light of limited viral testing and health facilities equipped to handle rising numbers of COVID-19 patients, the government announced a national health emergency with profound restrictions on human mobility (Hale et al., 2020). As part of this dialog, it became clear that prolonged social distancing would bear a high cost for households and firms (Gottlieb et al., Reference Gottlieb, Grobovsek, Poschke and Saltiel2020), and there was interest to create an evidence base for smart containment measures. Based on successful applications in other countries, the analysis then focused on the use of CDR data to understand patterns of human mobility during COVID-19.

3.2. Strengthening technical capacity

In addition to building a consensus about the analysis of CDR data, partners agreed to strengthen technical capacity and ensure knowledge transfer. Crucially, rather than building a system from scratch, efforts were directed at strengthening existing data collection protocols between the MNO and the PURA to include the necessary indicators. As part of its mandate to monitor the quality of calls, PURA already had established a centralized repository of data, which was plugged into the respective MNOs systems and updated in real-time. After securing the necessary approvals, the team worked with the system administrator to include additional indicators as part of this routine monitoring for use in the analysis. This minimized the reporting burden on MNOs, facilitating compliance. To ensure an additional level of security, the data collected for this project was firewalled and stored on a separate server on the premises, with remote access strictly limited to key researchers and system administrators. Capacity-building in the preparation and analysis of CDR data also built trust and offered an opportunity to discuss lessons learned from other countries. It helped to establish a platform to continue the work during the following month when all interactions between the counterparts in The Gambia and the team of researchers shifted online.

Throughout the partnership, PURA played a crucial role in working closely with the MNOs to obtain access to the CDR data. The regulator for telecommunication services used its convening power to discuss data sharing with MNOs while upholding national and international standards for data privacy. Two out of four MNOs agreed to provide access to their CDR data. After training in one-way encryption using a 160-bit hash function, they provided anonymized data to the regulator. In accordance with national regulatory requirements, the regulator set up a secure file transfer protocol (FTP), and all data were stored on-premise on a dedicated server. Aggregation of the data was conducted through highly restricted remote access into the server, which constrained computational capacity but kept the data secure and confidential. The team working remotely only had access to aggregate indicators for analysis which precluded any possibility of de-anonymizing the data.

3.3. Hardware requirements

A Hadoop platform was introduced as the primary system for data processing and analysis. Hadoop is a set of open-source software for data-intensive and distributed applications aiming to solve massive amounts of data and computation. Multiple machines work together as a cluster with parallel computation distributed among nodes. At the limit of storage and processing time, a cluster can be easily scaled by adding more machines to the cluster.

For the hardware requirements, a minimum of four machines is necessary to build up a cluster (see Figure 2). One works as a master node to keep metadata and manage processing jobs. The other three machines work as slave nodes or storage and computation nodes. The network connection among nodes must be at least a gigabit of ethernet to ensure no bottlenecking occurs on data transfer. An additional machine can be added for visualization, anonymization, and jump host to the cluster, which is located in a separate network ensuring data security and accessibility. The hardware can also be a virtual machine or physical machine depending on the existing infrastructure and additional cost calculations. In The Gambia, the team started with virtual machines on pilot data to provide preliminary results, and then upgraded to full hardware with the full dataset.

Figure 2. A Hadoop Cluster as a hardware solution to process CDR data. Source: Authors.

Allowing continuity and continual updating of the data, a well-defined data pipeline is essential. The data were provided by MNOs in a compressed or comma-separated file daily and uploaded to a secure FTP server under a private link or virtual private network. The task was run to extract data, import the Hadoop cluster, preprocess the data, and prepare of for analysis. The CDR data contain a rich set of information mainly used for network routing, usage accounting, and handset localization. The CDR Data consist of the following: the International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI), the International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) of the caller, a timestamp indicating when the session started, the usage duration, the base station identifier, and the activity type (call, short message service [SMS], and data communication). The base station ID is mapped onto the base station dataset according to the latitude and longitude of the cell tower. Ensuring privacy, the identifiable data fields such as the IMEI are encrypted and replaced with computer-generated random numbers before the analysis.

4. Data and Methodologies

4.1. CDR data descriptive

The mobile penetration rate of The Gambia was 94.2% in 2013 and rose to 140% in 2018, which was higher than the average of developed countries (ITU ICT-Eye, n.d.). As of 2018, 98.4% of households reported ownership of at least one mobile phone with limited variation across regions and between rural and urban areas. On the individual level, 85.1% of men and 74.1% of women in the age group between 15 and 49 years own a mobile phone (The Gambia Bureau of Statistics, 2019). According to PURA, the four major MNOs provide services to 2.59 million subscribers as of 2020, even allowing for persons with multiple SIM cards. In this paper, we use CDR data for a 3-month period between March 2 and May 31, 2020, offering a snapshot of changes in mobility during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Data were made available for two major MNOs, which cover approximately 70% of the market and include around 1.75 million subscribers. On average, the data comprise 18.8 million data points per day with very limited variations over the data period, which amounts to 2 billion anonymized observations in total. Hence, we assume that cell phone usage in terms of transaction volumes did not change fundamentally once COVID-19 hit the country. The average number of records per subscriber per day is 10.6 where approximately 2.6 records are used for calling. Like other developing countries, the practice of using multiple SIM cards is common in The Gambia. We expect a certain overlap between the two MNO subscribers, which might have resulted in over-representing the multiple-SIM-card holders. In this study, the impact of multi-SIM holding on the analysis result is considered to be limited since the two MNOs primarily market to different socio-economic groups. One of them is a leading MNO in The Gambia and is popular in urban areas with high-speed internet services. The other MNO provides only voice and SMS with inexpensive plans, which are much more popular in rural areas.

The preparation and analysis of CDR data under this project are based on a protocol to address concerns of privacy and confidentiality. Raw CDR data include several identifiers associated with each record, such as phone number, IMSI and IMEI. We employ a three-stage approach to anonymize these identifiers in order to protect data privacy.

  1. 1. First, identifiers are encrypted using a one-way function by the MNOs on their premises.

  2. 2. Second, the encrypted identifiers are replaced with the random numbers after the data are combined. Lists of cell towers and the locations provided by the MNOs are pooled in the regulator’s premise, and cell-tower locations are clustered using Ward’s hierarchical clustering, with a maximum distance constraint of 1 km from the centroid of the cluster.Footnote 1 We then use the centroid of the cluster to match and map the de-identified CDR data to their respective cell-tower locations. This process lowers the spatial granularity of cell-tower distributions.

  3. 3. Third, the results of all indicators are aggregated at the administrative unit level. There are certain concerns about reverse engineering for the re-identification of de-identified CDR data (Kondor et al., Reference Kondor, Hashemian, de Montjoye and Ratti2018) but the abovementioned aggregation process lowers the risk of reverse engineering.

4.2. Key indicators for the analysis of human mobility

The analysis of patterns of human mobility during COVID-19 in The Gambia is based on a set of mobility indicators, which are calculated based on CDR aggregates. The indicators capture changes in population movements during the baseline, under COVID-19 and post-intervention periods, and results can be updated continuously as additional CDR data become available. We used the first 2 weeks of March before the lockdown as baseline to obtain indicators about routine mobility levels.

The standardized indicators were proposed by the World Bank COVID-19 Mobility Task Force and build on a framework developed by Flowminder to support MNOs in producing basic indicators from telecom data (see Flowminder COVID-19 Resources—Mobility indicators, n.d.). Methodologies for computing indicators were designed to minimize computational intensity in resource-scarce settings. The indicators are fully anonymous and contain no information about individual subscribers, ensuring that the privacy of subscribers is maintained at all times. They are robust to sparse tower distribution and to infrequent phone usage, both of which are common in low- and middle-income countries. Eleven key indicators provide proxies for population, location of residence, distances traveled, and daily mobility trends across regions at different geographic and time levels. For this project, we selected 4 out of the 11 indicators. Table 1 summarizes the selected indicators based on information on the World Bank COVID-19 Mobility Task Force repository on GitHub.Footnote 2

Table 1. Summary of key indicators for the analysis a

a Source: Authors’ adaptation based on the World Bank COVID19 Mobility Task Force repository on GitHub.

Abbreviation: SMS, short message service.

4.3. Application in The Gambia

This paper makes use of the proposed indicators from the World Bank COVID-19 Mobility Task Force and applies them to the country context of The Gambia to analyze patterns of human mobility during COVID-19. More specifically:

  1. 1. Indicator 3 shows changes in the population distribution over time. As subscribers are accounted for in every region in which they use their phones, it overestimates subscribers who visit multiple regions in a day when computed at the administrative unit level. The value of this indicator can be also affected by load-sharing where several cell towers jointly cover a certain area due to network optimization. This impact is mitigated by the cell-tower clustering, which was described as part of data preprocessing in the previous section. We compute this indicator at the national level for examining how the number of active subscribers as a whole country changes over time and for adjusting the result of other indicators.

  2. 2. Indicator 6 illustrates changes in the location of residency, which could infer the incidence of migration over the data period. For mapping the residential distribution, there are various methodologies and algorithms (Ahas et al., Reference Ahas, Silm, Järv, Saluveer and Tiru2010; Deville et al., Reference Deville, Linard, Martin, Gilbert, Stevens, Gaughan, Blondel and Tatem2014) which provide more accurate estimates compared to the proposed method. We consider it still useful for detecting a flexible home location reflecting weekly changes as the estimation result is used at the administrative unit level. In addition, the proposed method is relevant under resource-scarce settings as it is not computationally intensive.

  3. 3. Indicator 7 demonstrates changes in levels of mobility over the data period. The value of this indicator is defined as the average distance traveled per person residing in a region. This indicator has limitations in detecting mobility particularly in rural areas due to lower cell-tower density. Mean values for regions in rural areas tend to be affected by extreme values generated from distant cell towers, which are much longer distance than can be traveled. In addition, median values for rural areas tend to be zero because short-distance travel is not detected when a wide area is covered by a cell tower. We use the value of the 75th percentile. It results in representing the mobility patterns of people whose mobility is relatively higher. However, the value enables us to capture changes without being affected by extreme values.

  4. 4. Indicator 10 describes the sizes of population inflow and outflow. We use this indicator for examining changes in population inflows. This indicator can be used for constructing OD matrices but has limitation in capturing long-distance trips. This is because a trip for constructing an OD matrix is defined by each consecutive pair of records, meaning that a long-distance trip is transformed into a set of several short trips, and thereby a link between the origin and destination of the long trip is missed.

The four indicators above are selected for application in The Gambia to inform COVID-19 responses. These indicators are useful for capturing changes in mobility patterns, occurring in a relatively short period in response to mobility restrictions, and for understanding the mobility patterns, directly affecting the spread of infectious diseases. We highlight that the use of Indicator 3 is critical for mitigating the impact of changes in active subscribers over time. Overall, the proposed methodology for the indicators is relevant to COVID-19 particularly in resource-scarce settings as it enables the generation of actionable statistics even with limited capacity and computing resources, which is a common state in many developing countries.

The following section summarizes key findings based on the set of four indicators outlined above and demonstrates how mobility statistics produced from CDR data can be used for understanding dynamic changes in population distribution and movements.

5. Results

5.1. Validation against known population distribution

As a first step in the analysis, we examine the validity of CDR data to measure population movements in The Gambia. We compare the known population density for each district to the density of unique subscribers as defined by their anonymized identifiersFootnote 3 during the baseline period in early March 2020. In Figure 3, we plot population density computed from the 2019 WorldPop dataFootnote 4 (Pwpop), and the 2013 Population Census (Pcensus) is plotted against the population density computed from CDR data (Pcdr).

Figure 3. Correspondence between Log (population density) and Log (unique subscriber density), using two different known measures of population density. (a) Log (WorldPop density). (b) Log (Census density). Source: Authors. Points represent districts, clustered by LGAs.

The correspondence was estimated using ordinary least squares given the following equations:

(1) $$ \log\ \left[\mathrm{Pwpop}\right]=\unicode{x03B1} 1+\unicode{x03B2} 1\times \log\ \left[\mathrm{Pcdr}\right]+\unicode{x03BC} \_\mathrm{k}+\unicode{x025B}\ 1, $$
(2) $$ \log\ \left[\mathrm{Pcensus}\right]=\unicode{x03B1} 2+\unicode{x03B2} 2\times \log\ \left[\mathrm{Pcdr}\right]+\unicode{x03BC} \_\mathrm{k}+\unicode{x025B}\ 2, $$

where α1 and α2 are constants, β1 and β2 are coefficients of interest, μ_k is a regional fixed effect allowing for inter-regional variation in the relationship between density and population, and ε is the error term. The fixed effect allows us to distinguish between urban and rural regions. As shown in Table 2 and Figure 3, subscriber density is highly correlated with the known population density. The β is within the margin of error of that found by Deville et al. (Reference Deville, Linard, Martin, Gilbert, Stevens, Gaughan, Blondel and Tatem2014) for France and Portugal, 0.77 ± 0.055, suggesting a stable relationship across countries. In addition, the R 2 value suggests that 85% of the variation in density in the WorldPop data is explained by variation in the CDR data. The R 2 is lower for the census, given that the data are older. These results confirm that CDR data are valid for examining the population distribution in terms of their residential locations. By extension, shifts in CDR data can capture both short term and long-term shifts in population over time, with implications for disaster risk management and urban planning.

Table 2. Correspondence between known population data and call detail records (CDR) data a

a Standard errors are reported in parentheses.

* Significance at 90% level.

** Significance at 95% level.

*** Significance at 99% level.

Source: Authors’ calculations.

5.2. Patterns of phone usage remained near-constant in terms of the number of active subscribers

Overall cell-phone use remains stable over the period of observation. We use the number of active subscribers computed for Indicator 3 to examine whether the pattern of phone usage changed against interventions and events over the period of observation. Figure 4 shows the number of active subscribers, which is presented as the ratio to the baseline. We use the average of the number of active subscribers for the first 2 weeks of March as the baseline. While we observe a short-term, sharp decrease at the beginning of the pandemic, with some erratic behavior in the following weeks, these fluctuations soon subside with a return to baseline levels of activity on average.

Figure 4. The number of active subscribers in The Gambia—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

This stability in the number of users suggests that people kept using their phones during the lockdown and that fluctuations in activity reflect population shifts rather than differential use patterns. Table 3 shows the descriptive statistics of the number of active subscribers for the period in between the interventions/events. It illustrates that mean activity levels stayed stable, while standard deviation decreased slightly, suggesting increased stability. Based on this indicator, we consider the fluctuations in overall phone activity to be random and not part of a significant increasing or decreasing trend. The value of this indicator is used for mitigating the impact of fluctuations caused by the changes in the number of active subscribers.

Table 3. Descriptive statistics of the number of active subscribers for four periods in between the interventions/event (presented as the ratio to the baseline) a

a Ratio defined during the baseline period during the first 2 weeks of March.

5.3. Mobility patterns suggest an initial urban exodus

We use the location of residence computed for Indicator 6 to examine shifts in population distributions at the district level and between urban and rural areas. The Gambia is divided into eight LGAs and subdivided into 48 districts. Three districts are omitted as no cell-tower clusters are located within their administrative boundaries. The districts are classified into four groups to compare changes in numbers of residents among districts based on rural/urban LGAs and whether it is an LGA capital. Three LGAs, Banjul, Kanifing, and Brikama, are classified as urban LGAs, all of which are located in the western part of The Gambia and include nearly half of the national populations. The remaining five districts are classified as rural LGAs. For each LGA, the administrative center is classified as the LGA-capital and the remainder grouped as non-LGA-capital districts. This is to allow for differential effects in local secondary cities, since non-capital districts differ from the administrative center in access in population density, access to services, and structure of economic activity. The classification result is presented in Table 4.

Table 4. Classification of 45 districts a

a Source: Authors’ calculations.

We convert the number of residents to the ratio to the baseline to examine changes from the normal period. The average number of residents of the first 2 weeks of March is used as the baseline. The ratio is scaled using Indicator 3 at the national level to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in the number of active subscribers. Indicator 3 at the administrative unit level is not used as it can introduce certain urban-rural biases; Indicator 3 overestimates the number of active subscribers in urban areas where cell-tower density is higher and people are relatively mobile compared to rural areas. Though this process helps mitigate the impact of the fluctuations on Indicator 6 to a certain extent, Indicator 3 cannot sufficiently address the impact. For instance, when the significance of population decreases at the district level is greater than that of active subscribers at the national level, the value of Indicator 6 computed as the ratio to the baseline cannot not sufficiently inflated.

Figure 5 shows an increased number of people moving to non-capital districts in rural LGAs in the last weeks of March as the State of Emergency was extended. It uses the number of residents for the four groups, which is calculated as the ratio to the baseline and adjusted using indicator 3. In contrast, districts in urban LGAs and LGA-capital districts show decreasing trends. This suggests that many people in urban areas shifted to rural areas as a result of the lockdown, returning to their hometown in rural areas because of decreased job opportunities in urban areas. During Ramadan, there was a brief spike of activity pronounced in urban LGAs. This reflects mobility patterns seen elsewhere, with an initial burst of out-migration from urban to rural areas, and a gradual trickle back as restrictions were lifted.

Figure 5. Numbers of residents at the district level in urban and rural areas—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

Interestingly, non-capital districts in urban LGAs are distinctive in that the estimated population remained almost unchanged in April and May after an initial decrease in activity, perhaps in anticipation of lockdowns. This might reflect populations living in sub-urban areas with more stable jobs and established homes, which are more reliant on local economic drivers than civil service and tourism. In contrast, the sharp decrease in capital districts in urban LGAs could represent the behaviors of migrants without stable jobs or homes, who were particularly vulnerable to the economic downturn.

5.4. Mobility decreased most in rural areas

We use the distance traveled computed for Indicator 7 to compare changes in levels of human mobility in urban and rural areas between March and May 2020. In addition to the mean distance defined in Table 1, we computed 50th- and 75th-percentile distances because the mean values tend to be affected by the sparse density of cell towers, which generate longer distances traveled than actual ones. For this analysis, we use 75th-percentile distances as the median resulted in zero in many districts. It means that the results of this indicator represent people whose mobility is relatively high.

Figure 6 illustrates changes in distance traveled at the district level in urban and rural areas, which is presented as the ratio to the baseline. We use the average distance traveled for the first 2 weeks of March as the baseline. The distances traveled of all groups remain less than the baseline after the restriction imposed except on 23 May, which is the end of Ramadan. It suggests that the mobility of people decreased overall. Among the non-capital districts, districts in urban areas show the most significant decreases, and those in rural areas have similar trends with smaller magnitudes. These trends indicate more significant impacts on activities in rural areas that rely heavily on mobility for the purposes of temporary migration and trade.

Figure 6. Distance traveled at the district level in urban and rural areas—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

5.5. Population inflow

We use the population inflow computed for the Indicator 10 to compare population inflow attracted to urban and rural districts. Figure 7 shows the population inflows to urban and rural areas at the district level, which is presented as the ratio to the baseline. We use the average of population inflows for the first 2 weeks of March as the baseline. After the state of emergency declared on March 27, population inflow to the rural districts of rural LGAs increased relative to the baseline. In contrast, population inflow to the capital districts of urban LGAs sharply declined and remained at lower levels compared to the baseline, suggesting a reversal of the usual trends toward urban migration. During the period of Ramadan, trends of urban and rural LGAs significantly diverged; population inflows to both capital and non-capital districts in urban LGAs gradually increased and exceeded the baseline level toward the end of the observation period, suggesting that many people gradually returned to the urban agglomerations as the holiday ended and COVID-19-related restrictions on movement and economic activity were lifted.

Figure 7. Population inflows to urban and rural areas at the district level—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

6. Policy Recommendations

6.1. Policy dialogue: first, find a use-case

This use-case highlights that CDR data are particularly useful in countries with limitations to frequency, timeliness, and coverage of administrative and survey data. Although the mobility statistics have constraints in terms of capturing all aspects of human mobility, our results show that statistics produced from CDR data capture changes in population distribution and movements, which continue to vary in a short period. This is particularly useful during an emergency like COVID-19, where traditional data collection methods may be too slow to capture the rapidly evolving situation.

The successful implementation of this use-case on COVID-19 is based on an early engagement with PURA and GBoS, which also established a platform to strengthen the policy relevance of the analysis. The workshop in February 2020 offered an opportunity to discuss with stakeholders their ideas, expectations, and concerns regarding the use of CDR data. Furthermore, building consensus among all stakeholders and using strategic alliances and champions embedded in the country dialog helped to foster ownership and sustainability of the project. When the COVID-19 crisis struck, the groundwork was already in place, and the team could quickly produce analytics focused on the impact of COVID-19 on patterns or human mobility.

6.2. Engagement model: bring decision-makers on board

As results from the use-case on COVID-19 became available, PURA and GBoS used these findings to inform their participation in the government task force for COVID19. The early dissemination of results helped to inform decision-makers and prompted requests for a scaled-up version providing real-time data during a quickly evolving health and economic crisis. Unfortunately, efforts to quickly turn this case-study into a fully functional data pipeline were delayed due to constraints in implementation capacity until late 2020. However, once the necessary hardware and training were provided, the CDR data pipeline became operational in early 2021.

Throughout the dialog with decision-makers, presentation of findings in an easily accessible format and identification of specific policy recommendations strengthened the support and the interest in the project. Maps created an entry point for dialog with a technical and non-technical audience as they were visually appealing but still contained important lessons (see Figure 8). Moreover, interpretation of results and specific applications in the context of the pandemic supported communication. For instance, the team argued that findings from the use-case on COVID-19 could inform targeted testing initiatives, by concentrating efforts in areas of high mobility. When a full lockdown is not possible given the economic costs, this can also inform where social-distancing policies should be enforced given higher mobility and associated with these increased risks of transmission. In addition, results demonstrated that the lockdown disproportionately affected urban areas by restricting economic activity, and relief and recovery efforts should therefore aim to address these adverse effects. These are but a few of the policy-relevant insights CDR data can deliver.

Figure 8. Weekly averages of distances traveled at the district level—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

6.3. Big Data for development: partnership, innovation, and capacity

The partnership on “Big Data for Development,” and the analysis of CDR data in the context of COVID-19, highlight that real-time data and analysis are valuable, but only when produced in close collaboration with local counterparts. Rather than aiming for shortcuts, the project brought together a statistics agency (GBoS) and government regulator (PURA), two entities who rarely collaborated in the past. In its engagement, the project also sought to play to the respective strengths of its counterparts. PURA brought the regulatory mandate and technical capacity to collect and process the data, while GBoS contributed in guiding and motivating the analytics. Positive feedback from other government entities, including the Ministry of Finance, has created incentives for GBoS and PURA to continue exploring opportunities to collaborate and innovate.

Through this project, the team introduced its counterparts to an innovative approach to handling big data while also following strict protocols on how to preserve the privacy and confidentiality of this new type of information. Recommended privacy practices include establishing appropriate encryption, maintaining file transfer and storage protocols to ensure the security of highly confidential data, and ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements and best practices. This sort of direct engagement model fosters innovation and ownership, helping to build capacity through continued engagement. This included training the MNO operators in one-way encryption protocol, and installing a stand-alone server on PURA premises to hold the data, with strict remote access protocols.

Finally, working in a limited-capacity context required flexibility, and from time-to-time involved compromises. In terms of hardware, an initial server provided to PURA for piloting purposes became the go-to for data storage when COVID-19 impeded the acquisition of additional server capacity. In terms of analytics, although there was a tool for producing standardized mobility statistics available on the GitHub repository, we chose to write our own script. This was to accommodate the system parameters on PURA’s premises. Since much of the analytical work was done through remote access, it was restricted by network capacity and could be interrupted by electrical outages. This required breaking computationally-intensive tasks into multiple steps with intermediate results, so that any interruption would only disrupt the current computation and not the whole script.

7. Conclusion

In this paper, we demonstrate the uses of four indicators for examining how interventions and events under COVID-19 are reflected in the patterns of phone usage, population distributions, levels of mobility, and population flows. Results show that CDR aggregates are relevant for capturing changes in these indicators, which continue to vary every few months. It indicates that CDR data provide timely and granular population statistics that can complement conventional statistics.

The use of CDR data in the context of COVID-19 in The Gambia demonstrates the hidden potential of big data, including CDR data, to inform decision-making. Due to lack of investments in statistical systems, severe data deprivations are likely to remain a challenge for governments, the private sector, and civil society, and this approach offers an opportunity to leapfrog, and exploit data which are available in real-time, re highly localized, and are accessible at relatively low cost. However, the use of CDR data will require future investments into the institutional and organizational framework of national statistical systems, including improvements of IT infrastructure and technical and statistical capacity. The analysis also demonstrates that CDR data are unlikely to substitute for traditional data, such as administrative and survey data, as linkages between telecommunication data and individual-level and household characteristics need to satisfy strict technical and ethical requirements.

This application focuses on a well-defined use-case, and further work is necessary to scale up the existing structure and ensure interoperability. This paper demonstrates that the analysis of CDR data can support decision-making during a crisis situation. This scaling up will require a commitment to include the analysis of CDR data into the standard set of planning instruments, including for the allocation of human capacity and financing.

Future work in The Gambia will build on existing partnerships and experiences. While valuable, CDR data on its own can only offer limited insights. We propose to build on this analysis by overlaying it with additional datasets. This includes validation of observed patterns against mobility data from Facebook. We also propose to overlay the mobility trends against price data to infer whether shifts in population drove food prices up in rural areas relative to urban areas. Finally, we would draw on recently available survey data, including the 2019 migration survey, to unpack the correlation between ward-level mobility metrics and underlying patterns of internal migration. Notably, did the areas that depend most on internal migrants see a large number of returns? This would allow us to infer how the COVID-19 induced lockdown differentially impacted vulnerable populations in rural and peri-urban areas.

From a policy perspective, the future analysis of CDR data could inform urban planning, particularly investments into infrastructure such as roads, schools, and hospitals. In addition, the private sector has also shown interest in using this information to better understand commuting and clustering patterns in order to exploit untapped market potential.

Abbreviations

COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019

CDR

call detail records

FTP

file transfer protocol

GBoS

Gambia Bureau of Statistics

GNI

Gross National Income

IMEI

International Mobile Equipment Identity

ISMI

International Mobile Subscriber Identity

IT

Information Technology

LGA

local government area

MNO

mobile network operator

OD

origin–destination

PURA

Public Utilities Regulatory Authority

SIM

subscriber identification module

SMS

short message service

Acknowledgments

We thank Horeja Cham, Lamin Dibba, Kristen Himelein, Kai Kaiser, Johan Mistiaen, Ryosuke Shibasaki, Matarr Touray, Tara Vishwanath, and participants at the UN 2020 conference on Big Data for official statistics, World Bank Poverty & Equity Brown Bang Lunch, and reviewers for helpful comments.

Funding Statement

This study received support from the World Bank Trust Fund for Statistical Capacity Building III (TFSCB-III) which is supported by the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Ireland, and the Governments of Canada and Korea. This study was partially supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) Grant Number 20 K10447.

Competing Interests

We declare that we have no relevant or material financial interests that relate to the research described in this paper. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank or any affiliated organizations, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., E.K., A.A., and A.W.; Methodology, A.A., A.W., E.K., and M.M.; Formal Analysis, E.K., M.M., and A.A.; Writing-original draft, E.K., A.A., M.M., and A.W., Writing-review & editing, E.K., A.A., and M.M.; Supervision, M.M.; Funding Acquisition, M.M. and A.A.

Data Availability Statement

The program codes and the aggregated statistics (if possible and currently under negotiations) will be made available through the GitHub platform (link here: https://github.com/worldbank/covid-mobile-data/tree/1b9f114abc9231964d9109f62df29a146912b4a2/cdr-aggregation#summary-of-indicators).

Footnotes

1 The choices of a clustering methodology and a distance threshold are proposed by the World Bank COVID19 Mobility Task Force.

2 Retrieved August 15, 2020 from Github, covid-mobile-data/cdr-aggregation.

3 IMEIs are used as a data field for defining the number of subscribers for the analysis while the IMEI generally defines the number of devices and the IMSI defines the number of SIM cards. This is because we combine datasets from two MNOs. In developing countries like The Gambia, it is common that one device is used by a person who has these two MNOs’ SIM cards. To avoid double counting the same person, who exists across two MNO data, the data were de-identified by respective MNOs and the encrypted identifiers were replaced with random numbers on regulator’s premise after the two datasets were combined.

4 Source: WorldPop https://www.worldpop.org/.

References

Ahas, R, Silm, S, Järv, O, Saluveer, E and Tiru, M (2010) Using mobile positioning data to model locations meaningful to users of mobile phones. Journal of Urban Technology 17(1), 327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630731003597306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aledort, JE, Lurie, N, Wasserman, J, Bozzette, SA, Lurie-Nicole, N, Wasserman-Jeffrey, . and Bozzette-Samuel, SA (2007) Non-pharmaceutical public health interventions for pandemic influenza: an evaluation of the evidence base. BMC Public Health 7, 208. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bengtsson, L, Lu, X, Thorson, A, Garfield, R and von Schreeb, J (2011) Improved response to disasters and outbreaks by tracking population movements with mobile phone network data: A post-earthquake geospatial study in Haiti. PLoS Medicine 8(8), 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001083CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumenstock, J, Cadamuro, G and On, R (2015) Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata. Science 350(6264), 10731076. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumenstock, JE (2018) Estimating economic characteristics with phone data. AEA Papers and Proceedings 108, 7276. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, F, Di Lorenzo, G, Liu, L and Ratti, C (2011) Estimating origin-destination flows using mobile phone location data. IEEE Pervasive Computing 10(4), 3644. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2011.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, F, Ferrari, L and Blondel, VD (2014) Urban sensing using Mobile phone network data: A survey of research. ACM Computing Surveys 47(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2655691.Google Scholar
Chen, C, Ma, J, Susilo, Y, Liu, Y and Wang, M (2016) The promises of big data and small data for travel behavior (aka human mobility) analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 68, 285299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.04.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deville, P, Linard, C, Martin, S, Gilbert, M, Stevens, FR, Gaughan, AE, Blondel, VD, Tatem, AJ (2014) Dynamic population mapping using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(45), 1588815893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408439111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flowminder COVID-19 Resources—Mobility indicators (n.d.) Available at https://covid19.flowminder.org/mobility-indicators (accessed 25 September 2020).Google Scholar
Google (2020) COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports. Available at https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/ (accessed 3 September 2020).Google Scholar
Gottlieb, C, Grobovsek, J, Poschke, M and Saltiel, F (2020) Lockdown accounting. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 13397. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3636626Google Scholar
GSM Association (2020) Mobile economy. GSMA. Available at https://www.gsma.com/ (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
ITU ICT-Eye (n.d.) Available at https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/icteye/#/topics/1002 (accessed 18 September 2020).Google Scholar
Kondor, D, Hashemian, B, de Montjoye, Y-A and Ratti, C (2018) Towards matching user mobility traces in large-scale datasets. IEEE Transactions on Big Data 6(4), 714726. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbdata.2018.2871693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondor, D, Thebault, P, Grauwin, S, Gódor, I, Moritz, S, Sobolevsky, S and Ratti, C (2015) Visualizing signatures of human activity in cities across the globe. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.00459 (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Lu, X, Wrathall, DJ, Sundsøy, PR, Nadiruzzaman, M, Wetter, E, Iqbal, A and Bengtsson, L (2016) Unveiling hidden migration and mobility patterns in climate stressed regions: A longitudinal study of six million anonymous mobile phone users in Bangladesh. Global Environmental Change 38, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, N., Lepri, B., Sterly, H., Lambiotte, R., Deletaille, S., De Nadai, M., Letouzé, E, Salah, AA, Benjamins, R, Cattuto, C, Colizza, V, de Cordes, N, Fraiberger, SP, Koebe, T, Lehmann, S, Murillo, J, Pentland, A, Pham, PN, Pivetta, F, Saramäki, J, Scarpino, SV, Tizzoni, M, Verhulst, S, Vinck, P. (2020). Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle. Science Advances 6(23), eabc0764. Available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, FR, Gaughan, AE, Linard, C and Tatem, AJ (2015) Disaggregating census data for population mapping using random forests with remotely-sensed and ancillary data. PLoS One 10(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundsøy, P, Johannes, B, Reme, B-A, Iqbal, AM and Jahani, E (2016) Deep learning applied to mobile phone data for individual income classification. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Technologies and Applications, pp. 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00722890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Gambia Bureau of Statistics (2019) The Gambia Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2018, Survey Findings Report. Banjul, The Gambia: The Gambia Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
The World Bank (2020) Republic of The Gambia Overcoming a No-Growth Legacy Systematic Country Diagnostic. Available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33810 (accessed 24 September 2020).Google Scholar
Wesolowski, A, Buckee, CO, Engø-Monsen, K and Metcalf, CJE (2016) Connecting mobility to infectious diseases: The promise and limits of mobile phone data. Journal of Infectious Diseases 214(Suppl 4), S414S420. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wesolowski, A, Eagle, N, Tatem, AJ, Smith, DL, Noor, AM, Snow, RW and Buckee, CO (2012) Quantifying the impact of human mobility on malaria. Science 338(6104), 267270. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223467CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Development Indicators (2020) Available at https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (accessed 1 September 2020).Google Scholar
Zu Erbach-Schoenberg, E, Alegana, VA, Sorichetta, A, Linard, C, Lourenço, C, Ruktanonchai, NW and Tatem, AJ (2016) Dynamic denominators: The impact of seasonally varying population numbers on disease incidence estimates. Population Health Metrics 14(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-016-0106-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Administrative boundaries of The Gambia. Source: Authors. Note: Names on the map indicate eight local government areas (LGAs). Boundaries present 48 Districts. LGA boundaries are highlighted in bold.

Figure 1

Figure 2. A Hadoop Cluster as a hardware solution to process CDR data. Source: Authors.

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of key indicators for the analysisa

Figure 3

Figure 3. Correspondence between Log (population density) and Log (unique subscriber density), using two different known measures of population density. (a) Log (WorldPop density). (b) Log (Census density). Source: Authors. Points represent districts, clustered by LGAs.

Figure 4

Table 2. Correspondence between known population data and call detail records (CDR) dataa

Figure 5

Figure 4. The number of active subscribers in The Gambia—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

Figure 6

Table 3. Descriptive statistics of the number of active subscribers for four periods in between the interventions/event (presented as the ratio to the baseline)a

Figure 7

Table 4. Classification of 45 districtsa

Figure 8

Figure 5. Numbers of residents at the district level in urban and rural areas—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

Figure 9

Figure 6. Distance traveled at the district level in urban and rural areas—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

Figure 10

Figure 7. Population inflows to urban and rural areas at the district level—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

Figure 11

Figure 8. Weekly averages of distances traveled at the district level—ratio to the baseline. Source: Authors’ calculations.

Supplementary material: PDF

Arai et al. supplementary material

Response to Reviewers

Download Arai et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 146 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.

Author comment: The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Madam and Sir,

With reference to your special call for submission for the journal "Data and Policy," we hereby share our draft paper on "The Hidden Potential of Call Detail Records in The Gambia". This paper was prepared jointly by Ayumi Arai, Erwin Knippenberg, Moritz Meyer, and Apichon, and summarizes key findings from the analysis of CDR data in The Gambia to show patterns and trends of human mobility during COVID19. This project was implemented in close collaboration with the national regulator for telecommunication services (PURA), and the national statistics office (GBoS), and in addition to policy-relevant information, this study served as a platform to strengthen technical and statistical capacity in a fragile and low-income country in Africa. We look forward to hearing from you, and stand ready to incorporate comments and suggestions.

Best regards,

Ayumi Arai

Review: The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

No Conflicts of Interest.

Comments

Comments to Author: Summary of the significance of the article:

The manuscript “The Hidden Potential of Call Detail Records in The Gambia” gives a descriptive account of a collaborative project involving Public Utilities Regulatory Authority

(PURA), The Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBoS), World Bank, and the authors. A data pipeline making available aggregated indicators derived from Call Detail Records (CDR) fromtwo mobile operators in The Gambia is described. Specifically, the paper states:

“This paper showcases the use of CDR data in The Gambia, a low-income and fragile country in West Africa.”

“Our findings demonstrate how the analysis of CDR data provides important insights into the impact of COVID-19 and social distancing measures on human mobility, …”

“Our contribution demonstrates how a system-building approach can make timely, disaggregated analysis based on CDR data available for quick decision making.”

The use of CDR has been demonstrated to be useful in much literature over the past decade, of which the manuscript references from. Hence, the value of the present discussion is through highlighting a project from The Gambia.

Quality of the paper and its suitability for publication:

The manuscript showcases and demonstrates findings that can be of interest for a broader audience. However, it comes across as weak when summarizing the political implications of the collaborative project. In the reviewer’s opinion, the most important questions remain unanswered: What important insights originating from the CDR pipeline, did the health authorities use? How were policies informed and how did insights shape health authorities’ actions during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Suggestions for improvement:

The following suggestions will strengthen the contribution, improve the scientific quality of the manuscript, and clarify ambiguities and inaccuracies:

1. Section 3 B. contains copies of paragraphs contained in Section 3 A. Remove the redundant text.

2. It is not clear from the descriptions whether only charging data is used (CDRs), or if more detailed location data from network probes is the bases for the pipeline. The significance of this is that CDRs will only be generated whenever a customer initiates a service, whereas data from the network will continuously measure customers’ location. The unclarity stems from the following statement in Section 3 C. Technical: “CDR data are massive datasets, which are huge in size and generated with high speed.” This is not true for CDR data in general. However, it is certainly true for network data.

3. “Ensuring privacy, the identifiable data field will be anonymized using a hashing algorithm, which is irreversible to original data.” Which identifiable data fields are hashed? According to European legislation (GDPR) hashing in itself does not guarantee anonymity, so please clarify the definition of when anonymity has been obtained.

4. “The mobile penetration rate of The Gambia was 94.2% in 2013 and rose to 140% in

2018.” This indicates that multi-SIMing is very frequent in The Gambia. In the solution, when counting the number of travelers between locations, how is multi-SIMing accounted for in the counts to make sure the counts are not inflated due to multi-SIMing behavior? It is important to get the counts right, since these are proxies for population travel patterns.

5. Page 7; line 4-5: “These identifiers are encrypted using a one-way function by the

MNOs so the data provided to the regulator do not include any personally identifiable information.” Hashing is only de-identifying the data records and not fully anonymizing them. Please note that de-identification through hashing is different from anonymous, and these are two different things. According to GDPR, the de-identified data is still potentially sensitive, and should be considered as personally identifiable information. The reason is that an adversary may possess another dataset that together with the deidentified dataset renders it identifiable.

6. Page 7; line 12: Suggest rewriting “… but the above-mentioned aggregation process lowers the risk of being reverse engineered substantially” to ““… but the abovementioned aggregation process lowers the risk of reverse engineering.”

7. What is the significance of including this sentence, when it is stated that two weeks of data was used? “It could ideally be computed for a period of four weeks before the initial COVID-19 cases were announced, which was 17 March, if the data before

March were available.”

8. Table 1: Indicator 3 Use-case column states “Proxy for population and population movement”. This is only a proxy for population count, I believe.

9. Page 8; Section C Application in The Gambia – First bullet point: “In our data, we observe no significant fluctuations in total transaction volumes over the data period.” What is the significance of this?

10. Page 8; Section C Application in The Gambia – Fourth bullet point: “we do not use this indicator for generating Origin-Destination (OD) matrices as we were not able to examine how the OD matrix is impacted by missing links between the origin and final destination regions”. OD matrices are the most important empirical tool for mapping and understanding the travel patterns in a country, and very important in epidemiological modelling to forecast disease spread. Hence, the reviewer is very puzzled by this statement, and believe that an elaboration is needed to give more details into why the OD matrices have not been used.

11. Page 8; Section C Application in The Gambia – Last paragraph: Suggestion for general improvement is to highlight and extend findings and the indicators’ specific relevance to COVID-19.

12. Page 8; Section 5 A – First sentence: I believe “population movement” should be “population distribution”.

13. Page 8; Section 5 A: Is it IMEIs that is being used? This will count the number of unique handsets, whereas IMSI will count the number of subscribers. Clarification needed.

14. Figure 4: There is made reference to a baseline, without defining what this baseline is. Please explain.

15. Section 6 B Technical constraints: The sentence “In addition, we had to employ complex techniques and multiple steps to complete a simple task, which means a single step easily run by an available code was divided into multiple steps with intermediate results. This is because such a simple task requires a lot of time for computation once it starts running, which could be easily interrupted due to an unstable network environment.” is hard to comprehend. Please consider rewriting.

16. Section 6 C Policy dialog – towards the end of the section:

o Population movement patterns … could inform targeted testing initiatives, …

o … this can also inform where constraints on mobility should be enforced ….

My question is: How was any of this information used by the Government or health authorities in The Gambia? Having this information is not the same as acting upon it. Did the right stakeholder within the Government have access to the information? Were the findings and insights shared with the decision makers putting in place testing policies? How was mobility information used when deciding on the socialdistancing policy implemented on March 1 8th, 2020 in The Gambia?

Review: The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

I know Erwin, one of the authors.

Comments

Comments to Author: Since the analysis of CDR data did not take into account biases of multiple ownership of SIM cards; the authors should at least reference literature where this has been done and fully articulate the implications of this bias with emphasis and additional detail so that the results of the analysis are considered with this in mind.

A very solid and well detailed paper. Strong literature review, outline of the engagement processes and technical methodology of the analysis is well narrated.

Recommendation: The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia — R0/PR4

Comments

Comments to Author: Please take into account the detailed comments of the reviewers, where possible. In addition, also try to answer the questions as they form the essence of the special issue:

- What important insights originating from the CDR pipeline, did the health

authorities use?

- How were policies informed and how did insights shape health authorities’

actions during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Decision: The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia — R1/PR6

Comments

Dear Editor, Data & Policy Journal

We would like to thank you for the letter dated 1 March 2021, and the opportunity to resubmit a revised copy of this manuscript. We would also like to take this opportunity to express our appreciation to the reviewers for the positive feedback and helpful comments for correction and modification.

We believe it has resulted in an improved manuscript, which you will find uploaded alongside this document. The manuscript has been revised to address the reviewer comments, which are appended alongside our responses to this letter.

We very much hope the revised manuscript is accepted for publication in Journal.

Best regards,

Ayumi Arai (on behalf of the team)

Review: The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

No Conflicts of Interest.

Comments

Comments to Author: Dear Authors,

I have now reviewed the revisions to the manuscript "The Hidden Potential of Call Detail Records in The Gambia" (DAP-2020-0040.R1).

I am delighted to inform you that I accept all your revisions, and I register great improvements to all comments raised in the first review. I have no further comments or suggestions.

My recommendation is that this revised version of the manuscript can be published in Data & Policy.

Best regards,

Kenth Engø-Monsen

Recommendation: The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia — R1/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: The hidden potential of call detail records in The Gambia — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.