Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T21:16:46.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Inter-Institutional Interface of Religion and Business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

Jared L. Peifer*
Affiliation:
Baruch College

Abstract:

It is frequently asserted that religion enhances the ethical climate of business. This is buttressed by the tacit assumption that religious moral authority is easily combined with and exerted in business, an inter-institutional process I call Engagement. By drawing upon Secularization Theory’s societal-level focus on religious authority and the symbolic boundary work surrounding the interface of competing institutional logics, I theorize a broader range of inter-institutional processes including, Disengagement, Co-optation and Adjudication. To exemplify these inter-institutional processes, I engage in qualitative analysis of historic religious magazines from 1927-1931 and 1985-1989 and focus on the religious moral authority directed at the financial market. I discuss how my findings relate to the scholarship on Religion and Business in particular and Business Ethics more broadly.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

A new mutual fund. 1987. Presbyterian Survey, July/August: 39.Google Scholar
Abend, G. 2013. The origins of business ethics in American universities, 1902-1936. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2): 171205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abend, G. 2014. The moral background: An inquiry into the history of business ethics. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agle, B. R., & Van Buren, H. J III. 1999. God and Mammon: The modern relationship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(4): 563582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, C. 2007. Bureaucracy and democracy in organizations revisiting feminist organizations. In Wharton, A. (Ed.), The sociology of organizations: 90106. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.Google Scholar
America’s enemy-greed. 1930. Christian Century, August 6.Google Scholar
Bankers Trust ends credit activities in South Africa. 1986. Presbyterian Survey. June.Google Scholar
Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. 2007. Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3): 229243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brotherhood and the machine. 1928. Christian Century, August 30: 10421043.Google Scholar
Burk, J. 1988. Values in the marketplace: The American stock market under federal securities law. New York: Walter De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, A. S. 1929. Religion and money-making. Watchman Examiner, July 25: 940.Google Scholar
Cadge, W., Ecklund, E. H., & Short, N. 2009. Constructions of religion and spirituality in the daily boundary work of pediatric physicians. Social Problems, 56(4): 702721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, J. 1994. Public religions in a modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, M. 1994. Secularization as declining religious authority. Social Forces, 72(3): 749774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Concerned? 1985. Christian Century, February 20: 193.Google Scholar
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. F. 2009. Managed by the markets : How finance reshaped America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbelaere, K. 1981. Secularization: A multi-dimensional concept. Current Sociology, 29(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbelaere, K. 1999. Towards an integrated perspective of the processes related to the descriptive concept of secularization. Sociology of Religion, 60(3): 229247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, J., & White, J. 1995. Toward the feminine firm: An extension to Thomas White. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(3): 463478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easy consciences on Wall Street. 1987. Christian Century, February 25.Google Scholar
Ecklund, E. H. 2010. Science vs. religion: What scientists really think. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. M. 1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1): 3141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Establishes Leo W. Simon memorial. 1927. Union Tidings, 5.Google Scholar
Fackler, P. M., & Lippy, C. H. 1995. Popular religious magazines of the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 232263. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Francis, . 2013. Evangelii gaudium: Apostolic exhortation on the proclamation of the gospel in today’s world. November 24.Google Scholar
Francis, . 2015. Laudato si’. May 24.Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. F., Bevins, G. M., & Zehr, S. C. 1985. Professionalization of American scientists: public science in the creation/evolution trials. American Sociological Review, 50(3): 392409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gift annuity pays up to 14%. 1988. Presbyterian Survey, March: 12.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. M. 1986. Doing business with South Africa. Christianity Today, April 4.Google Scholar
Gorski, P. S. 2000. Historicizing the secularization debate: Church, state, and society in late medieval and early modern Europe, ca. 1300–1700. American Sociological Review, 65(1): 138167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 317371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, D. 2007. Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3): 453476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, T. S. 1989. For Brother Knights and their families: The K of C insurance story. Columbia, May: 67.Google Scholar
Hidden, C. W. 1928. The Christian businessman. Watchman Examiner, May 10.Google Scholar
Hobbs, F., & Stoops, N. 2002. Demographic trends in the 20th Century: Census 2000 special reports: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Increase your interest in Israel. 1987. Reform Judaism, Summer.Google Scholar
Khurana, R. 2007. From higher aims to hired hand: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K., & Preda, A. 2005. The sociology of financial markets. Oxford,/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kurtz, L. 2008. Socially responsible investment and shareholder activism. In Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, 249280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, L III. 2009. Spiritualiy, inc.: Religion in the workplace. New York /London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, M. 1992. Money, morals and manners: The culture of the French and the American upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, M. 2000. The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Cambridge, MA: Russel Sage Foundation; Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, M. 2001. Symbolic boundaries. In Smelser, N. J., & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences: 1534115347. London: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landier, A., & Nair, V. B. 2009. Investing for change: Profit from responsible investment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Blonc, N. 1987. God has no money problems. Christianity Today, July 10.Google Scholar
Maltby, D. E. 1988. The one-minute ethicist: Can business school ethics courses really make us better? Christianity Today, February 19.Google Scholar
Merriam, E. F. 1929. The annuity gift system. Watchman Examiner, March 28.Google Scholar
Miller, D. W. 2007. God at work: The history and promise of the faith at work movement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, F. L. 1957. A history of American magazines: 1885-1905. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Muck, T. 1987. The Boesky touch. Christianity Today, March 6.Google Scholar
Negro education going forward. 1927. Christian Century, July 28: 893.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, R. 1930. The preaching of repentance. Christian Century, June 13.Google Scholar
Nothing has changed about IRAs in 1986. 1987. Lutheran Witness, January.Google Scholar
NYSE Market Data. 2014. Total number of shareowners (mils.) (1989-1998) http://www.nyxdata.com/Data-Products/Facts-and-Figures.Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M. 2011. Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3): 409444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patwardhan, A. M., Keith, M. E., & Vitell, S. J. 2012. Religiosity, attitude toward business, and ethical beliefs: Hispanic consumers in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 110: 6770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peifer, J. L. 2014. The institutional complexity of religious mutual funds: Appreciating the uniqueness of societal logics. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 41: 339368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Polish, D. 1987. Looking out for number one. Reform Judaism, Fall.Google Scholar
Presbyterians obtain their pension fund. 1927. Christian Century, June 9: 707708.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. D. 2002. Doing good and doing well: Shareholder activism, responsible investment, and mainline protestantism. In Wuthnow, R., & Evans, J. H. (Eds.), The quiet hand of God: Faith-based activism and the public role of mainline protestantism: 343363. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sacred dividends. 1931. Columbia, February.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. 1987. No ethics in business. Christian Century, November 11: 980.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. 1992. What is social investing? Who are social investors? In Kinder, P. D., Lydenberg, S. D., & Domini, A. L. (Eds.), The social investment almanac: A comprehensive guide to socially responsible investing: 823. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Shelly, B. 1989. Why work: Christians need to rediscover – and reapply- the Protestant work ethic. Christianity Today, July 14: 16.Google Scholar
Sidani, Y. M., & Thornberry, J. 2013. Nepotism in the Arab world: An institutional theory perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 6996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. 2003. The secular revolution: Power, interests, and conflict in the secularization of American public life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock market is no place. 1927. Watchman Examiner, August 11.Google Scholar
Stuart, J. M. 1928. Faith, works—and Raskob. Columbia, April: 10-11, 39.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tackling and ticklish problem. 1927. Christian Century, April 28.Google Scholar
Ten-year five-per-cent. 1929. Lutheran Witness, November 26.Google Scholar
The bishop and the bucket shop. 1929. Christian Century, July 17.Google Scholar
The uses of prosperity. 1927. Watchman Examiner, May 12.Google Scholar
This oil stock was all right. 1928. Christian Century, February 23: 246.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trust funds. 1930. Lutheran Witness, March 4: 69.Google Scholar
Tschannen, O. 1991. The secularization paradigm: A systematization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(4): 395415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitell, S. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. 2003. Consumer ethics: The role of religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 46: 151162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. 2005. Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 57: 175181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitell, S. J., Singh, J. J., & Paolillo, J. 2007. Consumers’ ethical beliefs: The roles of money, religiosity and attitude toward business. Journal of Business Ethics, 73: 369379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, J. M. 1987. A bear market and an overweight camel. Christian Century, November 11: 987.Google Scholar
Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. 2002. Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 7797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1905 [2009]. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
What is the solution to South Africa's racial problems? 1985. Christianity Today, October 4.Google Scholar
When ministers are swindled. 1928. Christian Century, March 15: 339–339.Google Scholar
Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, J., Daniel, R., & Freeman, R. E. 1994. A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 475497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workers and capitalists and capitalist workers. 1927. Christian Century, March 17: 325.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. A. 1978. Human values and the market: The case of life insurance and death in 19th-century America. The American Journal of Sociology, 84(3): 591610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed