Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:38:26.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ENT's part in the UK's ‘Medical Oscars’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2013

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

It is not often that doctors practising in otolaryngology are recognised in national awards. Hence, it is important for us to celebrate the achievement of the Britain Nepal Otology Service (BRINOS). This UK–Nepal non-government organisation (NGO) has received two prestigious awards at the recent BMJ Group Awards in London: ‘Karen Woo Surgical Team of the Year' and overall ‘UK Medical Team of the Year'.1 The work of BRINOS has included surgical ‘ear camps' as well as the development of a community ear care programme, and has been well documented in The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.Reference Weir2Reference Youngs, Weir, Tharu, Bohara and Bahadur4

This issue of the JLO has a number of key review articles highlighting clinical and research aspects of important otolaryngological conditions. Eisele and Richmon emphasise the importance of multidisciplinary involvement in the management of parapharyngeal space neoplasms.Reference Eisele and Richmon5 Gonçalves and colleagues review the mechanisms of cisplatin ototoxicity from a theoretical perspective, and conclude that these adverse events proceed via the formation of reactive oxygen species in cochlear tissue, with apoptotic cell death as a consequence.Reference Gonçalves, Silveira, Teixeira and Hyppolito6 Louw reviews the molecular events leading to acquired cholesteatoma, and concludes that the role of lipids is relatively unexplored and requires further research.Reference Louw7

Finally, Kulkarni and colleagues analyse research output from UK otorhinolaryngologists during the period 2000–2010.Reference Kulkarni, Kulkarni, Ramsden and Silva8 The perception of many is that research output has fallen due to many factors, such as funding restriction, difficulty obtaining project approval and changes in training programmes. It is encouraging, therefore, that these authors have found that on a worldwide basis the research output from the UK and Ireland grew by 22.8 per cent during the 10-year study period.

References

1BMJ Awards. BMJ 2013 Special Awards Supplement. BMJ 2013;346:114Google Scholar
2Weir, N. Ear surgery camps in Nepal and the work of the Britain Nepal Otology Service (BRINOS). J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:1113–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Shrestha, R, Baral, K, Weir, N. Community ear care delivery by community ear assistants and volunteers: a pilot programme. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:869–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Youngs, R, Weir, N, Tharu, P, Bohara, RB, Bahadur, D. Diagnostic otoscopy skills of community ear assistants in Western Nepal. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:27–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Eisele, DW, Richmon, JD. Contemporary evaluation and management of parapharyngeal space neoplasms. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:550–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Gonçalves, MS, Silveira, AF, Teixeira, AR, Hyppolito, MA. Mechanisms of cisplatin ototoxicity: theoretical review. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:536–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Louw, L. Acquired cholesteatoma: summary of the cascade of molecular events. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:542–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Kulkarni, K, Kulkarni, M, Ramsden, J, Silva, P. Are UK otorhinolaryngologists maintaining their research output? J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:556–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed