Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T23:27:54.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revival, Recognition, Restitution: Indigenous Rights in the Eastern Caribbean—ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Erratum
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2016 

doi: 10.1017/S0940739116000096

In Strecker’s article “Revival, Recognition, Restitution: Indigenous Rights in the Eastern Caribbean,” there was an error in the Endnotes section. An additional endnote (“43. Morales Padrón 2012”) was improperly inserted. It should not have been present, and all subsequent endnotes in the Endnotes section should have been renumbered appropriately. With the removal of the endnote and subsequent renumbering in the endnote section, the numbering in the article itself is correct as previously shown.

As well, the corresponding sentence with the improper endnote (page 8, lines 12–15) should have read: “Indeed, Maximilian Forte notes that in the early years of British administration, Trinidad was portrayed as a virtual ‘terra nullius.’43

The publisher sincerely regrets these errors. The original article has been updated with the proper numbering in the Endnotes section.

References

REFERENCE

Strecker, Amy. 2016. “Revival, Recognition, Restitution: Indigenous Rights in the Eastern Caribbean.” International Journal of Cultural Property 23, no. 2: 167–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar