Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T02:29:15.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Powder X-ray diffraction of nintedanib esylate hemihydrate, (C31H33N5O4)(C2H5O3S)(H2O)0.5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2024

Tawnee M. Ens
Affiliation:
North Central College, 131 S. Loomis St., Naperville, IL 60540, USA
James A. Kaduk*
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute of Technology, 3101 S. Dearborn St., Chicago, IL 60616, USA North Central College, 131 S. Loomis St., Naperville, IL 60540, USA
Anja Dosen
Affiliation:
ICDD, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, PA 19073-3273, USA
Thomas N. Blanton
Affiliation:
ICDD, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, PA 19073-3273, USA
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: kaduk@polycrystallography.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The crystal structure of nintedanib esylate hemihydrate was refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data and optimized using density functional theory techniques. Nintedanib esylate hemihydrate crystallizes in space group P-1 (#2) with a = 11.5137(1), b = 16.3208(4), c = 19.1780(5) Å, α = 69.0259(12), β = 84.4955(8), γ = 89.8319(6)°, V = 3347.57(3) Å3, and Z = 4 at 295 K. Hydrogen bonds are prominent in the crystal structure. The water molecule forms two medium-strength O–H⋯O hydrogen bonds to one of the esylate anions. The protonated nitrogen atom in each cation forms a N–H⋯O hydrogen bond to an esylate anion. The ring N–H groups form strong intramolecular N–H⋯O hydrogen bonds to carbonyl groups. The ring N–H groups form intramolecular N–H⋯O hydrogen bonds to esylate anions. Many C–H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonds (and one C–H⋯N hydrogen bond), with aromatic C–H, methylene groups and methyl groups as donors, are present. The hydrogen bonding patterns of the two cations differ considerably. The powder pattern has been submitted to ICDD for inclusion in the Powder Diffraction File™ (PDF®)

Type
New Diffraction Data
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Centre for Diffraction Data

Nintedanib (free base CAS Registry Number 656247-17-5) is a drug for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) as well as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In NSCLC, Nintedanib (brand name Vargatef) inhibits three types of growth factor receptors that are involved in angiogenesis for tumor growth as an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases (Yan et al., Reference Yan, Xue, Wang, Gao, Zeng, Wang and Jia2023). In IPF, Nintedanib (brand name Ofev) has antifibrotic properties involving growth factors in the lungs that act against connective tissue formation by inhibiting fibroblast proliferation, which acts similarly to its tumor inhibition properties (Wollin et al., Reference Wollin, Wex, Pautsch, Schnapp, Hostettler, Stowasser and Kolb2015; Marijic et al., Reference Marijic, Schwarzkopf, Schwettmann, Ruhnke, Trudzinski and Kreuter2021). Nintedanib is FDA-approved for Ofev, as an IPF treatment, that has been proven to reduce significant cell proliferation in the lungs against IPF and has been recognized to work well against NSCLC and systemic sclerosis by delaying long-term proliferation. Hepatotoxicity due to increased liver enzymes in metabolism is the main drawback of this type of therapy but has otherwise had promising results for IPF and NSCLC (Gole and Bankole, Reference Gole and Bankole2023).

Primarily administered in a salt form as nintedanib esylate (Figure 1 inset, CAS Registry Number 656247-18-6), the systematic name is methyl (3Z)-3-(((4-(N-methyl-2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)acetamido)phenyl)amino) (phenyl)methylidene)-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole-6-carboxylate ethanesulfonate. This work was carried out as part of a project to determine the crystal structures of large-volume commercial pharmaceuticals and include high-quality powder diffraction data for them in the Powder Diffraction File (Gates-Rector and Blanton, Reference Gates-Rector and Blanton2019).

Figure 1. Nintedanib esylate hemihydrate synchrotron X-ray diffraction pattern. Inset nintedanib esylate hemihydrate molecule. Image generated using JADE Pro (MDI, 2024) and Mercury (Macrae et al., Reference Macrae, Sovago, Cottrell, Galek, McCabe, Pidcock, Platings, Shields, Stevens, Towler and Wood2020).

The synchrotron pattern (Figure 1) of a commercial reagent (purchased from TargetMol, lot #131360) was measured at 11-BM at APS (Antao et al., Reference Antao, Hassan, Wang, Lee and Toby2008; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Shu, Ramanathan, Preissner, Wang, Beno, Von Dreele, Ribaud, Kurtz, Antao, Jiao and Toby2008; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Toby, Lee, Ribaud, Antao, Kurtz, Ramanathan, Von Dreele and Beno2008) using a wavelength of 0.459744 Å). The pattern was indexed using N-TREOR (Altomare et al., Reference Altomare, Cuocci, Giacovazzo, Moliterni, Rizzi, Corriero and Falcicchio2013) on a primitive triclinic unit cell. Triclinic lattice parameters for nintedanib esylate hemihydrate, CAS Registry Number 959762-24-4 (space group P-1, which had a similar unit cell) and a powder pattern were reported by Roth et al. (Reference Roth, Linz, Sieger, Rall, Hilberg and Bock2006; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH), but no atom coordinates were included. A connectivity search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom et al., Reference Groom, Bruno, Lightfoot and Ward2016) yielded the Refcode YASMIS for nintedanib esylate hemihydrate (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Huang, Cao, Sha, Sun, He, Wan, Li, Li and Ren2022). Although purchased as anhydrous, the sample seems to be the hemihydrate. The sample contains an unknown crystalline impurity. Thirteen peaks from this phase could be indexed on a primitive monoclinic unit cell having a = 14.2907, b = 4.6233, c = 23.6130 Å, β = 91.779°, and V = 1559.37 Å3; this impurity phase was included in the refinement as a Le Bail phase. The structure of the nintedanib esylate hemihydrate phase was refined using GSAS-II (Toby and Von Dreele, Reference Toby and Von Dreele2013) using an ordered model (removing a minor orientation of one of the esylate anions) and optimized using VASP (Kresse and Furthmüller, Reference Kresse and Furthmüller1996). A single-point density functional calculation (fixed experimental cell) and population analysis were carried out using CRYSTAL23 (Erba et al., Reference Erba, Desmaris, Casassa, Civalleri, Donà, Bush, Searle, Maschio, Daga, Cossard, Ribaldone, Ascrizzi, Marana, Flament and Kirtman2022).

The crystal structure contains corrugated layers parallel to the bc-plane. Our lattice parameters (Table I) fall between those of the other two determinations; perhaps, the water content varies among samples. Hydrogen bonds (Table II) are prominent in the crystal structure. The water molecule O13 forms two medium-strength O–H⋯O hydrogen bonds to one of the esylate anions. The protonated nitrogen atom in each cation forms an N–H⋯O hydrogen bond to an esylate anion. The ring N–H groups N31 and N102 form strong intramolecular N–H⋯O hydrogen bonds to carbonyl groups. The ring N–H groups N24 and N104 form intramolecular N–H⋯O hydrogen bonds to esylate anions. Many C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds (and one C–H⋯N hydrogen bond), with aromatic C–H, methylene groups, and methyl groups as donors are present. The hydrogen bonding patterns of the two cations differ considerably. A Mogul geometry analysis indicates that torsion angles involving rotation about the C43–N31 bond are unusual; these fall in a valley in a very broad distribution, so, perhaps, the intramolecular hydrogen bond has resulted in an unusual conformation. The C119–C115 torsion angles are also flagged as unusual.

TABLE I. Reduced lattice parameters of nintedanib esylate hemihydrate. Space group P-1

TABLE II. Hydrogen bonds (CRYSTAL23) in nintedanib esylate hemihydrate

a Intramolecular.

I. DEPOSITED DATA

The powder pattern of nintedanib esylate hemihydrate from this synchrotron data set has been submitted to ICDD for inclusion in the Powder Diffraction File. The Crystallographic Information Framework (CIF) files containing the results of the Rietveld refinement (including the raw data) and the DFT geometry optimization were deposited with the ICDD. The data can be requested at pdj@icdd.com.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The use of the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. This work was partially supported by the International Centre for Diffraction Data. We thank Saul Lapidus for his assistance in the data collection.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

REFERENCES

Altomare, A., Cuocci, C., Giacovazzo, C., Moliterni, A., Rizzi, R., Corriero, N., and Falcicchio, A.. 2013. “EXPO2013: A Kit of Tools for Phasing Crystal Structures from Powder Data.” Journal of Applied Crystallography 46: 1231–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antao, S. M., Hassan, I., Wang, J., Lee, P. L., and Toby, B. H.. 2008. “State-of-the-Art High-Resolution Powder X-ray Diffraction (HRPXRD) Illustrated with Rietveld Refinement of Quartz, Sodalite, Tremolite, and Meionite.” Canadian Mineralogist 46: 1501–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erba, A., Desmaris, J. K., Casassa, S., Civalleri, B., Donà, L., Bush, I. J., Searle, B., Maschio, L., Daga, L.-E., Cossard, A., Ribaldone, C., Ascrizzi, E., Marana, N. L., Flament, J.-P., and Kirtman, B.. 2022. “CRYSTAL23: A Program for Computational Solid State Physics and Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19: 6891–932. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates-Rector, S., and Blanton, T. N.. 2019. “The Powder Diffraction File: A Quality Materials Characterization Database.” Powder Diffraction 39: 352–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gole, S. & Bankole, A.. 2023. Nintedanib – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK585049/.Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P., and Ward, S. C.. 2016. “The Cambridge Structural Database.” Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials 72: 171–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kresse, G., and Furthmüller, J.. 1996. “Efficiency of Ab-Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set.” Computational Materials Science 6: 1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P. L., Shu, D., Ramanathan, M., Preissner, C., Wang, J., Beno, M. A., Von Dreele, R. B., Ribaud, L., Kurtz, C., Antao, S. M., Jiao, X., and Toby, B. H.. 2008. “A Twelve-Analyzer Detector System for High-Resolution Powder Diffraction.” Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 15: 427–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, J., Huang, J., Cao, Z., Sha, J., Sun, R., He, H., Wan, Y., Li, Y., Li, T., and Ren, B.. 2022. “Solubility Measurement and Thermodynamic Properties of Nintedanib Esylate Hemihydrate in Pure Solvents.” Journal of Molecular Liquids 352: 118624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M., and Wood, P. A.. 2020. “Mercury 4.0: From Visualization to Design and Prediction.Journal of Applied Crystallography 53: 226–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marijic, P., Schwarzkopf, L., Schwettmann, L., Ruhnke, T., Trudzinski, F., and Kreuter, M.. 2021. “Pirfenidone vs. Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” Respiration Research 22: 111. doi:10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y.Google ScholarPubMed
MDI (2024). JADE Pro version 9.0 (Materials Data, Livermore, CA).Google Scholar
Roth, G. K., Linz, G., Sieger, P., Rall, W., Hilberg, F., & Bock, T.. 2006. “3-Z-[1-(4-(N-((4-Methyl-Piperazin-1-yl)Methylcarbonyl)-N-Methylamino)Anilino)-1-Phenylmethylene]-6-Methoxycarbonyl-2-Indolinone Monoethanesulfonate and the Use Thereof as a Pharmaceutical Composition.” United States Patent 7,119,093 B2 (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH).Google Scholar
Toby, B. H., and Von Dreele, R. B.. 2013. “GSAS II: The Genesis of a Modern Open Source All Purpose Crystallography Software Package.” Journal of Applied Crystallography 46: 544–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Toby, B. H., Lee, P. L., Ribaud, L., Antao, S. M., Kurtz, C., Ramanathan, M., Von Dreele, R. B., and Beno, M. A.. 2008. “A Dedicated Powder Diffraction Beamline at the Advanced Photon Source: Commissioning and Early Operational Results.” Review of Scientific Instruments 79: 085105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wollin, L., Wex, E., Pautsch, A., Schnapp, G., Hostettler, K. E., Stowasser, S., and Kolb, M.. 2015. “Mode of Action of Nintedanib in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.” European Respiratory Journal 45: 1434–45. doi:10.1183/09031936.00174914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, S., Xue, S., Wang, T., Gao, R., Zeng, H., Wang, Q., and Jia, X.. 2023. “Efficacy and Safety of Nintedanib in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Novel Insights in Radiation-Induced Lung Toxicity.” Frontiers in Oncology 13: 1086214. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1086214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Nintedanib esylate hemihydrate synchrotron X-ray diffraction pattern. Inset nintedanib esylate hemihydrate molecule. Image generated using JADE Pro (MDI, 2024) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020).

Figure 1

TABLE I. Reduced lattice parameters of nintedanib esylate hemihydrate. Space group P-1

Figure 2

TABLE II. Hydrogen bonds (CRYSTAL23) in nintedanib esylate hemihydrate