Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:09:24.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party Identification, Realignment, and Party Voting: Back to the Basics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Warren E. Miller
Warren E. Miller
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The argument is presented for defining party identification by the root question, “Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an independent, or what?” With this definitional base, the partisan balance between Democrats and Republicans between 1952 and 1980 shows no evidence of realignment outside the South, belying the implications of the Markus-Converse and Fiorina analyses that suggest volatility in response to short-term influences. It also appears that the correlation between party identification and voter choices for president are very constant over time in the South as well as outside the South. Party line voting by party identifiers varies by region and party but did not decrease between 1952 and 1988.

Type
Research Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 557 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul, and Ostrom, Charles W. Jr. 1991. “Macropartisanship: An Empirical Assessment.” American Political Science Review 85:181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Sandra, and Lansing, Marjorie. 1983. Women and Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul A. 1977. “Partisan Development in the Postwar South.” American Political Science Review 71:477–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Paul A. 1982. “Realignment Begins? The Republican Surge in Florida.” American Politics Quarterly 10:421–38.Google Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brody, Richard A. 1978. “Change and Stability in the Components of Partisan Identification.” Prepared for the NES Conference on Party Identification, Tallahassee, Florida.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Campbell, Bruce A. 1977a. “Change in the Southern Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 21:37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Bruce A. 1977b. “Patterns of Change in the Partisan Loyalties of Native Southerners: 1952–1972.” Journal of Politics 39:730–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clagget, William. 1981. “Partisan Acquisition Versus Partisan Intensity: Life Cycle, Generation and Period Effects, 1952–1976.” American Journal of Political Science 25:193–214.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1963. “On the Possibility of Major Political Realignment in the South.” In Change in the Contemporary South, ed. Sindler, Allan P.Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1976. The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. and Pierce, Roy. 1987. “Measuring Partisanship.” Political Methodology 11:143–66.Google Scholar
Epstein, Laurily K. 1985. “The Changing Structure of Party Identification.” PS 13:48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. “An Outline for a Model of Party Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 21:601–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Frankovic, Kathleen. 1982. “Sex and Politics—New Alignments, Old Issues.” PS 3:439–49.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Palmquist, Bradley. 1990. “Of Artifacts and Partisan Instability.” American Journal of Political Science 34:872–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 1988. “The Impact of Party Identification on Issue Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 32:643–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith E., Bruce, David B., Magleby, Nelson, Candice J., Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark K., and Wolfinger, Raymond E. 1986. “The Partisan Affinities of Independent Leaners.” British Journal of Political Science 16:155–84.Google Scholar
Kelley, Stanley. 1988. “Democracy and the New Deal Party System. In Democracy and the Welfare State, ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1959. “Secular Realignment and the Party System.” Journal of Politics 17:3–18.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83:1125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. and Converse, Philip E. 1979. “A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review 73:1055–70.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Miller, Warren E., Raine, Alden E., and Brown, Thad D. 1976. “A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election.” American Political Science Review 70:753–78.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1990. “The Electorate's View of the Parties.” In The Parties Respond, ed. Maisel, Sandy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1991. “Party Identfication.” In Encyclopedia of American Political Parties and Elections, ed. Maisel, Sandy. New York: New York Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Traugott, Santa M. 1989. American National Elections Studies Data Sourcebook. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Jones, Calvin C. 1979. “Reciprocal Effects of Policy Performance, Party Loyalties, and the Vote.” American Political Science Review 73:1071–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1981. Party Coalition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1987. “Realignment: The South, New Party Coalitions and the Elections of 1984 and 1986.” Where's The Party? Washington: Center for National Policy.Google Scholar
Shanks, J. Merrill, and Miller, Warren E. 1990. “Policy Direction and Performance Evaluation: Complementary Explanations of the Reagan Election.” British Journal of Political Science 20:143–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, E. Phillips. 1979. “The Development of Party Identification Among Adults: Exploration of a Functional Model.” American Political Science Review 73:1039–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1984. The Decline of the American Political Parties 1952–1980. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F. 1988. “The Causal Relationships Between Issues, Candidate Evaluations, Party Identification, and Vote Choice—the View from ‘Rolling Thunder.’” Journal of Politics 50:961–84.Google Scholar
Wirls, Daniel. 1986. “Reinterpreting The Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50:316–30.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond, and Hagen, Michael C. 1985. “Republican Prospects: Southern Comfort.” Public Opinion Oct./Nov.: 8–13.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.