Book contents
- Resistance to Evidence
- Cambridge Studies in Philosophy
- Resistance to Evidence
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Epistemology and Psychology of Resistance to Evidence
- Part II Resistance to Evidence and Epistemic Proper Function
- Part III Theoretical Upshots
- Concluding Remarks
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2024
Book contents
- Resistance to Evidence
- Cambridge Studies in Philosophy
- Resistance to Evidence
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Epistemology and Psychology of Resistance to Evidence
- Part II Resistance to Evidence and Epistemic Proper Function
- Part III Theoretical Upshots
- Concluding Remarks
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Resistance to Evidence , pp. 197 - 214Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Adams, F. and de Moraes, J. A. (2016). ‘Is there a philosophy of information?’, Topoi, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adekola, J., Fischbacher-Smith, D., Okey-Adibe, T., and Audu, J. (2022). ‘Strategies to build trust and COVID-19 vaccine confidence and engagement in Scotland’, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, Vol. 13, pp. 890–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adriaans, P. (2012). ‘Information’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2013 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/information.Google Scholar
Adriaans, P. and van Benthem, J. (eds.) (2008). Philosophy of Information. Amsterdam and Oxford: Elsevier B.V.Google Scholar
Alston, W. (2002). ‘Plantinga, naturalism, and defeat’, in Beilby, J. (ed.), Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 176–203.Google Scholar
Alston, W. (2005). Beyond Justification: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
American Library Association. (2005). ‘Resolution on disinformation, media manipulation and the destruction of public information’. Available at: www.ala.org/aboutala/sites/ala.org.aboutala/files/content/governance/policymanual/updatedpolicymanual/ocrpdfofprm/52-8disinformation.pdf.Google Scholar
Ancell, A. (2019). ‘The fact of unreasonable pluralism’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 410–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baehr, J. (2009). ‘Evidentialism, vice, and virtue’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 78, pp. 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baehr, J. (2011). The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baehr, J. (2017). ‘Four dimensions of an intellectual virtue’, in Mi, C., Slote, M., and Sosa, E. (eds.), Moral and Intellectual Virtues in Western and Chinese Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 86–98.Google Scholar
Baker-Hytch, M. and Benton, M. (2015). ‘Defeatism defeated’, Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 40–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, N. and Coffman, E. J. (2011). ‘Uniqueness, evidence, and rationality’, Philosophers Imprint, Vol. 11, No. 18, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Barclay, D. A. (2022). Disinformation: The Nature of Facts and Lies in the Post-truth Era. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bates, M. J. (2006). ‘Fundamental forms of information’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57, No. 8, pp. 1033–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battaly, H. (2010). ‘Epistemic self-indulgence’, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 41, No. 1–2, pp. 214–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battaly, H. (2014). ‘Varieties of epistemic vice’, in Matheson, J. and Vitz, R. (eds.), The Ethics of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddor, B. (2015). ‘Process reliabilism’s troubles with defeat’, Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 65, No. 259, pp. 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddor, B. (2021). ‘Reasons for reliabilism’, in Brown, J. and Simion, M. (eds.), Reasons, Justification, and Defeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 146–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, M. (2014). ‘Knowledge norms’, in Fieser, J. and Dowden, B. (eds.), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: www.iep.utm.edu/kn-norms.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. (2006). Justification without Awareness. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, A. (2007). ‘Justified judging’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 74, pp. 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, D. C. (1992). ‘Information retrieval and the philosophy of language’, Computer Journal, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, D. C. (2003). ‘Information retrieval and the philosophy of language’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, J. P., Levine, T., and Shaw, A. (2010). ‘Content in context improves deception detection accuracy’, Human Communication Research, Vol. 36, pp. 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, C. F. and DePaulo, B. M. (2006). ‘Accuracy of deception judgments’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 10, pp. 214–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BonJour, L. (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brookes, B. C. (1980). ‘The foundations for information science: part I. Philosophical aspects’, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 2, pp. 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. (2012). ‘Assertion and practical reasoning: common or divergent epistemic standards?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 123–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. (2018). Fallibilism: Evidence and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. and Simion, M. (2021). Reasons, Justification, and Defeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucher, T. (2017). ‘The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms’, Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, M. K. (1991). ‘Information as thing’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 351–360.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, J. M. (2011). ‘Meaning, truth, and information: prolegomena to a theory’, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, D. J. (1998). ‘Etiological theories of function: a geographical survey’, Biology and Philosophy, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, J. (2016). ‘How the machine “thinks”: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms’, Big Data & Society, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, P. J. (2001). ‘Scholarly misconduct and misinformation on the World Wide Web’, Electronic Library, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capurro, R. and Hjørland, B. (2003). ‘The concept of information’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 343–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. and Bar-Hillel, Y. (1952). An Outline of a Theory of Semantic Information, Technical Report No. 247. Cambridge, MA: Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT.Google Scholar
Carter, J. A. and McKenna, R. (2020). ‘Skepticism motivated: on the skeptical import of motivated reasoning’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 702–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. A. and Navarro, J. (2017). ‘The defeasibility of knowledge-how’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 662–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cevolani, G. (2011). ‘Strongly semantic information and verisimilitude’, Etica and Politica/Ethics and Politics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 159–179.Google Scholar
Chaby, L. E., Karavidha, K., Lisieski, M. J., Perrine, S. A., and Liberzon, I. (2019). ‘Cognitive flexibility training improves extinction retention memory and enhances cortical dopamine with and without traumatic stress exposure’, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 13, p. 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, J. (2013). ‘Defeat reconsidered’, Analysis, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. and Fara, M. (2018). ‘Dispositions’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2018 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/dispositions.Google Scholar
Chrisman, M. (2008). ‘Ought to believe’, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 105, No. 7, pp. 346–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, D. (2010). ‘Higher-order evidence’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 185–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, A. (2012). ‘Rational epistemic akrasia’, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 113–124.Google Scholar
Comesaña, J. (2020). Being Rational and Being Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, E. (1987). ‘Evident, but rationally unacceptable’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 65, pp. 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, E. (1992). ‘The truth connection’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 52, pp. 657–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (2004). Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, I. (2002). ‘Theorizing information for information science’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, K. (2016). ‘Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crupi, V. (2021). ‘Confirmation’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2021 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/confirmation.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. (1975). ‘Functional analysis’, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 72, No. 20, pp. 741–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Alfonso, S. (2011). ‘On quantifying semantic information’, Information, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 61–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2003). ‘The problem of armchair knowledge’, in Nuccetelli, S. (ed.), New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2004). ‘Epistemic entitlement, warrant transmission, and easy knowledge’, Aristotelian Society Supplement, Vol. 78, pp. 213–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, R. E. (2001/2008). The Modern Invention of Information. Discourse, History, and Power, Paperback Gricean edition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dinneen, J. D. and Brauner, C. (2015). ‘Practical and philosophical considerations for defining information as well-formed, meaningful data in the information sciences’, Library Trends, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 378–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogramaci, S. and Horowitz, S. (2016). ‘An argument for uniqueness about evidential support’, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 130–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1970). ‘Epistemic operators’, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 67, pp. 1007–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1971). ‘Conclusive reasons’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 49, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1983). ‘Précis of knowledge and the flow of information’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 6, pp. 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutant, J. and Littlejohn, C. (2021). ‘Defeaters as indicators of ignorance’, in Brown, J. and Simion, M. (eds.), Reasons, Justification, and Defeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2022). Code of Practice on Disinformation. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-disinformation#:~:text=The%20Code%20will%20strengthen%20the,challenges%20related%20to%20such%20techniques.Google Scholar
Falbo, A. (2023). ‘Should epistemology take the zetetic turn?’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 180, pp. 2977–3002.Google Scholar
Fallis, D. (2009). A Conceptual Analysis of Disinformation, Preprint from iConference, Tucson, AZ. Available at: www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/15205/fallis_disinfo1.pdf?sequence=2.Google Scholar
Fallis, D. (2010). ‘Lying and deception’, Philosophers’ Imprint, Vol. 10, No. 11, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
Fallis, D. (2011). ‘Floridi on disinformation’, Etica & Politica, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 201–214.Google Scholar
Fallis, D. (2014). ‘The varieties of disinformation’, in Floridi, L. and Illari, P. (eds.), The Philosophy of Information Quality. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, and London: Springer, pp. 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallis, D. (2015). ‘What is disinformation?’, Library Trends, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantl, J. (2018). The Limitations of the Open Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantl, J. and McGrath, M. (2002). ‘Evidence, pragmatics, and justification’, Philosophical Review, Vol. 111, pp. 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. (2000). ‘The ethics of belief’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 667–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. (2004). ‘The ethics of belief’, in Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (eds.), Evidentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. (2008). ‘Modest deontologism in epistemology’, Synthese, Vol. 161, pp. 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J. H. (2004a). ‘Information: does it have to be true?’, Minds and Machines, Vol. 14, pp. 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J. H. (2004b). ‘Disinformation: the use of false information’, Minds and Machines, Vol. 14, pp. 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C. and Woodard, E. (2023). ‘Epistemic norms on evidence gathering’, Philosophical Studies, 180 (9), 2547–2571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. (2004). ‘Outline of a theory of strongly semantic information’, Minds and Machines, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. (2005a). ‘Is semantic information meaningful data?’, Philosophy and Phenomological Research, Vol. LXX, No. 2, pp. 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. (2005b). ‘Semantic conceptions of information’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2013 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/information-semantic/.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2007). ‘In defence of the veridical nature of semantic information’, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy (EUJAP), Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2008). ‘Trends in the philosophy of information’, in Adriaans, P. and van Benthem, J. (eds.), Philosophy of Information. Amsterdam and Oxford: Elsevier B.V., pp. 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. Available at: www.oxfordscholarship.com.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, R. (1991). ‘Evidence and reasons for belief’, Analysis, Vol. 51, pp. 98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C. J. (1983). Information and Misinformation: An Investigation of the Notions of Information, Misinformation, Informing, and Misinforming. Westport, CT, and London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Frances, B. and Matheson, J. (2019). ‘Disagreement’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2019 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/disagreement/.Google Scholar
Frické, M. (1997). ‘Information using likeness measures’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 882–892.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power & the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, J. (2020). ‘The epistemic and the zetetic’, Philosophical Review, Vol. 129, No. 4, pp. 501–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furner, J. (2004). ‘Information studies without information’, Library Trends, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 427–446.Google Scholar
Furner, J. (2010). ‘Philosophy and information studies’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 154–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furner, J. (2014). ‘Information without information studies’, in Ibekwe-SanJuan, F. and Dousa, T. M. (eds.), Theories of Information, Communication and Knowledge. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, and London: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp. 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, J. K. (2009). ‘Conceptualizing the relations between executive functions and self-regulated learning’, Journal of Psychology, Vol. 143, No. 4, pp. 405–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gendler, T. (2011). ‘On the epistemic costs of implicit bias’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 156, No. 1, pp. 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettier, E. L. (1963). ‘Is justified true belief knowledge?’, Analysis, Vol. 23, pp. 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, T. (2014). ‘The relevance of algorithms’, in Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P. J., and Foot, K. A. (eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. W., and Kahneman, D. (eds.) (2002). Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (1989). ‘Misinformation’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffey, A. (2008). ‘Algorithm’, in Fuller, M. (ed.), Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2022). ‘What is a speaker owed?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2016). ‘On the epistemic significance of evidence you should have had’, Episteme, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 449–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2018). To the Best of Our Knowledge: Social Expectations and Epistemic Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2021). ‘The normativity of knowledge and the scope and sources of defeat’, in Brown, J. and Simion, M. (eds.), Reasons, Justification, and Defeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (1979). ‘What is justified belief?’, in Pappas, G. (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston, MA: D. Reidel, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (1988). ‘Strong and weak justification’, in Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 13. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, pp. 51–69.Google Scholar
Graham, P. (2010). ‘Testimonial entitlement and the function of comprehension’, in Haddock, A., Miller, A., and Pritchard, D. (eds.), Social Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 148–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. (2012). ‘Epistemic entitlement’, Nous, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 449–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. (2014). ‘Functions, warrant, history’, in Fairweather, A. and Flanagan, O. (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. (2015). ‘Epistemic normativity and social norms’, in Henderson, D. and Greco, J. (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation. Purposeful Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 247–273.Google Scholar
Graham, P. and Lyons, J. (2021). ‘The structure of defeat: Pollock’s evidentialism, Lackey’s framework, and prospects for reliabilism’, in Brown, J. and Simion, M. (eds.), Reasons, Justification, and Defeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, D. and Hedden, B. (2016). ‘Uniqueness and metaepistemology’, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 113, No. 8, pp. 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1967/1989/1991a). ‘Logic and conversation’, Studies in the Way of Words, Paperback edition. Cambridge, MA, and London: First Harvard University Press, pp. 22–40.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1967/1989/1991b). ‘Meaning’, in Studies in the Way of Words, Paperback edition. Cambridge, MA, and London: First Harvard University Press, pp. 213–223.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1967/1989/1991c). Studies in the Way of Words, paperback edition. Cambridge, MA, and London: First Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, B., McGaw, E., and Care, E. (eds.) (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundmann, T. (2020). ‘Fake news: the case for a purely consumer-oriented explication’, Inquiry. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2020.1813195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halavais, A. (2004). The Isuzu experiment. Available from: http://alex.halavais.net/the-isuzu-experiment.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T. (2007). ‘Digital deception: when, where and how people lie online’, in Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T., and Reips, U.-D. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 289–301.Google Scholar
Harman, E. (2011). ‘Does moral ignorance exculpate?’, Ratio, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 443–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselton, M. G. (2007). ‘Error management theory’, in Baumeister, R. F. and Vohs, K. D. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 311–312.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G. and Buss, D. M. (2000). ‘Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mindreading’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselton, M. G. and Buss, D. M. (2009). ‘Error management theory and the evolution of misbeliefs’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 32, pp. 522–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselton, M. G. and Nettle, D. (2006). ‘The paranoid optimist: an integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 10, pp. 47–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawthorne, J. and Srinivasan, A. (2013). ‘Disagreement without transparency: some bleak thoughts’, in Christensen, D. and Lackey, J. (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlet, A. (2017). ‘On the special insult of refusing testimony’, Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 20, Suppl. 1, pp. 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernon, P. (1995). ‘Disinformation and misinformation through the internet: findings of an exploratory study’, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjørland, B. (2007). ‘Information: objective or subjective/situational?’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, No. 10, pp. 1448–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huemer, M. (2007). ‘Compassionate phenomenal conservatism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 30–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, N. (2019). ‘Dilemmic epistemology’, Synthese, Vol. 196, pp. 4059–4090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, J. (2014). ‘Justification is potential knowledge’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 44, pp. 184–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, J. (forthcoming). Epistemic Courage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins-Ichikawa, J. (2020). ‘Contextual injustice’, Kennedy Institute for Ethics Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jope, M. (2019). ‘Closure, credence and rationality: a problem for non-belief hinge epistemology’, Synthese, Vol. 198, pp. 3565–3575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. (2013). ‘Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection’, Judgement and Decision Making, Vol. 8, pp. 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. (2014). ‘Making climate-science communication evidence-based – all the way down’, in Boykoff, M. and Crow, D. (eds.), Culture, Politics and Climate Change. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–220.Google Scholar
Kahan, D., Hoffman, D., Evans, D., Devins, N., Lucci, E., and Cheng, K. (2016). ‘“Ideology” or “situation sense”? An experimental investigation of motivated reasoning and professional judgment’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 164, No. 349, pp. 349–438.Google Scholar
Kahan, D., Jenkins-Smith, H., and Braman, D. (2011). ‘Cultural cognition of scientific consensus’, Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.) (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlova, N. A. and Fisher, K. E. (2013). ‘A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behavior’, Information Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, p. 573.Google Scholar
Kearney, M. D., Chiang, S. C., and Massey, P. M. (2020). ‘The Twitter origins and evolution of the COVID-19 “plandemic” conspiracy theory’, Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, Vol. 1, No. 3. DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-42.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. (2010). ‘Peer disagreement and higher-order evidence’, in Feldman, R. and Warfield, T. A. (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, T. (2016). ‘Evidence’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2016 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/evidence/.Google Scholar
Kelp, C. (2018). Good Thinking: A Knowledge-First Virtue Epistemology. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. (2019). ‘Inquiry and the transmission of knowledge’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 99, pp. 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. (2020). ‘Internalism, phenomenal conservatism, and defeat’, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 30, pp. 192–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. (2021). Inquiry, Knowledge, Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. (2022). ‘Defeat and proficiencies’. Philosophical Issues, Vol. 32, pp. 82–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. (2023). The Nature and Normativity of Defeat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. and Simion, M. (2017). ‘Criticism and blame in action and assertion’, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp. 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. and Simion, M. (2021a). Sharing Knowledge: A Functionalist Account of Assertion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. and Simion, M. (2023a). ‘What is trustworthiness?’, Nous, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. and Simion, M. (2023b). Justification as the Proper Route to Knowledge. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Klintman, M. (2019). Knowledge Resistance: How We Avoid Insight from Others. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. (2001). ‘Epistemic obligation and the possibility of internalism’, in Fairweather, A. and Zagzebski, L. (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. (2015). ‘The role of reasons in epistemology’, Episteme, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzen, M. (2019). ‘A formal account of epistemic defeat’, in Fitelson, B., Borges, R., and Branden, C. (eds.), Themes from Klein: Knowledge, Scepticism, and Justification. Synthese Library 404. New York: Springer, pp. 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, R. (1980). ‘Humans as lie detectors: some second thoughts’, Journal of Communication, Vol. 30, pp. 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krohs, U. and Kroes, P. (eds.) (2009). Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, F (1993). ‘Rationality and epistemic paradox’, Synthese, Vol. 84, pp. 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, K. P. K. and Geethakumari, G. (2014). ‘Detecting misinformation in online social networks using cognitive psychology’, Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1987). ‘Motivated inference: self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 636–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunst, H., Groot, D., Latthe, P. M., Latthe, M., and Khan, K. S. (2002). ‘Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics’, British Medical Journal, Vol. 324, No. 7337, pp. 581–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lackey, J. (2006). ‘Knowing from testimony’, Philosophy Compass, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 432–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. (2011). ‘Assertion and isolated second hand knowledge’, in Brown, J. and Cappelen, H. (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. (2014). ‘Deficient testimonial knowledge’, in Henning, T. and Schweikard, D. (eds.), Knowledge, Virtue and Action. London: Routledge, pp. 30–52.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. (2018). ‘Credibility and the distribution of epistemic goods’, in McCain, K. (ed.), Believing in Accordance with the Evidence: New Essays on Evidentialism. New York: Springer, pp. 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. (2020). ‘The duty to object’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2010). ‘Unreasonable knowledge’, Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 24, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2014). ‘Higher-order evidence and the limits of defeat’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 88, pp. 314–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, N. (2020). ‘Epistemic dilemmas and rational indeterminacy’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 177, No. 3, pp. 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, N. (2023). ‘Epistemological problems of testimony’, in Zalta, E. N. and Nodelman, U. (eds.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2023 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/testimony-episprob/.Google Scholar
Levine, T. R., Park, H. S., and McCornack, S. A. (1999). ‘Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: documenting the “veracity effect”’, Communication Monographs, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, P. (2017). ‘Fake news in real context’, Explorations in Media Ecology, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 173–177.Google Scholar
Levy, N. (2021). Bad Beliefs: Why They Happen to Good People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, C. (2020). ‘A plea for epistemic excuses’, in Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (eds.), The New Evil Demon Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, C. and Turri, J. (2015). Epistemic Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., and Lepper, M. R. (1979). ‘Biased assimiliation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 2098–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, E. and Sylvan, K. (2021). ‘Suspension, higher-order evidence, and defeat’, in Brown, J. and Simion, M. (eds.), Reasons, Justification, and Defeat, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 116–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, E. and Sylvan, K. (2022). ‘On suspending properly’, in Oliveira, L. R. G. and Silva, P. (eds.), Propositional and Doxastic Justification. London: Routledge, ch. 9, pp. 141–161.Google Scholar
Lovden, M., Backman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., and Schmiedek, F. (2010). ‘A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity’, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 659–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, C. A. (2001). ‘When documents deceive: trust and provenance as new factors for information retrieval in a tangled web’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 12–17.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (2011). ‘Circularity, reliability, and the cognitive penetrability of perception’, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, J. (2008). ‘The definition of lying and deception’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2019 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/lying-definition/.Google Scholar
Mai, J.-E. (2013). ‘The quality and qualities of information’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, I. (2011). ‘Assertion, norms, and games’, in Brown, J. and Cappelen, H. (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, J. (2011). ‘The case for rational uniqueness’, Logos & Episteme, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, T. (2018). ‘Moral dilemmas’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2018 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/moral-dilemmas/.Google Scholar
McGrath, M. (2013). ‘Phenomenal conservatism and cognitive penetration: the “bad basis” counterexamples’, in Tucker, C. (ed.), Seemings and Justification. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNally, L. (2016). ‘Modification’, Aloni, M. and Dekker, P. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 442–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, P. and Van De Putte, F. (2022). ‘Deontic logic’, in Zalta, E. N. and Nodelman, U. (eds.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2022 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/logic-deontic/.Google Scholar
Melnyk, A. (2008). ‘Conceptual and linguistic analysis: a two-step program’, Noûs, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, H. (2020). Not Born Yesterday. The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mingers, J. C. (1995). ‘Information and meaning: foundations for an intersubjective account’, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miracchi, L. (2015). ‘Competence to know’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 172, No. 1, pp. 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miracchi, L. (2017). ‘When evidence isn’t enough: suspension, evidentialism, and knowledge-first virtue epistemology’, Episteme, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miscevic, N. (2016). ‘Epistemic value. Curiosity, knowledge and response-dependence’, Croatian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 16, pp. 393–417.Google Scholar
Miscevic, N. (2017). ‘Curiosity – the basic epistemic virtue’, in Mi, C., Slote, M., and Sosa, E. (eds.), Moral and Intellectual Virtues in Western and Chinese Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 144–163.Google Scholar
Molden, D. C. and Higgins, E. T. (2012). ‘Motivated thinking’, in Holyoak, K. J. and Morrison, R. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montmarquet, J. (1993). Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1939). ‘Proof of an external world’, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 25, pp. 273–300.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1993). Principia Ethica, revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, R. (2006). ‘Getting told and being believed’, The Philosopher’s Imprint, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Nagel, J. (2010). ‘Epistemic anxiety and adaptive invariantism’, Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 407–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. (1991). ‘The teleological notion of function’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 69, pp. 454–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesta, F. and Blanke, H. (1991). ‘Warning: propaganda!’, Library Journal, Vol. 116, No. 9, pp. 41–43.Google Scholar
Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., and Richards, J. M. (2003). ‘Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 665–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbett, R. and Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Odegard, D. (1993). ‘Resolving epistemic dillemas’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, P. S. (2002). ‘Web hoaxes, counterfeit sites, and other spurious information on the Internet’, in Mintz, A. P. (ed.), Web of Deception. Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J. (1986). Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pratchett, T., Stewart, I., and Cohen, J. (1999). The Science of Discworld. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Primiero, G. (2016). ‘Information in the philosophy of computer science’, in Floridi, L. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information, London: Routledge, pp. 151–175.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2015). Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J. (2000). ‘The skeptic and the dogmatist’, Nous, Vol. 34, pp. 517–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J. (2004). ‘What’s wrong with Moore’s argument?’, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 14, pp. 349–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J. (2012). ‘When warrant transmits’, in Coliva, A. (ed.), Mind, Meaning, and Knowledge: Themes from the Philosophy of Crispin Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowicz, W. and Rönnow-Rasmussen, T. (2004). ‘The strike of the demon: on fitting pro-attitudes and value’, Ethics, Vol. 114, pp. 391–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raleigh, T. (2017). ‘Another argument against uniqueness’, Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 267, pp. 327–346.Google Scholar
Reddy, S. (2013). ‘“I don’t smoke, doc,” and other patient lies’, Wall Street Journal. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323478004578306510461212692.html.Google Scholar
Richter, R. (1990). ‘Ideal rationality and handwaving’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 68, pp. 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. and Wood, W. (2007). Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, L. and Bawden, D. (2014). ‘Mind the gab: transitions between concepts of information in varied domains’, in Ibekwe-SanJuan, F. and Dousa, T. M. (eds.), Theories of Information, Communication and Knowledge. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, and London: Springer Science + Business Media B.V., pp. 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. W. (2012). ‘The problem of perfect fakes’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, Vol. 71, pp. 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, V. L. and Conroy, N. (2012). ‘Discerning truth from deception: human judgments and automation efforts’, First Monday, Vol. 17, No. 3. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3933/3170.Google Scholar
Rudy-Hiller, F. (2018). ‘The epistemic condition for moral responsibility’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2018 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/moral-responsibility-epistemic/.Google Scholar
Ryan, S. (2003). ‘Doxastic compatibilism and the ethics of belief’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 114, No. 1/2, pp. 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandvig, C. (2015). ‘Seeing the sort: the aesthetic and industrial defense of “the algorithm”’, Journal of the New Media Caucus. Available at: http://median.newmediacaucus.org/art-infrastructures-information/seeing-the-sort-the-aesthetic-and-industrial-defense-of-the-algorithm/.Google Scholar
Sassenberg, K., Winter, K., Becker, D., Ditrich, L., Scholl, A., and Moskowitz, G. (2022). ‘Flexibility mindsets: reducing biases that result from spontaneous processing’, European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 171–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scarantino, A. and Piccinini, G. (2010). ‘Information without truth’, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, F. and Zeckhauser, R. (2009). ‘Paltering’, in Harrington, B. (ed.), Deception: From Ancient Empires to Internet Dating. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, S. (2018). The Unity of Perception: Content, Consciousness, Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, M. (2012). ‘Value theory’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, summer 2012 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/value-theory/.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1948). ‘A mathematical theory of communication’, The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Flammini, A., and Menczer, F. (2016). ‘Hoaxy: a platform for tracking online misinformation’, WWW’16 Companion, Montréal and Québec, 11–15 April, pp. 745–750. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2890098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. (2012). ‘Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification’, Nous, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. (2017). The Rationality of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silins, N. (2005). ‘Deception and evidence’, in Hawthorne, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 19, Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 375–404.Google Scholar
Simion, M. (2016). ‘Perception, history and benefit’, Episteme, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2018a). ‘The explanation proffering norm of moral assertion’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2018b). ‘No epistemic norm for action’, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2019a). ‘Knowledge-first functionalism’, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2019b). ‘Saying and believing: the norm commonality assumption’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 176, No. 8, pp. 1951–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2019c). ‘Assertion: the context shiftiness dilemma’, Mind & Language, Vol. 34, pp. 503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2020). ‘A priori perceptual entitlement, knowledge-first’, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2021a). Shifty Speech and Independent Thought: Epistemic Normativity in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2021b). ‘Testimonial contractarianism: a knowledge-first social epistemology’, Nous, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 891–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2021c). ‘Knowledge and reasoning’, Synthese, Vol. 199, pp. 10371–10388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2022a). ‘Review of Juan Comesana, Being Rational and Being Right, Oxford University Press 2020’, Mind, Vol. 131, No. 523, pp. 1007–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2022b). ‘Sosa on permissible suspension. Book Symposium on Ernest Sosa’s “Epistemic Explanations: A Theory of Telic Normativity”’, Res Philosophica, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2023a). ‘Resistance to evidence and the duty to believe’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (2023b). ‘Knowledge and disinformation’, Episteme. DOI: 10.1017/epi.2023.25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M. (forthcoming). ‘Defeat’, in Sylvan, K. (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Epistemology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simion, M. and Kelp, C. (2017). ‘Commodious knowledge’, Synthese, Vol. 194, No. 5, pp. 1487–1502.Google Scholar
Simion, M. and Kelp, C. (forthcoming). ‘Information, misinformation, and disinformation: a knowledge-first account’, in Popa-Wyatt, M. (ed.), Vices of the Mind: Mis/Disinformation and Other Epistemic Pathologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simion, M., Kelp, C., and Ghijsen, H. (2016). ‘Norms of belief’, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, M., Schnurr, J., and Gordon, E. (2021). ‘Epistemic norms, closure, and no-belief hinge epistemology’. Synthese, Vol. 198, pp. 3353–3564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, S. and Martin, B. (2000). ‘Racist disinformation on the World Wide Web: initial implications for the LIS community’, The Australian Library Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. (2010). Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1994). From a Biological Point of View: Essays in Evolutionary Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Søe, S. O. (2016). ‘The urge to detect, the need to clarify. Gricean perspectives on information, misinformation, and disinformation’, PhD thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. (1987). ‘Anti-expertise, instability, and rational choice’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 65, pp. 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. (2022). ‘On epistemic explanations: responses to two critics’, Res Philosophica, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowards, S. W. (1988). ‘Historical fabrications in library collections’, Collection Management, Vol. 10, No. 3–4, pp. 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., Clement, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., and Wilson, D. (2010). ‘Epistemic vigilance’, Mind & Language, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 359–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staffel, J. (2023). ‘Transitional attitudes and the unmooring view of higher order evidence’, Nous, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 238–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steup, M. (2000). ‘Doxastic voluntarism and epistemic deontology’, Acta Analytica, Vol. 15, pp. 25–56.Google Scholar
Stokke, A. (2013). ‘Lying, deceiving, and misleading’, Philosophy Compass, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 348–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striphas, T. (2015). ‘Algorithmic culture’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 18, No. 4–5, pp. 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, S. (2014). ‘Pollock on defeasible reasons’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 169, No. 1, pp. 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudduth, M. (2018). Defeaters in epistemology. Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Available at: www.iep.utm.edu/ep-defea/#SH1b.Google Scholar
Sullivan-Bisset, E. (2017). ‘Malfunction defended’, Synthese, Vol. 194, No. 7, pp. 2501–2522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. (2005). ‘Stick to what you know’, Nous, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 359–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvan, K. (2022). ‘Suspending properly’ (with E. Lord), in Oliveira, L. R. G. and Silva, P. (eds.), Propositional and Doxastic Justification. London: Routledge, pp. 137–158.Google Scholar
Sylvan, K. and Lord, E. (2021). ‘Suspension, higher-order evidence, and defeat’, (with Lord, E.), in Brown, J. and Simion, M. (eds.), Reasons, Justification, and Defeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 116–145.Google Scholar
Sylvan, K. and Sosa, E. (2018). ‘The place of reasons in epistemology’, in Star, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 555–574.Google Scholar
Taber, C. S. and Lodge, M. (2006). ‘Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs,’ American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanesini, A. (2021). The Mismeasure of the Self: A Study in Vice Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., and Rand, D. G. (2021). ‘Rethinking the link between cognitive sophistication and politically motivated reasoning’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 150, No. 6, pp. 1095–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The П Research Network (2013). The Philosophy of Information – An Introduction, Version 1.0. The Society for the Philosophy of Information.Google Scholar
Thorstad, D. (2021). ‘Inquiry and the epistemic’, Philosophical Studies, 178 (9), 2913–2928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, E. (2016). ‘Belief echoes: the persistent effects of corrected misinformation’, Political Communication, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 460–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, G. (1967). Toward a Mathematics of Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Turri, J. (2010). ‘On the relationship between propositional and doxastic justification’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. LXXX, No. 2, pp. 312–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twain, M. (2002). ‘My first lie, and how I got out of it’, in The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg. New York: Prometheus Books, pp. 159–170 (original work published 1900).Google Scholar
Vermaas, P. E. and Houkes, W. (2003). ‘Ascribing functions to technical artefacts: a challenge to etiological accounts of functions’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 54, pp. 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities, 2nd edition. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. (2010). ‘Librarians and controlling disinformation: is multi-literacy instruction the answer?’, Library Review, Vol. 59, No. 7, pp. 498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, C. (2016). ‘(M∣D)isinformation reading list’, First Draft News. Available at: https://firstdraftnews.com/misinformation-reading-list/.Google Scholar
Wardle, C. (2017). ‘Fake news. It’s complicated’, First Draft News. Available at: https://firstdraftnews.com/fake-news-complicated/.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, D. (2017). ‘One kind of asking’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 67(266), 148–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. (2005). ‘Epistemic permissiveness’, Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 19, pp. 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitty, M. T., Buchanan, T., Joinson, A. N., and Meredith, A. (2012). ‘Not all lies are spontaneous: an examination of deception across different modes of communication’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 208–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willard-Kyle, C. (2023). ‘The knowledge norm for inquiry’, Journal of Philosophy, 120 (11): 615–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. (2007). ‘Knowledge and scepticism’, in Jackson, F. and Smith, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 681–700.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (forthcominga). ‘Justifications, excuses, and sceptical scenarios’, in Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (forthcomingb). ‘Epistemological ambivalence’, in Hughes, N. (ed.), Epistemic Dilemmas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Worsnip, A. (2015). ‘The conflict of evidence and coherence’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 96, pp. 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worsnip, A. (2018). ‘The conflict of evidence and coherence’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. (2002). ‘(Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: Moore and McDowell’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 65, pp. 330–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. (2003). ‘Some reflections on the acquisition of warrant by inference’, in Nuccetelli, S. (ed.), New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2004). ‘Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free)?’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 167–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (1997). ‘Moral responsibility and ignorance’, Ethics, Vol. CVII, pp. 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access