Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T16:47:59.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Practicality Analysis of JOS Staging System for Cholesteatoma Secondary to a Pars tensa Perforation: Japan Multicenter Study (2009–2010)

Presenting Author: Yutaka Yamamoto

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2016

Yutaka Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Jikei University School of Medicine
Tustuya Tono
Affiliation:
Miyazaki University
Hiromi Kojima
Affiliation:
Jikei University School of Medicine
Yuka Morita
Affiliation:
Niigata University
Masafumi Sakagami
Affiliation:
Hyogo College of Medicine
Yasuo Mishiro
Affiliation:
Hyogo College of Medicine
Taeko Okuno
Affiliation:
Mitsui Memorial Hospital
Yasuyuki Hinohira
Affiliation:
Kamio Memorial Hospital / Syowa University
Keiji Matsuda
Affiliation:
Miyazaki University
Sho Hashimoto
Affiliation:
National Sendai Medical Center
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Learning Objectives:

Introduction: Primary cholesteatoma generally arises from retraction of the squamous epithelium of the tympanic membrane (TM). However, in rare cases, epithelial invasion occurs from the edge of the TM perforation and migrates to the medial surface of the TM. In such cases, a thick TM, blunt perforation edge, and discharge of debris from the medial side of the TM are often observed. In this paper, the clinical features of the cholesteatoma secondary to a pars tensa perforation were evaluated and the pathogenesis of the disease was discussed.

Methods: A total of 599 ears that underwent surgery for fresh cholesteatoma between 2009 and 2010 at 6 institutions in Japan were recruited and cases with cholesteatoma secondary to a pars tensa perforation were selected. The criteria of the disease were defined as follows; a TM perforation in the pars tensa, continuous epithelial invasion from the perforation edge to the back side of the TM, and no adhesive lesion directly between the TM and promontrium. Incidence of the disease and clinical characteristics were evaluated retrospectively.

Results: Twenty-three ears of 23 patients with cholesteatoma secondary to a pars tensa perforation were identified. Incidence of the disease was 4.1 % of all of the cholesteatoma cases or 5.2 % of all of the acquired cholesteatoma cases. Characteristics of the disease were represented as following; high incidence in elder women, low rate of undeveloped mastoid air cell system, severe destruction of the stapes, and complex extension pathway.

Conclusions: The pathogenesis of cholesteatoma secondary to a pars tensa perforation is very different from that of other types of cholesteatoma. This disease should be clearly categorized as a different type of cholesteatoma and we need to recognize the nature and behavior of this disease. Additional storage of the data and detailed analysis by the multicenter study should be continued.