Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T22:35:26.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Incorporation of India: The Tata Business Firm Between Empire and Nation, ca. 1860–1970

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

MIRCEA RAIANU*
Affiliation:
Mircea Raianu is an assistant professor of History at the University of Maryland, College Park. The dissertation was completed at Harvard University in 2017. Contact information: University of Maryland, Department of History, 2115 Francis Scott Key Hall, College Park, MD20742. E-mail: mraianu@umd.edu.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Krooss Prize Dissertation Summaries
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2018. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Bagchi, Amiya K. Private Investment in India 1900–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckert, Sven. Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014.Google Scholar
Birla, Ritu. Stages of Capital: Law, Culture, and Market Governance in Late Colonial India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Chibber, Vivek. Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Eckert, Carter J. Offspring of Empire: The Koch’ang Kims and the Colonial Origins of Korean Capitalism, 1876–1945. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hazari, R. K. The Structure of the Corporate Private Sector: A Study of Concentration, Ownership and Control. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1966.Google Scholar
Markovits, Claude. Indian Business and Nationalist Politics 1931–1939: The Indigenous Capitalist Class and the Rise of the Congress Party. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Tirthankar. Company of Kinsmen: Enterprise and Community in South Asian History, 1700–1940. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitalis, Robert. When Capitalists Collide: Business Conflict and the End of Empire in Egypt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bagchi, Amiya K.Multiculturalism, Governance, and the Indian Bourgeoisie.” In Capital and Labour Redefined: India and the Third World, edited by Bagchi, Amiya K., 292–320. London: Anthem Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., and Hikino., TakashiThe Large Industrial Enterprise and the Dynamics of Modern Economic Growth.” In Big Business and the Wealth of Nations, edited by Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Franco Amatori, and Takashi Hikino, 24–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Claude. “The Tata Paradox.” In Merchants, Traders, Entrepreneurs: Indian Business in the Colonial Era, edited by Claude Markovits, 152–166. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piramal, Gita. “Big Business and Entrepreneurship.” Seminar No. 528 (August 2003).Google Scholar
Ranade, M. G.Indian Political Economy.” In Essays on Indian Economics, edited by Ranade, M.G., 1–36. Madras: G. A. Natesan & Co., 1920.Google Scholar
Tata Central Archives, PuneGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, Amiya K. Private Investment in India 1900–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckert, Sven. Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014.Google Scholar
Birla, Ritu. Stages of Capital: Law, Culture, and Market Governance in Late Colonial India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Chibber, Vivek. Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Eckert, Carter J. Offspring of Empire: The Koch’ang Kims and the Colonial Origins of Korean Capitalism, 1876–1945. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hazari, R. K. The Structure of the Corporate Private Sector: A Study of Concentration, Ownership and Control. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1966.Google Scholar
Markovits, Claude. Indian Business and Nationalist Politics 1931–1939: The Indigenous Capitalist Class and the Rise of the Congress Party. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Tirthankar. Company of Kinsmen: Enterprise and Community in South Asian History, 1700–1940. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitalis, Robert. When Capitalists Collide: Business Conflict and the End of Empire in Egypt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bagchi, Amiya K.Multiculturalism, Governance, and the Indian Bourgeoisie.” In Capital and Labour Redefined: India and the Third World, edited by Bagchi, Amiya K., 292–320. London: Anthem Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., and Hikino., TakashiThe Large Industrial Enterprise and the Dynamics of Modern Economic Growth.” In Big Business and the Wealth of Nations, edited by Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Franco Amatori, and Takashi Hikino, 24–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Claude. “The Tata Paradox.” In Merchants, Traders, Entrepreneurs: Indian Business in the Colonial Era, edited by Claude Markovits, 152–166. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piramal, Gita. “Big Business and Entrepreneurship.” Seminar No. 528 (August 2003).Google Scholar
Ranade, M. G.Indian Political Economy.” In Essays on Indian Economics, edited by Ranade, M.G., 1–36. Madras: G. A. Natesan & Co., 1920.Google Scholar
Tata Central Archives, PuneGoogle Scholar