No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“Speak the Language of Your Flag”: Speech, Language, and Oralism During the First World War
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2023
Abstract
With the United States’ entrance into the First World War, linguistic and cultural cohesiveness became imperative, compelling everyone—from immigrants with foreign accents to people with speech problems and hearing loss—to “sound American” by fluently speaking the language of their flag.
This article examines lip-reading, speech, and auricular training prescribed to deaf and hard-of-hearing children as well as for servicemen deafened in the war to demonstrate how World War I demanded all Americans to contribute to and participate in shared national soundscapes, regardless of their hearing status. Use of American Sign Language was considered a conspicuous sign of one’s failure to integrate into hearing society, and it shared parallels with immigrants who failed to learn English and fully assimilate into American culture. Indeed, rehabilitation of deafened soldiers of the First World War through speech training and lip-reading instruction at Hospital No. 11 at Cape May, New Jersey, coincided with broader national efforts to improve Americans’ speech and language use, and in turn, their patriotism and productivity.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era (SHGAPE)
References
Notes
1 Beglinger, Nina J., “Americanization,” Detroit Educational Bulletin 3 (Oct. 1919): 10 Google Scholar.
2 Van Adestine, Gertrude, “School for Deaf,” Detroit Educational Bulletin 3 (Oct. 1919): 11 Google Scholar.
3 Vacha, J. E., “When Wagner Was Verboten: The Campaign Against German Music in World War I,” New York History 64 (Apr. 1983): 171–188 Google Scholar; Kennedy, David M., Over Here: The First World War and American Society, 25th anniversary ed. (1980; New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 68Google Scholar.
4 Capozzola, Christopher, “Legacies for Citizenship: Pinpointing Americans during and after World War I,” Diplomatic History 38 (Sept. 2014): 713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 I use the term “lip-reading,” although “speech reading” more accurately conveys that the skill requires reading not only lips but also facial expressions and gestures. I do this to avoid confusion with “speech training,” which emphasizes clear speaking skills.
6 Deaf studies scholars have traditionally differentiated between the audiological condition of deafness and the cultural and linguistic category of Deafness. This distinction is notated by the capitalized “Deaf” indicating knowledge of American Sign Language and Deaf community membership and the lowercase “deaf” denoting the medical/pathological condition of hearing loss.
7 Kellogg, Louise Phelps, “The Bennett Law in Wisconsin,” Wisconsin Magazine of History 2 (Sept. 1918): 3–25 Google Scholar.
8 Jacobi, Juliane, “Schoolmarm, Volkserzieher, Kantor, and Schulschwester: German Teachers Among Immigrants During the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century” in German Influences on Education in the United States to 1917, eds. Geitz, Henry, Heideking, Jürgen, and Herbst, Jurgen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Quoted in Kellogg, “The Bennett Law in Wisconsin,” 12.
10 Arnold H. Leibowitz, “Language as a Means of Social Control: The United States Experience,” paper presented at the VIII World Congress of Sociology, University of Toronto, 1974 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 093 168), 14.
11 Barnes, Frank C., “Shall German Be Dropped from Our Schools?” Modern Language Journal 2 (Feb. 1918): 187–202 Google Scholar.
12 Barnes, “Shall German Be Dropped from Our Schools?” 188.
13 Barnes, “Shall German Be Dropped from Our Schools?” 191.
14 “Cut Out the Foreign Languages: The Use of One Language Will Make Our People a United Nation,” American Municipalities 35 (Apr. 1918): 59.
15 “Cut Out the Foreign Languages,” 59.
16 “Cut Out the Foreign Languages,” 59.
17 Des Moines Register, Jul. 29, 1918.
18 Des Moines Register, Jul. 29, 1918.
19 “Only English to be Spoken,” American Journal of Education 52 (Oct. 1918): 43.
20 Scott, James Brown, “Foreign Language Teaching in the United States,” American Journal of International Law 17 (July 1923): 508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 Capozzola, Christopher, Uncle Sam Wants You: World War I and the Making of the Modern American Citizen (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Capozzola, Uncle Sam Wants You, 196.
23 Hook, J. N., A Long Way Together: A Personal View of NCTE’s First Sixty-Seven Years (Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1979), 3 Google Scholar.
24 Crumpton, Claudia E., Guide to American Speech Week: Prepared for Use in the Campaign for the National Observance of American Speech Week, November 2 –8, 1919 (Chicago: The Council, 1919), 7 Google Scholar.
25 Hook, A Long Way Together, 29.
26 Monroe, Lewis B., Series of Readers (Philadelphia: E. H. Butler and Co., 1907)Google Scholar, preface.
27 “A Plea for Good Speech,” Continent 50 (Oct. 1919): 1298.
28 Gaylord, J. S., “Speech Improvement,” Quarterly Journal of Speech Education 5, no. 4 (1919): 358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
29 Ward, Cornelia Carhart, “The Opportunity of the English Teacher,” English Journal 7 (June 1918): 364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Crumpton, Claudia E., “American Speech Week throughout the Nation,” English Journal 8 (May 1919): 280 Google Scholar.
31 Cited in Kibbee, Douglas A., Language and the Law: Linguistic Inequality in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
32 New York Age, Aug. 13, 1921.
33 Crumpton, Claudia E., “Speech Betterment in Alabama,” English Journal 6 (Feb. 1917): 96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
34 Star Tribune (Minneapolis), Dec. 2, 1916.
35 Brooklyn Daily Eagle, Nov. 13, 1924.
36 Van Adestine, “School for Deaf,” 11.
37 Van Adestine, “School for Deaf,” 11.
38 Fairchild, Amy L., Science at the Borders: Immigrant Medical Inspection and the Shaping of the Modern Industrial Labor Force (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), 281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
39 Mullan, E. H., “Mental Examination of Immigrants: Administration and Line Inspection at Ellis Island,” Public Health Reports 32 (May 1917): 737 Google Scholar.
40 Nute, A. J., “Medical Inspection of Immigrants at the Port of Boston,” Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 170 (Apr. 1914): 644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
41 Orr, Harry D., “Examination of Recruits for the Army and Militia,” American Journal of Public Health 7 (May 1917): 487 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
42 Scripture, E. W., “The Nature of Stuttering,” Lancet 188 (Sept. 1916): 494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
43 Salina (Kansas) Evening Journal, Dec. 5, 1918; Tyler, Don, Music of the First World War (Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood, 2016), 52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 Goldmark, Daniel, “Stuttering in American Popular Song, 1890–1930” in Sounding Off: Theorizing Disability in Music, ed. Lerner, Neil William and Straus, Joseph Nathan (New York: Routledge, 2006), 98 Google Scholar.
45 Boston Sunday Post, Nov. 24, 1918.
46 Lawrence (Kansas) Daily Journal-World, Apr. 19, 1920.
47 Des Moines Register, Mar. 24, 1920.
48 Shamokin (Pennsylvania) News-Dispatch, Oct. 7, 1924.
49 Solomon, Andrew, Far from the Tree: Parents, Children and the Search for Identity (New York: Scribner, 2012), 52 Google Scholar.
50 Bell would later publish the results of his study on hereditary deafness in 1884 in his Memoir Upon the Formation of a Deaf Variety of the Human Race (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1884).
51 Circa 1872, cited in Gray, Charlotte, Reluctant Genius: Alexander Graham Bell and the Passion for Invention (New York: Arcade Publishing, 2006), 44 Google Scholar. For more on interventions to “cure” deafness, see Jaipreet Virdi, Hearing Happiness: Deafness Cures in History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020).
52 Bell, Alexander Melville, Visible Speech: Science of Universal Alphabetics (London: Simkin, Marshall & Co., 1867)Google Scholar.
53 Lane, Harlan, When the Mind Hears: A History of the Deaf (New York: Vintage Books, 1984), 346 Google Scholar.
54 Lane, When the Mind Hears, 344.
55 Cited in Winefield, Richard, Never the Twain Shall Meet: Bell, Gallaudet, and the Communications Debate (Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press, 2000), 74 Google Scholar.
56 The Volta Bureau is now the Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, and the Volta Review is still in publication.
57 While Heinicke is often is often credited for inventing oralism, oralist approaches to deaf education trace back to sixteenth-century monastic Spain with the Benedictine Fray Pedro Ponce de León. Lane, When the Mind Hears, 111; Plann, Susan, A Silent Minority: Deaf Education in Spain, 1550 –1835 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 81 Google Scholar.
58 American Sign Language emerged from the combination of Clerc’s French Sign Language with the home signs that American students brought to the Hartford school, particularly by those from Martha’s Vineyard. See Groce, Nora Ellen, Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language: Hereditary Deafness on Martha’s Vineyard (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985)Google Scholar.
59 Gallaudet, Edward Miner, “The Milan Convention,” American Annals of the Deaf 26 (Jan. 1881): 4 Google Scholar.
60 Flournoy, John J., “Scheme for a Commonwealth for the Deaf and Dumb,” American Annals of the Deaf 8 (Jan. 1856): 118–25Google Scholar.
61 Susan Burch challenges the traditional narrative of oralism’s supremacy in the early twentieth century by highlighting students’ and teachers’ continued use of ASL in the classroom. Burch, Susan, Signs of Resistance: American Deaf Cultural History, 1900 to 1942 (New York: New York University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.
62 Humphries, Tom and Padden, Carol, “The Problem of Voice” in Inside Deaf Culture (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005), 58 Google Scholar.
63 A transcript of Veditz’s speech is available in Carol Padden, “Translating Veditz,” Sign Language Studies 4 (Spring 2004): 244–60. Veditz was the son of German immigrants and was fluent in German.
64 Baynton, Douglas C., Bergey, Jean Lindquist, and Gannon, Jack R., Through Deaf Eyes: A Photographic History of an American Community (Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press, 2007), 6Google Scholar.
65 Linker, Beth, War’s Waste: Rehabilitation in World War I America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
66 A. G. Crane, “In Hospitals Caring for Defects of Hearing and Speech” in The Medical Department of the United States Army in the World War, vol.13, part one: Physical Reconstruction and Vocational Education, prepared under the direction of Surgeon General M. W. Ireland (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1921), 183.
67 Crane, “In Hospitals Caring for Defects of Hearing and Speech,” 183.
68 Charles W. Richardson, “Reconstruction of Defects of Hearing and Speech,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 80, Rehabilitation of the Wounded (Nov. 1918): 35–39.
69 “American Association to Promote the Teaching of Speech to the Deaf,” American Annals of the Deaf 63 (May 1918): 305.
70 Crane, “In Hospitals Caring for Defects of Hearing and Speech,” 185.
71 Crane, “In Hospitals Caring for Defects of Hearing and Speech,” 185.
72 Richardson, Charles W., “Organization of the Section of Defects of Hearing and Speech,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 28, no. 2 (1919): 434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
73 Crane, “In Hospitals Caring for Defects of Hearing and Speech,” 181.
74 Richardson, “Organization,” 439.
75 Charles W. Richardson, “Some Notes on the Scope of the Section of Defects of Hearing and Speech, Division of Physical Reconstruction, Surgeon General’s Office,” American Annals of the Deaf 63 (Sept. 1918): 425. The lip-reading teachers were Enfield Joiner, Mary Louise Wimsatt, Margaret Bodycomb, Clara Louise Rockwell, Mary Thornton, Lula May Bruce, Doris Freeman, Susan Norris, and Margaret Roberts; the speech teachers were Katherine O’Connell, Esta V. Pastel, and Mary Thornton.
76 See, for example, “Our Roll of Honor,” American Annals of the Deaf 63 (Sept. 1918): 375–76.
77 See, for instance, “North Carolina (Morganton) School,” School Items, American Annals of the Deaf 63 (Sept. 1918): 388, which announces the resignation of Miss Enfield Joiner.
78 “Miss Morgenstern a War Worker,” Volta Review 20 (Oct. 1918): 650.
79 Blake, Clarence John, “Speech-Reading for the War Deaf,” Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 179 (Dec. 1918): 734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
80 Berry, Gordon, “Is Adult Lip‐reading Worth While? A Detailed Study of 108 Cases,” Laryngoscope 32 (Sept. 1922): 652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
81 The specific requirement was hearing below 5/20 in both ears, meaning the inability to hear normal conversation beyond a distance of five feet. Berry, Gordon, “The Rehabilitation of the War-Deafened: I.—Historical and Veterans’ Aspects,” Laryngoscope 54, no. 9 (1944): 483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
82 Crane, “In Hospitals Caring for Defects of Hearing and Speech,” 183.
83 Berry, “Is Adult Lip‐reading Worth While?” 662. Berry himself experienced catarrhal deafness and, while working at Cape May as an otologist, trained in lip-reading himself.
84 Charles W. Richardson, “Some Notes,” 367.
85 Berry, “Is Adult Lip‐reading Worth While?” 648.
86 Berry, “Is Adult Lip‐reading Worth While?” 654.
87 Berry, “Is Adult Lip-reading Worth While?” 652.
88 Wood, Walter J., “Training the Eye to Hear: Three Hundred Service Men Who Came Out of War Deaf or Dumb Are Learning to Overcome Their Handicaps,” American Legion Weekly 2 (July 1920): 17 Google Scholar.
89 Wood, “Training the Eye to Hear,” 17.
90 Confederate Veteran 30 (Aug. 1922): 282.
91 The Veterans’ Bureau was established in 1921.
92 Berry, “Is Adult Lip‐reading Worth While?” 646.
93 “Seeing is Hearing: The Army is Educating its First Deaf Soldier by the Newest Methods,” Carry On: A Magazine on the Reconstruction of Disabled Soldiers and Sailors 1 (Sept. 1918): 15.
94 Muskogee (Oklahoma) County Democrat, Oct. 31, 1918.
95 Stewart, Cora Wilson, “Illiteracy and the War,” Journal of Education 87 (Mar. 1918): 354–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
96 Hoppe, T. L., “The Better Speech Movement,” Judicious Advertising 19 (Nov. 1921): 69 Google Scholar.
97 Crane, “In Hospitals Caring for Defects of Hearing and Speech,” 185.
98 Joiner, Enfield, “The Work at Cape May,” American Annals of the Deaf 64 (Sept. 1919): 283 Google Scholar.
99 Richardson, “Organization,” 435.
100 Berry, “Is Adult Lip‐reading Worth While?” 646.
101 “Seeing is Hearing,” 16–17.
102 Richardson, “Organization,” 441.
103 Richardson, “Organization,” 429.
104 Langfeld, H. S., "Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Baltimore, December 27 and 28, 1918,” Psychological Bulletin 16, no. 2 (1919): 33–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
105 Joiner, “The Work at Cape May,” 283.
106 Mrs. George T. Sanders, “Hospital No. 11, Cape May, N. J.,” Silent Worker 31 (June 1919): 162.
107 Berry, “Is Adult Lip‐reading Worth While?” 659.
108 Richardson, “Organization,” 429.
109 Richardson, “Organization,” 436.
110 Advocate-Messenger (Danville, KY), Feb. 10, 1920.
111 According to Leslie E. Morrissett, 418 men were totally deafened and 12,394 were partially deafened during World War I: “The Aural Rehabilitation Program of the U.S. Army for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology 55, no. 4 (1946): 821.
112 Second Report of the Provost Marshal General to the Secretary of War on the Operations of the Selective Service System to Sept. 20, 1918 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1919), 15–56.
113 Crane, “In Hospitals Caring for Defects of Hearing and Speech,” 187.
114 Crane, “In Hospitals Caring for Defects of Hearing and Speech,” 187.
115 See, for instance, Annual Report of the Director, United States’ Veterans’ Bureau (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1922), 616.
116 Chicago League for the Hard of Hearing, “Educational Report,” 1922; “Minutes of Executive Committee Meeting,” Sept. 13, 1924. Chicago Hearing Society Records, 1916–1976, box 1, folder 1, Chicago History Museum, Chicago, Illinois.
117 Blake, “Speech-Reading for the War Deaf,” 733.
118 Berry, “Is Adult Lip-reading Worth While?” 645; Berry, “The Rehabilitation of the War-Deafened,” 483.
119 Berry, “The Rehabilitation of the War-Deafened,” 483.
120 “Cases Having Hearing and Speech Disabilities,” Vocational Summary 2 (Mar. 1920): 205.