Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T05:28:13.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corrigendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
CORRIGENDUM
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 161
Copyright
© 2021 Law and Society Association.

In [1], the following error was published on page 10.

Independent Variables

Confirmatory factor analysis supported the formation of these measures (SRMR = 0.037; RMSEA = 0.046; CFI = 0.984; TLI = 0.954).

The text was incorrect and should have read:

Independent Variables

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a modest goodness of fit that is typical of the five-factor model based on the MFQ (Harper and Rhodes, 2021; Iurino and Saucier, 2020): SRMR = 0.070; RMSEA = 0.094; CFI = 0.842; TLI = 0.807.

This is supported by the following references:

Harper, Craig A., and Darren Rhodes. 2021. "Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire." British Journal of Social Psychology, advance online publication.

Iurino, Kathryn, and Gerard Saucier. 2020. "Testing measurement invariance of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire across 27 countries." Assessment 27(2): 365-372.

The author apologizes for this error.

References

Silver, Jasmine R., 2017. “Moral Foundations, Intuitions of Justice, and the Intricacies of Punitive Sentiment.” Law & Society Review 51(2): 413-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar