Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:34:43.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Money for mental health care in 2003/4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Gareth H. Jones*
Affiliation:
Bryn Capel, Caerffili CF83 3DF. E-mail: gareth.jones1k@doctors.org.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2003

Glover (Psychiatric Bulletin, April 2003, 27, 126–129) has served patients well, delineating the failure of the Department of Health to instruct the Primary Care Trusts to finance the National Service Framework documents. May I suggest a minimum compulsory target of 15% for urban areas, and 11% elsewhere, to be achieved within 5 years? A sector basis for distribution would be the Mental Health Needs Index (MINI; Glover, 1998). This index, most successful for urban areas, originated in NE Thames, and can be calculated on an electoral ward basis by a programme from Glover, and gives numbers needed for acute and psychiatric intensive care unit beds, as well as community 24 hour nursed homes, and other supported accommodation. The latter are vital, as the 40-50% homeless in-patients of the under-funded Tower Hamlets testify (Reference Turner and PriebeTurner & Priebe, 2003).

Personally, I doubt if a reasonably civilised service can be provided on less than £1 × MINI per capita per annum. A simpler measure is a district count of the number of residents (including homeless and hostel residents) known to have suffered with schizophrenia, though they may be temporarily out of contact with services. This group is most likely to cost long-term money, and its needs are recognised in the calculation of a 20% spend in the long-stay belt of the former Epsom hospitals, whose patients came from all over London. The lowest spend of 8% in East Devon is made up for by the 15% spend in Exeter, where the ex long-stay residents from all over Devon were resettled.

References

Glover, G., Robin, E., Emami, J., et al (1998) A needs index for mental health care (MINI). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33, 8996.Google Scholar
Turner, T. & Priebe, S. (2003) Forget community care – reinstitutionalisation is here. Letter. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 253.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.