Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T02:16:53.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Mesozoic Arctic: warm, green, and highly diverse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

Bas van de Schootbrugge
Affiliation:
Marine Palynology & Paleoceanography Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8A, 3584 CSUtrecht, The Netherlands
Gunn Mangerud
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, N-5007Bergen, Norway
Jennifer M. Galloway
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) Ressources naturelles Canada, Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) Commission géologique du Canada, 3303–33 Street NW, Calgary, AlbertaT2L 2A7, Canada Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies (AIAS), Aarhus University, Aarhus8000, Denmark
Sofie Lindström
Affiliation:
Stratigraphy Department, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland – GEUS, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350Copenhagen K, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Preface
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

The Arctic is disproportionately affected by current and forecasted anthropogenic climate change (ACIA, 2005). As a consequence, sensitive ecosystems are suffering from rapid and enduring changes in, for example, sea ice volume, permafrost stability, precipitation, sea surface and air temperatures, and biodiversity (Sommerkorn et al., Reference Sommerkorn, Casotta, Derksen, Eyakin, Hollowed, Pörtner, Roberts, Masson-Delmotte, Zhai, Tignor, Poloczanska, Mintenbeck, Alegría, Nicolai, Okem, Petzold, Rama and Weyer2019). Long time perspectives can help us to better understand the response of high northern latitude environments to the consequences of climate forcing in the future. Sediment and bedrock archives can inform us of past conditions of climate, sea level, and fauna and flora that existed and even thrived in Arctic regions despite the long polar night. The Mesozoic Era, in particular, offers a view into the fascinating world of the past, when dinosaurs and diverse forests existed in polar regions during a time typically thought of as a climatic greenhouse. During the Mesozoic, atmospheric CO2 concentrations were much higher than today, over 1000 ppm (as compared to the pre-industrial average of 280 ppm). Sea-surface temperatures may have exceeded 32°C at 15–20° N, while averaging 26°C at ∼53° S (Littler et al. Reference Littler, Robinson, Brown, Nederbragt and Pancost2011). Thus, looking to the past offers the potential for insight into what the planet may look like in the future if greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated.

In this special issue we have collected an eclectic set of papers on Mesozoic sedimentary archives stretching from Ellesmere Island in Canada to eastern Siberia in Russia, and ranging in age from the Early Triassic to the Late Cretaceous. A key proxy record, palynology, takes centre stage, with a number of contributions on pollen, spores and dinoflagellate cysts. Palynology is enormously important for the study of Arctic sedimentary rocks, as these are often carbonate-poor and contain abundant organic matter. Hence, palynomorphs are in many instances the only fossil group present that can be used for dating as well as for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. Several contributions on macrofossils, including invertebrates, vertebrates and plants, further underpin the generally well-preserved nature of fossils that are a rich source of information on past climate and terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Together with organic and inorganic geochemical proxy records, the wealth of microfossil data presented herein paints a picture of the Arctic as a warm and green place with thriving and diverse marine and terrestrial ecosystems.

Today, the remote Arctic land areas provide excellent exposures of sedimentary rocks, complemented by data from exploration and research drillings in the high-latitude seas, allowing investigations into palaeoclimatic changes during the Earth’s past and the responses of the biota. However, Arctic archives are also key ways into understanding palaeogeographic reconstructions and the impact of opening and closure of seaways between polar and lower-latitude waters on palaeoclimate and ocean circulation, as most areas in the high Arctic today were at lower palaeolatitudes during much of Earth history.

Peary Land in North Greenland, one of the most remote stretches of land on the planet today, located at 82° N, is an excellent example of an Arctic area that was further south during the Mesozoic. Lindström et al. (Reference Lindström, Bjerager, Alsen, Sanei and Bojesen-Koefoed2019) report on a palynological study of the Smithian Thermal Maximum from Peary Land. During the Early Triassic this area was part of a shallow marine basin located at 45° N and therefore can inform us about mid-latitude vegetation and climate via the palynomorphs that were washed or blown in from the continent. Supported by rigorous biostratigraphic data provided by ammonites, the authors use carbon isotope records to correlate sections across Greenland and further afield to Tibet and even Australia. The main find of the study is a major shift in vegetation across the Smithian–Spathian boundary that is driven by an increase in conifer tree abundance at the expense of lycophytes. In contrast to previous studies, where an abundance of lycophytes during the Late Smithian has been interpreted as indicating increased humidity, Lindström et al. (Reference Lindström, Bjerager, Alsen, Sanei and Bojesen-Koefoed2019) instead interpret the lack of gymnosperms and proliferation of xerophytic lycophytes as evidence of an extremely arid climate unable to sustain large stands of trees. The increase in gymnosperm vegetation at the Smithian–Spathian boundary is instead interpreted as a shift from periods with extreme droughts towards more regularly occurring wet seasons. The mid-latitude forestation event is accompanied by a large positive excursion in C-isotope records, suggesting that carbon burial increased under high pCO2. Whereas the carbon isotope excursion occurs synchronously in all sections, the vegetation shift in Greenland takes place later than in the southern hemisphere, congruent with the climate shift.

In the low latitudes, the Triassic was a time of extreme aridity within the interiors of Pangaea (Parrish, Reference Parrish1993), but around the margins of the supercontinent, large fluvial systems were draining at times of increased humidity. Many are familiar with the Carnian humid episode (‘Carnian Pluvial Event’) that triggered large river systems to drain south into the northern Tethys (Roghi, Reference Roghi2004), but at the northern end of Fennoscandia a vast humid coastal belt developed during the Triassic in what is now the Barents Sea. The study by Paterson and Mangerud (Reference Paterson and Mangerud2019) uses palynology to refine the biostratigraphy of the Anisian to Rhaetian portion of this very expanded Triassic deep marine to paralic succession, which they had worked on previously (Paterson and Mangerud, Reference Paterson and Mangerud2015), also linking palynology to the original plant communities. Interestingly, the palynofloras from this region differ markedly from those reported from the Alpine and Germanic realms. The Barents Sea area, including Svalbard, is characterized by relatively continuous sedimentation and thus represents a key area for understanding Triassic climate and ecosystem evolution in the northern Pangaea margin.

Palynological records tell a striking story of a warm, green and diverse Mesozoic polar world. The Early Jurassic Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event (T-OAE) is a case in point. Work by van de Schootbrugge et al. (Reference van de Schootbrugge, Houben, Ercan, Verreussel, Kerstholt, Janssen, Nikitenko and Suan2019) on the first detailed dinoflagellate cyst record from two outcrops in Siberia spanning the Toarcian OAE shows rapid diversification of cyst-producing dinoflagellate species during the large carbon cycle perturbation that marks the T-OAE (Suan et al., Reference Suan, Nikitenko, Rogov, Baudin, Spangenberg, Knyazev, Glinskikh, Goryacheva, Adatte, Riding, Föllmi, Pittet, Mattioli and Lecuyer2011). Highly diverse assemblages of dinoflagellate cyst species represent phytoplankton communities close to the North Pole during one of the warmest periods of the Mesozoic, as Siberia was located at a palaeolatitude of 85° N. Comparison with records from offshore Norway and the European Epicontinental Seaway (United Kingdom) indicate that the sudden appearance of two major lineages of dinoflagellates (Parvocysta and Phallocysta) following the T-OAE was not an origination event in Europe but rather a migration event from high to mid-latitudes. This migration event occurred in conjunction with a waning of the euxinia in NW Europe, and could signal the arrival of colder, more oxygenated waters. Perhaps more significant, though, is that these results provide a glimpse of the evolution of phytoplankton in the Arctic during one of the most extreme greenhouse episodes of the past 200 Ma. Could the Arctic have acted as a refuge and seeded other regions after global temperatures declined after the T-OAE?

High phytoplankton diversity and abundance in the mid- to northern high latitudes likely supported diverse communities of invertebrates, fish and large marine vertebrates at the top of the food chain, such as ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs. Delsett and Alsen (Reference Delsett and Alsen2019) describe a large haul of skeletal remains of these two groups of marine reptiles from the Oxfordian (Late Jurassic) of East Greenland. The newly described material adds to an increasing amount of records from across the Arctic including from Svalbard and Arctic Canada and contradicts the previous notion that ichthyosaurs were in decline during the Late Jurassic.

Long periods of elevated primary production in the high northern latitudes across the J/K boundary are also postulated (Rogov et al. Reference Rogov, Shchepetova and Zakharov2020). The authors compile and discuss a large body of sedimentary and organic geochemical data on the occurrence of dysoxic to anoxic conditions on the Arctic shelves in Russia and compare those to similar occurrences at low latitudes and even in the southern hemisphere. These so-called Shelf Dysoxic–Anoxic Events (SDAEs) that span the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous are only marginally comparable to better-known OAEs as they are of very long duration; in some regions SDAEs lasted for 20 Ma. The exact forcing mechanisms are up for debate: was it widespread changes in hydrography and oceanography, perhaps related to global warming following cooler conditions during the Middle Jurassic, or was it related to profound biotic changes, including the proliferation of newly evolved phytoplankton groups?

One of the major debates regarding the Mesozoic is whether the climate was warm and equable with largely ice-free polar regions (Hallam, Reference Hallam1985), or whether periods of extreme heat were interrupted by brief episodes of cold or even glacial conditions, so-called ‘cold snaps’ (Herrle et al. Reference Herrle, Schroder-Adams, Davis, Pugh, Galloway and Fath2015; Grasby et al. Reference Grasby, McCune, Beauchamp and Galloway2017). A series of cold events, based mostly on sedimentological evidence, is now proposed for the Early Jurassic (Ruebsam et al. Reference Ruebsam, Mayer and Schwark2019), Late Jurassic (Rogov and Zakharov, Reference Rogov and Zakharov2010) and the Early Cretaceous (Alley et al. Reference Alley, Hore and Frakes2019). However, most palaeotemperature proxy data, including new crenarchaeota lipid data (O’Brien et al. Reference O’Brien, Robinson, Pancost, Sinninghe Damsté, Schouten, Lunt, Alsenz, Bornemann, Bottini, Brassell, Farnsworth, Forster, Huber, Inglis, Jenkyns, Linnert, Littler, Markwick, McAnena, Mutterlose, Naafs, Püttmann, Sluijs, van Helmond, Vellekoop, Wagner and Wrobel2017), as well as clumped isotope data (Vickers et al. Reference Vickers, Bajnai, Price, Linckens and Fiebig2019), do not support very cold high-latitude conditions that would allow for the formation of ice caps. This debate can only be resolved by adding more high-resolution multi-proxy data from high-latitude archives. Galloway et al. (Reference Galloway, Vickers, Price, Poulton, Grasby, Hadlari, Beauchamp and Sulphur2019) present detailed C-isotope records integrated with ammonite biostratigraphy from Axel Heiberg Island, in the high Canadian Arctic. They improve the chronostratigraphy for the uppermost Jurassic and lowermost Cretaceous interval, a problematic time interval in need of chronological refinement. Their new carbon isotope record that spans the Jurassic–Cretaceous transition documents a large negative excursion in the middle Volgian Stage, followed by a return to less negative values and a small positive excursion in the Valanginian related to the Weissert Event. While the carbon isotope trends are consistent with other high-latitude records, the large negative excursion is absent from Tithonian carbonate strata deposited in the Tethys. This raises several questions: did Arctic seawater compositionally evolve away from open marine δ13C values during the Volgian due to low global or regional sea level? While a geologically sudden increase in volcanism may be responsible, a lack of precise chronological control globally for the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary interval precludes direct comparison with potentially coincident events.

Based on an extensive compilation of published data augmented with new analyses from more than 100 outcrops and cores, Nøhr-Hansen et al. (Reference Nøhr-Hansen, Piasecki and Alsen2019) present a state-of-the-art biostratigraphic framework for the entire Cretaceous of Greenland based on dinoflagellate cysts and accessory pollen and spores. This new palynozonation recognizes 15 palynozones that have been calibrated with a regional ammonite zonation and can be correlated to nearby zonations from the Barents Sea, the Norwegian Sea and the North Sea. Overall, more than 100 palynostratigraphic events have been recognized that will be of great importance for correlations of Cretaceous sedimentary successions in northern high latitudes with successions around the world.

Palynostratigraphy is also the central theme of the contribution by Śliwińska et al. (Reference Śliwińska, Jelby, Grundvåg, Nøhr-Hansen, Alsen and Olaussen2020) who provide a detailed dinoflagellate cyst stratigraphy for several Cretaceous formations on Svalbard. Śliwińska et al. (Reference Śliwińska, Jelby, Grundvåg, Nøhr-Hansen, Alsen and Olaussen2020) interpret a Valanginian to Hauterivian age for the Rurikfjellet Formation and a Hauterivian to Aptian age for the overlying Helvetiafjellet Formation using several cores and outcrop sections from central and eastern Spitsbergen. These two formations are important archives for understanding Early Cretaceous climate evolution. Interestingly, both the Valanginian Weissert Event and the Early Aptian OAE1a on Svalbard occur within major transgressive sequences that appear similar to sea level changes in low latitudes. Such correlations will be crucial for testing the driving mechanisms behind global eustasy during the Cretaceous, whether through ice or increases in mid-ocean ridge volumes.

Biostratigraphy of Early Cretaceous successions on Svalbard is very much dependent on well-preserved microfossils, because most Arctic successions suffer from a general lack of macrofossils, apart from some special cases, for example where methane seeps are concerned (Hryniewicz et al. Reference Hryniewicz, Hagström, Hammer, Kaim, Little and Nakrem2015). Alsen et al. (Reference Alsen, Jelby, Śliwińska and Mutterlose2019) present a new species of belemnite Arctoteuthis bluethgeni, which appears to be endemic to Svalbard and could serve as a useful macrofossil marker species for Valanginian–Hauterivian Cretaceous sediments in the Barents Sea region.

Macrofloral remains from NE Russia and northern Alaska provide evidence of a generally warm Arctic during the Late Cretaceous. By using leaf form and tree ring data, Spicer et al. (Reference Spicer, Valdes, Hughes, Yang, Spicer, Herman and Farnsworth2019) demonstrate a thermal regime at latitudes as high as ~80° N characterized as temperate, with only limited periods of freezing temperatures. The data indicate that most of the studied sites experienced summer precipitation around 0.5 m, and that neither drought nor cold periods were long enough to limit growth or freeze the soil below tree rooting depth, respectively. This study has implications for future Arctic climate warming. Whereas the Arctic today is a place where precipitation is sparse under a cold strong polar high-pressure system, global warming will likely lead to an invigorated hydrological cycle when warming-induced evaporation and enhanced transpiration from an increased and more complex vegetation weaken the polar high.

The collection of papers presented here demonstrates the importance of Arctic geology and tells a tale of what the future may hold. The papers provide evidence of the importance of terrestrial vegetation for major carbon cycle fluctuations, for connectivity between the polar and more southerly oceans, and of the Arctic as a refuge for biota during global warming events.

References

ACIA (2005) Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. ACIA Overview report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1020 pp.Google Scholar
Alley, NF, Hore, SB and Frakes, LA (2019) Glaciations at high-latitude Southern Australia during the Early Cretaceous. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences. doi: 10.1080/08120099.2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsen, P, Jelby, ME, Śliwińska, KK and Mutterlose, J (2019) An Early Cretaceous stratigraphic marker fossil in the High Arctic: the belemnite Arctoteuthis bluethgeni. Geological Magazine, published online 8 October 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0016756819000803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsett, LL and Alsen, P (2019) New marine reptile fossils from the Oxfordian (Late Jurassic) of Greenland. Geological Magazine, published online 12 July 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0016756819000724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, JM, Vickers, ML, Price, GD, Poulton, T, Grasby, SE, Hadlari, T, Beauchamp, B and Sulphur, K (2019) Finding the VOICE: organic carbon isotope chemostratigraphy of Late Jurassic – Early Cretaceous Arctic Canada. Geological Magazine published online 20 December 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0016756819001316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasby, SE, McCune, GE, Beauchamp, B and Galloway, JM (2017) Lower Cretaceous cold snaps led to widespread glendonite occurrences in the Sverdrup Basin, Canadian High Arctic. Geological Society of America Bulletin 129, 771–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A (1985) A review of Mesozoic climates. Journal of the Geological Society of London 142, 433–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrle, JO, Schroder-Adams, CJ, Davis, W, Pugh, AT, Galloway, JM and Fath, J (2015) Mid-Cretaceous High Arctic stratigraphy, climate, and Oceanic Anoxic Events. Geology 43, 403–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hryniewicz, K, Hagström, J, Hammer, Ø, Kaim, A, Little, CTS and Nakrem, HA (2015) Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous hydrocarbon seep boulders from Novaya Zemlya and their faunas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 436, 231–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, S, Bjerager, M, Alsen, P, Sanei, H and Bojesen-Koefoed, J (2019) The Smithian–Spathian boundary in North Greenland: implications for extreme global climate changes. Geological Magazine, published online 19 July 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0016756819000669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littler, K, Robinson, SA, Brown, PR, Nederbragt, AJ and Pancost, RD (2011) High sea-surface temperatures during the Early Cretaceous Epoch. Nature Geoscience 4, 169–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nøhr-Hansen, H, Piasecki, S and Alsen, P (2019) A Cretaceous dinoflagellate cyst zonation for NE Greenland. Geological Magazine, published online 29 October 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0016756819001043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, CL, Robinson, SA, Pancost, RD, Sinninghe Damsté, JS, Schouten, S, Lunt, D J, Alsenz, H, Bornemann, A, Bottini, C, Brassell, SC, Farnsworth, A, Forster, A, Huber, BT, Inglis, GN, Jenkyns, HC, Linnert, C, Littler, K, Markwick, P, McAnena, A, Mutterlose, J, Naafs, BDA, Püttmann, W, Sluijs, A, van Helmond, NAGM, Vellekoop, J, Wagner, T and Wrobel, NE (2017) Cretaceous sea-surface temperature evolution: constraints from TEX 86 and planktonic foraminiferal oxygen isotopes. Earth-Science Reviews 172, 224–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, JT (1993) Climate of the supercontinent Pangea. Journal of Geology 101, 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, NW and Mangerud, G (2015) Late Triassic (Carnian–Rhaetian) palynology of Hopen, Svalbard. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 220, 98119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, NW and Mangerud, G (2019) A revised palynozonation for the Middle–Upper Triassic (Anisian–Rhaetian) Series of the Norwegian Arctic. Geological Magazine, published online 14 November 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0016756819000906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roghi, G (2004) Palynological investigations in the Carnian of the Cave del Predil area (Julian Alps, NE Italy). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 132, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogov, M A and Zakharov, VA (2010) Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous glendonite occurrences and their implication for Arctic paleoclimate reconstructions and stratigraphy. Earth Science Frontiers 17, 345–7.Google Scholar
Rogov, MA , Shchepetova, EV and Zakharov, VA (2020) Late Jurassic – earliest Cretaceous prolonged Shelf Dysoxic–Anoxic Event (SDAE) and its possible causes. Geological Magazine, published online 19 August 2020, doi: 10.1017/S001675682000076X.Google Scholar
Ruebsam, W, Mayer, B and Schwark, L (2019) Cryosphere carbon dynamics control early Toarcian global warming and sea level evolution. Global and Planetary Change 172, 440–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Śliwińska, K K, Jelby, M E, Grundvåg, S-A, Nøhr-Hansen, H, Alsen, P and Olaussen, S (2020) Dinocyst stratigraphy of the Valanginian–Aptian Rurikfjellet and Helvetiafjellet formations on Spitsbergen, Arctic Norway. Geological Magazine, published online 11 February 2020, doi: 10.1017/S0016756819001249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerkorn, MM, Casotta, S, Derksen, C, Eyakin, A, Hollowed, Aet al. (2019) Polar regions. In IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (eds Pörtner, H-O, Roberts, DC, Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai, P, Tignor, M, Poloczanska, E, Mintenbeck, K, Alegría, A, Nicolai, M, Okem, A, Petzold, J, Rama, B and Weyer, NM). Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Spicer, R, Valdes, P, Hughes, A, Yang, J, Spicer, T, Herman, A and Farnsworth, A (2019) New insights into the thermal regime and hydrodynamics of the early Late Cretaceous Arctic. Geological Magazine, published online 30 May 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0016756819000463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suan, G, Nikitenko, BL, Rogov, MA, Baudin, F, Spangenberg, JE, Knyazev, VG, Glinskikh, LA, Goryacheva, AA, Adatte, T, Riding, JB, Föllmi, KB, Pittet, B, Mattioli, E and Lecuyer, C (2011) Polar record of Early Jurassic massive carbon injection. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 312, 102–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Schootbrugge, B, Houben, AJP, Ercan, FEZ, Verreussel, R, Kerstholt, S, Janssen, NMM, Nikitenko, B and Suan, G (2019) Enhanced Arctic-Tethys connectivity ended the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event in NW Europe. Geological Magazine, published online 13 December 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0016756819001262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, M L, Bajnai, D, Price, G D, Linckens, J and Fiebig, J (2019) Southern high-latitude warmth during the Jurassic–Cretaceous: new evidence from clumped isotope thermometry. Geology 47, 724–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar