Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T10:01:43.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Escape from troubled shores: finding of a shallow-water boreal gastropod Onoba aculeus on the high Arctic shelf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2023

Ivan O. Nekhaev*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
Zinaida Y. Rumyantseva
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Zoobenthos, Murmansk Marine Biological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Murmansk, Murmansk region, Russia
*
Author for correspondence: Ivan O. Nekhaev, E-mail: inekhaev@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The species composition and distribution of marine invertebrates varies greatly in different bathymetric regions. Nevertheless, the process of exchange between faunas of different depths has occurred repeatedly throughout the evolution of marine biodiversity. In high latitudes, this process should occur most actively due to absence of strong temperature stratification. The presence of physiological adaptations that allow northern shallow-water organisms to live at greater depth has been demonstrated in a series of experiments. However, known cases of recent colonization by species confined to a highly productive shallow-water zone in unusually deeper Arctic habitats are almost absent. The present study describes finding of population of the gastropod Onoba aculeus (Gould, 1841) in two samples from the lower continental shelf of the Arctic Ocean. Onoba aculeus is a shallow-water amphiatlantic species widely distributed in the temperate regions. The finding reported here is at the same time, the northernmost, easternmost, and most remote from the coast location. We assume that the detection of molluscs indicates the presence of an abundant isolated population in the region.

Type
Marine Record
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Introduction

The species composition and distribution of marine invertebrates varies greatly in different bathymetric regions. This is due to many environmental factors and physiological limitations that make vertical migrations of animals difficult. Nevertheless, the process of exchange between faunas of different depths has occurred repeatedly throughout the evolution of marine biodiversity (McClain & Hardy, Reference McClain and Hardy2010). In high latitudes, this process should occur most actively. The temperature stratification here is much weaker and does not create significant obstacles to the vertical migration of organisms. Many species common on the abyssal or continental slope in temperate and subtropical latitudes may also occur on the continental shelf in the Arctic seas (Bouchet & Warén, Reference Bouchet and Warén1993; Zimina et al., Reference Zimina, Frolova, Dikaeva, Akhmetchina, Garbul, Frolov and Nekhaev2017; Nekhaev, Reference Nekhaev2018; Nekhaev & Krol, Reference Nekhaev and Krol2020a).

On the other hand, deep-sea marine ecosystems, including the lower part of the continental shelf, are characterized by low productivity and low biological diversity compared with coastal communities. On the scale of geological time, shallow-water ecosystems are considered as the main sources of formation of deep-sea fauna (Thuy et al., Reference Thuy, Gale, Kroh, Kucera, Numberger-Thuy, Reich and Stöhr2012). The presence of physiological adaptations that allow northern shallow-water organisms to live at high hydrostatic pressure corresponding to abyssal and ultra-abyssal depths under similar temperature conditions has been demonstrated in a series of experiments (Tyler & Young, Reference Tyler and Young1998; Mestre et al., Reference Mestre, Thatje and Tyler2009; Smith & Thatje, Reference Smith and Thatje2012). However, known cases of recent colonization by species confined to a highly productive shallow-water zone in unusually deeper Arctic habitats are rare and are still confined to coastal regions (Sukhotin et al., Reference Sukhotin, Krasnov and Galaktionov2008).

The aim of the present paper is to describe the finding of the gastropod Onoba aculeus (Gould, 1841) on the lower continental shelf of the Arctic Ocean. Onoba aculeus is abundant in shallow waters along both shores of the Atlantic Ocean: from the latitude of southern France to New England, Scandinavia, Greenland and Svalbard (Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014) (Figure 1). The finding reported here is at the same time, the northernmost, easternmost, and most remote from the coast location.

Fig. 1. Distribution of Onoba aculeus in the North-eastern Atlantic and the Arctic Ocean. Coastal regions where the species is distributed are highlighted by red. Triangle indicates locality in the Arctic shelf reported here.

Materials and methods

The material was collected during the cruise of RV ‘Dalniye Zelentsy’ in October–November 2019 to the areas of the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean between the Novaya Zemlya and Franz Josef Land archipelagos (Figure 1). Samples of the bottom fauna were taken at 12 stations using a 0.1 m2 van Veen grab. Three samples were taken at each station. Immediately after collecting the samples were washed in a 0.5 mm sieve and then fixed with 4% buffered formalin. The samples were sorted manually in the stationary laboratory with use of a stereo microscope.

The specimens of Onoba aculeus were collected on 2 November at the station with coordinates 78°44.734′N 69°42.679′E and a depth of 343 m from the bottom with brown silt, clay and sand. The temperature recorded at the time of collection was −0.2 °C, the salinity was 34.9 PSU. The seafloor community was dominated by polychaete Spiochaetopterus typicus M Sars, 1856 and brittle star Ophiacantha bidentata (Bruzelius, 1805). For comparison we used material described by Nekhaev et al. (Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014). Also, we had studied collections of the Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences (Saint Petersburg, Russia), Natural History Museum of Denmark (Copenhagen, Denmark) and Swedish Museum of Natural History (Stockholm, Sweden).

Shell measurements were taken according to the scheme by Nekhaev (Reference Nekhaev2019).

Results

Onoba aculeus were found in two samples out of three collected at the station (3 and 2 specimens, respectively). The shells of collected snails are slender, conic with moderately flattened whorls covered with yellowish or brownish periostracum (Figure 2A, B). The shell surface with numerous thin spiral ribs, the axial sculpture is absent. Aperture drop-shaped, outer lip in side view is rounded, almost straight. The protoconch is relatively large, lecithotrophic, its surface was eroded in all five specimens. The measurements of the largest specimen (Figure 2A) are: shell height = 3.23 mm, aperture height = 1.13 mm, body whorl height = 2.03 mm, shell width = 1.48 mm, whorls number = 4.75.

Fig. 2. Shells of Onoba aculeus (A–D) and Onoba leptalea (E). (A and B) Arctic Ocean, 78°44.734′N 69°42.679′E, 343 m; (C) Svalbard, Grønfjorden, 77°59.25′N 14°12′E, littoral; (D) South-western Barents Sea, Murman Coast, 68°17.67′N 38°37.93′E, 3 m; (E) Arctic Ocean, 78°44.734′N 69°42.679′E, 343 m (same locality with A and B).

The combination of morphological features listed above makes us confident in the correctness of the species identification of the discussed snails. Apart from Onoba aculeus, five more species of the genus are known from the Eastern Arctic seas (Warén, Reference Warén1996; Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014; Nekhaev & Krol, Reference Nekhaev and Krol2020b). Onoba mighelsi (Stimpson, 1851), O. improcera (Warén, Reference Warén1996) and O. torelli (Warén, Reference Warén1996) differ from O. aculeus by less slender shell covered with lesser number (~10 vs ~20 in O. aculeus) of coarse spiral ribs (Warén, Reference Warén1996; Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014). Onoba semicostata is the only representative of the genus in the region with planktotrophic protoconch (Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014). Shell shape and sculpture of Onoba leptalea (Verrill, 1884) is the most similar to Onoba aculeus. The former species can be distinguished by larger size convex whorls, more prominent spiral ribs and prosocline aperture in side view (Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014). Three adult specimens Onoba leptalea (Figure 2E) were found at the same sample with Onoba aculeus.

Apart from two Onoba species, two more gastropod species, Punctulum wyvillethomsoni (Friele, 1877) and Propebela harpularia (Couthouy, 1838), were identified from the same station.

Onoba aculeus is a rather variable species throughout its range. Spiral sculpture is more pronounced in molluscs from southern populations, whereas in snails from northern regions it is poorly marked. The sculpture of the studied specimens corresponds to individuals from Svalbard and the Murman coast of the Barents Sea (Figure 2C, D).

Discussion

In our opinion, the finding of living specimens of Onoba aculeus in two samples at the same station cannot be an accident that occurred during the collection or processing of samples. In the southern part of the Murmansk harbour, at the place of permanent moorage of the R/V ‘Dalnie Zelentsy’, Onoba aculeus is absent, like many other marine species due to low salinity (Reference DerjuginDerjugin, 1915; personal observation). Before the cruise in which the molluscs were collected, the ship did not leave the harbour for a long time, and the sampling gear also was not in use for a long period before. The sorting of samples from this expedition in the laboratory was carried out separately from the processing of benthic collections from other areas.

Onoba aculeus is a typically shallow-water boreal mollusс confined to the littoral and seaweed zone (Matveeva, Reference Matveeva and Scarlato1974; Warén, Reference Warén1996; Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014; Nekhaev & Krol, Reference Nekhaev and Krol2020b). Finds of this species at depths exceeding 40–50 metres are isolated and confined to the inner fjord waters (Thorson, Reference Thorson1944; Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014). In fjords, due to the features of a sharp bottom slope, partial isolation, water circulation and sedimentation, the species composition is more homogeneous compared with the outer coastal regions and shallow-water fauna can often be found outside its usual bathymetric range (Buhl-Jensen, Reference Buhl-Jensen1986; Buhl-Mortensen & Høisæter, Reference Buhl-Mortensen and Høisæter1993).

Onoba aculeus is not known directly from the regions of the high Arctic but is found in some regions transitional between the Arctic and temperate biogeographic realms: New England, south-western Greenland, western Svalbard, northern Scandinavia, Kola Peninsula and the White Sea (Warén, Reference Warén1996; Nekhaev, Reference Nekhaev2014; Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014) (Figure 1). These areas are influenced by the warm branches of the North Atlantic current, which allows reduced boreal communities to exist there (Loeng et al., Reference Loeng, Ozhigin and Ådlandsvik1997; Spalding et al., Reference Spalding, Fox, Allen, Davidson, Ferdaña, Finlayson, Halpern, Jorge, Lombana, Lourie, Martin, Mcmanus, Molnar, Recchia and Robertson2007; Solyanko et al., Reference Solyanko, Spiridonov and Naumov2011; Nekhaev & Krol, Reference Nekhaev and Krol2020b).

The northernmost previous locality of Onoba aculeus was western Svalbard at 78°N. There molluscs live on the littoral even in winter and almost do not occur below the tide level (Rozycki, Reference Rozycki1993; Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014; Zimina & Meshcheryakov, Reference Zimina and Meshcheryakov2017). Mild temperature and ice conditions for this latitude allow relatively rich communities to exist on the littoral, which include several tens of macrofaunal species (Weslawski et al., Reference Weslawski, Wiktor, Zajaczkowski and Swerpel1993; Zimina & Meshcheryakov, Reference Zimina and Meshcheryakov2017). In general, the shallow-water communities of the area also abound with a large number of boreal species (Włodarska et al., Reference Włodarska, Wȩsławski and Gromisz1996; Laudien et al., Reference Laudien, Herrmann and Arntz2007; Malavenda, Reference Malavenda2021).

Onoba aculeus has not been reliably recorded from the coastal communities of the Franz Josef Land archipelago and the northern part of Novaya Zemlya with severe habitat conditions. Previously published findings of the species on Franz Josef Land are based on incorrectly identified specimens of Onoba leptalea (see Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Deart and Lyubin2014). The finding of Onoba aculeus published in the south of Novaya Zemlya (~ 71°N 52°E) needs confirmation (Nekhaev & Krol, Reference Nekhaev and Krol2017).

The finding locality of Onoba aculeus reported here is in the Arctic Ocean at ~1200 km eastward to the nearest previous locality in Svalbard. The molluscs are found at a great distance from the shore at an unusual depth for this species. Bottom communities in the area where the samples with Onoba aculeus originates include species complexes typical of the lower Arctic shelf (Frolova et al., Reference Frolova, Lyubina, Zimina, Dikaeva, Frolov, Akhmetchina, Garbul, Nekhaev, Matishov and Tishkov2011; Nekhaev & Krol, Reference Nekhaev and Krol2017; Zimina et al., Reference Zimina, Frolova, Dikaeva, Akhmetchina, Garbul, Frolov and Nekhaev2017). No other species unusual or new to the region were found in the samples.

The specimens found were adults, and the methods used for collection did not allow us to detect juvenile specimens that could be washed away through the sieve. Therefore, we cannot check whether the detection of Onoba aculeus indicates the presence of a self-reproducing population. In any case, the snails are involved in the bottom food chains of this region, and their actual distribution may not be limited directly to the place of collection.

The locality of Onoba aculeus lies between two areas of transport of warm Atlantic water to the Arctic. The first of them is the Murman Current, one of the branches of the North Atlantic Сurrent, which reaches the northern part of Novaya Zemlya (Loeng et al., Reference Loeng, Ozhigin, Ådlandsvik and Sagen1993; Ozhigin et al., Reference Ozhigin, Ingvaldsen, Loeng, Boitsov, Karsakov, Jakobsen and Ozhigin2011). Another flow of Atlantic water is the surface circulation of the Fram Strait branch current in the St. Anna Trench (Osadchiev et al., Reference Osadchiev, Viting, Frey, Demeshko, Dzhamalova, Nurlibaeva, Gordey, Krechik, Spivak, Semiletov and Stepanova2022). Both currents can serve as effective transport corridors for southern species. Snails, however, do not have pelagic larvae that could serve to spread them with the ocean current (Matveeva, Reference Matveeva and Scarlato1974). Most likely, they were brought into the region with drifting algae, wood and litter that are transported by the current (Grøsvik et al., Reference Grøsvik, Prokhorova, Eriksen, Krivosheya, Horneland and Prozorkevich2018).

Apart from physical environment, a significant limitation for the spreading of many coastal species at depths exceeding several tens of metres may be their association with seaweed as a food source or shelter. This is unlikely in the case of Onoba aculeus, which is detritophagus and is not strictly confined to macrophyte thickets in shallow water (Matveeva, Reference Matveeva and Scarlato1974; Tsikhon-Lukanina, Reference Tsikhon-Lukanina1987; Nekhaev & Krol, Reference Nekhaev and Krol2020b).

Thus, we assume that the discussed finding of Onoba aculeus indicates the presence of a population of the species in this area. Since Onoba aculeus has not been found elsewhere on the High Arctic shelf, we suggest that the discovered molluscs indicate a presence of an isolated ‘population island’. This type of distribution is typical for many species outside their main range (Harrison, Reference Harrison1991; Grimm et al., Reference Grimm, Reise and Strasser2003; Nekhaev et al., Reference Nekhaev, Zuev and Rusyaev2020). Population islands, as a rule, exist for a relatively short time, but may mean the permanent presence of the species in the macroregion (Collins & Glenn, Reference Collins and Glenn1991). In this case, there is a permanent disappearance of some populations with subsequent colonization of the territory by the species. The formation of population islands can also be a stage in the settlement of a species and precede the formation of its permanent population.

Recently, the migration of shallow-water species has been demonstrated in a temperate environment, probably due to climatic shifts, which make deep-sea areas warmer (Tyler & Young, Reference Tyler and Young1998; Perry et al., Reference Perry, Low, Ellis and Reynolds2005). The decrease in the thermal content of waters in the Arctic is especially noticeable (Boitsov et al., Reference Boitsov, Karsakov and Trofimov2012). However, it is impossible to determine whether the appearance of Onoba aculeus in this part of the Arctic shelf is the result of a recent introduction because there are no baseline data for previous decades.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Valentina Payusova (Murmansk, Russia) who carefully sorted the benthic samples. We also express our gratitude to Tom Shiøtte (Copnhagen, Denmark) and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments and recommendations.

Author contributions

Ivan O. Nekhaev – conceptualization, preparation of text and artworks, examination of main material and comparative collections, Zinaida Yu Rumyantseva – fieldwork, preliminary examination, and identification of the material, comments to manuscript.

Financial support

The work by I.O.N. was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 21-74-00034), the work by Z.Y.R. was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under projects 122020900044-2 for MMBI RAS.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Boitsov, VD, Karsakov, AL and Trofimov, AG (2012) Atlantic water temperature and climate in the Barents Sea, 2000–2009. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69, 833840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchet, P and Warén, A (1993) Revision of the northeast Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Mesogastropoda. Boulettino Malacologico Supplement 3, 579840.Google Scholar
Buhl-Jensen, L (1986) The benthic amphipod fauna of the west-Norwegian continental shelf compared with the fauna of five adjacent fjords. Sarsia 71, 193208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhl-Mortensen, L and Høisæter, T (1993) Mollusc fauna along an offshore-fjord gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series 97, 209224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, SL and Glenn, SM (1991) Importance of spatial and temporal dynamics in species regional abundance and distribution. Ecology 72, 654664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derjugin, KM (1915) Fauna of the Kola Bay and conditions of its existence. Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale Des Sciences, Ser. 8. Classe Physico-Mathématique 34, 119.Google Scholar
Frolova, EA, Lyubina, OS, Zimina, OL, Dikaeva, DR, Frolov, AA, Akhmetchina, OY, Garbul, EA and Nekhaev, IO (2011) Bottom communities near of the Arctic Archipelagoes coasts. In Matishov, GG and Tishkov, AA (eds), Land and Marine Ecosystems. Moscow – Saint-Petersburg: Paulsen, pp. 181210.Google Scholar
Grimm, V, Reise, K and Strasser, M (2003) Marine metapopulations: a useful concept? Helgoland Marine Research 56, 222228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grøsvik, BE, Prokhorova, T, Eriksen, E, Krivosheya, P, Horneland, PA and Prozorkevich, D (2018) Assessment of marine litter in the Barents Sea, a part of the joint Norwegian-Russian ecosystem survey. Frontiers in Marine Science 5, 111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S (1991) Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42, 7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudien, J, Herrmann, M and Arntz, WE (2007) Soft bottom species richness and diversity as a function of depth and iceberg scour in Arctic glacial Kongsfjorden (Svalbard). Polar Biology 30, 1103511046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeng, H, Ozhigin, V and Ådlandsvik, B (1997) Water fluxes through the Barents Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54, 310317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeng, H, Ozhigin, V, Ådlandsvik, B and Sagen, H (1993) Current measurements in the Northeastern Barents Sea. ICES CM 40, 122.Google Scholar
Malavenda, SV (2021) Species diversity of macroalgae in Grønfjorden, Spitsbergen, Svalbard. Polar Research 40, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matveeva, TA (1974) Ecology and live cycles of common gastropod species of the Barents and White seas. In Scarlato, OA (ed.), Exploration of the Fauna of the Seas. Vol. 13. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 65190.Google Scholar
McClain, CR and Hardy, SM (2010) The dynamics of biogeographic ranges in the deep sea. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277, 35333546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mestre, NC, Thatje, S and Tyler, PA (2009) The ocean is not deep enough: pressure tolerances during early ontogeny of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, 717726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekhaev, IO (2014) Marine shell-bearing Gastropoda of Murman (Barents Sea): an annotated check-list. Ruthenica: Russian Malacological Journal 24, 75121.Google Scholar
Nekhaev, IO (2018) Distribution of Admete contabulata and Iphinopsis inflata in the Arctic (Gastropoda: Cancellariidae). Ruthenica: Russian Malacological Journal 28, 163168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekhaev, IO (2019) Taxonomic review of the genus Boreocingula (Gastropoda: Rissoidae) in the Arctic and cold temperate waters. Polar Biology 42, 889905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekhaev, IO, Deart, YV and Lyubin, PA (2014) Molluscs of the genus Onoba H. Adams et A. Adams, 1852 from the Barents Sea and adjacent waters (Gastropoda: Rissoidae). Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS 318, 268279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekhaev, IO and Krol, EN (2017) Diversity of shell-bearing gastropods along the western coast of the Arctic archipelago Novaya Zemlya: an evaluation of modern and historical data. Polar Biology 4347, 22792289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekhaev, IO and Krol, EN (2020a) A review of the genus Anatoma in the Eurasian Arctic Seas (Gastropoda: Vetigastropoda). Zoosystematica Rossica 29, 128137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekhaev, IO and Krol, EN (2020b) Hidden under ice and mud: diversity of shell-bearing microgastropods in the eastern Arctic seas. Systematics and Biodiversity 18, 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2020.1785577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekhaev, IO, Zuev, YA and Rusyaev, SM (2020) Nomads of northern coasts: distribution of Aporrhais pespelicani (Gastropoda: Stromboidea) in the Barents Sea. Ruthenica: Russian Malacological Journal 30, 203206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osadchiev, A, Viting, K, Frey, D, Demeshko, D, Dzhamalova, A, Nurlibaeva, A, Gordey, A, Krechik, V, Spivak, E, Semiletov, I and Stepanova, N (2022) Structure and circulation of Atlantic water masses in the St. Anna trough in the Kara Sea. Frontiers in Marine Science 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.915674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozhigin, VK, Ingvaldsen, RB, Loeng, H, Boitsov, VD and Karsakov, AL (2011) Introduction to the Barents Sea. In Jakobsen, T and Ozhigin, V (eds), The Barents Sea: Ecosystem, Resources, Management – Half a Century of Russian-Norwegian Cooperation. Trondheim: Tapir Academic, pp. 3976.Google Scholar
Perry, AL, Low, PJ, Ellis, JR and Reynolds, JD (2005) Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science (New York, N.Y.) 308, 19121915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozycki, O (1993) Shallow-water molluscs of Isfjorden (west Spitsbergen, Svalbard). Polish Polar Research 14, 5564.Google Scholar
Smith, KE and Thatje, S (2012) The secret to successful deep-Sea invasion: does low temperature hold the Key? PLoS ONE 7, e51219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solyanko, K, Spiridonov, V and Naumov, A (2011) Benthic fauna of the Gorlo Strait, White Sea: a first species inventory based on data from three different decades from the 1920s to 2000s. Marine Biodiversity, 41, 441453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalding, MD, Fox, HE, Allen, GR, Davidson, N, Ferdaña, Z, Finlayson, M, Halpern, B, Jorge, M, Lombana, A, Lourie, S, Martin, K, Mcmanus, E, Molnar, J, Recchia, C and Robertson, J (2007) Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience 57, 573583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukhotin, AA, Krasnov, YV and Galaktionov, KV (2008) Subtidal populations of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis as key determinants of waterfowl flocks in the southeastern Barents Sea. Polar Biology 31, 13571363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, G (1944) Marine Gastropoda Prosobranchiata. The Zoology of East Greenland 121, 1181.Google Scholar
Thuy, B, Gale, AS, Kroh, A, Kucera, M, Numberger-Thuy, LD, Reich, M and Stöhr, S (2012) Ancient origin of the modern deep-sea fauna. PLoS ONE 7, e46913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsikhon-Lukanina, EA (1987) Trophology of Water Molluscs. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Tyler, PA and Young, CM (1998) Temperature and pressure tolerances in dispersal stages of the genus Echinus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): prerequisites for deep-sea invasion and speciation. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 45, 253277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warén, A (1996) New and little known Mollusca from Iceland and Scandinavia. Part 3. Sarsia 81, 197245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weslawski, JM, Wiktor, J., Zajaczkowski, M and Swerpel, S (1993) Intertidal zone of Svalbard – 1. Macroorganism distribution and biomass. Polar Biology 13, 7379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Włodarska, M, Wȩsławski, JM and Gromisz, S (1996) A comparison of the macrofaunal community structure and diversity in two Arctic glacial bays – a ‘cold’ one off Franz Josef Land and a ‘warm’ one off Spitsbergen. Oceanologia 38, 251283.Google Scholar
Zimina, OL, Frolova, EA, Dikaeva, DR, Akhmetchina, OY, Garbul, EA, Frolov, AA and Nekhaev, IO (2017) Fauna and distribution of abundance and biomass of zoobenthos in the northern Barents Sea in April and May 2016. Transactions of Kola Scientific Centre 2/2017, 6680.Google Scholar
Zimina, OL and Meshcheryakov, NI (2017) Quantitative characteristics of the littoral fauna of Grønfjorden Gulf (Spitsbergen) during winter and spring of 2016. Doklady Biological Sciences 474, 102105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distribution of Onoba aculeus in the North-eastern Atlantic and the Arctic Ocean. Coastal regions where the species is distributed are highlighted by red. Triangle indicates locality in the Arctic shelf reported here.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Shells of Onoba aculeus (A–D) and Onoba leptalea (E). (A and B) Arctic Ocean, 78°44.734′N 69°42.679′E, 343 m; (C) Svalbard, Grønfjorden, 77°59.25′N 14°12′E, littoral; (D) South-western Barents Sea, Murman Coast, 68°17.67′N 38°37.93′E, 3 m; (E) Arctic Ocean, 78°44.734′N 69°42.679′E, 343 m (same locality with A and B).